Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Oracle v. Google
Are APIs Copyrightable?
Boston Bar Association
November 13, 2013

Lee Gesmer
Gesmer Updegrove LLP
Boston,...
District Court:

2

To what extent, if at all, are certain
replicated elements of the structure,
sequence and organization...
3

•Android and the Java API
•Software Copyright Law
•District Court Trial/Ruling
•Issues on Appeal
11-13-2013
Wednesday, ...
4

Java/Android Timeline:

•1996
•2005
•2007
•2008
•2010

-

Sun releases Java
Google acquires Android
Google releases And...
Larry Ellison

5

• 2010 - Oracle sues Google
• 2012 - Trial and decision on infringement
• 2013 - Appeal (argument: 12-4-...
6

Android Mobile OS

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Android - Most widely used smartphone
OS platform
Samsung Galaxy S4

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com...
Android OS

JAVA virtual machine

API PACKAGES

15 million lines code

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

8

www.gesme...
Google development of Android
9

“Clean Room” using 40,000
page Java spec

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesm...
Google development of Android
10

Clean Room:

• “Java virtual machine”
• Java API “implementing code” (2.8
million lines)...
Google development of Android
11

But:
copied verbatim Java “declaring
code” (7,000 lines)

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November...
Android
12

- Android not marketed as Java
- Android not fully
interoperable with Java

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13,...
Android
13

- 750,000 devices a day
- 1 billion devices activated

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
14

The Java Platform
and the Java API

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Java - “Write Once, Run Anywhere”
Java Programming
Language (JPL)

JAVA API
Declaring Code
7,000 lines

15

Java API
Imple...
Java Implementing Code
2.8 million lines

16

- methods (subroutines) (6,000+)
- classes (600)
- packages (166) - Google u...
Form of Java declaring code
17

37 packages
600+ classes
6,000+ methods
11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer....
Java API Declarations (Methods)
18

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Google Opening Statement
19

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Google
20

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Google
21

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Oracle
Chutes and Ladders

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

22

www.gesmer.com
Oracle
23

Schematic
of 50-Story Office
Building

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Oracle
24

Java API =
Chapter titles,
topic sentences

“Ann Droid”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Judge’s analogy
25

Package ~ bookshelf (166 - 37 at issue)
Class ~ book (600)
Method (subroutine) ~ chapter (6,000+)

11-...
Brief History of the
Evolution of
Software Copyright
Law
11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com

26
17 U.S.C. 102 (1976)

(a) “Copyright protection subsists . . .in 27
original works of authorship fixed in any
tangible med...
17 U.S.C. § 101 . . . (1980)
28

A “computer program” is a set of
statements or instructions to be
used directly or indire...
Final Report of the National Commission on New
Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works
(“CONTU”) (1978)

“Should a line need ...
Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland
International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995)
30

“Applying copyright law to
compute...
Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental
Laboratory, Inc.,797 F.2d 1222 (3d Cir.1986)

“The purpose or function of a utili...
Whelan v. Jaslow
32

“Structure, sequence and organization”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Computer Associates International, Inc. v.
Altai, 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992):

“outdated appreciation of computer
science...
Computer Associates v. Altai
34

"abstraction-filtration-comparison"
“analytic dissection”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November...
abstraction
Java Programming
Language (JPL)

JAVA API
Declaring Code
7,000 lines

35

Java API Implementing
Code
2.8 milli...
Altai - filtration of plaintiff’s work:

•Ideas (idea/expression dichotomy)

• Merger
• Scenes a faire (standard treatment...
Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland
International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir.
1995)

"method of operation," as that term i...
Lotus:
38

The set of words, through which people use
or manipulate or operate a system, is on the
uncopyrightable side of...
Lotus:
39

Java API:

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir.
1993) and Sony v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596
(9th Cir. 2000)

- “Intermediate copyi...
2012 Trial

41

Judge William Alsup

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Oracle at trial
• Structure, sequence, organization (SSO) of 37
packages/classes/methods
• Creativity
• API analagous to “...
Google at trial
• Leading SSO case (Whelan) not the law
• Verbatim API commands essental for
interoperability
•SSO of comm...
44

Jury verdict
Did Google infringe the copyright in the
structure, sequence & organization of the APIs
in the 37 classes...
45

District Court
Ruling on
Copyrightability
11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Rule 50 JMOL Motion
46

Jury verdict on infringement of Java
SSO set aside
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.,872 F.
Sup...
District Court:
Issue:

47

“The extent to which, if at all,
certain replicated elements of the
structure, sequence and
or...
District Court:
48

“No law is directly on point. This
order relies on general principles of
copyright law ....”

11-13-20...
District Court:
verbatim copies (vs SSO)

49

“source code at issue includes
"declarations." Significantly, the rules
of J...
District Court:
verbatim copies -

50

“In order to declare a particular
functionality, the language
demands that the meth...
District Court:
SSO -

51

“Oracle's best argument . . . is that
while no single name is copyrightable,
Java's overall sys...
District Court:
SSO -

52

“Structure, sequence and organization ...
is a phrase that crept into use to
describe a residua...
District Court:
SSO -

53

“that phrase [SSO] has not been reused by the Ninth Circuit since
1989”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, ...
District Court:
SSO -

54

“the Whelan approach has given way
to the Computer Associates
approach”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, ...
District Court:
SSO -

55

“Many different API organizations could
supply the same overall range of
functionality. They wo...
Form of Java Declarations
56

- Package ~ bookshelf (166 - 37 at issue)
- Class ~ book (600)
- Method (subroutine) ~ chapt...
District Court:
SSO -

57

“Yes, it is creative. Yes, it is original. Yes,
it resembles a taxonomy.”
“. . . But it is neve...
58

“Degree of interoperability”

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
District Court:
“degree of interoperability” -

59

“Millions of line of code had been
written in Java before Android
arri...
District Court:
“degree of interoperability” -

60

Google was free to duplicate the
command structure for the 37
packages...
District Court:
“Degree of interoperability” -

61

Contrary to Oracle, “full
compatibility” is not relevant to
the Sectio...
District Court:
Oracle v. Google test? -

62

“functional [expressive] aspects
necessary for compatibility (not
copyrighta...
63

Oracle Appeal
to CAFC

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Oracle:
64

. . . Ann Droid . . .

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Oracle:
“Ann Droid wants to publish a bestseller. So
she sits down with a copy of Harry Potter
and the Order of the Phoeni...
Oracle:
66

Defendant Google Inc. has copied a
blockbuster literary work just as surely, and
as improperly, as Ann Droid

...
Oracle:
67

“If Ann Droid had paraphrased in the same
order every chapter title and topic sentence
without copying a singl...
68

Software API ~ imaginative fiction?

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Works of fiction
Historical/biographical works
Textbooks
Compilations

Expressive/functional elements in software
11-13-20...
Oracle:
70

• “Software exceptionalism”
• Google copied a “magnum opus”
• No ex post Altai filtration process
• Interopera...
Oracle re verbatim copying -

“Google Concedes Away the Entire
Case”
“To start, Google concedes that it
literally copied 7...
Oracle trial counsel:

“Our case is not about the taking of any
individual or even any small set of method
declarations. O...
Oracle:
Uses partial quote:

73

“many ways to group the methods
yet still duplicate the same range of
functionality ...th...
Excluding Court’s conclusion:
74

“Duplication of the command
structure is necessary for
interoperability”

11-13-2013
Wed...
Oracle:
Interoperability

75

interoperability defense relevant
to fair use, not copyrightability

11-13-2013
Wednesday, N...
Computer Associates v. Altai:

Filtration step includes:

76

“(2) compatibility requirements of
other programs with which...
77

Altai “filtration” At time of plaintiff’s writing, or at time
of infringement?
Ex ante or ex post?

11-13-2013
Wednesd...
Oracle:
78

Oracle: Ex ante (when work created)
Google: Ex post (when competing
product created)

11-13-2013
Wednesday, No...
Oracle:
79

Fact that function requires
identical copy is does not deprive
work of copyrightability under
merger or intero...
De facto standard
80

Can Java command structure lose
copyright protection by becoming a
de facto standard?
(analogy to ge...
81

Does CAFC need to “draw the line”
between 102(a) and (b)?

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Possible CAFC test? 82

The set of words, through which
people use or manipulate or
operate a system is unprotected by
cop...
Or 83

Software commands that carry out
preassigned functions necessary for
interoperatibility ex post are
unprotected

11...
Or -

APIs made available to programming
community and necessary for
interoperability ex post fall under
102(b)
Source cod...
Justice Ginsburg, Lotus, 1996
“I thought it was assumed that every one of
these process, system, method of operation
-- th...
Major questions facing CAFC

• Interoperability - copyrightability or fair
use? Partial or full?
• Altai filters: ex ante ...
Does copyright “de minimis doctrine” apply
to “rangeCheck”?

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com

87
De minimis copying
88

“range-Check” Function:
9 lines of code out of 15 million
tested by Oracle

11-13-2013
Wednesday, N...
De minimis copying

89

Court:

“an innocent and inconsequential
instance of copying in the context
of a massive number of...
De minimis copying

JUDGE ALSOP: I couldn't have told you the
first thing about Java before this trial. But,
I have done a...
De minimis copying
91

MR. BOIES: Your Honor -JUDGE ALSOP: You're one of the best
lawyers in America. How can you even
mak...
92

Thank You!
Slides will be available on:

masslawblog.com

11-13-2013
Wednesday, November 13, 13

www.gesmer.com
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Oracle v. google Boston Bar Association presentation

128

Published on

Slides from a presentation I gave at the Boston Bar Association in November 2013. Subject: Oracle v. Google copyright case

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
128
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Oracle v. google Boston Bar Association presentation"

  1. 1. Oracle v. Google Are APIs Copyrightable? Boston Bar Association November 13, 2013 Lee Gesmer Gesmer Updegrove LLP Boston, Massachusetts Copyright Gesmer Updegrove LLP 2013 www.gesmer.com Wednesday, November 13, 13
  2. 2. District Court: 2 To what extent, if at all, are certain replicated elements of the structure, sequence and organization of the Java application programming interface (API) protected by copyright? www.gesmer.com Wednesday, November 13, 13
  3. 3. 3 •Android and the Java API •Software Copyright Law •District Court Trial/Ruling •Issues on Appeal 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  4. 4. 4 Java/Android Timeline: •1996 •2005 •2007 •2008 •2010 - Sun releases Java Google acquires Android Google releases Android Kit First Android phone Oracle purchases Sun (Java) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  5. 5. Larry Ellison 5 • 2010 - Oracle sues Google • 2012 - Trial and decision on infringement • 2013 - Appeal (argument: 12-4-13) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  6. 6. 6 Android Mobile OS 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  7. 7. Android - Most widely used smartphone OS platform Samsung Galaxy S4 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 7
  8. 8. Android OS JAVA virtual machine API PACKAGES 15 million lines code 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 8 www.gesmer.com
  9. 9. Google development of Android 9 “Clean Room” using 40,000 page Java spec 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  10. 10. Google development of Android 10 Clean Room: • “Java virtual machine” • Java API “implementing code” (2.8 million lines) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  11. 11. Google development of Android 11 But: copied verbatim Java “declaring code” (7,000 lines) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  12. 12. Android 12 - Android not marketed as Java - Android not fully interoperable with Java 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  13. 13. Android 13 - 750,000 devices a day - 1 billion devices activated 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  14. 14. 14 The Java Platform and the Java API 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  15. 15. Java - “Write Once, Run Anywhere” Java Programming Language (JPL) JAVA API Declaring Code 7,000 lines 15 Java API Implementing Code 2.8 million lines Java Virtual Machine Host OS (IBM/Apple, Android) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  16. 16. Java Implementing Code 2.8 million lines 16 - methods (subroutines) (6,000+) - classes (600) - packages (166) - Google used 37 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  17. 17. Form of Java declaring code 17 37 packages 600+ classes 6,000+ methods 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  18. 18. Java API Declarations (Methods) 18 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  19. 19. Google Opening Statement 19 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  20. 20. Google 20 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  21. 21. Google 21 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  22. 22. Oracle Chutes and Ladders 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 22 www.gesmer.com
  23. 23. Oracle 23 Schematic of 50-Story Office Building 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  24. 24. Oracle 24 Java API = Chapter titles, topic sentences “Ann Droid” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  25. 25. Judge’s analogy 25 Package ~ bookshelf (166 - 37 at issue) Class ~ book (600) Method (subroutine) ~ chapter (6,000+) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  26. 26. Brief History of the Evolution of Software Copyright Law 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 26
  27. 27. 17 U.S.C. 102 (1976) (a) “Copyright protection subsists . . .in 27 original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed ....” (b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery …. 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  28. 28. 17 U.S.C. § 101 . . . (1980) 28 A “computer program” is a set of statements or instructions to be used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about a certain result. 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  29. 29. Final Report of the National Commission on New Technology Uses of Copyrighted Works (“CONTU”) (1978) “Should a line need to be drawn to exclude certain manifestations of programs from copyright, that line should be drawn on a case-by-case basis by the institution designed to make fine distinctions – the federal judiciary” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 29
  30. 30. Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995) 30 “Applying copyright law to computer programs is like assembling a jigsaw puzzle whose pieces do not quite fit” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  31. 31. Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.,797 F.2d 1222 (3d Cir.1986) “The purpose or function of a utilitarian work would be the work’s idea, and everything that is not necessary to that purpose or function would be part of the expression of the idea. Because that idea could be accomplished with a number of different structures, the structure of the program is part of the program’s expression, not its idea.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 31
  32. 32. Whelan v. Jaslow 32 “Structure, sequence and organization” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  33. 33. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, 982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992): “outdated appreciation of computer science” “. . . relies too heavily on metaphysical distinctions and does not place enough emphasis on practical considerations.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 33
  34. 34. Computer Associates v. Altai 34 "abstraction-filtration-comparison" “analytic dissection” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  35. 35. abstraction Java Programming Language (JPL) JAVA API Declaring Code 7,000 lines 35 Java API Implementing Code 2.8 million Java Virtual Machine Host OS (IBM/Apple, Android) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  36. 36. Altai - filtration of plaintiff’s work: •Ideas (idea/expression dichotomy) • Merger • Scenes a faire (standard treatment in genre) • Functionality • Compatibility requirements • Technical standards/industry demands • Efficient implementation • External factors • Public domain • Simplicity/ease of use 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 36
  37. 37. Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995) "method of operation," as that term is used in § 102(b), refers to the means by which a person operates something ... The Lotus menu command hierarchy does not merely explain and present Lotus 1-2-3’s functional capabilities to the user; it also serves as the method by which the program is operated and controlled” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 37
  38. 38. Lotus: 38 The set of words, through which people use or manipulate or operate a system, is on the uncopyrightable side of the 102(a)/102(b) line 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  39. 39. Lotus: 39 Java API: 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  40. 40. Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1993) and Sony v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) - “Intermediate copying” - Compatibility/interoperability 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 40
  41. 41. 2012 Trial 41 Judge William Alsup 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  42. 42. Oracle at trial • Structure, sequence, organization (SSO) of 37 packages/classes/methods • Creativity • API analagous to “taxonomy” • Android not fully interoperable 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 42
  43. 43. Google at trial • Leading SSO case (Whelan) not the law • Verbatim API commands essental for interoperability •SSO of command structure essential for interoperability •Law does not require 100% interoperability 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 43
  44. 44. 44 Jury verdict Did Google infringe the copyright in the structure, sequence & organization of the APIs in the 37 classes? Jury: Yes Is Google’s copying protected by fair use? Jury: undecided (hung) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  45. 45. 45 District Court Ruling on Copyrightability 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  46. 46. Rule 50 JMOL Motion 46 Jury verdict on infringement of Java SSO set aside Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.,872 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (Judge William Alsop) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  47. 47. District Court: Issue: 47 “The extent to which, if at all, certain replicated elements of the structure, sequence and organization of the Java application programming interface are protected by copyright” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  48. 48. District Court: 48 “No law is directly on point. This order relies on general principles of copyright law ....” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  49. 49. District Court: verbatim copies (vs SSO) 49 “source code at issue includes "declarations." Significantly, the rules of Java dictate the precise form of certain necessary lines of code called declarations, whose precise and necessary form explains why Android and Java must be identical when it comes to those particular lines of code.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  50. 50. District Court: verbatim copies - 50 “In order to declare a particular functionality, the language demands that the method declaration take a particular form. There is no choice in how to express it.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  51. 51. District Court: SSO - 51 “Oracle's best argument . . . is that while no single name is copyrightable, Java's overall system of organized names — covering 37 packages, with over six hundred classes, with over six thousand methods — is a "taxonomy" and, therefore, copyrightable” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  52. 52. District Court: SSO - 52 “Structure, sequence and organization ... is a phrase that crept into use to describe a residual property right where literal copying was absent. A question then arises whether the copyright holder is more appropriately asserting an exclusive right to a functional system, process, or method of operation that belongs in the realm of patents, not copyrights” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  53. 53. District Court: SSO - 53 “that phrase [SSO] has not been reused by the Ninth Circuit since 1989” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  54. 54. District Court: SSO - 54 “the Whelan approach has given way to the Computer Associates approach” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  55. 55. District Court: SSO - 55 “Many different API organizations could supply the same overall range of functionality. They would not, however, be interoperable. Specifically, code written for one API would not run on an API organized differently, for the name structure itself dictates the precise form of command to call up any given method.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  56. 56. Form of Java Declarations 56 - Package ~ bookshelf (166 - 37 at issue) - Class ~ book (600) - Method (subroutine) ~ chapter (6,000) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  57. 57. District Court: SSO - 57 “Yes, it is creative. Yes, it is original. Yes, it resembles a taxonomy.” “. . . But it is nevertheless a command structure, a system or method of operation — a long hierarchy of over six thousand commands to carry out preassigned functions. For that reason, it cannot receive copyright protection” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  58. 58. 58 “Degree of interoperability” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  59. 59. District Court: “degree of interoperability” - 59 “Millions of line of code had been written in Java before Android arrived ... Such code was owned by the developers, not by Oracle. In order for at least some of this code to run on Android, Google was required to provide the same command system” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  60. 60. District Court: “degree of interoperability” - 60 Google was free to duplicate the command structure for the 37 packages,in Android in order to accommodate third-party source code relying on the 37 packages (taking care to write its own implementations). 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  61. 61. District Court: “Degree of interoperability” - 61 Contrary to Oracle, “full compatibility” is not relevant to the Section 102(b) analysis.” Sony v. Connectix - involved subset of functions 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  62. 62. District Court: Oracle v. Google test? - 62 “functional [expressive] aspects necessary for compatibility (not copyrightable) versus copying functional [expressive] aspects unnecessary for compatibility (possibly copyrightable).” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  63. 63. 63 Oracle Appeal to CAFC 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  64. 64. Oracle: 64 . . . Ann Droid . . . 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  65. 65. Oracle: “Ann Droid wants to publish a bestseller. So she sits down with a copy of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix .... She verbatim copies all the chapter titles—from Chapter 1 (“Dudley Demented”) to Chapter 38 (“The Second War Begins”). She copies verbatim the topic sentences of each paragraph, starting from the first (highly descriptive) one and continuing, in order, to the last, simple one (“Harry nodded.”).” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 65
  66. 66. Oracle: 66 Defendant Google Inc. has copied a blockbuster literary work just as surely, and as improperly, as Ann Droid 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  67. 67. Oracle: 67 “If Ann Droid had paraphrased in the same order every chapter title and topic sentence without copying a single word verbatim, the entire plot that she copied—the structure, sequence, and organization of the overall work— would be protected. ... This principle applies equally to software.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  68. 68. 68 Software API ~ imaginative fiction? 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  69. 69. Works of fiction Historical/biographical works Textbooks Compilations Expressive/functional elements in software 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 69
  70. 70. Oracle: 70 • “Software exceptionalism” • Google copied a “magnum opus” • No ex post Altai filtration process • Interoperability irrelevant to copyrightability • Partial interoperability/fragmentation • Court “over-dissected” API 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  71. 71. Oracle re verbatim copying - “Google Concedes Away the Entire Case” “To start, Google concedes that it literally copied 7,000 lines of declaring code . . . collapsing the challenge on appeal to a single question: Is there any protected expression at all in either the copied code or the copied structure” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 71
  72. 72. Oracle trial counsel: “Our case is not about the taking of any individual or even any small set of method declarations. Our case is about the comprehensive taking of the structure, sequence and organization of the computer programs as defined by the API specifications. That structure, sequence and organization includes method declarations at the appropriate level. It is like the sub sub subchapter in the outline structure. ... [W]hat we are seeking to protect is our very complex outline.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 72
  73. 73. Oracle: Uses partial quote: 73 “many ways to group the methods yet still duplicate the same range of functionality ...there were many ways to group the methods yet still duplicate the same range of functionality.” (District Court) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  74. 74. Excluding Court’s conclusion: 74 “Duplication of the command structure is necessary for interoperability” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  75. 75. Oracle: Interoperability 75 interoperability defense relevant to fair use, not copyrightability 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  76. 76. Computer Associates v. Altai: Filtration step includes: 76 “(2) compatibility requirements of other programs with which a program is designed to operate in conjunction; (3)computer manufacturers' design standards; (4) demands of the industry being serviced; and (5) widely accepted programming practices within the computer industry.” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  77. 77. 77 Altai “filtration” At time of plaintiff’s writing, or at time of infringement? Ex ante or ex post? 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  78. 78. Oracle: 78 Oracle: Ex ante (when work created) Google: Ex post (when competing product created) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  79. 79. Oracle: 79 Fact that function requires identical copy is does not deprive work of copyrightability under merger or interoperability 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  80. 80. De facto standard 80 Can Java command structure lose copyright protection by becoming a de facto standard? (analogy to generic trademark) 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  81. 81. 81 Does CAFC need to “draw the line” between 102(a) and (b)? 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  82. 82. Possible CAFC test? 82 The set of words, through which people use or manipulate or operate a system is unprotected by copyright law where necessary for compatibility or interoperability ex post 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  83. 83. Or 83 Software commands that carry out preassigned functions necessary for interoperatibility ex post are unprotected 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  84. 84. Or - APIs made available to programming community and necessary for interoperability ex post fall under 102(b) Source code/object code not disclosed to users, developers does not 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 84
  85. 85. Justice Ginsburg, Lotus, 1996 “I thought it was assumed that every one of these process, system, method of operation -- that you have to extract out of them what is the expression, the separable expression. . . . but that you can't just say, oh, method of operation. Forget it. We don't have to worry about expression. That seems to me a wholly different way of looking at 102(b) than runs through all of copyright. There's always the question, is there separable expression?” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 85
  86. 86. Major questions facing CAFC • Interoperability - copyrightability or fair use? Partial or full? • Altai filters: ex ante or ex post? • Under what circumstances should copyright law allow a free compulsory license that permits copier to use expressive aspects of a copyrighted work to create an interoperative derivative work? 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 86
  87. 87. Does copyright “de minimis doctrine” apply to “rangeCheck”? 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 87
  88. 88. De minimis copying 88 “range-Check” Function: 9 lines of code out of 15 million tested by Oracle 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  89. 89. De minimis copying 89 Court: “an innocent and inconsequential instance of copying in the context of a massive number of lines of code” 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  90. 90. De minimis copying JUDGE ALSOP: I couldn't have told you the first thing about Java before this trial. But, I have done and still do a lot of programming myself in other languages. I have written blocks of code like rangeCheck a hundred times or more. You could do it. It is so simple. There was no way that you could say that that was speeding them along to the marketplace. That is not a good argument. 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com 90
  91. 91. De minimis copying 91 MR. BOIES: Your Honor -JUDGE ALSOP: You're one of the best lawyers in America. How can you even make that argument? You know, maybe the answer is because you are so good it sounds legit. But it is not legit. That is not a good argument. 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  92. 92. 92 Thank You! Slides will be available on: masslawblog.com 11-13-2013 Wednesday, November 13, 13 www.gesmer.com
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×