The power of ad-hoc revenue management and pricing re-adjustment techniques in extreme market conditions • Adjusting demand through schedule changes • Improving forecasts whilst reducing variation • Advising optimal responses to triggers (seasonality, schedule changes, booking class realignment, etc…) Performance measurement involves monitoring values of performance measures (units of measure) to determine progress toward specific objective. In the airline industry, performance measurement can be used to monitor when and where passengers are flying, spot variations or trends, measure outcomes of business strategies, document changes in revenues, estimate outcomes of sales strategies, and indicate how well airline objectives are met. Some of the several types of performance reports include: advance booking report, passenger load factor, denied boarding report, spoilage report, spill and stifle report, and historical seat demand report. To be specifically effective, a performance measurement system should involve timely sharing of information with employees and managers. To maximize revenue airlines must sell a maximum amount of premium fares and fill the remaining seats with lower priced fares. Generally speaking lower priced fares tend to be booked well in advance whereas premium fares tend to be booked at the last moment. The challenge of inventory control is to correctly estimate demand in order to protect the appropriate amount of higher priced fares until the last moment. If not enough higher priced fares are protected then the airline will loose revenue. However if too many higher priced seats are protected then revenue from lower prices seats can potentially be squandered. With the internet only displaying price levels, the importance of availability of a booking class is directly related to its price being displayed. Inventory controls are the key lever these days to raise or lower price levels in the market. Typically, the price structure is filed through ATPCO or SITA, and it is static or what we call a core structure. Opening or closing inventory just highlights the related price. If the lowest booking class is available, the lowest price will show. When that booking class closes, then the price goes up, in relation to the next booking class availability. Airlines can use a form of “gating” to make the price go up at pre-determined intervals. Those intervals can be BLF (booked load factor) related or days-prior-to-departure related. This gating is actually replacing advance purchase restrictions that have been filed with the prices in the past. There are also tactical prices filed whenever there needs to be stimulation, and these can be restricted to dedicated booking class inventory which is limited to only certain flights, or certain days of the week. Using historical demand and class distribution, we can evaluate demand change based on changes in the schedule and/or frequency and capacity with resulting spill/recapture. For capacity reductions, we can estimate retention and possible spill/recapture on other flights. The level of detail should be by flight and day of the week. To maximize revenue and protect seats for the highest-revenue passengers at their preferred departure times, price-sensitive passengers should be shifted to alternative non-prime flight departures
Restriction Free Pricing 199 L 229 Q 259 V 289 H 319 B 399 M 499 Y 0 3 5 7 14 21 APUR Booking Class
A New Pricing Model Lowest Class Availability
Revenue Management Objectives
Produce a demand forecast based on market data, commercial objectives, and calendar-related events
Adjust the demand forecast based on environmental changes, management guidelines, and performance metrics
Set up and manage an allocation strategy using the revenue management system tools in a systematic and efficient manner
Prioritize administrative tasks
Revenue Management Strategies and Policies Low LF Mixed Flow Leisure Flow Protect business Prevent buy down High Med Business Leisure Mixed Flow Attract additional traffic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Source: W.H.T. Blom, VP Pricing & Revenue Management Europe, KLM, Barcelona 7 & 8 March 2005
Reacting to Market Changes Workflow Control Trigger Triggers require specific (re)actions Process What reaction is required in order to respond to trigger Tool How to apply the tool to cover the business process? Feedback & Control Performance measurement and evaluation. Theoretical Basis Concepts, terms and theory RM Basics Market Knowledge and Analysis Business Process Orientation
Flight Management Strategies Source: Jerry Foran, British Airways, IATA RM & Pricing, Oct. 2004
Category Criteria 88% Avg. PLF 20% Avg. Business Mix Prime (HM HP ) High (HM LP ) Medium (LM HP ) Low (LM LP )
Flight Categories
Rule-Based Control Thresholds
Flight Category Treatment Booking Class Y M Booking Class B H Booking Class V Q L High Medium Low
Competition Match Rule-Based Control
Scan the internet for the lowest available price on selected routes
Define the correlation between each flight departure and the competition
Establish business rules for matching lowest available price on a flight departure basis
Performance Measurement
Looking into the past
Passenger load factor
Distribution
Variances
Revenue and yields
Spill
Stifle
Spoilage
Denied boardings
Patterns and trends
Market share
Connecting traffic
Looking into the future
Bookings
Distribution
Variances
Activity and velocity
Potential spill
Potential stifle
Available seats and price
Competitive monitoring
Market share
Scheduled capacity
Business Demand
Advance Booking Report Sample
Historical PLF and No-Show Trends
Load Factor Trends
Remaining Availability by Date / Class
Spill Analysis BLF > 70%, and A > 1
Stifle Analysis BLF < 50%, and A <= 1
Business Process Orientation
Forecast Accuracy (Statistical Process Control)
Things to Look For
The point of making control charts is to look for variation. Several types of conditions exist that indicate that a process is out of control.
Extreme point condition is when a point is either above the upper control limit (UCL) or below the lower control limit (LCL). This is the most frequent and obvious out of control condition. One point beyond a UCL or LCL is an extremely unlikely occurrence (less than 1%) when the forecast follows the normal distribution.
Runs above or below the centreline (9 or more consecutive points) are also extremely unlikely.
Linear trends showing 6 or more consecutive points increasing or decreasing is also extremely unlikely.
Case Study – Observations
Average error ≈ 3 pax
Error is increasing over time
Was under-forecasting in Feb, now consistently over-forecasting
Potential Causes
Increased capacity (lower demand by flt)
Demand decline (mkt share loss and/or market shrinkage)
Change in booking pattern (pax starting to book earlier on)
Introduction of new booking classes. RMS forecasts new classes while continuing to forecast traditional classes at same historical level (double counting)
Possible Solutions
Seasonal forecast edit to redistribute demand across flights
Seasonal forecast edit to reflect new trend until RMS picks it up and/or adjust forecast mix to put more weight on more recent data
Reference curve edit to shift some demand from traditional classes to new booking classes and forecast mix grid to put more weight on more recent data
Business Process Orientation
The Power of Adhoc Re-adjustment Techniques in Extreme Market Conditions [email_address] IATA Commercial Strategy Symposium 2007, 27-29 November 2007, Athens, Greece
0 comments
Post a comment