Establishing the significant properties of digital research Gareth Knight Centre for e-Research King’s College London iPRE...
Overview <ul><li>Definitions </li></ul><ul><li>Potential risks to significant properties </li></ul><ul><li>Criteria for de...
InSPECT Project <ul><li>Project:  Investigating the Significant Properties of Electronic Content over Time </li></ul><ul><...
Many definitions… <ul><li>“ The characteristics of digital objects that must be preserved over time in order to ensure the...
Representation Information <ul><li>RI consists of: </li></ul><ul><li>Structure information  that  describes the encoding s...
Interpreting SPs in abstract NAA Performance Model OAIS Reference Model
Interpreting SPs in practice NAA Performance Model data = information content computer + OS + + application
Risk scenarios <ul><li>“ traditionally, preserving things meant keeping them unchanged; however … if we hold on to digital...
Differences in rendering… Previous slide in OpenOffice Impress 2.0
What is significant? <ul><li>“ A digital object’s Significant Properties are not empirical; archives will make judgments a...
Frameworks <ul><li>Rothenberg & Bikson (1999) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Encouraged analysis of business functions, followed by...
Criteria for deciding significance <ul><li>Composition of the digital object </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Form in which the idea ...
Significant property types <ul><li>Ch aracteristics of the intellectual content  itself </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Length (dura...
Cataloguing SPs (1) <ul><li>Data Dictionary for Significant Properties: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Catalogue significant proper...
Cataloguing SPs (2) <ul><li>i dentifier </li></ul><ul><li>t itle </li></ul><ul><li>description </li></ul><ul><li>functio n...
Compare and contrast
Compare and contrast
General Observations <ul><li>An understanding of significant properties is useful during creation and distribution of obje...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Establishing the significant properties of digital research

908 views
830 views

Published on

Slides for the talk on establishing the significant properties of digital research at iPRES 2008 on 29-30 September 2008.

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
908
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Establishing the significant properties of digital research

    1. 1. Establishing the significant properties of digital research Gareth Knight Centre for e-Research King’s College London iPRES 2008 29 September 2008
    2. 2. Overview <ul><li>Definitions </li></ul><ul><li>Potential risks to significant properties </li></ul><ul><li>Criteria for deciding significance </li></ul><ul><li>Recording and comparing SPs </li></ul><ul><li>General observations </li></ul>
    3. 3. InSPECT Project <ul><li>Project: Investigating the Significant Properties of Electronic Content over Time </li></ul><ul><li>Development Partners: Centre for e-Research, KCL; The National Archives; The British Library (advisory) </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Expand and articulate the concept of ‘significant properties’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Determine the properties that are significant to the long-term accessibility of different types of digital object (email, presentation structured text, audio, raster images) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To develop methods for expressing and measuring properties to: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>validate the results of preservation actions </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>support the needs of user communities </li></ul></ul></ul>
    4. 4. Many definitions… <ul><li>“ The characteristics of digital objects that must be preserved over time in order to ensure the continued accessibility, usability and meaning of the objects” </li></ul><ul><li>Wilson, 2007 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Significant properties are those properties of digital objects that affect their quality, usability, rendering, and behaviour.” </li></ul><ul><li>Hedstrom & Lee, 2002 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Those characteristics (both technical, intellectual, and aesthetic) agreed by the archive or by the collection manager to be the most important features to preserve over time.” </li></ul><ul><li>The Cedars Project Report, 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>Closely tied to notions of authenticity and integrity </li></ul>
    5. 5. Representation Information <ul><li>RI consists of: </li></ul><ul><li>Structure information that describes the encoding scheme in which data is stored, e.g. format, encoding algorithm </li></ul><ul><li>Semantic information that indicate how the values are to be interpreted. E.g. documentation that indicates how numeric values in a CSV or tab-delimited format must be interpreted. </li></ul>
    6. 6. Interpreting SPs in abstract NAA Performance Model OAIS Reference Model
    7. 7. Interpreting SPs in practice NAA Performance Model data = information content computer + OS + + application
    8. 8. Risk scenarios <ul><li>“ traditionally, preserving things meant keeping them unchanged; however … if we hold on to digital information without modifications, accessing the information will become increasingly more difficult, if not impossible.” </li></ul><ul><li>Su-Shing Chen, “The Paradox of Preservation”, Computer , March, 2001, pp. 2-6. </li></ul><ul><li>Recreation of source data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Hardware (e.g. upgrades, virtual machines, emulators) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Operating system </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software application </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Conversion – format normalisation/migration </li></ul><ul><ul><li>File Format </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Encoding format </li></ul></ul>
    9. 9. Differences in rendering… Previous slide in OpenOffice Impress 2.0
    10. 10. What is significant? <ul><li>“ A digital object’s Significant Properties are not empirical; archives will make judgments at levels appropriate to fulfil their preservation responsibilities and meet the needs of the archive’s user communities ” </li></ul><ul><li>The Cedars Project Report, 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Definitions of Significant Properties that affect the aesthetics, implied meaning, and affordances of digital objects tend to be much more subjective and tied to the context of creation and use.” </li></ul><ul><li>Hedstrom & Lee, 2002 </li></ul><ul><li>Fundamental Questions of digital preservation: </li></ul><ul><li>What must you retain to ensure the integrity and authenticity of the digital object? </li></ul><ul><li>What can you lose without potential implications? </li></ul>
    11. 11. Frameworks <ul><li>Rothenberg & Bikson (1999) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Encouraged analysis of business functions, followed by technological capabilities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Digital Diplomatics (2001) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Created by InterPARES project, based on archival diplomatics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Analysis of Records rather than Objects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Examines Documentary form, Annotations, Context of creation and use </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Utility Analysis (2004) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Developed during DELOS project and used in PLANETS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>File characteristics, process characteristics </li></ul></ul>
    12. 12. Criteria for deciding significance <ul><li>Composition of the digital object </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Form in which the idea is expressed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Expression method in a digital environment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Purpose </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Intended function (e.g. diplomatic analysis) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Type of user </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Organisational investment </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Strategic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Financial </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Expectation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Capability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tools </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Legal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Financial </li></ul></ul>
    13. 13. Significant property types <ul><li>Ch aracteristics of the intellectual content itself </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Length (duration of audio recording, no. of characters) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Placement (e.g. audio playback through left/right speaker, position and size of shape, sequential order of several paragraphs) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Properties that indicate the environment in which the intellectual content may be reproduced </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality level (no. of colours, audio quality) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Access status (viewing, editing) </li></ul></ul>
    14. 14. Cataloguing SPs (1) <ul><li>Data Dictionary for Significant Properties: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Catalogue significant properties of digital object that must be maintained </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>May be applied to range of resource types, file formats and subject disciplines </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Validate that information content is authentic, in regards to its original meaning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Note any property constraints and their application to specific functions and designated communities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>XML schema in the near future… </li></ul>
    15. 15. Cataloguing SPs (2) <ul><li>i dentifier </li></ul><ul><li>t itle </li></ul><ul><li>description </li></ul><ul><li>functio n </li></ul><ul><li>genre </li></ul><ul><li>preservation Level </li></ul><ul><li>specification registry </li></ul><ul><li>m easurement </li></ul><ul><li>relationships </li></ul>
    16. 16. Compare and contrast
    17. 17. Compare and contrast
    18. 18. General Observations <ul><li>An understanding of significant properties is useful during creation and distribution of objects, in addition to long-term curation and preservation. </li></ul><ul><li>Although some properties may be identified that are important to the form of resources, many d ecisions on significance require consideration of the context. </li></ul><ul><li>Curators should begin to consider ways to capture and retain significant properties information on ingest into repository </li></ul><ul><li>The success of preservation activity should be evaluated on the basis of the ability to maintain significant properties </li></ul><ul><li>Further collaborative work between creators, archives/repositories and tool developers is required to provide a consistent approach. </li></ul>

    ×