Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Virtual Private Server Trade-off
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Virtual Private Server Trade-off

687

Published on

Trade-off analysis of Virtual Private Server service providers (presented on 27-06-2009 @ Liberdade229).

Trade-off analysis of Virtual Private Server service providers (presented on 27-06-2009 @ Liberdade229).

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
687
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Virtual Private Server Provider
    Trade-off analysis
    Tiago Franco
  • 2. Agenda
    Motivation
    Trade-off method
    Selection Criteria
    Scores fragmentation
    Results
    Conclusions
  • 3. Motivation
    Select a provider of Virtual Private Server services for production sites
  • 4. Trade-off method
    Scoring model
    Identify several hosting services offering Virtual Private servers
    Identify several characteristics
    Assign weight for each one
    Fragment each characteristic in 5 sections
    Assign a score for each section
    Calculate the weighted mean of each service
  • 5. Selection Criteria
    Note: This criteria is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different criteria and weight.
  • 6. Scores Fragmentation (1)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 7. Scores Fragmentation (2)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 8. Scores Fragmentation (3)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 9. Scores Fragmentation (4)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 10. Scores Fragmentation (5)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 11. Scores Fragmentation (6)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 12. Scores Fragmentation (7)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 13. Scores Fragmentation (8)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 14. Scores Fragmentation (9)
    Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.
    Your case may have different ranges.
  • 15. Results
  • 16. Conclusions
    Usually pick one of the top 3
    DEDIBOX is not a well known provider
    Gandi the company selected by the author for a test-drive
    SliceHost is 4th
    Users of SliceHost, that agree with the criteria and score fragmentation, are not advised to migrate
    the cost of change can be higher than the benefit)

×