Team NY: Package 2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Team NY: Package 2

on

  • 336 views

3/2/2012

3/2/2012

Statistics

Views

Total Views
336
Views on SlideShare
278
Embed Views
58

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

1 Embed 58

http://gudc2012nyc.tumblr.com 58

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Team NY: Package 2 Team NY: Package 2 Presentation Transcript

  • GUDCN Y C
  • Purpose To assess all measures and parameters deemed necessary to ultimately select a singular site for a proposed Stanford Auxiliary Science and Engineering campus in the City of New York.
  • Mayor Questions Developed Property with Existing Neighborhood Infrastructure (Large Capital Investment, Small Infrastructure Investment) VS. Area of low economic and social vitality with a promise for opportunity (Large Infrastructure Investment, Small Capital Investment)
  • Vision The Stanford’s NYC campus is poised to become one of the world’s leading schools for business and engineering, establishing New York City as the East Coast’s center for entrepreneurship and innovation. Collaboration with local universities will reinforce the learning environment, enhance human capital, and foster the advancement of human ingenuity. In partnership with the city government, local community, and area high-tech firms, the Stanford NYC campus will become integral in addressing some of today’s most challenging technological issues, infusing sustainability and integrity at its core philosophy, and promoting a spirit of passionate pursuit for the betterment of mankind.
  • Outline I. Site Analyses and Sustainability Program II. Matrix and Parameter Guidelines III. Financial Report IV. Final Selection V. Process
  • SITE ANALYSES AND SUSTAINABILITY POTENTIALS
  • Site Map 5 West End Avenue 666 1st Avenue 46 - 08 5 Street 1 Quay Street 22 Flushing Street Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Sustainability Aspect solar power and solar heating cooperation with local Stewardship organisations shading and greenhouse solutions public places differnet green roof systems and renewable material for construction urban farming density and program mixing water source heat pumps and cooling systems creating an education cluster with other universities nearby smart grid systems and proper insulation Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 5 West End Avenue (Manhattan) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 5 West End Avenue (Manhattan) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 5 West End Avenue Main sustainable potentials of the site: (2 FAR bonus for adding Inclusionary housing) (Lincoln Square Neighbourhood Center and Committee for Environmentally Sound Development) (Columbia University, NYU and Fordham University) (2 FAR bonus for constructing an open plaza) (tax abatement up to $100.000) (tax abatement up to $62.500) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 666 1st Avenue (Manhattan) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 666 1st Avenue (Manhattan) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 666 1st Avenue Main sustainable potentials of the site: (extra 2 FAR bonus for Inclusionary housing) (Lincoln Square Neighbourhood Center and Committeefor environmentally Sound Developement) (Columbia University, NYU and Fordham University) (2 FAR bonus for constructing an open plaza) (tax abatement up to $100.000) (tax abatement up to $62.500) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 1 Quay Street (Brooklyn)
  • 1 Quay Street (Brooklyn) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 1 Quay Street Main sustainable potentials of the site: (extra 2 FAR bonus for Inclusionary housing) (Habitatmap, North Brooklyn Compost Project, Open Space Alliance Of North Brooklyn) (Water Access Program, Local Stewardship Programs) (underground gasoline tanks) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 46-08 5 Street (Queens) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 46-08 5 Street (Queens) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 46-08 5 Street Main sustainable potentials of the site: (Friends of Gantry Neighbourhood Parks at Hunters point and Habitatmap) (tax abatement up to $100.000) (tax abatement up to $62.500) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 22 Flushing Avenue (Brooklyn) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 22 Flushing Avenue (Brooklyn) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 22 Flushing Avenue Main sustainable potentials of the site: (buildings once owned by the Navy) (possibility to enhance the strong character of the Old Navy Yard) (tax abatement up to $100.000) (tax abatement up to $62.500) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • MATRIX AND PARAMETERGUIDELINES MATRIX and PARAMETER ANALYSIS
  • Matrix Methodology Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Matrix Stakeholder Allotment and Rationale Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford university (Parametric Weight Allotment) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityPublic Education Facilities in the Area (10%) Grading based on how many museums, galleries, libraries, institutes, high-tech companies and high-tech stores exists in the area, radius of 1 miles (15 minute walk). Famous museums, galleries etc. count double. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityPublic Education Facilities in the Area (10%) Quay St 0.4 46 - 08 5 St 0.39 22 Flushing 0.38 St museum 666 1st Ave 0.5 gallery library institute 5 West End high-tech company Ave 0.5 hight-tech store 0 10 20 30 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversitySafety (20%)Considerations about safety are based on a Sterling agency’scalculations. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford University Safety (20%) Quay St 0.68 46 - 08 5 St 0.68 22 Flushing 0.68 666 1st Ave St 0.85 West End zip code area violent crime Ave 0.8 zip code area property crime 0 3 6 9 12 15 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityOutside impression (15%)Reputation of the Area is connected with how city residentssee the area as a whole. Aesthetics of the Area is a parameter that measures the state of the streets, parks and other public spaces in the surrounding 1 mile radius (15 minutes walk).Desired New York Character of the Area as seen from non-residents (image of the city which the NY City has as atrademark). Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityOutside impression (15%) Quay St 0.3 46 - 08 5 St 0.38 22 Flushing 0.38 666 1st Ave St 0.66 aesthetics of the area 5 West End reputation of the area Ave 0.66 desired New York character 0 3 6 9 12 15 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityPublic Transportation (15%)Describes the access to public transportation in the area. Differentdistances to the nearest transportation service (2miles=30mins,1mile=15mins, 0,5mile=8 mins). Overall accessibility indicates any othertransportation service than bus or subway. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityPublic Transportation (15%) Quay St 0.66 46 - 08 5 St 0.67 22 Flushing 0.39 666 1st Ave St 0.78 subway 5 West End bus Ave 0.91 overall accessibility 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityZoning Regulation (10%)ZoLa - Zoning indicate how wellApplication Parameters and Land Use the zoning parameters of the area and chosen plot suit the BriefWith the Department ofto thePlannings Zoning andland use and footprint) and volume spacing. the requirements according City program (in both sense, Land Use (ZoLa) application you can findzoning for a property, discover new proposals for your neighborhood and learn where CityPlanning initiatives apply across NYC. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityZoning Regulation (10%) Quay St 0.39 46 - 08 5 St 0.36 22 Flushing 0.38 666 1st Ave St new building height 0.41 land use5 West End surrounding existing land use Ave 0.41 surrounding existing building height 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityNatural Factors (15%)Plots in the zone area A will most likely need to evacuate the area in a case of abigger hurricane. This is connected with expenses and certain degree ofuncertainty.Sea Level Rise Plots within the plausible sea level rise will need to be design in a way, to achieve higher grounds. This is connected with higher expenses. Higher grounds, above the street level is also a design challenge which prioritize plots with higher altitude.As a result of a study that has shown poor condition of city air on Manhattanone of the main goals of PlanYC is to improve air qualityProximity to large, green open space/park Offers a possibility for a retreat and therefore it is certain benefit for the university to advertise itself, or also a possibility to do a research in it. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityNatural Factors (15%) Quay St 0.26 46 - 08 5 St 0.15 22 Flushing 0.18 666 1st Ave St hurricane flooding 0.32 sea level rise5 West End air quality Ave 0.32 national or regional park nearby 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityHuman Capital Increase Potential (10%) Examines: I.Diversity of Demographic II.Pace and Vivacity/Social Vitality III.Existing Educational Facilities IV.Existing Business Environment Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Stanford UniversityHuman Capital Increase Potential (10%) Quay St 0.38 46 - 08 5 St 0.42 22 Flushing 0.33 666 1st Ave St variety of people 0.61 pace5 West End existing educational enviroment Ave 0.65 existing business enviroment 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University Student (Parametric Weight Allotment) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsEducational Institutions (25%) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsEducational Institutions (25%) Quay St 0.64 46 - 08 5 St 0.56 22 Flushing 0.64 666 1st Ave St 1.00 library university high-tech company5 West End college Ave 1.00 events 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsRecreational and Leisure Space (10%) Examines Number of and Proximity to: I.Sports Fields II.Jogging Tracks III.Bicycle Lanes IV.Water Sport Facilities V.Group Activity Facilities/Recreation Centers/Gyms Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsRecreational and Leisure Space (10%) Quay St 0.64 46 - 08 5 St 0.56 22 Flushing 0.34 666 1st Ave St sport fields 0.64 jogging tracks bicycle lanes5 West End water sports Ave 0.64 group activities 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsShopping and Entertainment (25%) Number and proximity of places to leisure and frequent in 1 mile radius. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsShopping and Entertainment (25%) Quay St 0.18 46 - 08 5 St 0.12 22 Flushing restaurants 0.05 St theaters cinemas 666 1st Ave bars 0.15 clubs bowling5 West End cafees Ave 0.18 student apartments open public spaces 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsExisting Community (5%) Examines: I.Age Structure (favoring younger generation) II.Work Environment III.Diversity of nearby nodes, facilities, and public spaces and demography Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsExisting Community (5%) Quay St 0.23 46 - 08 5 St 0.23 22 Flushing 0.23 666 1st Ave St 0.25 age structure5 West End work enviroment Ave 0.25 diversity 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 15.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsNature (5%) Examines Proximity to: I.Rivers II.Lakes/Ponds III.Riverside IV.Forests V.Large green areas and open space *measures unregulated versus regulated areas* Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsNature (5%) Quay St 0.12 46 - 08 5 St 0.06 22 Flushing 0.06 666 1st Ave St 0.395 West End Ave 0.69 unregulated regulated 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsTransportation (15%)Describes access to public transportation in the area/different distances to the nearest transportation service. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsTransportation (15%) Quay St 0.63 46 - 08 5 St 0.60 22 Flushing 0.42 666 1st Ave St 0.63 subway bus5 West End train Ave 0.64 bicycle ferry 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsSafety (15%)Considerations about safety are based on crime ratings of bestplaces.net/crime andneighborhoodlink.com. All ratings were assessed against the National Average.Proximity to a Hospital was also assessed. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsSafety (15%) Quay St 0.63 46 - 08 5 St 0.63 22 Flushing 0.48 666 1st Ave St 0.855 West End violent crime Ave 0.76 health care 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • University StudentsLocal Community (Parametric Weight Allotment) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityAmenities (30%)Amenities that local community lacks in existing situation. Parameters try to definewhat would be the best “treat” for local residents to become positive about theproject. In Not integrated scenario, the values are sometimes 0, disregarding the table. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityAmenities (30%) Quay St 0.77 46 - 08 5 St 0.62 22 Flushing 0.81 666 1st Ave St 0.33 green areas public places5 West End recreation Ave 0.15 cultural events urban improvements 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityRegulation and Zoning Compatibility (30%) Examines: I.FAR (Floor Area Ratio) and New Building Heights II.Noise Pollution III.Incompatibility of Programs* *in low density neighborhoods private interests are usually source of unpreparedness for urban change. The scale of the university it can also be problematic when approaching to single house scale area. At the other hand, it can be welcome for residents to get some new programs in the neighborhood.* Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityRegulation and Zoning Compatibility (30%) Quay St 0.42 46 - 08 5 St 0.36 22 Flushing 0.36 666 1st Ave St 0.42 the new building height noise5 West End Ave 0.42 incompatibility of the programs 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 15.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityHousing (10%) Population structure can be problematic when the density of the area is low. Further more, both high and low density areas with mixed age structure are being better accepted. This measure looks at Floor to Area Ratios (High FAR = high rating in our scale) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityHousing (10%) Quay St 0.30 46 - 08 5 St 0.10 22 Flushing 0.10 666 1st Ave St 0.505 West End population struct. in new Ave 0.50 housing units 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityJobs (10%) Assessment based on density of area and land use zoning of area. This metric assesses FAR having a negative relationship with our scale (HIGH FAR = Low Rating in our scale) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityJobs (10%) Quay St 0.30 46 - 08 5 St 0.50 22 Flushing 0.50 666 1st Ave St 0.105 West End Ave 0.10 new jobs created 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityTransportation (10%)This metric assesses the abundance of public transportationopportunities at a low scale, implying that there is no room forimprovement/the community lacks in its existing situation/potential forgrowth. Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityTransportation (10%) Quay St 0.20 46 - 08 5 St 0.15 22 Flushing 0.35 666 1st Ave St 0.095 West End Ave 0.00 new bus lines, bike lanes ... 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityHuman Capital Increase (10%) University attracts people with certain knowledge, ambition or wealth. By doing that it improves the neighborhood. *High FAR, Lower Score* Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Local CommunityHuman Capital Increase (10%) Quay St 0.30 46 - 08 5 St 0.50 22 Flushing 0.50 666 1st Ave St 0.105 West End Ave 0.10 entrepreneurship, innovation, education 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • MATRIX RESOULTS MATRIX and PARAMETER ANALYSIS
  • Final Comparison Matrix Stakeholders Local Stanford Students Total community 5 WEST END AVENUE, Manhattan 2,12 1,45 0,19 3,77 666 1 AVENUE, Manhattan 2,04 1,37 0,23 3,64 QUAY STREET, Brooklyn 1,53 1,07 0,34 2,94 46 AVENUE, Queens 1,52 0,97 0,33 2,82 22 FLUSHING AVENUE, Brooklyn 1,35 0,78 0,39 2,52
  • FINANCIAL REPORT MATRIX and PARAMETER ANALYSIS
  • Financial report Lot Program Total MIN land Approximate Total assessed Land MAX MIN land Construction and value (45 % of total footprint footprint purchasable needed construction tax value density needed land price value is TAX combined needed value value cost BASE)LocationUnit sq.ft. sq.ft. $/sq.ft. $/sq.ft. FAR sq.ft. $ 200.41 $/sq.ft $ $ %5 WESTENDAVENUE, 366.936 330.000 109,33 117,86 10+2+2 33.000 3.607.952 66.135.300 70.024.583 31.384.463 10Manhattan666 1AVENUE, 255.375 330.000 257,97 301,58 10+2 33.000 8.513.164 66.135.300 76.087.570 33.591.809 10Manhattan22FLUSHINGAVENUE, 1.543.330 360.000 21,86 45,81 2+0 180.000 3.935.337 72.147.600 80.392.706 34.237.322 10BrooklynQUAYSTREET, 595.391 360.000 11,85 49,14 6+1.2 60.000 710.712 72.147.600 75.096.150 32.786.240 10Brooklyn46 AVENUE, 243.773 360.000 78,86 70,01 2+0 180.000 14.194.257 72.147.600 84.749.734 38.853.836 10Queens Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • FINAL SELECTION MATRIX and PARAMETER ANALYSIS
  • Final comparison Matrix Financial report Survey Stakeholders Local Construction and Total assessed Questioners Stanford Students Total community land price value votes 5 WEST END AVENUE, Manhattan 2,12 1,45 0,19 3,77 $ 70M $ 31M 28666 1 AVENUE, Manhattan 2,04 1,37 0,23 3,64 $ 76M $ 34M 25QUAY STREET, Brooklyn 1,53 1,07 0,34 2,94 $ 75M $ 33M 20 46 AVENUE, Queens 1,52 0,97 0,33 2,82 $ 85M $ 39M 17 22 FLUSHING AVENUE, Brooklyn 1,35 0,78 0,39 2,52 $ 80M $ 34M 15 Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • 5 West End Avenue (Manhattan) Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site on the Map 5 West End Avenue Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • WHY?Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • ACCESSIBILITY IMAGE DENSITY SUSTAINBILITY OPPORTUNITY CONNECTIVITY SAFETY COSTSite Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • PROCESS MATRIX and PARAMETER ANALYSIS
  • Web Conferencing Tools GoToMeeting Skype •Document Sharing and Viewing Capabilities •Instant Chat •6 Way Face-to-Face communication (GoToMeeting) •Main medium for organized and planned weekly meetings Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Document Collaboration Tools •Package 2 items and documents collected in one collection (GoogleDocs) •Easy, multi-user editing •Near seamless compatibility with Microsoft Suite •Multiple viewer capability Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Research tools Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • Improvement Points (over Package 1 Process) Increased frequency of meetings (at least twice/week) + Time-allotted agenda distributed before meetings + Faster email response + Clear delineation and equal distribution of responsibilities + Collaborative work ethic and increased drive (shortened time period) = Better Performance, Better Presentation, Better Results Site Analyses Parameter Analyses Financial Report Final Selection Process
  • GUDCN Y C