Janet Raat 15

230 views

Published on

compare your self to the top

Published in: Technology, Career
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
230
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
14
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Janet Raat 15

  1. 1. Compare yourself to the top A.N. Raat (Janet) FOCUS your FUTURE May 16-17, 2013
  2. 2. PhD-student  Career read write publish WORK
  3. 3. PhD-student  Career WORK in a social context
  4. 4. Social Comparison Festinger, 1954
  5. 5. Social Comparison Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. Wood, 1996
  6. 6. Social Comparison Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. Wood, 1996
  7. 7. A. N. Ra at, FO CU S yo ur FU TU RE Social Comparison goals motivation pleasure Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. selection Most informative: similar attributed other
  8. 8. Preferred comparison other during clinical rotations
  9. 9. Preferred comparison other during clinical rotations peer students 1 2 3 4 5 residents 1 2 3 4 5 staff 1 2 3 4 5 never always N 437 t-test p.001 Raat et al, 2010 (3.64) (3.40) (2.84) p.001
  10. 10. Intermezzo Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself.
  11. 11. ambitious empathic insecure Social Comparison Orientation Buunk et al, 2007
  12. 12. Influence of SC
  13. 13. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
  14. 14. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
  15. 15. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
  16. 16. Influence of SC and gender
  17. 17. Influence of SC and same sex female female worse similar better male male worse similar better participants participants -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107)
  18. 18. Influence of SC and opposite sex female female male worse similar better male worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107)-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
  19. 19. SCO upward positive Process of comparison: model Buunk et al, 1997 identification endow sense of opportunities provide information how to improve anticipate on problems / threats
  20. 20. SCO upward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification discourage no benefit
  21. 21. SCO downward positive Process of comparison: model contrast inspiring self-confidence integrity respect support
  22. 22. SCO downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification discourage lower your standard
  23. 23. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model Buunk et al, 1997 contrast identification identification
  24. 24. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification identification
  25. 25. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification identification
  26. 26. SCO upward downward positive negative contrast identification identification integrity respect support
  27. 27. A. N. Ra at, FO CU S yo ur FU TU RE Social Comparison goals motivation pleasure Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. selection
  28. 28. Social comparison

×