• Save
Adaptive Disaster Risk Reduction
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
750
On Slideshare
710
From Embeds
40
Number of Embeds
4

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
2

Embeds 40

http://unjobs.org 27
http://conftool.grforum.net 7
http://www.idrc.info 5
http://users.unjobs.org 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Global Risk Forum Davos 2012 Adaptive Disaster Risk Reduction PD. Dr.-Ing Joern Birkmann Head of Section, UNU-EHS Bonn, Germany
  • 2. A changing climate leads to changes in extremeweather and climate events 2
  • 3. Since 1950, extreme hot days and heavyprecipitation have become more common There is evidence that anthropogenic influences, including increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, have changed these extremes 3
  • 4. New challenges for DRR  Need for adaptive DRR and adjustments of international response ◯ Increase planning horizon and work with multi-hazard approach ◯ Improve the consideration of future CC- hazards into response & reconstruction ◯ Rethink: time and spatial scales of DRR ◯ Evaluate the adaptiveness of DRR measures (e.g. EW, evacuation concepts etc.)
  • 5. Humanitarian aid & DRR  Revisit existing norms and management approaches in times of crises and disasters  Strengthen the focus on how disasters might also function as a catalyst for change and resilience building  Evaluate the adaptiveness of DRR measures (e.g. EW, evacuation concepts etc.)  Improve the link between crises management, rehabilitation and climate resilient development  More strategic evaluation, e.g. establishment of DRR- CCA checklist  Potential to extend standards, e.g. SPHERE, to coordinate action of climate change and development stakeholders?  Incorporate DRR and CCA in bilateral agreements
  • 6. Analysis of tools - priorities Key thematic areas Selected priority tools(based on HFA & Cardona et al. based on expert inteviews 2005) Identification and Risk and vulnerability assessment understanding of risk Reduction of underlying risk Planning and social development factors Disaster preparedness and Early warning systems (EWS) emergency management National policy and legal frameworks Institutional capacities and and financial mechanisms financial mechanisms
  • 7. Adapting DRR tools Risk and vulnerability Assessment • Resolution of CC projections • Accounting for different and dynamic exposure •Scenarios of vulnerability •Coping and adaptation capacities. • Timescales •Creeping changes
  • 8. Increasing exposure of people and assets has been the major cause of changes in disaster losses (IPCC 2012)Specific types of urban development and rural-urban migration mightincrease the exposure of people to floods (example Mekong Delta VN)(Photo: Krause 2012) 8
  • 9. Challenges for Adaptation and DRR (Photos: Birkmann 2011; Map Source: Garschagen et al. 2012)The main challenge for local adaptation to climate extremes is to apply a balanced portfolio of approaches as a one-size-fits all strategy may prove limiting for some places and stakeholders. (IPCC 2012, p. 295)While structural measures provide some protection from disasters, they may also create a false sense of safety. (IPCC 2012, p. 293)Conflicts between governmental and non-governmental strategies and norms can generate additional vulnerabilities. (IPCC 2012, p. 86)
  • 10. Conclusions• We observe an emerging cooperation between Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation research (IPCC SREX). This cooperation has also to be strengthened in various countries, e.g. between different ministries (MoNRE – MARD).• Exposure and vulnerability are dynamic. Hence we need also to develop different scenarios for vulnerability and risks (in addition to climate change scenarios).• Vulnerability and risk assessment as well as adaptation strategies need to combine different data and knowledge sources as well as methodologies.• Lastly, we have to critically review DRR measures that worked in the past (e.g. dyke construction), but might not work in the future.
  • 11. PD Dr. Joern BirkmannUNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITYInstitute for Environmentand Human Security (UNU-EHS)Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 1053113 Bonn, GermanyPhone: ++ 49 (0) 228 815-0208Fax: ++ 49 (0) 228 815-0299E-Mail: birkmann@ehs.unu.edu 11