Malone D2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Malone D2

on

  • 107 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
107
Views on SlideShare
107
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Malone D2 Malone D2 Presentation Transcript

  • WASHINGTON STATE SUPERINTENDENTS AND K-12 ONLINE LEARNING: LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS, CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES Glenn E. Malone4/11/2012 D2
  • Malone 2012 Examine the perceptions, interpretations, and reactions of K-12 superintendents in Washington in response to the rapid growth of online learning Purpose
  • Malone 2012 Research Questions Q1 What are the issues that impede or support the implementation of online learning as perceived by Washington superintendents? Q2 What do Washington superintendents identify as the purposes for online learning? Q3 What recommendations do Washington superintendents suggest for successful implementation of online learning? Q4 How does district size, years of experience, and online status affect superintendent perceptions of the online learning environment?
  • 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 Total Respondents 70% 287 201 Respondents Malone 2012 # of Superintendents
  • 9% 22% 14% 17% 14% 11% 13% District Size Less than 100 students 100 – 500 students 501 – 1,000 students 1,001 – 2,500 students 2,501 – 5,000 students 5,001 – 10,000 students 10,000+ students Respondents Malone 2012
  • 25% 33% 18% 24% Years Experience as Superintendent 0-3 years 4-7 years 8-11 years 12+ years Respondents Malone 2012
  • 19% 16% 65% Online Status Not offering Considering Currently offering Respondents Malone 2012
  • Q1 ISSUES Financial Quality Regulations Findings Malone 2012
  • ISSUE: FINANCIAL  “I am deeply troubled by districts using online learning to make money.”  “I have issues with the choice and the way some programs target recruit, even though they are not supposed to target.”  “If a district wants to use on-line resources for it's own students that’s fine, but when they go out to other districts to steal students, there is a problem.”  “It is clearly a method for school districts to add additional funds to the district. School districts in Washington State have used this process, knowingly, to pirate students from districts.”  “When funding for online students is not at 100% it is hard to support this option!”  “With reduced revenue, our district is not able to afford online learning this year.”  “The STATE needs to help fund online learning, not the district. We are already UNDERFUNDED! “  “Currently, online learning is viewed as a way for districts to make money, though few will admit.”  “It is becoming a cash cow for a lot of districts.”  “With declining resources how can we possibly allocate funds that we don't have to researching these opportunities. They are important but we are just "trying to survive" right now!”  “Schools shouldn't be penalized when they live in our district and our dollars go to a distant learning school.”  “Some districts inappropriately access huge amounts of FTE $$; at the expense of other districts.”  “We are forced to provide these programs now in order to keep some kids enrolled. Create the program or lose the FTE.”  “Online learning is a money making proposition that some schools have gotten involved in. I believe the growth of online programs runs more in line with the economic challenges in front of us than the "opportunity for kids". It's all about the money!”  “ I am very skeptical of the motives of private companies and some school districts' purposes. While it is not likely generalizable, my perception is that in some instances there is more interest in making money than with teaching and learning.”  “Online learning is good, but is an extreme cost to districts and/or parents.”  “ We provide on-line learning to 150-200 students. 50 are from our own district. The others from across the state. We could not offer either without the other. We need 150-200 to break even ... and we still lose money compared to bricks and mortar schools.” Findings Malone 2012
  • ISSUE: QUALITY  “The harm to local districts comes when the parents get sick of baby sitting and send the student back to the home district and we have to pick up the loss of academic gains.”  “I also have issue with the quality of some of the programs, since these students often end up back in our system with inadequate skills/learning.”  “We find that students that come back to us from an online program have significant deficits in their learning.”  “It is curious that in a time when businesses are looking for better soft skills we are moving to a more individualized, isolated way of learning.”  I worry that online programs that may be legally sufficient are not necessarily quality programs that provide an alternative pathway for student success, but they do provide dollars to a district.  “We have many students that waive out of our district in to WAVA or the like. These students, when they return to us, come back with deficits in their learning.”  “It got a bad start - some programs poor quality.”  “I have never heard, in my experience, whether or not these programs make an impact on student learning.”  “It is often an excuse for parents to avoid issues presented them in a school setting. Those students are unsuccessful in online schools and then public school has to clean the mess up again.”  “Quality of on line learning courses vary dramatically and need validation of quality of program.”  “Many statewide programs are all about the numbers. Educating students is secondary to their mission.”  “Some district are offering full online classes that in my opinion lack quality and academic integrity.”  “It is essential that Washington have quality options for online learning. Quality rather than cost should be the focus.”  “The quality of instruction is even more widely varied than in regular school.”  “The motives are overwhelmingly financial.” Findings Malone 2012
  • ISSUE: REGULATION  “I oppose the process and the lack of regulation from OSPI in addressing this growing problem.”  “Online should be part of basic education, if specific requirements and guidelines are set up to hold districts accountable, yet allow the flexibility to meet their own students' needs.”  “They have to be regulated to weed out the money grabbers from the legitimate educators.”  “It is too easy for students with little support and challenging personal issues to transfer out of their home district in to a program they perceive to be easy.”  “Living in the midst of school districts trying to push the limits of the new laws to "bring in FTE", I am a bit jaded at this point.”  “The ever changing funding for ALE makes investment risky.”  “The idea that some schools profit from online courses with FTE, and that other school loose FTE is difficult.”  “State agencies need to work together to remove road blocks to online learning.”  “Splitting enrollment with districts who 'harvest' our students by offering them classes if they enroll in their online program is hurting small districts who are already experiencing declining enrollment. There needs to be a way where the state provides, as part of basic education, online programs that are affordable and do not take away from the district's FTE.”  “The state taking away 20% of the funding AND opening their own online competition is definitely an issue!” Findings Malone 2012
  • Malone 2012 Findings 1.95 2.1 2.15 2.35 2.41 2.48 2.64 2.8 2.82 2.82 2.85 2.94 3.17 3.21 3.22 3.31 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 19. Financial Burden on Parents 25. Easy to Pass 18. Diminishes Parent Invlvmt 17. Financial Burden on Schools 16. Increased Inequities 27. Void of Diversity Issues 21. Teacher/Student Interactions 26. Detracts from Community 31. Create Policy Limits 24. Isolates Students 22. Tech Skills Needed 23. Best for 6th – 12th grade 29. Gain Support 30. Adequate Computers 33. Trained Teachers 32. Manage Records Q1 ISSUES Disagree Agree
  • Q2 PURPOSES Flexibility Individualization Options Findings Malone 2012
  • PURPOSE: FLEXIBILITY  Scheduling Flexibility (M=3.23)  “To provide flexible opportunities for students in a system that is traditionally not flexible.”  “Online Learning allows us to provide students with an opportunity to fulfill graduation requirements when they need to accrue credits.”  “It gives students options and opportunities in a variety of situations young students get themselves into.” Findings Malone 2012
  • PURPOSE: INDIVIDUALIZATION  Meeting Individual Student Needs (M=3.13)  “Not all students learn the same way. Online learning gives those students an opportunity for an education who may not be able to attend a brick and mortar school for specific reasons.”  “Online learning seems best suited to meeting unique, individual needs rather than serving large numbers of students.” Findings Malone 2012
  • PURPOSE: OPTIONS  Expanding Course Options (M=3.11)  “Online learning is a tool used in creating a continuum of services to meet the mission of ensuring the learning of all our children.”  “Online learning seems best suited to meeting unique, individual needs rather than serving large numbers of students.”  “Online learning allows us to provide students with an opportunity to fulfill graduation requirements when they need to accrue credits.” Findings Malone 2012
  • Q2 PURPOSES  “I do not believe the purpose(s) of online learning align with the practice.”  “I believe districts "rip off" the system and have lost site of the purpose.”  “There is a considerable gap between the stated 'potential' for on- line learning and its actual implementation, which is profit-driven.” Findings Malone 2012
  • Malone 2012 Findings 1.95 1.96 2.67 2.68 2.79 2.79 2.88 2.94 3.11 3.13 3.23 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 9. Provide Financial Resources 6. Solution to Teacher Shortage 14. Develops Tech Skills 12. Home School 8. Individualized Instruction 5. Avoid Scheduling Conflict 11. Special Needs 7. Advanced Placement Selection 4. Offer Unavailable Courses 10. Homebound Students 13. Flexible Learning Disagree Agree Q2 PURPOSES
  • Q3 RECOMMENDATIONS Blending Individualization Regulations Examination Findings Malone 2012
  • RECOMMENDATIONS: BLENDING  “Face-to-face contact remains critical to maintaining an effective and sustained online learning program.”  “Traditional and online learning together produce the best results.”  “Strong face-to-face student-to-teacher relationships and interactions are essential as the mainstay of K-12 education.”  “Teachers are still an important component of online learning. The human connection is critical.”  “Online learning and blended classrooms are the future of education. We as educators must have the vision to allow these programs in our existing schools to support and enhance our more traditional academic programs.” Findings Malone 2012
  • RECOMMENDATIONS: INDIVIDUALIZATION  “Online learning provides an opportunity for students who do not fit in the traditional classroom setting.”  “It's a tool used in creating a continuum of services to meet the mission of ensuring the learning of all our children. Not a whipping post for legislators and short sighted educators who may be afraid of change.” Findings Malone 2012
  • RECOMMENDATIONS: REGULATIONS  “OSPI needs to create reasonable reporting requirements and funding formulas.”  “I think a variety of on-line learning options should be offered to WA students, through the OSPI, and not through individual districts.”  “If the state wants to support online learning, they provide a "school", take a slice of the pie and the home district keeps the kid.”  “Regulate the funding of online learning very carefully from OSPI. Make an effort to limit abuse from revenue generating interests.”  “Provide via statewide model so districts are not competing for students.”  “Online programs, if offered to the public, should be offered and controlled 100% by OSPI.”  “Develop stronger policies that discourage fly-by-night providers that create a churn in student enrollments for profit.”  “Vetted courses should be made available at no cost to districts, funded by the state, so that access to educational services does not become even more inequitable.” Findings Malone 2012
  • RECOMMENDATIONS: EXAMINATION  “Good grief, how many more hours should a young person spend in a virtual versus actual experience?”  “Online programs exacerbate the problems of regular schools, rather than solve them.”  “In general, online learning is not a meaningful learning experience.”  “We cannot afford to bury our heads in the sand on this issue. Technology will continue to infuse itself into education; we can embrace it or get choked by it.”  “The decision to offer online programming should be based on student need, not the administrative prejudices or limitations of the adults in the system.”  “We are all convinced that the 'breakthrough strategy' for improving the quality of instruction that students receive, and for improving the quality of professional learning for teachers, is the meaningful collaboration (PLC) of teachers who share students and content. This is not a feature of online instruction, and in fact online programs are a step backward toward isolation of practice and norms of autonomy vs. the norms of collaboration we have been working to establish.” Findings Malone 2012
  • Q4 DEMOGRAPHIC AFFECT Experience District Size Online Status Findings Malone 2012 ALE FA IO 21st LC
  • DEMOGRAPHIC: EXPERIENCE Findings Malone 2012  Correlations in each of the subscales to the superintendent’s Number of Years of Experience were negligible with the exception of the Learner- Centered Instruction subscale.  There was a small positive correlation to the superintendent’s Number of Years of Experience and perceptions that the virtual school offers Learner- Centered Instruction (r=0.107, n=191, p=0.141)  Superintendents’ perceptions of the Alternate Learning Environment and Instructional Options were not affected by the Number of Years of Experience.  The mean level of agreement for the Alternate Learning Environment and Instructional Options was unchanged respectively, from 0 to 12+ years of experience.  Overall, superintendents were in agreement that the virtual school provides an Alternative Learning Environment, viable Instructional Options and 21st Century Skills.  Finally, superintendents disagreed that virtual schools offered a Fiscal Advantage.
  • Malone 2012 Findings IO ALE 21 LC FA 0-3 years 3.01 2.93 2.92 2.34 1.88 4-7 years 3.05 2.98 2.78 2.46 1.97 8-11 years 3.02 2.92 2.98 2.57 1.73 12+ years 2.93 2.92 2.91 2.51 2.03 3.05 2.98 2.78 2.46 1.97 3.02 2.92 2.98 2.57 1.73 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 Agree Superintendent Perceptions by Experience Disagree Q4
  • Malone 2012 Findings 1.88 1.97 1.73 2.03 3.01 3.05 3.02 2.93 2.34 2.46 2.57 2.51 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 0-3 years 4-7 years 8-11 years 12+ years Superintendent Perceptions by Experience ALE FA IO 21 LC Q4 Agree Disagree
  • DEMOGRAPHIC: DISTRICT SIZE  There was a significant small positive correlation between School District Size and Alternate Learning Environment (r=0.157, n=191, p=0.030).  Superintendents of schools with over 10,000 students had a higher mean level of agreement on the Alternate Learning Environment subscale (M=3.18, SD=.56) than Superintendents of schools with less than 1,000 students (M=2.87, SD =.49).  As school district size increased, superintendents agreed more strongly that the virtual school offers an Alternate Learning Environment.  The data suggested that District Size did not influence superintendents’ perceptions of Fiscal Advantage. Findings Malone 2012
  • Malone 2012 Findings IO ALE 21 LC FA < 1,000 2.98 2.87 2.87 2.36 1.97 1,001-2,500 2.99 3 2.78 2.55 1.89 2,501-5,000 2.92 2.88 2.89 2.61 1.85 5,001-10,000 3.02 2.95 3.06 2.45 1.96 10,000+ 3.19 3.18 2.92 2.56 1.83 2.92 2.88 2.89 2.61 1.85 3.19 3.18 2.92 2.56 1.83 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 Agree Superintendent Perceptions by District Size Disagree Q4
  • Malone 2012 Findings 1.97 1.89 1.85 1.96 1.83 2.98 2.99 2.92 3.02 3.19 2.36 2.55 2.61 2.45 2.56 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 < 1000 1001-2500 2501-5000 5001-10000 10000+ Superintendent Perceptions by District Size ALE FA IO 21 LC Q4 Agree Disagree
  • DEMOGRAPHIC: ONLINE STATUS  There was a small positive correlation between the district’s Online Status and four of the subscales; two of which were significant.  Correlations were significant for the Alternate Learning Environment (r=0.280, n=191, p=0.000) and the 21st Century Skills subscales (r=0.171, n=191, p=0.017.)  The Superintendent of districts currently offering online classes agreed more strongly than those not offering online classes that the virtual school provides an avenue for students to experience an Alternate Learning Environment (M=3.02 and 2.61, respectively) and engage in 21st Century Skills (M=2.96 and 2.63, respectively).  Finally, the data suggested that districts’ Online Status did not influence Superintendents’ perceptions of Fiscal Advantage. Findings Malone 2012
  • Malone 2012 Findings IO ALE 2I LC FA Not Offering 2.88 2.61 2.63 2.29 1.99 Considering 3.02 3.02 2.84 2.53 1.90 Currently Offering 3.03 3.02 2.96 2.49 1.91 2.88 2.61 2.63 2.29 1.99 3.03 3.02 2.96 2.49 1.91 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 Agree Superintendent Perception by Online Status Disagree Q4
  • Malone 2012 Findings Q4 1.99 1.9 1.91 2.88 3.02 3.03 2.63 2.84 2.96 2.29 2.53 2.49 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 Not Offering Considering Currently Offering Superintendent Perception by Online Status ALE FA IO 21 LC Disagree Agree
  • RECOMMENDATIONS (P. 85) Regional Adaptive Dialogic Work Statewide Superintendent Forums Accountability Legislation Blended Online Learning National Alignment with CCSS Disseminate these results Recommendations Malone 2012
  • FUTURE RESEARCH (P. 86) Case Study of Specific Superintendents Online Learning Effectiveness Equitable Access Longitudinal Study of Students Student Perceptions Funding Models w/out Charter Future Research Malone 2012
  • PERSONAL REVELATION (P. 84)  The research questions for this study sought to describe the issues that impede or support the implementation of online learning with the underlying assumption that online learning should be implemented.  Superintendents go beyond just the implementation of online learning and distinctly express the issues and their warranted concerns of online learning itself.  The superintendents in this study send a clear message; online learning may not be “the” way but “a” way to improve student learning.  The privatization of public education is at the center of the debate. When profit is the motive, superintendents’ perceptions are suspicious, leery and jaded.  While some would contend that choice and competition between districts improves customer service, others believe that competing for students and the dollars attached is an unreliable and foolhardy way to run a public school system. This study suggests some superintendents consider some colleagues as part of the problem; animosity and bitterness are evident among superintendents. Those same superintendents view their colleagues as shortsighted and close-minded. Conclusion Malone 2012