0
The Chemical and Biological Detection Market:
           Not So Toxic After All


        Ryan Hendrix, Industry Analyst
 ...
Focus Points


    Total Market Overview
•


    Major Trends
•


    Market Challenges
•


    Market Drivers
•


    Key...
Market Introduction




                 source: http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/photos/WWII/Preps/WW2-Prep.htm




           ...
Total Chemical and Biological Detection Market Revenue

                                                                  ...
Chemical Detection Market - Trends


                           • More and more companies are realizing the demand for Rug...
Biological Detection Market - Trends


                       • Government RDT&E and procurement spending increased for fi...
Chemical Detection Market - Challenges




                                                                  High DoD Stan...
Biological Detection Market - Challenges

    Government spending leans toward bio-
•




                                ...
Chemical Detection Market - Drivers

                                                         Length of arrow indicates re...
Biological Detection Market - Drivers

                                                                 Length of arrow in...
Total U.S. Chemical and Biological Detection Market

                                            Total Chemical and Biolog...
Total U.S. Chemical and Biological Detection Market



                                       Total Chemical and Biologica...
Key Participants

           Total Chemical/ Biological Company Market Share (U.S.), 2007




                            ...
Conclusion

                  Chemical/ Biological Company Market Assessment (U.S.), 2008


 High


                      ...
Next Steps

  Register for Frost & Sullivan’s Growth Opportunity Newsletter and keep
  abreast of innovative growth opport...
Your Feedback is Important to Us

          What would you like to see from Frost & Sullivan?

Growth Forecasts?

Competit...
For Additional Information


    To leave a comment, ask the analyst a question, download a
•
    copy, or receive the fre...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Frost and Sullivan Ananlyst Briefing: The Chemical and Biological Detection Market: Not So Toxic After All

2,163

Published on

The size of the U.S. chemical and biological markets has been increasing continuously. In 2007, the market was worth $195.3 million and had a CAGR of 16.1 percent from 2006 to 2012. The entire market is expected to increase to more than $200 million by 2012.

Industry Analyst, Ryan Hendrix will provide an overview of the current state of the Chemical and Biological Detection market. He will also discuss technology overviews, industry trends, key drivers, insights into important trends, and opportunities for growth.

Published in: Business, Technology
1 Comment
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,163
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
32
Comments
1
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Frost and Sullivan Ananlyst Briefing: The Chemical and Biological Detection Market: Not So Toxic After All"

  1. 1. The Chemical and Biological Detection Market: Not So Toxic After All Ryan Hendrix, Industry Analyst Aerospace and Defense December 17, 2008
  2. 2. Focus Points Total Market Overview • Major Trends • Market Challenges • Market Drivers • Key Participants • Major Findings • Conclusions • 2
  3. 3. Market Introduction source: http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/photos/WWII/Preps/WW2-Prep.htm 3
  4. 4. Total Chemical and Biological Detection Market Revenue $6.8 $2.1 Chemical& Biological Total Market (U.S.), 2006-2012 450.0 $35.3 400.0 $20.3 350.0 300.0 $62.8 $11.0 250.0 200.0 $ Million $ Million $ Million 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 $113.9 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $306.8 DoD DHS State & Local Other Fed Chemical& Biological Total Market (U.S.), 2007 $2.70 , 1% $27.10 , $136.50 , 14% 70% 2006 2012 $29 , 15% • The U.S. chemical and biological detection markets have had a high priority in receiving funds. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) comprises 70 percent of the total chemical and biological detection market. Note: All figures are rounded; the base year is 2007. Source: Frost & Sullivan 4
  5. 5. Chemical Detection Market - Trends • More and more companies are realizing the demand for Rugged systems Rugged Systems* • Smaller systems continue to be in demand by the military Product Miniaturization* • The DoD has set aside significant funding for projects involving chemical detection Multi-Detection Systems* • Identifying specific agents are in greater demand Identifying Agents* * Source: Microsoft Clip Art 5
  6. 6. Biological Detection Market - Trends • Government RDT&E and procurement spending increased for fixed- site air samplers Continuous Sampling* • Biological detection devices with reduced operating costs across all market segments Operating Costs* Immunoassay international first responders market has many potential • opportunities International First Responder Market* * Source: Microsoft Clip Art 6
  7. 7. Chemical Detection Market - Challenges High DoD Standards Long Procurement Cycles Highly Competitive Market State and Local Markets are Reaching Saturation High DoD Standards • Weak Long Procurement Cycles Can Keep • Challenges Potential Vendors Out of the Market Highly Competitive Market • Strong State and Local Markets are Reaching • Saturation Length of arrow indicates relative impact Source: Frost & Sullivan 7 .
  8. 8. Biological Detection Market - Challenges Government spending leans toward bio- • Lack of testing standards Devices for state and local must be listed on the AEL counter measures rather than detection Government spending leans toward bio- counter measures rather than detection Weak Lack of testing standards • Restraints Devices for State and Local must be listed on • the AEL Strong . Length of arrow indicates relative impact Source: Frost & Sullivan 8
  9. 9. Chemical Detection Market - Drivers Length of arrow indicates relative impact The Demand for More Advanced Detection • Equipment Strong Continued DoD and DHS spending on RDT&E detection The demand for more advanced detection systems Continued DoD spending on detection equipment Continued Spending on Detection • Equipment by Department of Defense Drivers Continued Spending on RDT&E by • Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security within the Detection Market Weak equipment Source: Frost & Sullivan 9
  10. 10. Biological Detection Market - Drivers Length of arrow indicates relative impact Persistent Fear of a Devastating Attack • Strong Delivers accurate results both in the lab and in field Increased DoD Expenditure • Drivers Need for Biological Detection Equipment that • Delivers Accurate Results Both in the Lab and in the Field Increased DoD Expenditure Persistent fear of an attack Weak Source: Frost & Sullivan 10
  11. 11. Total U.S. Chemical and Biological Detection Market Total Chemical and Biological Detection Market Spending by Segment (U.S.), 2006-2012 300.0 ($ Million) 200.0 100.0 0.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 113.9 136.5 159.3 193.5 241.4 276 306.8 DoD 11 29 34.8 46.8 54.9 59 62.8 DHS 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.7 4.5 5.7 6.8 Other Federal 20.3 27.1 28.4 31.2 34 34.6 35.3 State & Local Note: All figures are rounded; the base year is 2007. Source: Frost & Sullivan The U.S. military, which is the largest purchaser of chemical and biological agent detection equipment, has not reduced the number of programs and funding. The size of the U.S. chemical and biological markets continue to increase. 11
  12. 12. Total U.S. Chemical and Biological Detection Market Total Chemical and Biological Detection Market Spending by Category (U.S.), 2006-2012 500 400 ($ Million) 300 200 100 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 14 32.6 19.3 19.8 22.6 28.8 31.8 Services 36.1 59.4 125.8 155.9 180.6 185.9 195 RDT&E 97.7 103.3 80.5 99.5 131.6 160.6 184.9 Procurement Note: All figures are rounded; the base year is 2007. Source: Frost & Sullivan 12
  13. 13. Key Participants Total Chemical/ Biological Company Market Share (U.S.), 2007 10% Smiths Detection 24% General Dynamics-ATP ITT Ahura Scientific Hamilton Sundstrand 28% 2% AAI Engineering 3% U.S. Genomics 3% Idaho Technology 4% SESI Bechtel 5% 12% 4% Other 5% Source: Frost & Sullivan 13
  14. 14. Conclusion Chemical/ Biological Company Market Assessment (U.S.), 2008 High Most Attractive Markets Attractiveness Biological Detection Revenue Chemical Attractiveness Detection High Medium Low Low Market Open Significant Openness Market Barriers 14
  15. 15. Next Steps Register for Frost & Sullivan’s Growth Opportunity Newsletter and keep abreast of innovative growth opportunities (www.frost.com/news) Register for the next Chairman’s Series on Growth: The CEO's Growth Team™: Research & Development Driving Growth and Innovation (April 7th) (http://www.frost.com/growth) Join us at our 5th Annual Customer Contact Executive MindXchange April 19-22 2009, Bonita Springs, FL (www.frost.com/ccs) Request a proposal for a Growth Partnership Service to support you and your team to accelerate the growth of your company. (myfrost@frost.com) 1-877-GoFrost (1-877-463-7678) Follow Frost & Sullivan on-line at: http://twitter.com/Frost_Sullivan http://www.facebook.com/people/Frost-Sullivan/1131686497 15
  16. 16. Your Feedback is Important to Us What would you like to see from Frost & Sullivan? Growth Forecasts? Competitive Structure? Emerging Trends? Strategic Recommendations? Other? Please inform us by taking our survey. 16
  17. 17. For Additional Information To leave a comment, ask the analyst a question, download a • copy, or receive the free audio segment that accompanies this presentation, please contact Stephanie Ochoa, Analyst Briefing Coordinator, at (210) 247-2421 or via email, analystbriefings@frost.com. 17
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×