• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Why the us wants to attack iran
 

Why the us wants to attack iran

on

  • 315 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
315
Views on SlideShare
315
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Why the us wants to attack iran Why the us wants to attack iran Document Transcript

    • Why The US Wants To Attack IranTuesday, September 25, 2012 15:08BY WAR TARDLooks like the US is playing musical chairs with its carrier groups in the Gulf of Oman.The USS Stennis Carrier Group moved to the Indian Ocean last week so the US could transitanother carrier, the Abraham Lincoln, through the Straits of Hormuz just to remind theIranians how screwed they’d be if the shooting starts. The carrier was escorted by the cruiserUSS Cape St. George, two destroyers, the Royal Navy anti sub frigate HMS Argyll and even theFrench got an invite and sent along their own La Motte-Picquet anti sub frigate to fill out theinternational nature of the party. That’s pretty interesting and those frigates show the West’sconcern at the Iranian submarine threat and the small chance that the Iranians might manageto land a torp in the nuke belly of a carrier. Sure, it’s unlikely but the Chinese did manage tosneak a diesel powered sub into the middle of a carrier group during USN exercises off Taiwanin 2006. So nothing’s impossible. Also, the USS Enterprisecarrier group is on its way and dueto arrive in the Gulf in March which is an interesting choice considering it’s the oldest nukecarrier in the US fleet, secretly nicknamed the “Mobile Chernobyl” by sailors and due to bedecommissioned later this year. Warships passing through the Strait are pretty typical movesbut a combined US, UK and French flotilla is unusual and reeks of dick waving to show thepesky Persians what they might be dealing with if they try any ‘funny stuff’ like miningHormuz and blocking world oil supply.Grab popcorn but don’t microwave it just yet.I still say this war is way too scary to enter a shooting phase but that’s only because I want tobelieve Western leaders are not insane. And I keep getting proved wrong on that point. Thisweek’s naval moves off the Iranian coast had me rummaging through my library for obligatorySun Tzu quotes and the best I could come up with was ”Engage people with what theyexpect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles theminto predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for theextraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.” The Euros came up with anextraordinary moment of their own this week by way of an oil embargo on Iranian oilpurchases that won’t take effect till June and is actually a subtle attempt to stop this warfrom entering the shooting phase. It’s a move designed to appease the trigger happy US andIsrael so they don’t go straight to the bombers and risk setting the world on fire. Of course,the Israelis are still not happy and don’t believe it’ll stop that theater parity Shia nuke.Truth is, nothing is going to stop that nuke.Even if the US and Israel do conduct air strikes on Iran’s 15 nuke sites, they still can’tphysically damage an idea. The Iranian nuke program is diversified enough that even aconcerted bombing campaign can at best only delay it a few years. Nobody can put the
    • nuclear genie back in the bottle anymore. So this week I got to thinking of this war in widerglobal proxy resource war terms and that’s when things started making more sense.Iran is sitting on the fourth largest oil deposit on the planet and has huge reserves of naturalgas and that’s a sweet energy prize by any account. It’s kind of like Inca gold and the SpanishMain in the 16th century… everybody wants a piece of the action. The fun thing about oil isthat while it’s in the ground, its value is theoretical but not actual. That’s actually a plus. Forexample, when the West grabbed Iraqi oil, they didn’t go in right away and start extractingspice like Hungry Hippos. That oil is fine where it is for now. It is control of the real estateabove the deposit and a say in how and at what rate those reserves get extracted that reallymatters. And that’s why the Green Zone in Baghdad houses the largest US embassy in theworld even after the US pulled out combat troops. Sure, the US can let foreign competitors into extract the spice and sub contract the work out to other nations, but so long as oil is adollar based commodity, US economic hegemony of world energy remains intact.The interesting player here in all this is China. Though a long way from being a militarysuperpower, its economic power is rising fast, so fast that the US and Europe fear the loss oftraditional Western dominance of the global economy. The gaping weakness of the Chineserise is energy supply. And without a credible naval fleet to protect the flow of spice, theweakness of China gets exposed… Chinese dependence on sea borne oil delivery and theirsusceptibility to a blockade sometime in our proxy resource war future. What the West reallyfears here in the global energy game of Risk, is Iran having unfettered control of its own hugeenergy reserves, selling those reserves outside the dollar to geopolitical rivals (China) andfacilitating the rise of a pan Pacific hegemon that could contest Western dominance at somepoint later this century.That’s why Iran is in the cross hairs.
    • Their whole nuke program is symbolic of their determination not to play nice in the petrodollar chessgame and the question remains, will they get Tomahawked this year because of it?Let’s get to the fun stuff.How would this war play out if the US does attack Iran? In a nutshell, really badly for Iran.Initially at least. The problem for the Iranians is their dated air defence system based mainlyaround the Soviet S-200 system. For perspective, Gaddafi fielded this against the US whenReagan bombed Libya in 1986 and even pre stealth F-111s managed to do serious damage forthe loss of only one plane. These days, with modern EW jamming in the mix, the US and Israelwill dominate the skies above Iran unopposed. Also, the US already knows where all these S-200 sites are which makes them really easy to target. Every time those fixed SAM radarantenna get switched on for maintenance or calibration it’s like painting a big fat bulls eye onyour air defense network. That goes for the more mobile Soviet Tor (SA-15) system too even ifit can drive around, stop, find a target and drive off again. Strangely, the Iranians do have afighter wing of Shah era US F-14 Tomcats which is pretty funny when you imagine someflailing Persian Top Gun Maverick trying to get a lock on a US bogey. In any possible strikescenario, Iran is pretty much defenseless against 5th generation Western tech. Along with theusual rain of Tomahawk missiles, air delivered bunker busters and the Israelis ruthlesslyfollowing up behind, Iran is going to wake up the morning after the raid with a serioushangover. And, I suppose, this is where we get to the the really interesting question.What will the Iranian response be?There are so many options it’s hard to keep track. One option not often discussed is theconcept of Iranian restraint. I’ve thought about this lately and it does have merits if you’rean Iranian general. What happens if they do nothing? Sure, it’s a long shot. But what happensif the Iranians let the world see reactors on fire, spewing radiation across the Persianlandscape, broadcast pictures of dead babies to the world and try to play this out in thegladiatorial arena of world opinion? You just got sucker punched for a nuclear weapon youdon’t even have. In a social media world, the idea that Iran could play the wounded stoichere is a viable option and could be worth a try to make it clear who the real ‘bad guys’are.Another reason why I like the idea from the point of view of their crazy theocracy is thatgetting bombed usually results in the “London Blitz effect”. Getting bombed by externalenemies rallys populations around whatever power structure happens to be in place and surewould hurt CIA funded opposition groups operating in Iran. All those Green revolution kids onthe streets of Tehran getting whipped and shot by Basij thugs would suddenly swing rogue ifan external enemy bombed their mom’s house.Smart leaders in history like Churchill capitalized on stuff like that.The problem with politicians and the religious freaks who run countries these days is that theyare rarely that smart. The Iranian theocracy is no different. So the question remains, do theIranians go loud and bust out their myriad asymmetrical options and retaliate against thebombers once Natanz is burning? Who knows? Let’s examine the Iranian options:
    •  Unleash a thousand speed boats and mine the Straits of Hormuz back to the Stone Age. Oil price hits $200 a barrel until US/Euro/Japanese minesweepers clear the Strait. It’ll take two months to declare the all clear. Meanwhile, in the West, we cry like babies because feeding our car hurts, bread has doubled in price and nobody can afford a new flatscreen. The Iranians launch their limited supply of Shahab IIIs against Israeli population centers. Tel Aviv gets hit and the Israelis launch a reciprocal strike on the civilian population of Tehran. The doomsday Iranian theocracy doesn’t like it. Escalation possibilities ensue. A nuclear missile versus chemical missile war. Mass casualties happen on your TV. (Unlikely). The Iranians launch Chinese Silkworm missiles (and Shahab IIIs) across the Persian Gulf, hit Saudi oil installations like Ras Tanura and set the world economy on fire. The world enters a new paradigm of what the fuck? Oil hits $300 a barrel, food prices double and you wish you were a farmer who could grow his own food. The Iranians engage in proxy warfare and pressure Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon to bombard Tel Aviv with the thousands of missiles the Iranians have already supplied them with. The IDF responds with a massive attack on Southern Lebanon and attempts to rectify their ‘defeat’ in 2006. Thousands die but nobody cares in Western countries because food tastes nice. Iran activates their foreign asymmetrical “terrorist” cells in the US and Europe, they blow up stuff in Western cities and make already unruly citizens decry another bullshit war that didn’t have to be. Meanwhile, Western countries turn into police states because everybody could be a terrorist. Oh wait, that’s already happened. The Iranians do nothing, lament their dead babies and garner worldwide everyman support because they’re just another victim of globalization and the ongoing corporate takeover of the world’s real estate. Occupy Wall Street protesters finally start wrecking shit. What’s most disturbing is that Western leaders seem prepared to play this casino game of chance. How will the Chinese and Russians react if Iran is burning? That’s the real question in this whole cluster fuck. China is a major buyer of Iranian oil. Russia has provided enriched uranium and scientists to run the Iranian reactor at Bushehr since 2009. If Russian nationals die in that attack and if that destroyed reactor is spewing Fukushima levels of radiation across the landscape, what’s next? The Russians may be happy to issue stern protests at the UN while secretly laughing to themselves as oil, Russia’s main export, pushes beyond the $150 dollar a barrel mark; the mark that crashed the world economy in 2008. Since the Russians rely on oil exports to keep their economy flowing ($110 a barrel oil is the estimated minimum price to keep that former superpower economically growing and appease their restless but dwindling population), the Russians will benefit from the US and Israel’s stupid war against Iran. China, on the other hand, will be pissed. With the just announced Euro embargo, the Chinese have already started demanding discounts on Iranian oil. If there’s one thing you can say about the Chinese, they’re smart as hell and playing the long game. 5000 years of contiguous history and Sun Tzu can’t be wrong. They will see a Western attack on Iran as yet another chess move to block their economic growth and secretly take note of who their real enemy is.
    • One billion people can’t be wrong as they continue to conscript their cheap village labor intofactories to supply American Wal Marts with cheap plastic goods. For now. Even if Iran isburning, China could be smart, like they’ve always been, and yet again play the waitinggame. In the wake of a US/Israeli attack on Iran’s nuke sites, China and Russia will supply theIranians with military technology to prevent such an attack from ever happening again. It’llbe a Rubicon moment in their eyes, the moment when the Western energy lust went a bridgetoo far. Hell, the Iranians might finally receive a shipment of the Russian S-300/400 SAMsystem that would make a repeat attack orders of magnitude more difficult for foreign airforces. But, of course, it’ll take a year to train Iranian crews in the operation of thatsophisticated 5th generation technology. The Russian S-400 SAM system… The Iranian dream…Meanwhile, we’re all living in Blade Runner.Let’s face it, the US, the Euros, the Russians, the Chinese, India, Pakistan and the Israelis willeventually have to face the truth of what Oppenheimer unleashed in the New Mexican desertin 1945. This is what Oppenheimer said after the first nuke exploded on earth. It still gives meshivers… “We knew the world would not be the same. Few people laughed, few people cried,most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress himtakes on his multi-armed form and says, “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”In the coming 21st century sci fi dystopia future world, every nation of consequence is goingto have nukes. Does Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD philosophy) mean we upright apes getto escape our fate?No nation wants World War III right now.But then again, no nation ever wanted a World War ever and yet we dumb humans alwaysmanage to stumble into one. That’s if 20th century history is anything to go by.2012 is starting to feel like 1912 all over again.
    • http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2012/09/why-the-us-wants-to-attack-iran- 2445718.html?currentSplittedPage=0 Related Stories Everyone Hates Government Lunch An 82-page analysis concludes that Israel is currently the greatest threat to US national interests Israel Lobbyist suggests False Flag Attack to facilitate war with Iran Obama Won’t Bow to Israel? Yeah, Right. No One in Arizona Could Write this Story and Live Washington state’s first ‘zombie bees’ reported; parasite causes bees to fly erratically, die American High School Band Marches with Hammer & Sickle Panic cash withdrawals in Spain drain banks; Greece-style economic implosion now imminent President Ahmadinejad 2012 Interview With Piers Morgan Milwaukee Police Ignore Derek Williams Pleas For Help, Wait For Him To Die!