• Like
  • Save
Merkel putin
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Merkel putin

on

  • 244 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
244
Views on SlideShare
244
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Merkel putin Merkel putin Document Transcript

    • Naročnik.:E.S. Vse pravice pridržane V imenu E.S. ( 6280 lobbyist project ) Boris Kaludjerski Matić Komen 52 6223 Komen Slovenija boris.matic@gmail.com +38641859249 MERKEL & PUTIN FACT-FINDING MISSION “CONTACT GROUP” BERLIN March 2, 2014
    • 2 Contents A.: MILITARY CONFLICT ................................................................................................................................. 4 RUSSIAN AGENDA.......................................................................................................................................... 5 EU/USA AGENDA........................................................................................................................................... 6 NATO/RUSSIAN FORCES ................................................................................................................................ 7 SOLUTION ( CONTACT GROUP ) .................................................................................................................... 8 ONE OF THE EXAMPLES OF COMMON GOALS : ( 22-2-2014 ) ...................................................................... 9 B.: ECONOMIC CONFLICT ............................................................................................................................ 10 SOLUTION ( CONTACT GROUP ) .................................................................................................................. 11 E.S. INTERVENTION IN UKRAINE.................................................................................................................. 12
    • 3 The German government says Russian President Vladimir Putin accepted a proposal by Chancellor Angela Merkel for a fact-finding mission and a "contact group" on Ukraine that could be led by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Government spokesman Georg Streiter said the proposal came in a telephone conversation Sunday in which Merkel accused Putin of breaking international law with the "unacceptable Russian intervention in Crimea." The "contact group," which Merkel's foreign minister floated earlier Sunday, would be aimed at getting dialogue going between Russia and Ukraine. ( ABC news/media, 02-03-2014 ) ( Lobbyist observatory group ) E. S. recommendations : E.S. ask itself two questions. How to solve military conflict ? How to solve economic conflict ? All recommendations must be based on rapid execution, with realistic goals of finding solution to block escalating global diplomatic conflicts in a window frame of opportunity of less than 15 days. Into account were taken interests of : Ukraine EU Russia signatories of Bratislava memorandum ( 1994 ) non EU countries ( USA/CANADA/CHINA ) Ukraine military forces Russian military forces Nato ( EU ) military forces Common goal is to avoid possible scenario of dividing Ukraine, resolve military and economic conflict through actions of “ contact group “. Solution represents one of many open options and it’s intention is, that creates open maneuver space frame of improvements between agreed parties. E.S. was asked 03-03-2014 from governmental body of EU representatives to create brief statement of possible real solutions for quick implementation
    • 4 A.: MILITARY CONFLICT UKRAINE : MEMORANDUM ON SECURITY ASSURANCES ( 1994 ) Signed parties : United states of America Russian federation United Kingdom of Great Britain Northern Ireland 1. The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act, to respect the Independence and Sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine. Existing borders of Ukraine are in jeopardy. Russia went to Ukraine, to fulfill signed agreement of Ukraine memorandum. Russian decision is based on premise, that Ukraine government is a construct of coup d'état. In democratic countries, elected parliament represents citizens rights of human rights of elections. Collapse of national leadership in Ukraine, demands on Ukraine constitution, implementation of elections. EU/USA/NATO/RUSSIA agenda : ( open diplomatic problems )
    • 5 RUSSIAN AGENDA 1. New governmental body of Ukraine is a product of successful coup d'état. 2. Russia must defend it’s citizens and do it’s best to stop escalating violence which can emerge as option of dividing Ukraine 3. Russia as signed party of memorandum in 1994, is commited and bound by first paragrapfh of signed memorandum 4. It’s decision can be explained through terrorist occupation of parliament ( right wing extremist party PRAVY SEKTOR/other nazi parties ), attempt to annihilate russian rights in Ukraine, Ethnic intolerance between Ukrainian nation, escalating violence between governmental bodies and civil attacks on state authority, destruction of external media broadcasting, USA propaganda through Kerry announced speech ( 04-03-2014 ), extortion of Russian sovereignty through diplomatic boycott of G8 countries, threats to russian economy of boycotting their products, destroying russian import contracts, closing foreign embassies on russian territory, interpretation of russian help to obtain Sovereignty as russian invasion, complete withdrawal of diplomatic help to Russia from other members of signed memorandum in 1994 to resolve military, governmental and economic problems in Ukraine, destruction of 21-02-2014 agreement
    • 6 EU/USA AGENDA 1. coup d'état did not happen 2. There is no terrorist organization in Ukraine, PRAVY SEKTOR is peacefull partnership 3. Opposition which took control over Ukraine, after violent protest against coalition, is official government body 4. Russian intervention is casus belli on Ukraine territorial ground 5. Russia does not adhere to the signed agreement of memorandum on security assurances. Open diplomatic problems with interpretation of memorandum : We can argue that no country is obliged by memorandum by marking memorandum as diplomatic agreement. Memorandum doesn’t appeal on ongoing conflict between different diplomatic/economic interests and agenda of signed parties. This memorandum is such a complex problem, which can not be resolved in less than 15 days. We must agree on common denominator of conflict of interests : 1. Sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine are in danger 2. Some countries acknowledge new Ukrainian government, others don’t Treatment of this addresses are so complex on international level, it is unrealistically to anticipate common understanding between national foreign interests of Ukraine civil-war.
    • 7 NATO/RUSSIAN FORCES Another main problem is, again connected with governmental body of Ukraine. Who are “ they ” to ask for NATO help? Who are representatives of Ukraine governmental body to convene mobilization and open statement of Russian invasion? All we can agree on, that signed obligations from 21-2-2014, was discarded. Agreement to resolve crisis in Ukraine was signed by Ukrainian president Yanukovich, in mediaton attempt of Russia, France, Germany and Poland. NATO INVOLVEMENT Problems : 1. Ukraininan government is not internationally accepted, this body can not call for NATO intervention 2. Ukraine is not a NATO member, it’s still in phase of partnership of peace
    • 8 SOLUTION ( CONTACT GROUP ) By Russian premise of memorandum agreement ( 1994 ) to defend Ukraine Sovereignty, UK and USA, ( THROUGH NATO ), can also go in Ukraine to resolve Ukrainian civil war, by the same premise and by the same signed agreement ( 1994 ) UK and USA are NATO members. As it was stated before, NATO/RUSSIAN military forces must be in help of UKRAINE military forces, to keep Ukraine borders intact. We don’t have time, Ukraine bankruptcy is at the door in less than 360 hours. CONTACT GROUP can include a rapid reaction team to create a common body with NATO/RUSSIAN forces, to stabilise NATO/RUSSIAN military conflict. CONTACT GROUP can send EU/RUSSIAN observatory UN groups to obtain proven facts in “FACT-FINDING” mission. CONTACT GROUP between NATO/RUSSIAN forces, by the premise of signed memorandum in 1994, must have bilateral agreement on common objective.
    • 9 ONE OF THE EXAMPLES OF COMMON GOALS : ( 22-2-2014 ) It is required to establish a working military body and cooperation on the grounds of Ukraine, with RUSSIAN MILITARY FORCES AND NATO FORCES. Pact must be temporary and it’s mission objective : 1. Disarm protesters, and obtain stolen weapons back to Ukrainian military base. 2. Disband protesters occupation of ALL government buildings 3. Create an open invitation to election 4. Stop violence and protect Yanukovich and Yanukovich coalition members. ( E.S. diplomatic dispatch ) Schedule of events : we must avoid of expected wave of further Ukrainian region splitting, by Ukrainian province declaration of independece, we must avoid additional false flag attempts, and create a common understanding of other national parties to create military conflict between NATO/RUSSIA Russian intervention must be acknowledged as help to Ukraine to defend Ukraine borders, by signed memorandum in 1994 NATO intervention must be acknowledged as help to Ukraine to defend Ukraine borders, by signed memorandum in 1994 ( some signed parties are NATO members ) Military intervention must be oriented to halt EU/USA/NATO/RUSSIA agenda.
    • 10 B.: ECONOMIC CONFLICT Economic aid must be mutual, between IMF ( EU/USA ) and Russia. Economic delay only brings Ukraine in down-spiral path of selling Ukraine infrastructure to best bidder ( EU/USA/RUSSIA agenda ) We all know how oil-pipe lines are going through Russia in Ukraine and from Ukraine to Europe. We must also acknowledge text-book rule of take over of countries through PROXY WAR. This recipe is international and it is used in all modern warfare. 1. supply opposition ( ammunition, money, diplomatic help ) 2. Help coalition 3. Destroy coalition with opposition 4. Issue an invoice to oposition for your “help” of creating “democratic” state In this recipe, we have EU/USA agenda to supply opposition, some help was made to coalition ( 21-2-2014 AGREEMENT ) coalition was successfully destroyed with coup. Now it’s time for economic help, which will steal Ukraine infrastructure from their people. Ukraine is all about oil infrastructure. USA propaganda with tomorrow speech in Ukraine, is alarming action and despicable deed, which can be used to assasin their speaker, to get casus belli excuse.
    • 11 SOLUTION ( CONTACT GROUP ) Contact group can resolve questions of military and economic involvements of foreign countries in Ukraine. Contact group can create temporary working body, to resolve questions about military intervention, with full control of military actions, and economic intervention, with full control of economic/lobbyist foreign interests.
    • 12 E.S. INTERVENTION IN UKRAINE It is not hygienic for E.S. involvement in “ contact group “ from all perspectives. It is true that E.S. is lobbying for creation of combined body between NATO/RUSSIA but E.S. representative will not be involved. E.S. has it’s own agenda. E.S. major premise is to create diplomatic connection with former EX-YUGOSLAVIA nations for open market with Russia and to gain an advantage from EU/USA extortions through IMF and EU sanctions against those countries which does not blindly believe in clean transactions and righteous intentions of EU/USA/CANADA in Ukraine involvement to “ save “ Ukraine from Russian agression. It is irrefutable fact, that there is another economic conflict and interests to deplete Russian currency. G8 boycott, and USA threats are threats to all other non-decided countries. I as a representative of E.S., must declare that only E.S. intention in Ukraine,is to get E.S. members out of Ukraine. E.S. members are foreign intelligence personnel, who are still in Ukraine, and who tried to stop USA agenda of financing opposition parties to create first step of many steps of EUROPE division, as it was succesfully accomplished by USA intervention of destroying Yugoslavian federation and Yugoslavian army threat. I’ve already stated that I have send my adress to Haag. And with all due respect, CIA is now pressuring slovenian government to extradict E.S. member, me. I’m not a whistleblower. We terminate whistleblowers. We are not playing dirty games with “WIKI-leaks” USA agenda. If slovenian national interests are in jeopardy, I’m going to undertake all accusations which was already stated. I’m a proud slovenian citizen. Proud member of EU and proud member of NATO. With all due respect, you can suck my Serbian cock, which was born in Croatia. No money or threats can silence 24 year old fight to once again unite ex Yugoslavian countries under EU flag. Colour is not important.