Illegal nsa surveillance of americans  secret authorizations granted by bush and obama
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Illegal nsa surveillance of americans secret authorizations granted by bush and obama






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Illegal nsa surveillance of americans  secret authorizations granted by bush and obama Illegal nsa surveillance of americans secret authorizations granted by bush and obama Document Transcript

    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM]   Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Eric Zuesse May 15, 2014 The May 13th PBS “Frontline” documents that on 4 October 2001, President George W. Bush signed a secret authorization for the NSA to see the “metadata” (the to-whom, and from-whom) records for all phone calls, and also “a lot of content of phone calls. They’re actually recording the voices — not for all of our calls, but for a lot of U.S. telephone calls.” Titled “United States of Secrets,” this documentary reports that only about a half- dozen people were informed of this operation, which was called “the Program.” NSA chief Michael Hayden was informed of it, and he supported it. Attorney General John Ashcroft was informed of it, but he opposed it as being illegal, a direct violation of the 4th Amendment, and also possibly of the 1st Amendment. The Justice Department was sidelined from it. President Bush’s order was drafted not by the President’s lawyer, Alberto Gonzales (though he supported it), but by David Addington, VP Dick Cheney’s Legal Counsel, who was not so much asked whether it was Constitutional, as he was asked to come up with an argument for its being Constitutional, even if only a fig-leaf argument — which it turned out to be. Cheney actually ran the country, and Bush rubber-stamped whatever came out of Cheney’s office. Within 30 minutes after the President signing the order, Addington placed it into his office safe, and he showed it to very few people, only on a need-to-know basis. President Bush is shown as saying to the public, “Nothing has changed, by the way. When we’re talking about chasing down terrorists, we’re talking about getting a court order before we do so.” And: “It’s important for our fellow citizens to understand constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland because we value the Constitution.” These statements MOST POPULAR Police Officer Shot and Killed During No-Knock Raid (1377 comments) Bill Maher Shocks: 'Islam Is The Problem' (1308 comments) Police Officer Shoots Puppy After 'Fearing For His Safety' (1013 comments) Cops Attack Family With Tasers And Pepper Spray For Having Party In Their Own Home (1002 comments) Connecticut Tries to Hide Sandy Hook Truth (853 comments) Transhumanists: Superhuman Powers & Life Extension Tech Will Allow Us To Become Like God (815 comments) Greenwald: Criticism of President Hillary Will Be Labeled "Misogynistic" (781 comments) FCC Moves Corporatization of Internet Forward (737 comments) NM State Rep: Don't Vote For White Candidates (724 comments) Home Alex Jones Radio Show News Multimedia Forum Store Contact Top Stories Breaking News Search Advertise
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] were simply lies from him, and there was no “court order” for anything in “the Program.” For a long time, the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Court wasn’t even informed about the existence of “the Program.” So: it didn’t even have FISA Court authorization. Employees at NSA who balked at breaking the law, and who refused to do what they thought to be wrong, at least unless and until they saw legal authorization for it — which they were not presented to them — were threatened by their superiors. Some were fired. Others tried to contact reporters, and were then prosecuted. The Bush Administration wrecked their lives, broke up some marriages, and prosecuted one of them all the way into the Obama Administration, which threatened him with prison and then gave up when he was finally financially stripped and his marriage destroyed. Arthur Sulzberger, the controlling owner of The New York Times, and his Editor, Bill Keller, blocked their own reporters, James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, from publishing the fact (communicated by the leakers) that that Bush’s statements that everything was hunky-dory legal were lies. Thus, Bush was able to win re- election against John Kerry in 2004. But, then, Risen got a book contract, and so was able to publish the truth after the 2004 election (which was what principally concerned Bush — his re-election); and, so, The New York Times finally allowed the truth to be published also in their pages, after the “election,” and thus too late for the public to absorb the fact that they’d been deceived by Bush about this. The news report was headlined on 16 December 2005, “Bush Secretly Lifted Some Limits on Spying in the United States After 9/11, Officials Say.” Online, it was headlined “Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts.” The responses to this news story (such as were shown there at the print version) were largely from conservatives (people who trusted Bush’s honesty), who accused the Times of being a voice of the Democratic Party, though the reality of this situation was more like the exact opposite. The reality was that the Times hid (actively suppressed) this information, for as long as possible. Furthermore, the story itself misrepresented even some basic facts, in the direction of softening Bush’s lies. For example, the opening two sentences of it were: “Months after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials. Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible ‘dirty numbers’ linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications.” Here is how Frontline reports the actual event, not the NYT’s reporting of it: “On October 4th [2001], in a secret signing with Cheney, the president officially authorized ‘the program’.” The NYT-implied Bush reluctance, of “Months after the Sept. 11 attacks,” was a fiction. Cheney immediately, on 9/11, told his people to come up with proposals for whatever they thought needed to be done, and said that he would get it done; and Bush was 100% supportive of that must-do, can-do, will-do, attitude, and of “the Program.” Furthermore, the description provided by NYT of the Program, understated its scope; and, to refer to “the court-approved warrants ordinarily required” was itself a lie, because those warrants were a legal requirement, which had been legislated shortly after Richard Nixon was booted from the White House for Watergate, and adherence to that law wasn’t just “ordinarily required,” but it was always adhered to, because NSAers didn’t want to go to prison. This documentary makes that fear, of breaking the law, clear. Furthermore, to say that “messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States” were the scope of this “Program,” which actually encompassed virtually all telecom traffic of the hundreds of millions of American citizens, would be ludicrous if such a lie could be funny at all. So: the NYT’s report was highly sanitized. This documentary also reports Barack Obama’s lies. It shows candidate, Senator, Obama promising, “No more secrecy. That’s a commitment that I make to you as president!” And, “I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to track and take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedom. That means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens.” And, “No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. That’s not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists.” And, then, finally: “BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States: The laws that are written will be more open to the public. No more secrecy. That’s the commitment I make to you as president!” (And he now was President.) All of those promises, from Obama, were also lies. Furthermore, this documentary makes clear that both Bush and Obama have consistently tried to imprison whistleblowers, within the NSA and elsewhere, who attempted to get word out about this rampant law- breaking by the Federal Government. Edward Snowden was just the last of a long line of those. At one point, practically the entire top rung of the U.S. Justice Department were preparing to resign over this matter. NSA Senior Executive Thomas Drake was fired over it, prosecuted with the threat of life imprisonment, and then, when Obama ultimately couldn’t find anything serious to charge him with, just stripped financially to pay his legal expenses. And, of course, Obama still wants to kill Edward Snowden for WATCH THE NEWS DIRTY DHS BUSTED AIDING TERRORISTS. THURSDAY: THE ALEX JONES SHOW. BOMBSHELL: MILITARY POLICE DETAIN INFOWARS REPORTERS REQUESTING TRUTH. PLUS, TEACHER BLOWS WHISTLE: CONSTITUTION AND AMERICAN REVOLUTION REMOVED FROM COMMON CORE! WEDNESDAY: THE INFOWARS NIGHTLY NEWS. RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTER DEMANDS OBAMA REPLY TO CLAIMS OF U.S. MERCENARIES IN UKRAINE. PLUS, 2ND AMENDMENT: “CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER” IN ILLINOIS. WEDNESDAY: THE ALEX JONES SHOW. EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE: INFOWARS REPORTERS INSIDE ARMY BLACK OPS TRAINING CENTER. PLUS, HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING, ARTIFICIAL BUBBLES AND THE DANGEROUS FINANCIAL ROAD AHEAD. 1 2 3 4 5
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] exposing this “Program.” However, this documentary is itself largely a cover-up. It presents “the Program” as being a response to 9/11, but actually the desire and intention to do it began almost as soon as George W. Bush entered the White House. On October 11th of 2007, bannered “NSA Domestic Surveillance Began 7 Months Before 9/11, Convicted Qwest CEO Claims,” and Ryan Singel reported that Joseph Nacchio, the CEO of the phone company Qwest, claimed in court documents that he had been sentenced to prison because he had decided in February 2001, just a month after George W. Bush entered the White House, that he could not authorize his company to participate in warrantless wiretaps of Americans because such wiretaps would be illegal. Nacchio’s April 2007 statement to the court was just now being released by the court, and said that he “respectfully renews his objection to the Court’s rulings excluding testimony surrounding his February 27, 2001 meeting at Ft. Meade with representatives from the National Security Agency (NSA) as violative of his constitutional right to mount a defense. Although Mr. Nacchio is allowed to tell the jury that he and James Payne [Qwest’s government liason] went into that meeting expecting to talk about the ‘Groundbreaker’ project,” a multi-billion-dollar NSA telecom contract (it didn’t yet have the name “the Project”), and that he “came out of the meeting with optimism about the prospect for 2001 revenue from NSA, the Court has prohibited Mr. Nacchio from eliciting testimony regarding what also occurred at that meeting. [REDACTED, but presumably referring to demands by NSA for Qwest to permit federal snooping on Americans without court warrants.] The Court has also refused to allow Mr. Nacchio to demonstrate that the agency retaliated for this refusal by denying the Groundbreaker and perhaps other work to Qwest.” In other words, Mr. Nacchio was alleging that this huge federal contract had been denied to Qwest because Qwest had refused to participate in Bush’s illegal warrantless snooping on phone and e-mail communications of Americans. This is before 9/11. In 2001, Nacchio sold some of his Qwest stock shares, and the Bush Administration charged him with insider trading, because Qwest’s share-price declined after that sale. “Nacchio unsuccessfully attempted to defend himself by arguing that he actually expected Qwest’s 2001 earnings to be higher because of secret NSA contracts, which, he contends, were denied by the NSA after he declined in a February 27, 2001 meeting to give the NSA customer calling records.” The court refused to allow Nacchio to present to the jury any information regarding the NSA’s demands which Nacchio had turned down. Consequently, according to Nacchio’s lawyer, he was convicted and received a 6-year prison sentence. Two days later, on October 13th, the Washington Post bannered “Former CEO Says U.S. Punished Phone Firm,” and reported: “A former Qwest Communications International executive, appealing a conviction for insider trading, has alleged that the government withdrew opportunities for contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars after Qwest refused to participate” in Bush’s NSA surveillance against Americans. “Former chief executive Joseph P. Nacchio, convicted in April of 19 counts of insider trading, said the NSA approached Qwest more than six months before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to court documents unsealed in Denver this week.” That would have placed it probably back in February 2001. If Nacchio’s allegations were true, then Bush was already organizing the illegal wiretapping against Americans months before 9/11 even occurred, and Nacchio’s prosecution was retaliation against his non- cooperation with Bush’s illegal NSA program. A week later, on October 22nd, the WP headlined “Immunity for Telecoms May Set Bad Precedent, Legal Scholars Say.” The Bush Administration was trying to push through Congress immunity for Verizon and ATT, which, unlike Qwest, had participated in Bush’s illegal spying against Americans. Bush’s proposal, now in 2007, was to retroactively legalize what those companies had done, even though this would constitute a form of ex post facto law: It would retroactively change the law in order to immunize those two companies. This type of ex post facto law is known as an “amnesty law,” because it amnesties, or retrospectively legalizes, rather than illegalizes, the defined activities. Article I Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states: “No … ex post facto Law shall be passed.” That includes an amnesty law (certainly of this type, though not necessarily of illegal immigration, since that isn’t a criminal violation). To Republicans, and to the conservative Democrats who also were pushing Bush’s legislation, the U.S. Constitution was merely an inconvenience; only the Bible was the Law, to them. On 5 November 2007, the Electronic Frontier Foundation headlined “AT&T Whistleblower to Urge Senate to Reject Blanket Immunity for Telecoms,” and reported that a retired AT&T technician, Mark Klein, said, “My job required me to enable the physical connections between AT&T customers’ Internet communications and the NSA’s illegal, wholesale copying machine for domestic emails, Internet phone conversations, web surfing and all other Internet traffic.” The following day, the Austin American- Statesman bannered “AT&T Whistleblower: Say No to Telecom Immunity,” and Rebecca Carr reported that Klein said “I have first-hand knowledge of the clandestine collaboration between one giant telecommunications company, AT&T, and the NSA to facilitate the most comprehensive illegal domestic spying program in [U.S.] history.” Then, the next day, on November 7th, the Washington Post bannered “A Story of Surveillance: Former Technician ‘Turning In’ AT&T Over NSA Program.” Ellen Nakashima reported Klein as saying, “This splitter was sweeping up everything, vacuum-cleaner style. … The NSA is getting everything.” Moreover, this AT&T facility which he installed “carry not just AT&T’s FEATURED VIDEOS High Frequency Trading And Artificial Bubbles See the rest on the Alex Jones YouTube channel. Real Time Total Information Awareness Tracking Grid Is Being Implemented Now See the rest on the Alex Jones YouTube channel.
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] customers but everybody’s.” Klein described specific AT&T “links to 16 entities,” including Global Crossing, Verizon, Level 3, Sprint, and Qwest. It was the central hub for all international U.S. telecommunications traffic. ABC headlined concerning only the internet aspect, “Big Brother Spying on Americans’ Internet Data,” and reported Klein as asserting that, “An exact copy of all Internet traffic that flowed through critical AT&T cables — e-mails, documents, Web browsing, voice-over-Internet phone conversations, everything – was being diverted to equipment inside the secret room.” Although, according to Nacchio’s testimony, George W. Bush’s laying the groundwork for illegal spying against regular American citizens began well before the 9/11 attacks, the press in the United States continued to parrot unquestioningly, in their stenographic “news” stories, the White House’s line, that the spying program began as a response to 9/11 in order to prevent a recurrence. Long afterward, Bush was still successful in getting the AP, The New York Times, and other “news” organizations, to put this dubious assumption before the American public, as a supposedly established fact, in “news reports.” On 14 March 2008, georgia10 at headlined “Dear Media: Please Stop Repeating This Lie.” She documented there cases in which the media had recently presented this Bush assertion as if it were an established fact. The pleading here was in vain. America’s major “news” media are propaganda agencies. On 16 December 2007, The New York Times headlined “Wider Spying Fuels Aid Plan for Telecom Industry,” and reported that, “At stake” in the battle over retroactive immunization of the traitorous telecom companies which had served the aspiring dictator “is the federal government’s extensive but uneasy partnership with [these criminal elements in, not with (as here implied) all] industry to conduct a wide range of secret surveillance.” A lawsuit “claims that in February 2001, just days before agency officials met with Qwest officials, the N.S.A. met with AT&T officials to discuss replicating a network center in Bedminster, N.J., to give the agency access to all the global phone and e-mail traffic that ran through it.” When these meetings with telcos were occurring, requesting these companies to provide the Bush Administration access which was prohibited by existing laws, such as the FISA act, President Bush was simultaneously shoving off anti-terrorism chief Richard Clarke, who was futilely trying to get the Administration to pay attention to the Al Qaeda threat. So, Bush’s Big Brother effort here had nothing whatsoever to do with Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups. The Executive Order of the President, that Bush signed in October 2001 “legally” authorizing this spying, was merely using 9/11 as the convenient excuse, a pretext, for something that Bush had planned all along. A lawyer for one of the whistle-blowing telecom employees said, “What he saw … was decisive evidence that within two weeks of taking office, the Bush administration was planning a comprehensive effort of spying on Americans.” George W. Bush, at the time this news story appeared, December 16th six years after the Program’s start, was threatening the U.S. Senate, by saying that he would veto any FISA reauthorization which failed to provide his demanded unconstitutional retroactive immunity for the telephone companies which had participated in Bush’s police-state initiative. He needed them to be immune, because otherwise he himself would not be. After all: they were doing his bidding. Thus, it was even more shameful that America’s major media continued peddling Bush’s lie that the illegal surveillance program was a response to 9/11 — a deception that is reinforced by this Frontline piece on 13 May 2014. On the same day, December 16th of 2007, the headline that appeared of this news at wasn’t the Republican newspaper’s tepid and misleading “Wider Spying Fuels Aid Plan for Telecom Industry,” but was instead the very direct and honest: “AT&T Engineer Says Bush Administration Sought to Implement Domestic Spying Within Two Weeks of Taking Office.” An attention-grabber like that isn’t what a U.S. President wants in a headline for such a news report. This news story also didn’t “bury the lede” as the NYT had done. Instead, it opened directly, by saying: “Nearly 1,300 words into Sunday’s New York Times article revealing new details of the National Security Agency’s domestic eavesdropping program, the lawyer for an AT&T engineer alleges that ‘within two weeks of taking office, the Bush administration was planning a comprehensive effort of spying on Americans’ phone usage.’” The New York Times is the supreme master of news-slant, not just “burying the lede,” but burying truth. On account of the widespread lie that Bush’s surveillance program was a response to 9/11, Siobhan Gorman of the Wall Street Journal bannered on 14 March 2008, “Democrats Dig In for Surveillance Battle,” and reported a “Partisan Battle” over retroactive telecom immunity, because 74% of Republicans (and a lower 52% of all respondents) polled by Princeton Survey Research Associates had said that, “Government surveillance of suspected terrorists without court permission” is “Generally right,” while 57% of Democrats (and 44% of all respondents) said it’s “Generally wrong.” America’s conservative masses were passionately supportive of this surveillance; they were driven by fear, even if they were playing into the hands of the worst forces; and their pettiness was destroying
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] Share This Article   Print This Page. everything that made the United States great. They didn’t at all fear America’s tyrant at that time, George W. Bush. Surveillance without a warrant isn’t just “Generally wrong”; it’s always wrong. Lawbreaking by Government is always wrong, especially when it threatens basic constitutional freedoms, and most especially when it threatens the introduction of a police state. In June 2008, a large minority of congressional Democrats joined all but one Republican in a FISA “compromise,” H.R. 6304, which seemed to give the President what he wanted, because otherwise, without it, Democrats would likely lose crucial seats in Congress, representing conservative districts, where fear of alien Muslim terrorists exceeded even their fear of immigrants and of other aliens in general. On 20 June 2008, Massimo Calabresi in TIME bannered “ Behind  the Compromise on  Spying,” and he explained how stupid it would have been for congressional Democrats to support the U.S. Constitution during this key election year. America’s high-school-civics teachers had failed disastrously, and so America’s voters possessed virtually no idea of what a constitutional democracy really is, much less of how to continue to be one. How, for example, could American voters intelligently evaluate the Republican and Democratic Presidential candidates’ respective positions on warrantless wiretapping? A political game was being played here, and voters were the ultimate chips to be won or lost in this game. They weren’t the ultimate deciders; the ultimate deciders were the players of the game. It was no democracy. However, this new snooping law didn’t actually provide Bush protection after all. Buried in its Title II, Section 802 of the revised FISA law, was an obscure clause which restricted legal immunity to only things telecoms did that were “authorized by the President during the period beginning on September 11, 2001.” That was its key clause, and it hadn’t been in the previous versions of the bill. In this new version, there was no immunity at all for anything which was illegal and which the President had authorized prior to 9/11, such as had been revealed by Joe Nacchio, and also by the AT&T whistleblower, Mark Kline, both of whom referred to illegal snooping demands by Bush occurring in February of 2001. Bush couldn’t very well veto this bill once it passed Congress; he had to sign it into law, because he claimed publicly that 9/11 had caused this snooping, that this snooping was a response to 9/11. And Republicans in Congress couldn’t vote against the bill either, because it gave both them and the President what they were publicly demanding. The Democrats were now essentially calling the Republicans’ bluff on their demands, and doing it during a Presidential election year, in which the Republican Party was now widely loathed, and when Republican Representatives and Senators feared the real prospects of losing their seats. Basically, congressional Democrats had congressional Republicans, and the Republican President, caught in a political trap, from which there was no way out. So, the supposed telecom-immunity was, essentially, a fiction. On 18 September  2008, bannered “Domestic  Spying Lawsuit Targets Bush, Cheney, NSA,” and reported that, “Based on news reports and information obtained from former AT&T employee Mark Kline, EFF [Electronic Frontier Foundation] alleges a massive surveillance apparatus has been trained on Americans to vacuum up information on virtually every telephone call, e-mail and Internet search to feed a massive database maintained by the NSA. … Information on the lawsuit and a link to the 55-page filing is available on EFF’s Web site.” So: As soon as Obama came into the White House, he not only continued, virtually unchanged, George W. Bush’s bailouts of Wall Street, non-enforcement and non-prosecution against banksters, and rabid prosecutions against whistleblowers in government, but he also refused to prosecute George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for their lawless regime. He thereby established the precedent that the U.S. President is, in effect, above the law, that he’s supposed to enforce. He made this a bipartisan dictatorship. We do not have a free press. It’s a propaganda operation, by, and for, the people at the top. Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity. This article was posted: Thursday, May 15, 2014 at 3:49 pm Related Articles Telecom Companies in Cahoots with Illegal Bush Admin Surveillance Programs Court Rules That Mass Surveillance of Americans is Immune From Judicial Review Government Claims Americans Have No Right To Challenge NSA Phone Surveillance Huge swath of GCHQ mass surveillance is illegal, says top lawyer There Was A Secret Ruling Against The NSA For Spying On Americans
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] Trending Offers and Articles ADVERTISEMENT Some of the hottest women on the planet are the wives & girlfriends of NBA stars. New Rule in Arizona: Do Not Pay Your Next Car Insurance Bill Until You Read This... Surprisingly simple solution to help your joints. See why these ingredients are flying off shelves New currency law goes into effect July 1st, 2014 [Devastating] Shocking! Here's What Happened When We Tested The Top Probiotics 2013: The Best Sunless Tanners: You Won't Believe The Results If you don't speak Spanish, watch this video now Tucson arrest records. Who do you know? INFOWARS.COM VIDEOS: COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE 30 Comments Infowars 4 Sort by Newest Share ⤤ Join the discussion… Brian Charles • a minute ago DEAL WITH THIS TRAITOR - David B. Lacquement, NSA Cybercom RFTYGAR@NSA.GOV Favorite ★
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] Phone number 410-695-5772 Addresses 4526 Butler St Fort George G Meade, MD 20755-2103 424 Pendleton St Alexandria, VA 22314-1902 People David may know Kathryn B Lacquement Alex D Lacquement Jennifer L Napper Mark Napper Kathryn B Lacquement Age: 55-59 4526 Butler St Fort George G Meade, MD 20755-2103 424 Pendleton St Alexandria, VA 22314-1902 3421 SW 195th Ave Miramar, FL 33029-5890 Alex D Lacquement Age: 25-29 Jennifer L Napper Age: 18-24 Phone number 703-670-9714 Addresses 4526 Butler St Fort George G Meade, MD 20755-2103 135 Grierson Ave Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613-1329 111 Hamblen Ave Old Hickory, TN 37138-2624 15532 Windward Ct Dumfries, VA 22025-1251 People Jennifer may know Kathryn B Lacquement David B Lacquement Alex D Lacquement Mark Napper Mark Napper Phone number
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] • Edit • Reply • 410-305-4108 Address 4526 Butler St Fort George G Meade, MD 20755-2103 People Mark may know Kathryn B Lacquement David B Lacquement Alex D Lacquement Jennifer L Napper △ ▽ • Reply • American101 • 22 minutes ago The 3 headed Beast, which could equate to Obama, the Senate, and the Congress. most of the Congress and Senate are so arrogant and self righteous, they could'nt care less about Representing Their constituents, .The Days of Partisanship are over, these people have trashed this Nation and its peoples for far to Long,.and gotten far to Rich on the backs of the Working Men and Women,.time to Throw these Old dogs a bone out of their cushy Seats,.time for new Blood they can't possibly be any worse than what we've got now. △ ▽ Brian Charles • 24 minutes ago DEAL WITH THIS TRAITOR, Before They Send You To The FEMA Camps - Ex- NSA Director Keith Brian Alexander Here today I present you the director of the NSA. This is just an update. Thought it would be funny to go after his dead father and dead grandparents. You brought this upon yourself. If you want to blame someone you need to get off your lazy ass and look into a mirror. Stop making failure pathetic piss-poor attempts at your joke of a job, Keith. This won't stop until you quit all of your useless bullshit. Hopefully you understand. Thanks. ? Name: Keith Brian Alexander DoB: Share › Share ›
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] 12/2/1951 SSN: 097-44-9763 Phone Number: (202) 554-8786 Address: 1274 State Route 49, Constantia, NY 13044 Previous Phone Numbers: (703) 781-7299 (315) 623-9559 (703) 781-7299 (703) 850-5655 Previous Addresses: 10245 Fairfax Dr, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 3478 Everett Ave, Spring Hill, FL 34609 4940 Glen Robin Dr, Syracuse, NY 13215 1101 Cedar Oaks Ln, Harker Heights, TX 76548 1274 St Rt, Constantia, NY 13044 5226 Dunleigh Dr, Burke, VA 22015 2107 McClelland Ave #1, Tampa, FL 33621 9759 Turnbuckle Dr, Burke, VA 22015 5 Armistead St, Fort Bragg, NC 28307 201 Reynolds St #L201, Alexandria, VA 22304 1101 Cedar Oaks Ln, Killeen, TX 76548 Armistead, Fort Bragg, NC 28307 204 Mi Bn Hhc, Apo, AE 09157 Emails:
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] - Changed. Skype: keith.alexander41 - Attached to Wife: Deborah L Alexander Phone Number: (410) 674-1810 Address: 10245 Fairfax Dr, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 Previous Phone Numbers: (703) 781-7299 (410) 674-1810 (813) 840-9063 (703) 764-8587 Previous Addresses: 4628 English Ave, Fort George G Meade, MD 20755 4940 Glen Robin Dr, Syracuse, NY 13215 2107 McClelland Ave #1, Tampa, FL 33621 Armistead, Fort Bragg, NC 28307 5 Armistead St, Fort Bragg, NC 28307 9759 Turnbuckle Dr, Burke, VA 22015 5226 Dunleigh Dr, Burke, VA 22015 HC 204TH MI, Apo, AE 09157 Emails: Father: Donald Henry Alexander - Dead DoB:
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] 12/15/1927 SSN: 052-20-2057 Phone Number: (315) 623-9559 Address: 3478 Everett Ave, Spring Hill, FL 34609 Previous Phone Numbers: (315) 623-9559 (352) 683-7491 Previous Addresses: Boone Hbr, Constantia, NY 13044 Mother: Charlotte Carol Alexander Phone Number: (352) 683-7491 Address: 3478 Everett Ave, Spring Hill, FL 34609 Previous Phone Numbers: (315) 623-9559 (315) 668-1190 (352) 683-7491 Previous Addresses: Boone Hbr, Constantia, NY 13044 Grandfather: Howard W Alexander - Dead DoB: 5/10/1895 Grandmother: Josephine Agnes Alexander - Dead DoB: 1/27/1894
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] SSN: 350-10-3258 // This proves a lot on the dead members of his family - http://freepages.genealogy.roo.... // Keith's SSN has been verified thanks to and ~Doxed by CGOD Taken from "General_Keith_Brian_Alexander.txt" -------------------------------------------------------------- Education History: Westhill Senior High School Address: 4501 Onondaga Blvd, Onondaga, NY 13219 Phone: (315)-426-3100 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 43° 1' 49.9188" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -76° 12' 7.1244" Total Distance: 866.3 mi Total Time: 12 Hours, 33 Minutes United States Military Academy Address: Bldg 600, West Point, NY 10996 Phone: (845)-938-3507 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 41° 23' 30.0998" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -73° 57' 31.5097" Total Distance: 972.3 mi Total Time: 14 Hours, 2 Minutes U.S. Army Command and General Staff College Address: 100 Stimson Ave, Leavenworth, KS 66027 Phone: (913)-684-2958
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 39° 20' 37.36" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -94° 55' 1.1014" Total Distance: 543 mi Total Time: 7 Hours, 58 Minutes National War College Address: 1 E street SW, Fort Lesley J. McNair, DC 20319 Phone: (202)-685-3674 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 38° 52' 59.5852" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -77° 0' 32.4047" Total Distance: 717 mi Total Time: 10 Hours, 34 Minutes Boston University Master Of Science In Business Administration Address: 1 Silber Way, Boston, MA 02215 Phone: (617)-353-2000 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 42° 20' 58.9366" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -71° 5' 59.8394" Total Distance: 1149.5 mi Total Time: 16 Hours, 46 Minutes Naval Postgraduate School Master Of Science In Systems Technology (electronic warfare) Master Of Science In Physics Address: 1 University Cir, Monterey, CA 93943 Phone: (831)-656-2441 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 36° 35' 49.8926" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -121° 52' 27.5412"
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] • Edit • Reply • Total Distance: 2232 mi Total Time: 8 Hours, 37 Minutes National Defense University Master Of Science In National Security Strategy Address: 300 5th Avenue #62, Fort McNair, DC 20319 Phone: (202)-685-3140 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 38° 53' 39.4562" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -76° 59' 58.9178" Total Distance: 724.4 mi Total Time: 10 Hours, 30 Minutes -------------------------------------------------------------- Employment History: Director Of The National Security Agency Address: 9800 Savage Rd, Fort Meade, MD 20755 Phone:(301)-688-6524 Latitude (Deg-Min-Sec): 39° 6' 32.1775" Longitude (Deg-Min-Sec): -76° 46' 16.8344" Total Distance: 742.1 mi Total Time: 10 Hours, 42 Minutes http://doxbinzqkeoso6sl.onion/doxviewer.php? dox=Keith_B_Alexander_NSA_Director △ ▽ • Reply • What Tea party this is Sparta • an hour ago Is this America or is it THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?? △ ▽ What Tea party this is Sparta • an hour ago Share › Share ›
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] • Reply • Happy birthday President Obama! May I say also that we denounce white Privilege and happily endure the anal probing. The tea party is just not going to gain momentum and hopefully, you will start a war that keeps you in the White house indefinately! Your wife looks really cool holding that sign about all the dead children from droning and all your efforts to support abortion. I was just wondering do you prefer to kill children unborn to the ones who "see it coming" ? With your policies?? △ ▽ • Reply • Ajc1973 • an hour ago what do you expect from two progressives... They infliltrated both parties decades ago... thats why you get Mccain, Hillary Clinton, and Newt Gingrich all saying they admire and their favorite president was Teddy Roosevelt, father of the modern Progressive party... △ ▽ • Reply • golchie2 • an hour ago The duopoly is really one party now; it is big spending, progressive and ignores our Constitution which is the law of the land. It meddles Militarily around the World where we are not wanted. The only way for things to change are for a Libertarian or other alternative Party to gain power △ ▽ • Reply • Diocletian • 2 hours ago The key point is that there is no difference between Bush and Obama policies. They are all heavily connected to the CIA and run by 4th Reich loving Nazi believers. The U.S. government is using the same playbook Hitler used. Fascist policies are replacing the Constitution on a daily basis. △ ▽ • Reply • John Gault • 2 hours ago Operation American Spring May 16, 2014 △ ▽ 18 young and dumb • 2 hours ago I would like to see AMERICA sue the UNITED STATES of AMERICA INC. There IS a difference as the UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. It is NOT the nation. It is Washington D.C. Look it up. be stunned I was. Share › Share › Share › Share › Share ›
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] • Reply •△ ▽ • Reply • SecretHarmony • 2 hours ago Photos of an NSA “upgrade” factory show Cisco router getting implant: Servers, routers get “beacons” implanted at secret locations by NSA’s TAO team. Here’s how it works: shipments of computer network devices (servers, routers, etc,) being delivered to our targets throughout the world are intercepted. Next, they are redirected to a secret location where Tailored Access Operations/Access Operations (AO-S326) employees, with the support of the Remote Operations Center (S321), enable the installation of beacon implants directly into our targets’ electronic devices. These devices are then re-packaged and placed back into transit to the original destination. All of this happens with the support of Intelligence Community partners and the technical wizards in TAO △ ▽ • Reply • gn28 • 3 hours ago SCENARIO: every man with a gun kills a few pollice-men, politicians, bankers and NSA-like workers. After the first week there are no more taxes and there is no more government opression. 2 △ ▽ • Reply • kirk • 3 hours ago there's the R's and the D's for you. same turds in different clothing. 3 △ ▽ • Reply • Alex 0rtiz • 3 hours ago> kirk I second that 2 △ ▽ • Reply • fu traitors • 3 hours ago I cant wait to see these coward traitors run like hell. △ ▽ • Reply • The Keep • 3 hours ago> fu traitors Run back to hell. △ ▽ CaptainUSA • 3 hours ago Both~~~~~~Wing's Share › Share › Share › Share › Share › Share › Share ›
    • » Illegal NSA Surveillance of Americans: Secret Authorizations Granted by Bush and Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind![5/15/2014 7:22:48 PM] • Reply •△ ▽ • Reply • ManaMoffa • 4 hours ago Non-sense, This is PBS's attempt to pin Obama' illegal expansion on Bush, Both suck but this is an attempt to excuse Obama cus "Bush must have done it too" △ ▽ Show 1 new reply • Reply • Ajc1973 • an hour ago> ManaMoffa Of course it is, but that doesnt change the fact that both parties is infiltrated by Progressives... Bush did it, but Obama said ill see your illegal activities and double it... △ ▽ • Reply • Alex 0rtiz • 3 hours ago> ManaMoffa Everything obama was able to do, Bush set him up for it. G.W. put it all in place, all obama did was hit the execute button 3 △ ▽ Share › Share › Share › Share › © 2013 is a Free Speech Systems, LLC company. All rights reserved. Digital Millennium Copyright Act Notice. Digital Millennium Copyright Act Advertise Writers Terms of service