• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Aspartame rumsfeld   news followup.com transparencyplanet, promote biz-govt t
 

Aspartame rumsfeld   news followup.com transparencyplanet, promote biz-govt t

on

  • 167 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
167
Views on SlideShare
167
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Aspartame rumsfeld   news followup.com transparencyplanet, promote biz-govt t Aspartame rumsfeld   news followup.com transparencyplanet, promote biz-govt t Document Transcript

    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM]   NewsFollowUp.com search Franklin Scandal Omaha    pictorial index sitemap   home Aspartame Rumsfeld, G. D. Searle, ... CEO, 1974     Go to NFU Intelligent Design Jokes pages ...................................Refresh F5...archive  home 50th Anniversary of JFK assassination "Event of a Lifetime" at the Fess Parker Double Tree Inn. JFKSantaBarbara.  News for the 99%     Connect the Dots:  Aspartame, Searle,  Rumsfeld,  Neo-cons,  Plamegate, Iraq War,  Iran War Mongering, $$$ economic charts    Aspartame.com  Aspartame equals death.  go to: Intelligent Design Jokes pages     page 1 Page 2 Medical Symptoms/Remedies Email from Rich Murray, Yahoo Groups Toxicity Splenda Rumsfeld connections, Searle 'Intelligent Design', Aspartame Related topics:     Nutrition        Health       Corporate Fraud PROGRESSIVE  CONSERVATIVE* Aspartame.ca Betty Martini, Founder of Mission Possible NewsFollowUppers Aspartame.ca Aspartame.com AspartameTruth Boycott Aspartame Dorway.com Monsanto Watch Natural Health News Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of Science & Technology Splenda Exposed Tristaronline Aspartame.com Aspartame equals death.  AspartameKills Rumsfeld info Aspartame is Poison x AspartameTruth the fox minding the chicken coop Boycott Aspartame Monsanto, Searle chemicals  Corporate Watch  Monsanto, life sciences company watch. Cure Zone Educating instead of medicating, Aspartame Dangers Dorway.com Betty Martini, Aspartame kills,  Essential.org Aspartame toxic info   FDA, Recall Aspartame as a Neurotoxic Drug, Docket # 02P-0317  Aspartame & Human Studies, doc submitted Food Standards Australia New Zealand aspartame Food and Healing AnneMarie Colbin, PhD FDA independent research, causes Formaldehyde accumulation, brain tumors, Fibromyalgia symptoms, doc submitted HolisticMedicine Aspartame info Icanect Aspartame Disease a world epidemic  Sound and Fury Productions Imagin.net research hightlights, poison, brain drug, methanol.... Medscape brain tumors in middle-aged populations Mercola, Dr Joseph fda aspartame info Aspartame and Multiple Schlerosis, naltrexone aspartame. Monsanto Corporation Sucks Monsanto watch If Bush blames the Democrats for the Iraq War failure they will lose the 2008 election Monsanto Watch from Organic Consumers Natural Health News World Natural Health Organization, news, aspartame info,  Oberserver UK know what your kids eat at school? Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of Science & Technology gm foods, cell phones, aspartame info Rumsfeld Blog Stevia sugar alternative FDA Talk Papers search SunsentPress  x Swankin-Turner Asp Tristaronline Aspartame Consumer Safety Network Fact Sheet Yahoo Groups Aspartame Aspartame Ag Bio Forum search Monsanto, aspartame = 0 ? Aspartame.info from Ajinomoto Switzerland AG NewsFollowUppers AP Aspartame.info Aspartame.org BioTechKnowledge CNN FDA International Sweetners Assc. Monsanto Snopes Is there a link between Aspartame, Rumsfeld (G. D. Searle CEO) and 'Intelligent Design'?... and see Intelligent Design Jokes Aspartame.org aspartame never reaches the organs of the body BioPharmaLink Glycine, Amino acids for flavour pet foods, cosmetics, Biotin Sweeteners Ace K Aspartame, Cosmeceuticals, Phyto Nutritionals, Proteins, Arthritis, Obesity, Gastrointestinal, UK. Beverage Online search aspartame, Virginia Dare Extract,  BioTechKnowledge sponsored by Monsanto Business Communications Inc. search Calorie Control Coke FarmSource doing business with Monsanto. U.S. Ag resource.
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] search, recalls Friends of Freedom healthier lives, individual freedom, Aspartame is a food additive, not a drug. International Sweetners Assc. search Monsanto neotane, phenylalanine, produced by NSC,  Monsanto CEO: Bob Shapiro,  Doug Ivestor, Coke CEO, both gone soon. Monsanto Fund Philantrophy fund, glyphosate, RoundUp ready soybean seed.  Pepsi Reduce regulation, lower taxes, strong defense, liberty, freedom, profit. Sweeteners.org no problems Snopes Urban legends, says Martini wrong Seed Quest Monsanto company reports. Solutia = Monsanto maker of integrated mylon, films, resins, additives,  Soy Daily Club Monsanto company reports. Woods Industries Aspartame process        Rumsfeld      top     and Searle page PROGRESSIVE  REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* AspartameKills Rumsfeld info Dorway.com Betty Martini, Aspartame kills,  Swankin-Turner, Chronology of Aspartame New Media Explorer Aspartame Gate Rumsfeld Blog UnderReported Rumsfeld, Reagan connection, search Whale Mr. Aspartame (Rumsfeld).   Rumormill News search Rumsfeld: CEO G. D. Searle, CEO 1977-1985, Aspartame approved by FDA Rumsfeld, CEO General Instrument, also Gilead Sciences, Amylin Pharmaceuticals also Asea Brown Boveri, Tribune, Rand, Saloman Smith Barney Ru sea   Aspartame.info from Ajinomoto Switzerland AG Calorie Control Coast Packing beverage sweetener info Coke Is there a link between Aspartame, Rumsfeld (Serle CEO) and 'Intelligent Design'?... and see Intelligent Design Jokes Pepsi International Sweetners Assc. search Sweeteners.org no problems Snopes Urban legends, says Martini wrong Medical Complaints /Remedies          top PROGRESSIVE  REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* AspartameKills symptom info Aspartame Support Groups Official Aspartame list Dorway.com Betty Martini, Aspartame kills,  FDA, Recall Aspartame as a Neurotoxic Drug, Docket # 02P-0317 independent research, causes Formaldehyde accumulation, brain tumors, Fibromyalgia symptoms SweetPoison Aspartame Detox program Yahoo Groups Aspartame Aspartame Swankin-Turner notes, timeline: 1967, 7 infant monkeys tested aspartame, 1 died, 5 had grand mall seizures. 1970, Jim Turner: Cyclamate associated with cancer.  Questions about saccharin Dr. John Olney (monosodium glutamate removal from baby food) says aspartic acid causes holes in the brains of infant mice.  File objections 1973, Searle 'positive' safety tests blitz. FDA investigation of Searle, manuevered out of existence by Washington influence peddling. see Bressler report Dr Arthur Hayes overrules all evidence of toxicity of aspartame, says its safe NSDA says aspartame breaks down into DKP and formaldehyde above 85 degrees 1983, aspartame approved. CDC documents consumer complaints. Aspartame.info from Ajinomoto Switzerland AG Coke Monsanto neotane, phenylalanine, produced by NSC,  Monsanto CEO: Bob Shapiro,  Doug Ivestor, Coke CEO, both gone soon. Monsanto Fund Philantrophy fund Pepsi  FoodMarketExchange news archive Splenda       top PROGRESSIVE  REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* Red Ice sear Splenda Exposed search artificial sweetener, Sucralose Toxicity Center Wholefoods Sucralose banned from Wholefoods markets   SFgate search Wikipedia Splenda, McNeil Nutritionals, division of Johnson & Johnson Notes: Sucralose, manufactured by the selective chlorination of sucrose, by adding chlorine atoms to Sucrose molecule.  National Library of Medicine Sucralose toxicity Diet COKE search net on  COKE campaign contributions McNeil Nutritionals, division of Johnson & Johnson Splenda.com Tate & Lyle "Tastes like sugar because its made from sugar" ... Toxicity          top PROGRESSIVE  REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* Boycott Aspartame Monsanto, Searle chemicals  Evaluation of Consumer Complaints related to Aspartame.info from Ajinomoto Switzerland AG
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] Dorway.com Betty Martini, Aspartame kills,  Oberserver UK know what your kids eat at school? Phoenix Ascended FDA and aspartame approval process fraud.  Alternative healing. Aspertame CDC 1984  CDC European Commission Food Safety  food safety page Kid Fit Connections  Avoid baking with...that contains aspartame or gelatin, search. Aspartame breaks down... MSFocus   Multiple Schlerosis F......CDC analyzed 500 complaints.... OBGYN.net   Office of Regulatory Affairs   search BioPharmaLink Glycine, Amino acids for flavour pet foods, cosmetics, Biotin Sweeteners Ace K Aspartame, Cosmeceuticals, Phyto Nutritionals, Proteins, Arthritis, Obesity, Gastrointestinal, UK. Coke Monsanto neotane, phenylalanine, produced by NSC,  Monsanto CEO: Bob Shapiro,  Doug Ivestor, Coke CEO, both gone soon. Monsanto Fund Philantrophy fund Pepsi          top PROGRESSIVE  REFERENCE REFERENCE pesticides and food additives Email from Rich Murray, Aspartame, Yahoo, Groups <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/988> aspartame classified as a "food additive", no GRAS status: Stoddard: Wurtman: Gold: Murray 4.10.3 rmforall April 10 2003 Hello Mary Nash Stoddard, Good question! Here is the key information: "food additives" are not required to be tested or monitored for safety. GRAS means "Generally Regarded as Safe." "Compounds that do affect physiological systems are classified as drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and are subject to considerably more demanding regulatory procedures than food constituents. Moreover, because food additives must be shown to be physiologically inert in order to win initial FDA approval, once they have obtained this approval they are exempted from the requirement, imposed on all drugs, that their safety be continuously monitored: Companies that manufacture and use approved food additives are not obligated to monitor adverse reactions associated with consumption of their product, nor to submit to the FDA reports of such adverse reactions; they also are not required to carry out further government-mandated research programs to affirm their product's safety." <http://www.dorway.com/wurtman1.html Possible Neurologic Effects of Aspartame, a Widely Used Food Additive -- by Timothy J. Maher (Department of Pharmacology, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy, 179 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115) and Richard J. Wurtman (Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139). <dick@mit.edu> Introduction: Food Additives as Neuroactive Environmental Constituents For the very great majority of Americans, i.e., those who elect to eat processed foods, food additives are a ubiquitous constituent of the environment, and one with potentially important health effects. The laws governing the sale of these compounds require that their addition to foods fulfill a specific purpose, such as improving flavor, retarding spoilage, or enhancing nutritional quality, and that such use be risk- free. Implicit in this latter requirement is the expectation that the food additive not be found to affect physiological processes other than the nutritional or sensory ones underlying its use: Compounds that do affect physiological systems are classified as drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and are subject to considerably more demanding regulatory procedures than food constituents. Moreover, because food additives must be shown to be physiologically inert in order to win initial FDA approval, once they have obtained this approval they are exempted from the requirement, imposed on all drugs, that their safety be continuously monitored: Companies that manufacture and use approved food additives are not obligated to monitor adverse reactions associated with consumption of their product, nor to submit to the FDA reports of such adverse reactions; they also are not required to carry out further government-mandated research programs to affirm their product's safety. However, the consumption of a number of food additives can cause physiological effects which include, for some, modification of the chemical composition and functional activities of the nervous system (1 Jury rules against Monsanto By Elizabeth Bluemink Star Environmental Correspondent 02-23-2002 GADSDEN Plaintiffs in the Monsanto trial achieved an initial victory against the company and its spinoff, Solutia, Friday. After five hours of deliberation in two days, the Monsanto trial jury reached a verdict shortly after 9 a.m. Friday that Monsanto and Solutia are legally responsible for polluting the Anniston area and people's blood with PCBs. The Bowie v. Monsanto case, begun in 1996, is far from over, with approximately 3,500 individual claims left to be presented to the Gadsden jury. Several hundred plaintiffs say they are sick from Monsanto's PCBs, but their injury claims will not be presented for at least a month. Moreover, the jury will not award monetary damages to the plaintiffs until the entire trial is over, and that could be several months from now, Calhoun County Circuit Judge Joel Laird told The Star Friday afternoon. Yet, the jury's verdict on liability resulted in immediate rejoicing among the plaintiffs and their attorneys, who hugged and cried in the Etowah County courthouse Friday morning. Tears rolled down western Anniston plaintiff Peggy Moore's face as she explained, "For seven years, we've been hollering and finally somebody heard us. This is release; it's justice." The response from Solutia officials was one of disappointment. In a prepared statement, the chairman and CEO of Solutia, John Hunter, said "We are extremely disappointed with the jury's verdict handed down today … While we recognize and appreciate the jury's time and effort, it's important to note that this is an interim step in a long process. There has been no decision reached with regard to damages." Hunter also said Solutia has made "solid progress" in investigating and cleaning up PCBs in the Anniston area. Tommy Abernathy, who lives with his family near the former Monsanto plant, said, "Monsanto got exactly what was coming to them." He said he would not have raised a family in western Anniston if the company had given full disclosure to residents about the spread of the PCB contamination from its plant. Plaintiff attorney Donald Stewart said he is "gratified about the verdict. We're looking forward to putting on the rest of our case." Solutia's Anniston plant manager, David Cain, said he was disappointed with the verdict and he said he didn't feel it reflected the company's conduct in Anniston in the past or present. He noted, "It is not going to change how we feel about this community. We are going to continue to strive to be good neighbors in Anniston." The jury members filed into the courtroom at approximately 10 a.m. Friday, and their foreman, Christy Lewis, a health worker in Etowah County, gave the bailiff the document containing the jury's unanimous ruling on six counts - negligence, wantonness, fraud, trespass, nuisance and outrage. Several of the jurors turned to look directly at the lawyers and plaintiffs sitting in the benches before Lewis handed their letter to the bailiff, who then gave it to Laird to open and read. As Laird read the rulings on each count, some of the plaintiffs made muted exclamations and others cried. The judge then asked the jury to return to court Monday for continued proceedings in the case.
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] ,2). These effects may generate health risks for some people. Moreover, in the case of one such compound, the artificial sweetener aspartame (L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanyl-methyl ester), these neural effects were largely unexplored prior to the compound's addition to the food supply, and were not a factor in calculating the quantities that individuals can safely consume (the ADI, or acceptable daily intake, currently set for aspartame at 50 mg/kg) (3). The effects of aspartame, and of certain other food additives, like caffeine, on the nervous system are sometimes not of such a nature as to allow their detection by the standard neurotoxicological tests used to assess the safety of food additives, inasmuch as these effects need not be associated with cell death, nor with other visible manifestations of neuronal damage. Rather, they involve more subtle biochemical changes, as well as functional consequences that are demonstrable only in specially treated animals (4) (and possibly, by extrapolation, only in especially vulnerable people). Although these physiological effects are unrelated to the reason that the additive was placed in the food, they may have important health implications just the same, given the very large number of Americans who are routinely exposed to environmental constituents added to the food supply. If only 1% of the 100,000,000 Americans thought to consume aspartame ever exceed the sweetener's ADI, and if only 1% of this group happen coincidentally to have an underlying disease that makes their brains vulnerable to the effects of an aspartame-induced rise in brain phenylalanine levels, then the number of people who might manifest adverse brain reactions attributable to aspartame would still be about 10,000, a number on the same order as the number of neurally related consumer complaints already registered with the FDA and other federal agencies (5,6). A Google search on "aspartame, GRAS" gives 3,100 links. <http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk3/1977/7702/770207.PDF Cancer Testing Technology and Saccharin (Part 7 of 13) FDA approved aspartame as a food additive for a number of foods in July 1974,... <http://www.doh.state.fl.us/chdpasco/DI_Web/2000abstracts%5Caspartame.htm What is Aspartame? What is It Used For? by Rebecca Granda The FDA is the primary regulatory body that oversees the safety and truthfulness in labeling of food and drug products in the United States. Aspartame was approved for use in tabletop sweeteners, various foods, and dry beverage mixes in 1981. It was approved for use in carbonated beverages in 1983. Aspartame was awarded Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS) Affirmation. The FDA evaluates, affirms, and regularly monitors intakes of GRAS status products. <http://www.parkinson.org/aspartame.htm> Food and Drug Administration, FDA Consumer November - December 1999 by John Henkel While questions about saccharin may persist, the safety of another artificial sweetener, aspartame, is clear cut, say FDA officials. FDA calls aspartame, sold under trade names such as NutraSweet and Equal, one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved. The agency says the more than 100 toxicological and clinical studies it has reviewed confirm that aspartame is safe for the general population. <http://www.nzhealth.net.nz/poisons/aspartame.html> H.J. Roberts DOES ASPARTAME CAUSE HUMAN BRAIN CANCER? Journal of Advancement in Medicine Volume 4, Number 4, Winter 1991 Aspartame (NutraSweet) was licensed for use as an additive in the Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) category by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), first as a tabletop sweetener in July 1981, and then for “wet” use in beverages in July 1983. But this link <http://www.eatright.org/adap0598.html> Use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners-- Position of ADA J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98:580-587. lists the GRAS status of most sweeteners, but lists aspartame as: "Approved as a general-purpose sweetener" Laird said his discussion with the jurors on Monday will help him decide what to do about the plaintiffs' request for injunctive relief - in which they ask Laird to order comprehensive PCB cleanups of landfills and waterways. He said he will begin to consider the injunctive relief request next week. Meanwhile, the Monsanto legal team has asked Laird to dismiss the non-property damage claims of 2,042 plaintiffs in the case - either because they have no detectable PCBs in their blood or because they have not been tested. In a Feb. 12 filing to the court, the defense claimed "these plaintiffs have no evidence to support their claimed exposure to PCBs." Monsanto attorney Adam Peck said Solutia "looks forward to the next step in the (trial) process." He added that Solutia will continue to work on PCB cleanup issues with state and federal agencies no matter what happens in the Gadsden courtroom. Solutia previously has settled two PCB-related cases in the Anniston area. The company gave Choccolocco Creek and Logan Martin Lake property owners $40 million for contaminating the waterways and committed $21 million to a waterway investigation of PCBs. Solutia also settled with 1,600 plaintiffs who had property and personal injury claims in western Anniston, giving them $45 million. Currently, more than 25,000 people have sued or are suing Solutia and Monsanto in regards to PCB pollution in the Anniston area, including an approximate 15,000 who are now suing in Birmingham federal court. The initial phase of the Bowie v. Monsanto case includes property damage claims and emotional distress for the 15 plaintiffs who had elevated levels of PCBs in their blood. PCBs are a group of chemicals first manufactured in Anniston by the Swann Chemical Company in the early 1920s. Swann's Anniston plant was purchased by Monsanto in 1935, and the Missouri-based chemical company continued to produce PCBs in Anniston until 1971. PCBs are known to cause cancer in rats and mice and are linked to human neurological and developmental problems, skin rashes, thyroid dysfunction and other diseases. The Environmental Protection Agency lists PCBs as suspected human carcinogens  
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] So, I and others seem to have been mistaken in believing that aspartame had specific GRAS status, but it clearly was classified as a food additive, not a drug, and is therefore rather exempt from rigorous safety testing and monitoring. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/262> Gordon: UPI: aspartame toxicity Part 1/3 Oct 1987: Murray 7.10.0 rmforall Gregory Gordon, UPI investigative reporter] Dr. Gary Flamm, the FDA’s top toxicologist overseeing food additives, said that beyond labeling, once a food additive such as NutraSweet has won approval, it is far more difficult to restrict its marketing. "If...our approval of it was a mistake, we couldn't rectify that without data showing that aspartame was unsafe," said Flamm, an aspartame defender. Even then, he said, the agency would face a new regulatory thicket unless it could be shown NutraSweet posed "an imminent hazard." Consumer lawyer James Turner, who has campaigned for more than a decade for a NutraSweet ban, assailed the FDA’s treatment of such safety issues. "Once a product is on the market, whether there by nefarious or honest means," he said, "it is impossible to get it off the market until it has caused severe, undeniable damage that has probably lasted over many years." <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/56> Gold: aspartame history 1979-1999: Murray 11.6.99 rmforall Community Nutrition Institute (CNI) filed suit against the FDA in District Court claiming that the FDA did not follow proper procedure in approving aspartame for beverages and that they should have held a public hearing before giving final approval (Farber 1989, page 39). After the District Court dismissed their suit and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied their request for a hearing stating that they failed to "raise any material issues of fact that require the FDA to grant a hearing," CNI stated: ...where the holding of a public hearing is no longer a responsible part of the food additive process, the F.D.A. and the appeals court have increased the likelihood that unsafe food additives will reach the market. <http://www.HolisticMed.com/aspartame> 603-225-2100 Aspartame Toxicity Information Center Mark D. Gold mgold@shelltown.net 12 East Side Drive #2-18 Concord, NH 03301 <http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/methanol.html> "Scientific Abuse in Aspartame Research" *********************************************************** Rich Murray, MA Room For All rmforall@att.net 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA 505-986-9103 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/984> aspartame review: methanol, formaldehyde, formic acid toxicity: Murray 4.10.3 rmforall <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/983> aspartame & formaldehyde toxicity: Murray 4.10.3 rmforall <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages> for 988 posts in a public searchable archive <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartame/> 633 member group <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/985> details on EU Environment Committee vote 2.19.3 to reevaluate aspartame and stevia and limit cyclamate-- EU vote April 9: Murray 4.8.3 rmforall <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/968> EU MEPs vote to re-evaluate aspartame and stevia: Martini: Murray 2.21.3 rmforall <http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/scf2002-response.htm> Mark Gold exhaustively critiques European Commission Scientific Committee on Food re aspartame (12.4.2): 59 pages, 230 references ***************************************************
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] Aspartame Consumer Safety Network and Pilot Hotline 1987-2001] Mary Nash Stoddard, Founder & President P.O. Box 780634 Dallas, TX 75378 . 214-352-4268 marystod@airmail.net <http://web2.airmail.net/marystod/index.html> <http://web2.airmail.net/marystod/espanol.htm> Toxicology Sourcebook: "Deadly Deception: Story of Aspartame" Subject: GRAS substance? Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:34:16 -0500 From: Mary Stoddard <marystod@airmail.net> To: rmforall@att.net Dear Rich: Thank you for keeping us on your mailing list for updates. In a recent mailing, you wrote: Also, the potent effects of aspartame clearly vitiates the industry's claim that it is a "food additive", Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS), not a "drug", which should be vetted for safety by stringent and thorough studies. It is our understanding that aspartame has not yet been officially classified by FDA as a GRAS generally recognized as safe] substance. I asked that specific question, on my last meeting with them in their Washington D.C. headquarters, and their top officials assured A.C.S.N. co-founder, James Turner, Esq. and me that it was not officially GRAS. Do you have information from them that says something different? Best regards, Mary Hon. Mary Nash Stoddard, Founder and President Aspartame Consumer Safety Network & Pilot Hotline 1987-2003] P.O. Box 780634 - Dallas TX 75378-0634 U.S. ************************************************************* Yahoo! Groups Sponsor PLEASE TRY AND RECRUIT MEMBERS - SEND THEM TO <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartame/> PRINT OUT THIS FLIER AND HAND IT OUT TO PEOPLE: <http://www.ojinaga.com/aspartame/> CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE!! <http://presidiotex.com/aspartame> FREE ASPARTAME BUMPER STICKER <http://ojinaga.com/bumperstickers/freesticker/> to unsubscribe from this list, send a blank e-mail to: aspartame- unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Our chat room is at <http://pub43.bravenet.com/chat/show.php/3648148879> phenyllalanine, excitotoxins, MSG, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, depletes serotonin, rosacea, binds to calcium in teeth problems, Monsanto sold aspartame to Ajinomoto, an investment firm made up of Monsanto managers, Michael Dell's investment firm, and Childs of Boston,   Sandra Cabot M.D. not a diet product, but drug to make you crave carbs FDA, Recall Aspartame as a Neurotoxic Drug, Docket # 02P-0317 independent research, causes Formaldehyde accumulation, brain tumors, Fibromyalgia symptoms   Guardian How aspartame, sugar enhance onset of cancers They are extremely sweet. They are used in making almost all processed foods and drinks, even children's medicines. But they may be doing more harm than good. Besides diabetes and obesity, several new studies have linked aspartame and sugar to various cancers. CHUKWUMA MUANYA writes.
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] ARTIFICIAL sweeteners are common articles on breakfast tables. They are used to sweeten meals from tea to pap. They are used in making diet soft drinks, confectionaries, and children vitamins. Before now, artificial sweeteners such as aspartame and sugar have been associated with obesity and diabetes. This strong link has made medical experts to recommend alternative and healthy options like honey and thaumatin (from the rhizome of Moi Moi leaf plant, Thaumatococcus danielli). Thaumatin has been rated the sweetest natural substance known to mankind. The faking of honey by unscrupulous Nigerians by boiling crude sugar, sugar cane and starch, and selling them to unsuspecting buyers as 'original' has not helped matters. Critics say this may be contributing to the epidemic of diabetes in the country. Previous studies supported by endocrinologists, nutritionists, naturopaths and medical doctors suggest that sugary drinks such as fruit juices and energy drinks are fueling the onset of type 2 diabetes and heart disease. But latest studies suggest that top artificial sweetener, aspartame, has been found in latest animal experiments to cause breast cancer, leukemia and lymphomas. Also, ten new studies have shown the link between sugar and increased cancer risk. Aspartame, more commonly known as NutraSweet or Equal, is allegedly one of the most toxic substances being consumed today. The artificial sweetener, currently used in over 4,000 products worldwide, entertains a sordid past and has been one of the most tested and debated food additives. While the manufacturer maintains that aspartame is not a danger to human health, the scientific studies do not necessarily agree. Unfortunately, aspartame is an approved product for mass consumption, in spite of overwhelming evidence that aspartame can have neurotoxic, metabolic, allergenic, fetal and carcinogenic effects. In 1965, James Schlatter, a chemist for G.D. Searle, United States, was developing an anti-ulcer drug when he accidentally stumbled upon aspartame. Made up of aspartic acid (40 per cent), phenylalanine (50 per cent) and methanol (10 per cent), aspartame is 200 times sweeter than natural sugar. Aspartame is a neurotransmitter in the brain, facilitating information from one neuron to another. Too much aspartame has been shown to allow an influx of calcium into the brain cells, triggering an excessive amount of free radicals, which kill the cells. Aspartame is referred to as an "excitotoxin" because of the nerve cell damage that it causes. Many chronic illnesses have been attributed to long-term excitotoxin exposure, including multiple sclerosis, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), memory loss, hormonal problems, hearing loss, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, hypoglycemia, dementia, brain lesions and neuro endocrine disorders. Often referred to as 'Lou Gehrig's Disease,' ALS is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and the spinal cord. Why does cancer love sugar? A study team at Duke University School of Medicine, United States, has suggested a possible reason why cancer cells like sugar so much. Basically, according to the researchers, in healthy cells, certain growth factors regulate their metabolism and cell survival. When these growth factors are removed, there is loss of glucose uptake and metabolism, and the cells die. However, they found that cancer cells are able to maintain glucose metabolism by using a protein called "Akt", which promotes glucose metabolism. This prevents cell death, even when the growth factors are not available. A fertility expert at Medical Art Centre Maryland Ikeja, Lagos, and Joint Pioneer Test Tube technology in Nigeria, Prof. Oladapo Ashiru, told The Guardian in a telephone interview from Chicago, United States: "It is a fact that aspartame has been linked to cancer as well as low sperm count and hyper sensitivity reactions." A diabetologist from the Diabetes Clinic, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH), Dr. Okeoghene Ogbera said aspartame does not cause cancer in man but in animals. She said: " Sugars are known sources of energy and they also have an appealing taste. Sugar is rapidly digested and absorbed into the body, thus providing much needed energy". "Though a high content of sugar or glucose unilaterally does not lead to the development of Diabetes mellitus and cancers, consistent ingestion of processed food products by people with risk factors for Diabetes mellitus and cancer places them at a higher risk for developing the disease." However, there is actually a large volume of scientific evidence available, which shows the link between aspartame, sugar and increased cancer risk. A new study on aspartame conducted by the Ramazzini Foundation reveals that aspartame causes a dose-dependent increase in cancers (lymphomas, leukemias and breast cancers) when consumed at levels approaching those consumed by humans in diet soft drinks. Specifically, the study shows a significant dose-related increase of malignant tumor-bearing animals in males, in particular in the group treated at 2000 ppm; a significant increase of the incidence in lymphomas/leukemias in males treated at 2000 ppm and a significant dose-related increase of the incidence of lymphomas/leukemias in females, in particular in the group treated at 2000 ppm; a significant dose-related increase of the incidence of mammary cancer in females, in particular in the group treated at 2000 ppm. The researchers conclude: "The results of this carcinogenicity bioassay not only confirm, but also reinforce the first experimental demonstration of (aspartame's) multipotential carcinogenicity at a dose level close to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for humans. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that when lifespan exposure to aspartame begins during fetal life, its carcinogenic effects are increased." The study, entitled "Lifespan Exposure to Low Doses of Aspartame Beginning During Prenatal Life Increases Cancer Effects in Rats" has been accepted for publication in the peer- reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP), the most widely-read environmental science journal in the world. This is the second study conducted by the Ramizzini Foundation documenting the cancer-causing effects of aspartame in animals. Most sane people, when faced with such evidence, would ask the obvious questions: Could aspartame also cause cancer in humans? Should review the safety of aspartame be reviewed just in case? A study conducted by Harvard Medical School, United States, found that women who ate the most foods with high glycemic load - the glycemic index, or GI, of a food gives an idea of how quickly sugar (more specifically, glucose) levels in the blood rise after eating it - had almost three times the risk of getting colorectal cancer in the future, compared with women who ate lesser amounts of such foods. Typically, processed foods made from refined grains and refined sugar, including candy bars, cakes, cookies and other snacks, are high glycemic foods "We find a very straightforward and clear association between high-glycemic foods and the risk of colorectal cancers," said lead researcher Dr. Simin Liu. This study involved some 40,000 American women. Another study at Harvard University found that middled aged men whose diets tended to increase blood sugar levels quicker, that is those who ate more high GI foods, had a 32 per cent
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] higher chance of getting colorectal cancer over a period of 20 years. The study, which involved more than 50,000 men, also found that this effect seemed to be more pronounced in heavier men. The Women's Health Study in the United States found that those who consumed a diet, which raised blood sugar levels more had a 135 per cent higher risk of getting breast cancer in the seven-year period of the study. The Iowa Women's Health Study in the United States looked at some 23,000 post-menopausal women. It found that those who consumed a diet, which raised blood sugar levels more had a 46 per cent higher risk of getting endometrial cancer over a period of 15 years. Another study in Italy carried out on women with endometrial cancer found that those who consumed a blood sugar-raising diet had a 110 per cent higher risk of getting this disease. In a study, which followed almost 90,000 US women participating in the Nurse's Health Study for a period of 18 years, it was found that women with a high glycemic load intake had a 53 per cent higher risk of getting pancreatic cancer. A similar increase in risk, 57 per cent, was observed for fructose intake. Further, the study also found that women who were heavy and with low levels of physical activity experienced greatly enhanced risk. Women in this group with high glycemic load had 2.67 times the risk of their counterparts with low glycemic load intake! A study carried out by Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden and Central Hospital in V?ster?s, Sweden followed almost 78,000 Swedish men and women with no previous diagnosis of cancer or history of diabetes for a mean period of more than seven years. The subjects were aged from 45 to 83 years. The study found that consuming added sugar, soft drinks, sweetened fruit soups or stewed fruit increased the risk of pancreatic cancer. Those who ate the most sugar had a 69 per cent higher risk compared with those who ate the least sugar. The corresponding higher risk for soft drinks was 93 per cent, while for sweetened fruit soups or stewed fruit it was 51 per cent. The study concluded that "high consumption of sugar and high-sugar foods may be associated with a greater risk of pancreatic cancer". An Italian study examined the habits of men aged 46 to 74 who had prostate cancer and compared their dietary choices to similar men who did not contract the disease. The study found that those men whose diets were more likely to increase blood sugar levels had a 57 per cent higher risk of getting prostate cancer. A large study carried out by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Yonsei University in Seoul, Korea tracked almost 1.3 million Korean men and women, aged between 30 and 95 years, for a period of 10 years. The study found that those with the highest fasting glucose levels were more likely to die from all types of cancer combined. For the men, the strongest link was found for pancreatic cancer, while significant links were also reported for oesophagus, liver and colorectal cancers. For the women, the strongest associations were for liver and cervical cancers. All in all, besides being more likely to die from cancer, those with highest fasting blood glucose levels also had higher risk of developing cancer. And obesity had a part to play, too. "This study provides more information on glucose intolerance, an emerging cause of cancer. It points to increased cancer risk as another adverse consequence of rising obesity around the world," concluded Sun Ha Jee, leader of the study. Another thing to note - the study participants were said to be substantially leaner than the typical population in Western countries, as mentioned by the study team. A study carried out at Umea University Hospital in Sweden looked at almost 65,000 people in northern Sweden for a mean period of eight years. The study found that women with the highest blood sugar levels had a higher risk of getting cancer before the end of the study period. This group of women also had higher risk of endometrial cancer, while those below 49 years of age had higher risk of breast cancer. In addition, both men and women who had the highest levels of blood sugar had higher risks of pancreatic cancer, urinary tract cancer, as well as malignant melanoma. These results led Prof. Par Stattin, part of the study team, to state that keeping blood sugar levels within the normal range "may reduce cancer risk". According to Dr. Russell L. Blaylock in Excitotoxins, "when your stomach processes DKP, it produces a compound very similar to N-nitrosourea, a powerful brain tumor-causing chemical. In addition, aspartame contains methanol, which the body breaks down into formic acid and formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is one of the main substances pumped into a dead body during the embalming process. "Now, when I am dead, the morticians can pump formaldehyde into my body. Before then, however, I do not want to be pumped full of any chemical used in the embalming process, and I am sure you do not, either. According to Blaylock, formaldehyde accumulates near DNA and causes serious damage. "Drinking even one diet cola a day can cause formaldehyde buildup in cells, so that the amount of the toxin increases daily," he writes in Health and Nutrition Secrets. Phenylalanine is an amino acid normally found in the brain. Human testing has shown phenylalanine levels in the blood are increased significantly in those who chronically use aspartame. Excessive levels of phenylalanine in the brain can cause the levels of serotonin to decrease, which can lead to depression, schizophrenia and make one more susceptible to seizures. Studies conducted on rats by G.D. Searle found phenylalanine to be safe for humans. However, Louis J. Elsas, Director of Medical Genetics and Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine told the U.S. Senate in 1987 that, "Normal humans do not metabolize phenylalanine as efficiently as do lower species such as rodents and thus most of the previous studies on aspartame effects on rodents are irrelevant." Unfortunately, this fell on deaf ears and failed to garner additional testing. By far, the most controversial ingredient in aspartame is methanol (aka wood alcohol). A United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assessment of methanol states that it is "considered a cumulative poison due to the low rate of excretion once it is absorbed. In the body, methanol is oxidated to formaldehyde and formic acid; both of these metabolites are toxic." This oxidation occurs when methanol reaches 86 degrees F (30 degrees C). A product broken down from aspartame is a known carcinogen and causes retinal damage, birth defects and interferes with DNA replications. The EPA recommends a consumption limit of 7.8 mg/day. A 1 Liter aspartame sweetened beverage contains about 56 mg of methanol, seven times the EPA limit. The most common maladies related to methanol poisoning are vision problems including misty vision, progressive contraction of visual fields, blurring of vision, obscuration of vision, retinal damage and blindness.
    • Aspartame-Rumsfeld NewsFollowup.com TransparencyPlanet, promote biz/govt transparency http://www.newsfollowup.com/aspartame.htm[5/28/2014 5:30:34 PM] Ashiru said: "Based on the findings of the above mentioned studies, we can conclude that sugar feeds cancer. The truth is, sugar feeds all cells in human bodies. It therefore cannot be all bad. Two things we must take note of, however, is the amount and the type of sugar, which is consumed. "Consuming too much sugar causes human bodies to produce excessive amounts of insulin. And insulin itself encourages the growth of cells, something, which is good for healthy cells, but not cancerous cells. "The other key point is to avoid simple sugars. Broadly speaking, processed and refined foods, including soft drinks, sugary beverages, candy bars, cakes, other desserts, as well as other snacks, contain high amounts of simple sugars. These are high GI foods, which can cause insulin levels to spike. "On the other hand, natural sugars found in fruits and vegetables are so much safer and better for health. Even fresh fruit juice, despite its high sugar content, is great for health. On top of that, healthy whole foods come with a wide concoction of vitamins and minerals, something which refined sugar is totally devoid of. "When one's insulin levels suddenly increase, the level of sugar in the blood can suddenly crash. This, then, can cause one to feel intensely hungry. People then eat more, and feel hungry again soon, and the cycle keeps going." Ogbera said: "Further, because of their lack of nutrition, foods with a lot of simple sugars are basically empty calories. When the body's nutritional needs are not met, it continues to crave for food, which again explains the non-stop eating and feasting. "The more refined sugars one eats, the fatter one becomes, yet the more malnourished one can be. It is a huge paradox, and a dangerous one at that. "Refined sugar is devoid of important nutrients, causes obesity, causes cavities, and also increases cancer risk. If you or a loved one are battling cancer, or are serious about avoiding the disease, you may want to take note of your intake of this common yet dangerous substance."   follow up, the act of following up. 2. an action or thing that serves to increase the effectiveness of a previous one, as a second or subsequent letter, phone call, or visit. 3. Also called follow. Journalism. a. a news story providing additional information on a story or article previously published. b. Also called sidebar, supplementary story. a minor news story used to supplement a related story of major importance. Compare feature story (def. 1), human-interest story, shirttail. –adjective 4. designed or serving to follow up, esp. to increase the effectiveness of a previous action: a follow-up interview; a follow-up offer. 5. of or pertaining to action that follows an initial treatment, course of study, etc.: follow-up care for mental patients; a follow-up survey. fol·low –verb (used with object) 1. to come after in sequence, order of time, etc.: The speech follows the dinner. 2. to go or come after; move behind in the same direction: Drive ahead, and I'll follow you. 3. to accept as a guide or leader; accept the authority of or give allegiance to: Many Germans followed Hitler. 4. to conform to, comply with, or act in accordance with; obey: to follow orders; to follow advice. 5. to imitate or copy; use as an exemplar: They follow the latest fads. 6. to move forward along (a road, path, etc.): Follow this road for a mile. 7. to come after as a result or consequence; result from: Reprisals often follow victory. 8. to go after or along with (a person) as companion. 9. to go in pursuit of: to follow an enemy. 10. to try for or attain to: to follow an ideal. 11. to engage in or be concerned with as a pursuit: He followed the sea as his true calling. 12. to watch the movements, progress, or course of: to follow a bird in flight. 13. to watch the development of or keep up with: to follow the news. 14. to keep up with and understand (an argument, story, etc.): Do you follow me? –verb (used without object) 15. to come next after something else in sequence, order of time, etc. 16. to happen or occur after something else; come next as an event: After the defeat great disorder followed. 17. to attend or serve. 18. to go or come after a person or thing in motion. 19. to result as an effect; occur as a consequence: It follows then that he must be innocent. –noun 20. the act of following. 21. Billiards, Pool. follow shot (def. 2). 22. follow-up (def. 3). —Verb phrases23. follow out, to carry to a conclusion; execute: They followed out their orders to the letter. 24. follow through, a. to carry out fully, as a stroke of a club in golf, a racket in tennis, etc. b. to continue an effort, plan, proposal, policy, etc., to its completion. 25. follow up, a. to pursue closely and tenaciously. b. to increase the effectiveness of by further action or repetition. c. to pursue to a solution or conclusion. —Idiom26. follow suit. suit (def. 13). fol·low·a·ble, adjective —Synonyms 3. obey. 4. heed, observe. 8. accompany, attend. 9. pursue, chase; trail, track, trace. 19. arise, proceed. Follow, ensue, result, succeed imply coming after something else, in a natural sequence. Follow is the general word: We must wait to see what follows. A detailed account follows. Ensue implies a logical sequence, what might be expected normally to come after a given act, cause, etc.: When the power lines were cut, a paralysis of transportation ensued. Result emphasizes the connection between a cause or event and its effect, consequence, or outcome: The accident resulted in injuries to those involved. Succeed implies coming after in time, particularly coming into a title, office, etc.: Formerly the oldest son succeeded to his father's title. —Antonyms 1. precede. 2, 3. lead. 4. disregard. 9. flee.  news follow up