Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Patent Portfolios that Attract Venture Capital Investment
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Patent Portfolios that Attract Venture Capital Investment

  • 452 views
Published

 

Published in Economy & Finance , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
452
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. MassMedic Meeting March 6, 2008 Omar Amirana, MD Oxford Bioscience Partners 222 Berkeley Street, Suite 1650 Boston, MA 02116 617-357-7474 General [email_address] www.oxbio.com Patent Portfolios that Attract Venture Capital Investment
  • 2. Oxford BioScience Partners
    • Boston based life science venture capital firm
    • OBP Brand spans 20 years in the industry
    • Five Funds totaling $1B of committed capital
    • Team of 5 general partners and 5 investment professionals & Executives-In-Residence group
    • Invest in Therapeutics, Medical Devices, Research Tools, and other Life Science Breakthroughs
    • Invest in all stages; Find & lead over 60% of deals
    • Invest worldwide
  • 3. Is IP still the Wild West of Innovation? ?
  • 4. Goals of IP
    • Protect a Potential Product
    • Protect a Path to Market
    • “ Own a Space”
    • Create Exclusivity and Desire
    • Block Competition
    • Funding
    • Exits
  • 5. IP: “Intellectual” Property Intellectual – adjective 1. appealing to or engaging the intellect: intellectual pursuits. 2. of or pertaining to the intellect or its use: intellectual powers. 3. possessing or showing intellect or mental capacity, esp. to a high degree: an intellectual person. 4. guided or developed by or relying on the intellect rather than upon emotions or feelings; rational. Property – noun 1. that which a person owns; the possession or possessions of a particular owner: They lost all their property in the fire. 2. goods, land, etc., considered as possessions: The corporation is a means for the common ownership of property. 3. ownership; right of possession, enjoyment, or disposal of anything, esp. of something tangible: to have property in land. 4. something at the disposal of a person, a group of persons, or the community or public: The secret of the invention became common property.
  • 6. Intellectual Property: Attention at all Stages Litigation Enforcement Transactions Prosecution
  • 7. IP: Asset or Liability?
    • Timing of Corporate Events: Funding / Exits
    • Pending vs. Issued
    • Competitors; IP Landscape
    • “ Freedom” – To FTO or Not?
    • Value Inflection Curves
    • Timing to Market vs Funding vs IP Costs
    • Global vs Domestic
    • “ Types” of IP: Method vs Device Claims
    • IP can reflect on management
  • 8.
    • Example 1: Stents
        • In 1994, there were ~400 Stent Patents*
        • In 2005, there were 7000+ Stent Patents* 
        • The Palmaz Stent Patent was Purportedly Worth $1M/Day
    Medical Device Patent Landscape is Exploding Results of Search in US Patent Collection database for: TTL/stent: 1981 patents. ACLM/stent: 3887 patents. *Based on a Keyword searches Source: Townsend and Townsend
  • 9.
        •     Example 2: Guidewires
        •         In 1974, a Modified VW Clutch Cable was used
        • (and then Patented for use) as a Vascular Guidewire
        •         In 2005, there were 5700+ Guidewire Patents*
    Medical Device Patent Landscape is Exploding *Based on a Keyword searches Source: Townsend and Townsend Results of Search in US Patent Collection database for: TTL/guidewire: 491 patents. ACLM/guidewire: 2265 patents.
  • 10. PercuSurge: Distal Embolic Protection
  • 11. PercuSurge: IP Evolution 1 6,558,401 Low profile catheter for angioplasty and occlusion (May 2003) 2 6,500,147 Flexible catheter 3 6,468,230 Core wire with shapeable tip 4 6,454,741 Aspiration method 5 6,398,773 Aspiration system and method 6 6,375,629 Core wire with shapeable tip 7 6,375,628 Hollow medical wires and methods of constructing same 8 6,355,016 Catheter core wire 9 6,355,014 Low profile catheter valve 10 6,338,709 Intravascular radiation therapy device and method of use 11 6,325,778 Low profile catheter valve and inflation adaptor 12 6,325,777 Low profile catheter valve and inflation adaptor 13 6,319,229 Balloon catheter and method of manufacture 14 6,312,407 Occlusion of a vessel 15 6,273,878 Shaft for medical catheters 16 6,270,477 Catheter for emboli containment 17 6,234,996 Integrated inflation/deflation device and method 18 6,231,588 Low profile catheter for angioplasty and occlusion 19 6,228,072 Shaft for medical catheters 20 6,217,567 Hollow medical wires and methods of constructing same 21 6,190,332 Core wire with shapeable tip 22 6,159,195 Exchange catheter and method of use 23 6,156,054 Medical wire introducer and balloon protective sheath 24 6,152,909 Aspiration system and method 25 6,135,991 Aspiration method 26 6,068,623 Hollow medical wires and methods of constructing same 27 6,050,972 Guidewire inflation system 28 6,022,336 Catheter system for emboli containment 29 5,997,562 Medical wire introducer and balloon protective sheath 30 5,893,867 Stent positioning apparatus and method 31 5,833,650 Catheter apparatus and method for treating occluded vessels 32 5,833,644 Method for emboli containment (Nov 1998)
  • 12. PercuSurge: 1 st Issued Patent in 1998 Financing history ($, millions) 9 7 21 15 5 25 57 100 125 110 16 80 50 2.25 0 75 150 225 1995 1996 1997 1999 2000 2000 Start-up Dev Beta Commercialization 225 Product Launch Source: Venture Source
    • Developed and commercialized embolic protection devices
    • Raised $54M in private capital
    • Bought by Medtronic in 2000 for $225M
    • Without revenues, would have likely been valued at $100M
    • Investors doubled their return by launching product
    100-120 Pioneer 1 st Patent issues: Nov. 10, 1998 5,833,644 Zadno-Azizi, et al Method for emboli containment
  • 13.
    • Medical Devices Have an Almost 
    • "Ideal" Business Cycle for Patenting: 
    • High Value Products
    • Typically ~3 to ~9 Year Cycle
    • Initial Product Development / FDA Approval
    • Initial Patent Application/Broad Patent Coverage
        • Significant Product Commercial Life (Often 10+ Years) Incremental Product Improvements after initial Approval
        • Absent IP, Reduced Barriers to Entry for Second in Field
    Why the Medical Device Patent Explosion?
  • 14.
      • Technologically Interdisciplinary
        • Anatomy & Physiology
        • Mechanical
        • Visualization: Optical, Ultrasound, MRI, CT, . . .
        • Electrical: RF and Microwave Power, Data Processing
        • Drug Delivery, Diagnostics, Implantables, . . .
      • Subtle Differences Result in Vastly Different Patient Outcomes
      • US and International Laws Distinguish Between “Medical” and Other Patents
      • Valuable Patents Reflect The Industry’s Business Models
        • Disposables/Consumables and Capital Equipment
        • Marketing to Interv. Cardiologists vs. Cardiac Surgeons
    Med. Dev. Prosecution has Become Highly Specialized
  • 15. As Medical Patents Surge, So Do Lawsuits…
    • Tresa Baldas The National Law Journal July 16, 2007
    • A surge in patents that protect surgeries and other medical methods has triggered numerous lawsuits in recent years , with inventors fighting more vigorously than ever to protect their intellectual property rights.
    • The medical community is weary of the trend, noting that threats of patent infringement litigation could interfere with effective patient care .
    • Attorney John Dragseth of the Minneapolis office of Fish & Richardson said he has noticed a new trend: doctors getting their own patents , and then asserting them against medical device companies in court.
    • Dragseth cited the recent case of Dr. Gary Michelson, who in 2005 received a $1.35 billion settlement after suing a medical device company over his patented spinal surgical technique that speeds recovery. Medtronic v. Michelson , No. 01cv2373 (W.D. Tenn.).
    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1184576791631
  • 16. As Medical Patents Surge, So Do Lawsuits
    • Last month, a veterinarian who sued a surgical instrument maker over his patented technique for declawing a cat also won his case when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld his patent. Young v. Lumenis , No. 06-1455 (S.D. Ohio).
    • About 100 medical-process patents are issued a month -- double the amount in the 1980s, according to the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics and other legal and academic journals.
    • 1996 federal law prohibits method infringement lawsuits against doctors . But medical device makers can be sued for inducing infringement of a method by a doctor . And universities and companies are increasingly trying to impose restrictions on the use of their intellectual property.
    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1184576791631
  • 17.
    • February 22, 2008 - In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld initial lower court rulings that medical device manufacturers cannot be held liable in state tort cases if the device has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The case, Reigel v. Medtronic, is significant because it reaffirms that existing Federal device approval laws preempt individual state regulations. Specifically, the ruling applies to devices approved by the FDA under a premarket approval (PMA) application.
    http://www.medicaldevices.org/public/ Supreme Court Limits Lawsuits Against Medical Device Manufacturers
  • 18.
    • Friday February 15, 3:11 pm ET By Mark Jewell, AP Business Writer
    • BOSTON (AP) -- A patent judgment against Boston Scientific Corp. has jumped to $501 million after a judge tacked on an additional $69 million in interest . U.S. District Judge John Ward ruled Thursday to expand the damages award -- decided by a federal jury in Marshall, Texas -- to cover interest on royalties dating to the medical device maker's 2004 U.S. launch of drug-coated heart stents.
    • After deliberating less than two hours, jurors awarded $432 million on Monday to Dr. Bruce Saffran, who argued the stents violated his 1997 patent covering technology to deliver medication within the body to heal injuries.
    • Saffran, a radiologist from Princeton, N.J., filed a similar patent challenge against Johnson & Johnson over its Cypher stent. That case is pending in Ward's court , an East Texas district that is a popular venue to bring patent claims.
    • Saffran's award involving Boston Scientific covers only past royalties. The judge also ordered that the question of future royalties be split into a separate case after the doctor files a new complaint covering that issue . Ward ordered Boston Scientific to file quarterly reports with the court on sales of its top-selling product, the Taxus Express stent, and the next-generation Taxus Liberte.
    Damages in Stent Patent Case = $501M
  • 19.
    • NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. and MENLO PARK, Calif., Nov. 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Johnson & Johnson and Conor Medsystems, Inc. a cardiovascular device company, today announced a definitive agreement whereby Johnson & Johnson will acquire Conor Medsystems for approximately $1.4 billion.
    • The acquisition of Conor Medsystems by Johnson & Johnson will provide Cordis Corporation, a Johnson & Johnson company, with a unique controlled drug delivery technology. This technology is currently employed on the CoStar® Stent System, a paclitaxel-eluting cobalt chromium stent with a bioabsorbable polymer. The CoStar® Stent is currently sold outside the United States, and enrollment in its U.S. pivotal clinical trial has been completed.
    JNJ Acquires Conor Medsystems for ~$1.4B
  • 20. Even with Great Advances, Caution is Prudent
  • 21. Consult the Experts; Hire Excellent IP Attorneys
  • 22. Summary: IP = Asset which should Build Value
    • Protects a Blockbuster Product
    • Protects a Path to Market
    • “ Owns a Space”
    • Creates Exclusivity and Desire
    • Blocks Competition
    • Is Budgeted for; has a Strategy
    • Encourages Funding
    • Helps Drive Exits
  • 23. MassMedic Meeting March 6, 2008 Omar Amirana, MD Oxford Bioscience Partners 222 Berkeley Street, Suite 1650 Boston, MA 02116 617-357-7474 General [email_address] www.oxbio.com Patent Portfolios that Attract Venture Capital Investment