Cream Of The Crop Part Iii How Effective Is Your Loyalty Program

  • 647 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
647
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Cream of The Crop Part III How Effective is Your Loyalty Program? May | 2009
  • 2. Cream of The Crop Part III I How Effective is Your Loyalty Program? The third in a series around features of successful loyalty programs that have helped certain companies stand out from the rest, with program offerings that are recognized as best-in-class. Keeping Costs Under Control While this article was to focus on control groups and measurement methods as was mentioned previously, there is a more pressing urgency that needs to be addressed. This is around the concept of keeping loyalty program costs under control. The most appreciated loyalty programs from a customer perspective are those that are perceived as generous. Customers desire to be recognized for the value they add to a company, and thus, want their loyalty programs to award them generously. In certain sectors and their respective loyalty programs, there are minimums that customers expect back as a payout – traditionally 1-2% in supermarkets, 3-5% in telecoms, 10%+ in retail (particularly clothing and restaurants). Paying out less is simply not acceptable for two reasons – one, when your competitors are being generous to their customer base and thus your program is not best-in-class, and two, when your customer base is wary of your tactics and can calculate your stinginess. So what to do when you can’t convince your Finance Department or executive ranks to be generous? Revise your business model and offerings. Here’s an example of how to make the customer think they are getting 2% back, but in reality, it affects your company’s bottom line by .4%: Begin with a 2% payout rate. Traditionally, successful loyalty programs have participation rates of 75%, and redemption rates of around 60%. This right away brings the payout to .9% (2%*.75%*.60% = .9%). If you don’t have Execs on board yet, there’s more. Bring in a partner that offers an attractive redemption alternative from customers to not only improve the overall strength of your program, but to reduce the overall costs. Here’s how a blended offering would work at a grocery store if they brought on board a restaurant chain as a partner. Points Earned Payout Estimated Redemption Per 1 USD Spent Ratio Reward for 500 points Ratios 10 USD Voucher for Use 1 2% in Grocery Store 50% 10 USD Voucher for Use at Restaurant Partner 50%
  • 3. With the above rules in place, two additional topics come into play – one, the discount to be obtained from the partner, and two, the cannibalization effect: 1.) Traditionally, such partners are willing to give a 50% discount on the reward in question – our loyalty program engagements dictate this (this depends somewhat on the negotiating power of the grocery store). The above mentioned 10 USD restaurant voucher in essence costs the grocery store only 5 USD, but still makes the customer feel they are getting 2% back. 2.) Cannibalization in this case refers to the concept of whether the 10USD voucher in question is cannibalizing from a normal purchase the customer would have made regardless, and thus, is technically lost revenue. In most cases, the reward does cause significant cannibalization – the customer is a regular shopper and would have given you the 10 USD in question at their next visit but now won’t. Thus, this entire amount can be considered foregone revenue (in some sectors like airlines and banking, this cannibalization occurs to a much lesser degree, especially if the reward is not pure cash but rather lest often used benefits and services). Taking the .9% ratio and considering half of the restaurant partner redemptions are subsidized, the payout is whittled down to a .67% ratio. There are ways to bring this down even further by modifying internal benefits to ultimately help you achieve a payout ratio of .45%, but the rewards should always be kept relatively attractive – in this case, the internal voucher is a necessity. Thus, the original 2% payout ratio is stabilized in this case at .67%, one third of the original figure. Added back in would be .1-.2% traditionally to cover launch and ongoing marketing costs around the program. Other one-time costs around systems may also apply. Most important here is that the customer perception around the generosity of the program is maintained, and management is hopefully persuaded to go forward with a launch. Next month, as promised, we’ll talk about to measure the overall success of the program, how the perception in fact turns into benefits that can quantifiably me measured.
  • 4. About Forte Consultancy Group Forte Consultancy Group delivers fact-based solutions, balancing short and long term impact as well as benefits for stakeholders. Forte Consultancy Group provides a variety of service offerings for numerous sectors, approached in three general phases - intelligence, design, and implementation. For more information, please contact info@forteconsultancy.com Forte Consultancy Group | Istanbul Office www.forteconsultancy.com