THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE                            TM                            bismi-lLahi-rRa...
montage of quotes from Shermer’s spurious novel-as-true-history – DenyingHistory: “The purpose of this book is to… show pr...
THE “PURE EXTERMINATION CENTERS”                          The number of                                                   ...
the quantities of ashes that remain… The wood ashes remaining would then haveweighed approximately 1,000 metric tons… The ...
the Germans were able to burn these millions of bodies by the ingenious“discovery” that by stacking the bodies “just right...
“Eyewitness” Yankel Wiernik’s model showing the “huge mass graves” ofTreblinka that allegedly contain the millions of poun...
sciences of forensic criminology and archaeology? If not, why? And if so, thenwhy does he refuse to publish the results? A...
Michael Shermer accuses real skeptics of denying history because, in part,they refuse to share his delusional belief that ...
Treblinka right before the Jews’ obscuration (and consecration) of the sitewith their delusive shrine.      Can you locate...
refuse to publish the findings of his alleged investigation which he claims heconducted at Treblinka? (Odd behavior for a ...
The following email is just one example that illustrates the numerous                    opportunities that were afforded ...
And speaking of deliberate omissions, there are a few more important thingsto know about Shermer’s deluding novel Denying ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

The Treblinka crime scene investigation challenge TM

932

Published on

Even though the scientific method can be (and has been) used to prove or disprove this “historical fact,” here’s an example of how easy just a little skeptical inquiry and honest historiography can be used to expose the Treblinka holohoax for the fraud that it is; Holocaust “expert” Yitzak Arad: “All we do have is survivors’ evidence and testimony… this is the main source for our information about the camp… No trace of the extermination operation remain.” (Arad’s “expert testimony” at the trial of John Demjanjuk.) Yet Treblinka “survivor / eyewitness” Szyja Warszawski claims: “The ashes that remained after the burning were thrown back into the pits where the bodies had been dug out earlier… For some pits only the top layer of bodies was dug out. The rest of the bodies were covered over with soil…” (Warszawski’s “eyewitness testimony” to the Main Commission for the Investigation of the Hitlerite Crimes in Poland.) So who do you believe – the so-called “experts” or the alleged “eyewitnesses?” These contradictory claims can’t both be true. (But they can both be false!) The official Treblinka story is based entirely on fraudulent “eyewitness accounts,” yet numerous “eyewitness accounts” totally contradict the official story. Yet it is literally a thought crime in 15 countries of the world for not simultaneously believing both of these contradictory claims! But it gets worse. There are many more new lies being told to cover up the old. The holocaust industry’s asinine response to Krege’s scientific / forensic debunking of the alleged Treblinka holocaust is to claim that the reason he found no evidence of the alleged huge mass graves was because the Germans “obliterated” all evidence of their crime. Yet at the same time, MICHAEL SHERMER claims that he’s used the methods of science to prove the orthodox version of the alleged Treblinka holocaust! What’s wrong with this picture? (Other than the fact that he refuses to publish his results.) To illustrate the sophistic machinations that the holocaust industry (which of course includes Shermer and his “Skeptics” Society) has gone through to make this fraudulent claim, look at this montage of quotes from Shermer’s spurious novel-as-true-history – Denying History: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence, how we know the Holocaust happened… we must obey the rules of reason and apply the tools of science… Historians both discover and describe the past, just as natural scientists… we can use the methods of science to… marshal the evidence and apply tight logic… This process is practiced by all scientists… historical scientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything in the past happened… We must review the physical evidence in conjunction with written documents and eyewitness testimonies… As historical scientists, however, we realize that… when the participating scholars play by the rules of science, logic, and reason… hypotheses can be weighed agains

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
932
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "The Treblinka crime scene investigation challenge TM"

  1. 1. THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful You must scientifically – forensically prove the grave’s EXACT location, its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetric density. The cremated remains must total at least one percent of the alleged mass murder. JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! – JUST ONE PERCENT! Even though the scientific method can be (and has been) used to prove ordisprove this “historical fact,” here’s an example of how easy just a little skepticalinquiry and honest historiography can be used to expose the Treblinka holohoaxfor the fraud that it is; Holocaust “expert” Yitzak Arad: “All we do have issurvivors’ evidence and testimony… this is the main source for our informationabout the camp… No trace of the extermination operation remain.” (Arad’s“expert testimony” at the trial of John Demjanjuk.) Yet Treblinka “survivor /eyewitness” Szyja Warszawski claims: “The ashes that remained after theburning were thrown back into the pits where the bodies had been dug outearlier… For some pits only the top layer of bodies was dug out. The rest of thebodies were covered over with soil…” (Warszawski’s “eyewitness testimony” tothe Main Commission for the Investigation of the Hitlerite Crimes in Poland.) Sowho do you believe – the so-called “experts” or the alleged “eyewitnesses?”These contradictory claims can’t both be true. (But they can both be false!) Theofficial Treblinka story is based entirely on fraudulent “eyewitness accounts,” yetnumerous “eyewitness accounts” totally contradict the official story. Yet it isliterally a thought crime in 15 countries of the world for not simultaneouslybelieving both of these contradictory claims! But it gets worse. There are many more new lies being told to cover upthe old. The holocaust industry’s asinine response to Krege’s scientific / forensicdebunking of the alleged Treblinka holocaust is to claim that the reason he foundno evidence of the alleged huge mass graves was because the Germans“obliterated” all evidence of their crime. Yet at the same time, MICHAELSHERMER claims that he’s used the methods of science to prove the orthodoxversion of the alleged Treblinka holocaust! What’s wrong with this picture? (Otherthan the fact that he refuses to publish his results.) To illustrate the sophisticmachinations that the holocaust industry (which of course includes Shermer andhis “Skeptics” Society) has gone through to make this fraudulent claim, look at this
  2. 2. montage of quotes from Shermer’s spurious novel-as-true-history – DenyingHistory: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence, howwe know the Holocaust happened… we must obey the rules of reason and applythe tools of science… Historians both discover and describe the past, just asnatural scientists… we can use the methods of science to… marshal the evidenceand apply tight logic… This process is practiced by all scientists… historicalscientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything inthe past happened… We must review the physical evidence in conjunction withwritten documents and eyewitness testimonies… As historical scientists, however,we realize that… when the participating scholars play by the rules of science,logic, and reason… hypotheses can be weighed against the evidence… We knowthat the Holocaust happened through the tried and true method employed by allhistorical scientists… our book clearly presented the convergence of evidence forhow we know the Holocaust happened.” Well now, that changes everything doesn’t it? If Shermer, who insists that hemust see compelling evidence before he believes anything, has proven theholocaust via the scientific method, then there must be tons of tangible physicalevidence that proves the alleged Treblinka holocaust, right? But why then didn’tany of this “physical evidence” show up on Krege’s GPR scan? And if the Jewsdispute Krege’s results, then why haven’t they conducted their own forensic /GPR examination of Treblinka? They could easily and conclusively prove thealleged Treblinka holocaust in a heartbeat by using real science and moderntechnology. (IF the story is true.) Why do you think they had to resort to thefalse “science of history” to counter the real sciences of forensic criminologyand archeology? Of course, those were all rhetorical questions. Denying History is nothingbut pure Orwellian rectification of history – damage control to counter the harmthat the holocaust truth movement is doing to their sinking ship of lies. THEHOLOCAUST INDUSTRY has sophistically attempted to elevate the study ofhistory into a “science,” then use this newly manufactured science to prove theirfalse history, thus; claiming to repudiate real science without offering an iota ofscientific / physical evidence for the alleged Treblinka holocaust. Not a singlemass grave. Not a single pound of crushed bone. Not so much as a singletooth! The truth is, they’re trying to blind you with sophistically manufacturedscience just in case you have the common sense to see through their maliciouslymanufactured history. *****
  3. 3. THE “PURE EXTERMINATION CENTERS” The number of The alleged method used to The alleged pure alleged The number of alleged magically obliterate all extermination center eyewitnesses / murder victims evidence of their crime survivors Dig the bodies out of the Treblinka 40 – 70 * 870,000 ** “huge mass graves,” burn them on pyres made from Sobibor 20 – 40 * 250,000 ** railroad rails, sift the bones from the ash, crush the bones, then throw all Belzec 2–7* 600,000 ** the teeth, crushed bone and ash back into the “huge mass graves” and Chelmno 2–4* 320,000 ** cover the remains with a layer of soil ** Source – Total – 2,040,000 – 1/3 of the mythical “sacred six* Depends on the source Encyclopedia of the Holocaust million” “OBLITERATED ALL EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIME?” Do you really believe that two million people could be murdered without leaving a trace? The number of teeth that would The weight of the crushed bone that The alleged pure be mixed in with the alleged would have been left behind IF this story extermination center millions of pounds of crushed is true bone Treblinka 6.351 million pounds * 27.840 million Sobibor 1.825 million pounds * 8.000 million Belzec 4.380 million pounds * 19.200 million Chelmno 2.336 million pounds * 10.240 million * Calculations are derived from figures used by Arnulf Neumaier in The Treblinka Holocaust (see below) To illustrate just how easy it is to debunk the big lie that burning bodies makes them magically disappear, look at the following (chapter 4.3) from Arnulf Neumaier’s THE TREBLINKA HOLOCAUST: “Regarding the claim that the 870,000 corpses were eliminated completely without any trace, we must consider
  4. 4. the quantities of ashes that remain… The wood ashes remaining would then haveweighed approximately 1,000 metric tons… The ash content of a human bodymakes up about 5.6% of the body‟s weight; given a 132 lb. body, this comes to 7.3lbs. The ashes from the 870,000 burned bodies would thus have weighed 6,387,500lbs. The total quantity of ashes – wood ashes plus human ashes – would thereforehave weighed almost 4,000 metric tons, or 8.6 million pounds, all of which(according to the witnesses) were then mixed with the soil and thrown back intothe pits. Even if this quantity of ash had been mixed with the roughly 3.53 millioncubic feet of soil excavated from the burial pits, it would be easy to find evidencefor human remains of the quantity alleged by the witnesses. It must also be notedthat in the incineration of corpses under the conditions specified by the witnesses,the bones would not have turned to ash, but would have remained as bones.” NOTE: You do understand that even modern cremation techniques don’treduce bodies to ashes, but rather to BONES, right? Disingenuously referring tothe alleged cremated remains as “ashes” rather than correctly referring tothem as bones is a crucial component of this big lie / cognitive illusion. So what’s the Jews’ response when it’s conclusively demonstrated thatburning bodies on pyres doesn’t make them magically disappear? “Why, theGermans obliterated all the evidence by crushing the bones,” they shriek. Toillustrate how absurd this is, and how easy it is to debunk the crushing-the-bones-equals-obliteration thesis, take a look at these photos of the REAL HOLOCAUSTthat the allies inflicted on Dresden Germany. (Please view photos 0030.jpg through0041.jpg.) And what’s the Jews’ response when it’s conclusively demonstrated thatcrushing bones doesn’t make them magically disappear either? “Why, those evilgeniuses reburied the remains in the huge mass graves and then covered it all upwith a layer of soil,” they screech. Do you understand the insanity of this? Ifburning bodies and crushing the bones doesn’t “obliterate” evidence, then how canthe simple act of covering the remains with dirt do the trick? To illustrate how easyit is to debunk the burying-the-evidence-equals-obliteration thesis, and to examinethe relevance that teeth have on this issue, scroll down to the last question on thislink HERE: “Cremation destroys DNA… However, teeth stay pretty intact… Duringthese examinations we can‟t find DNA, but we can find TEETH”: “As might beexpected from a damp cave, bodies buried 3,200 years ago had long since returnedto dust. But precise excavation recovered evidence of each individual – their teeth.” So if Shermer and all the other officially sanctioned holocaust “scholars”can’t offer an iota of tangible physical evidence to back up their fraudulent claimthat the alleged Treblinka holocaust has been scientifically proven - not even asingle tooth out of an alleged 27 million! - then what’s left for the true believersto cling to in justifying their continued belief in the orthodox version of theTreblinka story? Why the perfect crime / magically disappearing Jew “theory” ofcourse! It simply boggles the mind that it’s necessary to explain to collegeeducated school teachers (just as you would to a three-year-old child), that bycovering something up with dirt you’re not actually making it magicallydisappear. (And we haven’t even touched on the most asinine claim of all – that
  5. 5. the Germans were able to burn these millions of bodies by the ingenious“discovery” that by stacking the bodies “just right,” they’ll “catch” fire andmagically burn all by themselves – just like fire logs!) Just as astonishing is thefact that even after seeing conclusive proof that the official Treblinka legend isnothing but one PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY after another and that the latestJewish holocaust is the most grossly exaggerated event of the 20th century, the truebelievers are totally unaffected by the truth. Why? Because they would then haveto admit that the fraudulent Treblinka holocaust is a literal JEWISHCONSPIRACY, and that would make them (gasp!) an anti-Semite! So what exactly is the significance of the fact that this fraudulent holocaustwithin the holocaust is a malicious lie? First, the pure extermination center mythcannot stand if the Treblinka cornerstone is pulled. And if the Treblinkaholohoax is debunked (which of course it has been), then the equally syntheticpillars of Belzec, Chelmno and Sobibor become untenable and the fraudulent pureextermination center legend collapses. And without the pure extermination centercanard, the official version of the final solution becomes untenable, ergo - NOEXTERMINATION PROGRAM! (It’s like pulling on a loose thread of a cheapsweater.) Secondly, it irrefutably proves that not only is the Treblinka holohoax aliteral Jewish conspiracy, but also that the orthodox holocaust story is a maliciouslie. Even if the Treblinka holohoax is the only remaining segment of the entireholocaust story that is false (which obviously it isn’t), that still makes the holocaustindustry’s version of the story a lie. (A story that is only 1% maliciously false is stilla lie.) Third, it exposes the Jews’ unconscionable tactic of accusing those whoquestion any aspect of the orthodox holocaust story, no matter how much scientificevidence they have to back up their reasons to be skeptical, as being a “DENIER.”
  6. 6. “Eyewitness” Yankel Wiernik’s model showing the “huge mass graves” ofTreblinka that allegedly contain the millions of pounds of crushed bone, tens ofmillions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings. Now who in their right mind could believe the official story that theTreblinka site was “utterly eradicated” by a layer of soil and couldn’t bedetected today with the use of modern archeological / forensic sciencetechniques? Compounding the obvious absurdity that the pseudo “science” ofhistory gives eyewitness testimony more credence than tangible physical evidence(or the lack thereof) is the fact that every single “eyewitness” that helped to“historically” prove the preposterous Treblinka legend was a shamelessPATHOLOGICAL LIAR. Don’t believe it? Then winning THE TREBLINKACSI CHALLENGE TM should be like taking candy from a baby. (Unless you’resticking with the perfect crime / magically disappearing Jew “theory.”) If however,you acknowledge the fact that Treblinka is a literal Jewish conspiracy (And whathonest, intelligent person wouldn’t?), wait until you examine the absurd lies of theother three alleged pure extermination centers and Babi Yar. They’re essentiallymirror images of the Treblinka fairy tale replete with the asinine millions ofpounds of magically disappearing evidence yarn. And if the camp with the mostalleged “eyewitnesses / survivors” has been scientifically debunked, then what arethe chances that the absurd legends of the other camps are true? Since Michael Shermer (the president of the “Skeptics” Society andpublisher of “SKEPTIC” magazine) has such disdain for real skeptics (i.e. –intelligent / logical people who refuse to share his delusion that millions of Jewscan magically vanish from the face of the earth without leaving a trace),“SKEPTIC” magazine should be more than willing to publish the results of anyscientific investigation that claims to have proven that the largest of the asininepure extermination center legends has been forensically proven to be a fact.Therefore, all one has to do to become a claimant for THE TREBLINKACRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM reward is to have saidclaims / results published in “SKEPTIC” Magazine. Now, just how hard shouldit be for the “we-must-see-compelling-evidence-before-we-believe” sham“Skeptics” Society to prove just 1% of the alleged mass murder at Treblinka IF theofficial story is true? To all those who want to put an end to holocaust denial and who still believethat the deniers are crazy when they talk about Jewish conspiracies (But yourbelief in magically disappearing Jews is sane, right?), then why haven’t youaccepted THE TREBLINKA CSI CHALLENGE TM? And why don’t you ASKMICHAEL SHERMER why, if he so desperately yearns to earn the title ofRighteous Gentile, does he refuse to take advantage of the golden opportunity thatNAFCASH TM is giving him to help stop holocaust denial? And while you’rechallenging Shermer, why don’t you remind him of what he wrote in his deludingnovel DENYING HISTORY: “We also traveled to the camps themselves, to…Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec… to test the claims that no mass murders… took placeby intention at these camps.” Really? Did he conduct scientific tests using the real
  7. 7. sciences of forensic criminology and archaeology? If not, why? And if so, thenwhy does he refuse to publish the results? And why don’t you ask him how herationalizes his cowardly refusal to debate true skeptics who expose his grosshypocrisy and illusory “testing of the claims” with this other quote from DenyingHistory: “Others have argued that to meet with the deniers or answer their claimsis to validate them, but we believe that to let their arguments go unansweredpresents the greater danger.” So why does Michael Shermer refuse to answerNAFCASH’s TM questions and/or accept its challenges? If “the world’s foremost skeptic” (who insists his sophomoricCONVERGENCE OF EVIDENCE theory historically proves the holocaust), can’tscientifically locate even one of the alleged huge mass graves of Treblinka andcan’t forensically prove even 1% of this absurd myth, then what does that sayabout the veracity of this so-called historically proven fact? Shermer’s sophistry isakin to a scientist claiming that he has proven the great flood / Noah’s Ark fable byusing nothing but bible verses! What we’re challenging anyone to prove isundeniably a scientifically knowable truth and a forensically provable fact.Anyone who believes otherwise is delusional. That is of course, IF the legend istrue. Don’t believe it? The following is from holocaust “scholar” Yitzhak Arad’sdeluding novel (which was written to rectify the damage that was done to theTreblinka holohoax by Steiner’s embarrassing confession of fraud / forgery)BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA, chapter 23 – The Erasure of the Crimes: “Thecamp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles ofash and bits of bone that remained… Ultimately it was decided to dump the ashand bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to coverthem with a thick layer of sand and dirt… [“Eyewitness”] Abraham Goldfarbrelates: …‟we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and wewrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put thescraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intentionwas that if one day someone looked for traces of the Nazis’ crimes, they couldindeed be found.‟” NOTE: Historical “truths” are not exempt from THE SCIENTIFICMETHOD. Exposing the lies of the holocaust, the fraud of the final solution andthe criminal Jewish conspiracy of the nonsensical pure extermination centers is not“denying” the holocaust. Using the scientific method to prove that the largest massgravesite in the history of mankind is, in reality, a fraudulent hoax is not “denying”the holocaust. Refusing to accept a logically absurd, demonstratively false,scientifically debunked historical event is not “denying” that somethinghappened. Just because the dull-uding “experts” lack the curiosity to examine, theintelligence to understand, the courage to accept, the integrity to acknowledge andthe character to speak the truth about this fraudulent COGNITIVE ILLUSIONdoes not make a skeptic of the official holocaust story a “denier.” (By the way, youcannot “deny” something that never happened.)
  8. 8. Michael Shermer accuses real skeptics of denying history because, in part,they refuse to share his delusional belief that the Germans were able to murdermillions of Jews without leaving a trace. In his sophomoric and sophistic attemptto “prove” this accusation, he has denied forensic science, criminology andarcheology. In accusing others of practicing pseudo history, he not only hasengaged in it himself, but also had to forgo the scientific method and the veryfundamental principles of skepticism which he claims guides his belief system. Inhis own words, again from Denying History: “The best way to beat a lie detector isto believe the lie yourself… Deception becomes self-deception.” Really? Wellthen, let’s use the alleged Treblinka holocaust as a case study in denial and self-deception. Here’s another montage of Michael Shermer quotes from DenyingHistory: “The culmination of years of research… our purpose… to present thehistorical facts that refute Holocaust denial… To debunk the deniers can’t we justgo there and see them for ourselves? The answer, of course, is “yes.”… We canno longer ignore the deniers, calling them names and hoping they will go away…We cannot remain silent anymore. It‟s time to respond… Not only is it defensibleto respond to the deniers, it is, we believe, our duty… Many of our arguments drawon specialized research into the claims of the deniers that took us… to the Naziextermination camps themselves… we went to Europe to conduct research at thecamps, in particular at… Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec… We wanted to see forourselves just what evidence there is at the camps and to take the opportunity toexamine firsthand the claims… Much of the research is the type of workprofessional historians normally do… analyzing ground and aerialphotographs… in order to make proper interpretations, we must review thephysical evidence… Like criminologists solving a crime, we piece together themyriad bits of evidence until a conclusion emerges from the morass of data… Howis it that so much physical evidence can come to be doubted?” “Reviewing the physical evidence?” – “Analyzing ground and aerialphotographs?” – “Like criminologists solving a crime?” Well now Michael, realskeptics and scholars have been waiting for years for you to publish the results ofyour alleged firsthand examination of the physical evidence and analysis of aerialphotographs of Treblinka. If you’re so incredulous that people can come todoubt so much physical evidence and photographic proof, then why do yourefuse to publish the results of your alleged research? If there’s so muchphysical evidence – then let’s see it! What’s wrong Shermer? Your silence isdeafening. What happened to your duty to respond? (After all, you do want to putan end to holocaust denial – don’t you?) Who’s self-deceiving? Who’s denying theREAL HISTORY of Treblinka? Who’s denying common sense, iron logic, criticalthinking, forensic science and the fundamental principles of skeptical inquiry andthe scientific method? Who’s denying reality?
  9. 9. Treblinka right before the Jews’ obscuration (and consecration) of the sitewith their delusive shrine. Can you locate the alleged huge mass graves that Michael Shermer claimshe’s proven exist? Maybe these “eyewitness / survivor” MAPS OF TREBLINKA will help. So why are the billion dollar per-year holocaust industry and its fawningfront men at the “Skeptics” Society afraid to honestly apply the scientific methodto the fairy tale known as the Treblinka holocaust? It really is this incrediblysimple: The alleged Treblinka holocaust literally stands or falls on theexistence of the alleged huge mass graves, and the nonsensical lies of Belzec,Chelmno and Sobibor become untenable (as if they’re not already!) if the truthabout Treblinka is exposed. Are you beginning to understand why the Jews havegotten holocaust denial (Jewish code name for THE TRUTH) to be a criminaloffense in 15 countries of the world? And the “Skeptics” Society is aiding andabetting them in this immoral inquisition! And to add insult to injury, they’reprostituting themselves to the holocaust industry under the guise of skepticalinquiry and the scientific method! That explains why the alleged Treblinkaholocaust had to be “proven” with the “science of history” instead of real scienceand tangible physical evidence. (The only other explanation for this craven refusalto apply the scientific method to scientifically knowable truths and forensicallyprovable facts is that the logically retarded pseudo-skeptics at the SchlepticsSociety actually believe in magically disappearing Jews!) Of course, if all thesecharges are unfounded, then it begs the question: Why does Michael SHAMMER
  10. 10. refuse to publish the findings of his alleged investigation which he claims heconducted at Treblinka? (Odd behavior for a “scientist” who claims he wants to putan end to holocaust denial – isn’t it?) NOTE: Are you aware that the Jews and their minions have gotten lawspassed in nine states – California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri,New Jersey, New York and Washington, that mandate that this NONSENSICAL,religiously based atrocity propaganda be taught to our children as “irrefutablehistorical fact?” (Laws that sanctify an “official version” of any historical event arethe first step in criminalizing contradictory interpretations.) Every time a teachervomits up the lies of holocaustianity onto his students, he’s brainwashing themwith maliciously manufactured false history based on Jewish mythology. Anyeducator who doesn’t understand why the Zionists can’t accept a lower figure thanthe sacred six million and/or who still believes that the total number of Jewishdeaths “doesn’t matter,” shouldn’t even be allowed in a classroom. (If it doesn’tmatter, then why is it illegal in 15 countries of the world for heretics to reveal thatthe actual figure is far less than the sacred six million? It’s analogous to beingimprisoned for “denying” the “fact” that the earth is six thousand years old! And ifthe truth doesn’t matter, then why not pass laws that mandate that our children betaught that Iraq really did have WMDs?) Remember, you don’t have to say that theholocaust didn’t happen to be branded a HOLOCAUST DENIER; all you have todo is suggest that the six million figure is an exaggeration. RECAP: Burning bodies destroys all evidence? DEBUNKED. Crushingbones destroys all evidence? DEBUNKED. Putting millions of pounds of crushedbone into huge pits and covering it over with a layer of soil destroys all evidence?DEBUNKED. Michael Shermer’s deluding boast that he’s proven the orthodoxversion of the holocaust / final solution / pure extermination centers? Easily,logically, scientifically, forensically and irrefutably DEBUNKED: “That‟s the onlyway to understand this subject. It has to be studied carefully… If you slow downand look carefully at the logic, his „jumping together‟ illusion doesn‟t work…Shermer has set up his argument in such a way that the ordinary methods of logicdon‟t apply… This is like a shell game: you have to watch what he‟s doing… TheShermer principle is not logic… The jumping together phenomenon is howillusionists produce their illusions.” NO GRAVES = NO TREBLINKA HOLOCAUST Please note that every effort was made to give Michael Shermer an opportunity to rebut the contents of this site.
  11. 11. The following email is just one example that illustrates the numerous opportunities that were afforded him. From: “Greg Gerdes” <treblinkafraud@yahoo.com> To: DrMichaelShermer@aol.com Subject: Your refusal to debate me Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:16:56 –0700 “… This will be the third and last time that I challenge you to a debate. Iwill have no other recourse than to assume that your continued craven refusal toaddress my questions and charges constitutes undeniable proof that you are in facta coward, hypocrite and fraud… Let me reiterate the basis of my charges… youclaim to have visited Treblinka itself (as well as Belzec and Sobibor) to… “Testthe claims that no mass murders, especially by gassing, took place by intention atthese camps.”… So, for the record, just what scientific tests did you conduct atTreblinka in the first place and just how did the Treblinka holocaust pass these so-called scientific tests and where EXACTLY are these alleged “mass graves” ofTreblinka that you claim exist and just how EXACTLY is it that you know for surethat they contain the crushed bone and ash of the alleged 870,000 murderedpeople at Treblinka? Simple, reasonable and logical questions from a REALskeptic, based on skeptical inquiry and the scientific method. We‟re waiting Mike!” And what kind of a response do you think we got from Mr. “We cannotremain silent anymore. It‟s time to respond?” Silence of course! Why? Becausethis obsequious Shabbas Goy is one of the holocaust industry’s most prizedimprimaturs. (To be fair, he did send a very short reply to one email, but he mealy-mouthed his way around the subject of debate and he refused to answer anyquestions concerning his alleged research.) As the holocaust scholar PaulGrubach so poignantly noted after his equally unsuccessful attempt to debateShermer: “Will Dr. Shermer accept my challenge? I doubt it. When he crossedswords with revisionist historian Mark Weber, it was a disaster for Shermer andthe traditional view of the Holocaust. Weber made Holocaust revisionism look toogood for Shermer‟s liking, and the traditional view of the Holocaust severelydeficient. Furthermore, many who saw the debate said that Shermer appearedamateurish, and at times, even foolish. Since that disaster, Shermer has never (tomy knowledge) engaged another Holocaust revisionist in public debate. It appearsas though Shermer is fearful of undermining the media-created, public image ofhimself as the “Great Guru of Skepticism.” To cross swords with Holocaustrevisionists would call public attention to the severe deficiencies in his own workand Holocaust historiography in general. His strategy seems to be as follows:Never again engage a revisionist in debate, just write about them in mainstream,establishment media outlets. In this way, he can selectively create any image ofrevisionists and revisionist historiography he so chooses, without ever having toworry about the negative fallout resulting from an expose of the fallacies, errorsand omissions in his work on the Holocaust.”
  12. 12. And speaking of deliberate omissions, there are a few more important thingsto know about Shermer’s deluding novel Denying History and his bogus claim thathe’s an unbiased historian. Shermer’s co-author, Alex Grobman? Jew. The book’sforward author, Arthur Hertzberg? Jew. The book’s cover endorsement author,Jared Diamond? Jew. The six people prominently thanked in the book’sacknowledgments section, Samuel Goetz, Herbert Gelfand, John Fishel, AvnerShalev, Motti Shalem and Marcia Reines Josephy? Jews all. The well over fiftyothers who were thanked in the book’s acknowledgments section? The list may notbe comprised entirely of Jews, but it reads like a Tel Aviv phone book. The threeorganizations under whose auspices the book was written, The S. Mark TaperFoundation, The Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles and The Leslieand Susan Gonda (Goldschmied) Foundation? Jewish organizations all. And getthis! The organization that shares the novel’s copyrights with Shermer andGrobman? The Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust! If you still believe that thisJudophile is unbiased, click HERE: “You testified that there was no forensicevidence of Treblinka… However, there appears to already exist considerableforensic evidence of Treblinka… the excavation… failed to discover any residueof human bones… Thus, given all of the above, it seems inconceivable that youwere unaware of the existence of the two forensic investigations of Treblinkathat appear to have been conducted… Or did you suppress it?” If Shermer is unbiased, then why did he intentionally try to suppress thefindings of these and other FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS? And why didn’t hemention the fact that Steiner’s book TREBLINKA was proven to be a fraud and thatSteiner himself admitted that his book was a forgery? Did Shermer attempt to putthis down the memory-hole also because his “proof” of the alleged Treblinkaholocaust is based entirely on Steiner’s false “eyewitnesses?” Denying History isnothing more than the same lies rehashed in a new book, but this time – it’sfraudulently repackaged under the guise of “science.” Do you see how Shermerhas attempted to rewrite history by using propaganda by omission? That is why hesuppressed Krege’s GPR scan of Treblinka in order to make his science of historyclaptrap sound plausible. He also shamelessly declares in Denying History – “Wemust be forthright and honest about what we know and do not know about theholocaust.” And, “It is the duty of informed experts on a subject to share theirknowledge.” And, “Truth will always win out when the evidence is made availablefor all to see.” Are you beginning to understand why this sycophant Shabbas Goy(whose “Skeptic” Society, by the way, is literally infested with Jews) is consideredby true skeptics to be a shameless fraud and the Quisling of the skepticalcommunity?

×