• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
John Searle - Exercise referral - time to improve the outcomes

John Searle - Exercise referral - time to improve the outcomes






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    John Searle - Exercise referral - time to improve the outcomes John Searle - Exercise referral - time to improve the outcomes Presentation Transcript

    • Exercise referral – time to improve the outcome John Searle Chief Medical Officer FIA
    • Exercise Exercise is the most effectivedisease prevention ‘stuff’ there is
    • Exercise in disease preventionHeart attacks Stroke
    • Exercise in disease preventionObesity Type 2 diabetes
    • Exercise in disease preventionDementia Stress
    • Exercise in disease preventionDepression Falls
    • Exercise in disease preventionVarious typesof cancer
    • Exercise in disease management?
    • Exercise in disease• Improves symptoms• Slows progression• Promotes physical activity and wellbeing(British Journal of Sport and ExerciseMedicine 2009; 43: 550-555)
    • Exercise referral schemes• 1990’s• National Quality Assurance Framework 2001• BHFNC Toolkit 2010
    • Do exercise referral schemeswork?NICE 2006‘there is insufficient evidence to recommendthe use of exercise referral services topromote physical activity other than part ifresearch studies where their effectivenesscan be evaluated’
    • HTA 2011 (in press)The National Institute of Health Research HealthTechnology Assessment AgencyLittle or no effect in increasing physical activity.Serious lack of properly controlled, randomisedstudies in exerciser referral.Many studies have a poor methodology
    • Welsh National ExerciseReferral Scheme (2010)• Higher levels of physical activity in patients with coronary risk factors• Positive effects on depression and anxiety particularly in those referred wholly or partially for mental health reasons
    • Why don’t ER schemes work?Toolkit 2010 – wide variation in•Inclusion / exclusion criteria•Programme duration•Qualifications of instructors•Adherence to the NQAF•Scheme evaluation
    • Other concernsLack of GP training Risk to patients
    • Other concerns
    • Joint Consultative Forum (JCF)
    • Terminology• Recommendation:Advising a patient to be more physicallyactive in order to improve their health andreduce the risk of disease
    • Terminology – exercise referralExercise referral is a formal process whichuses exercise as a component of themanagement of a patient’s condition, withthe objectives of improving or reducingthe rate of its progression andachieving an independent andsustainable increase in physical activity
    • The processReferral of a patient by a health careprofessional to a service or an independentexercise referral instructor for the process ofproviding an exercise programme as part ofthe management of people (i) with stable orsignificant limitations related to a chronicdisease or disability and/or (ii) with one ormore CV disease risk factors
    • Professional & operationalstandards in exercise referral• Risk stratification• Qualifications• The process• Record keeping• Medico-legal issues• Services and facilities
    • Risk stratification – thePAR-Q• ‘No’ to all the questions• Heart rate < 100 bpm• BP < 140/90Remain in the ER service, undertake a rangeof activities programmed by but notnecessarily supervised by the ER instructor
    • Answers ‘yes’ on the PAR-QIrwin Morgan assessment:• Low risk – as in PAR-Q ‘no’• Medium risk – personalised supervised programme• High risk – (i) cardiac into cardiac rehab programme (ii) non cardiac, multidisciplinary assessment before exercise
    • Irwin Morgan assessment• Not a validated tool but it is recommended in the Toolkit• What else is there?• ? PAR-Q + and PARMedEx in the future
    • QualificationsFitness instructors working in exercise referral must be a REPs registered Exercise Referral Fitness Instructor or a REPs registered Level 4 Specialist Instructor, meeting the National Occupational Standards for the knowledge, competence, and skills of good practice.
    • Assessment• Personal details• BMI• Waist circumference• Pre ex HR• BP• PA questionnaire - IPAQ• Quality of life – EQ-5D
    • Assessment• Aerobic – not necessary• ROM in musculoskeleta l disease• Requested by referrer
    • GoalsShort tern –attendance, sessionalMedium term (i) condition specific(ii) Patient specificLong term – asustainable increasein physical activity
    • DeliveryACSM disease specificguidelinesAppropriateprogressionGood communicationTrust and rapport
    • Monitoring• Attendance• During the session• Repeat base line measurements at mid point and the end of the programme• 6 and 12 months: physical activity and wellbeing questionnaires**using group sampling
    • Exit strategies• Absolutely essential!• Keep in view from the outset• What would the patient like to do to keep physically active?• What is available?• On-going support
    • Medico-legal mattersDoctors must only refer patients for thepurposes of using exercise as part oftreatment to an appropriately qualified andregistered exercise referral fitness instructoror a service which employs such instructorsMedical Defence Societies
    • Other matters• Reporting to the referrer and to commissioners• Service evaluation and appraisal – by commissioners and professionally• Instructor appraisal – fit to practice
    • Why – the objectives?• Provision of high quality, safe and effective exercise referral services• Exercise becomes a routine part of the management of chronic disease• Bench mark for commissioners
    • How has it been done?• JCF: drafting group + the Forum• Advisory group from across the fitness sector• Consultation process – to mid August.(stephen.wilson@fia.org.uk)
    • Help – the bench mark is too high!
    • Implementation will be gradual• Standard setting• Training institutions• Operators• Health professionals• Commissioners – NHS reforms timetable
    • CHOICE• Stay as we are and confirm the NICE judgment of 2006 and HTA 2010 OR• Develop a modern professional service and provide long term benefits to patients