Ferma survey part 2 - governance enterprise risk mnagement and key risks for 2012

505 views
434 views

Published on

Ferma survey part 2 - governance enterprise risk mnagement and key risks for 2012

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
505
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
227
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ferma survey part 2 - governance enterprise risk mnagement and key risks for 2012

  1. 1. Governance, ERM and Key Risks for 2012FERMA European Risk Management Benchmarking Survey 2012 Jean-Michel Paris, Ernst & Young
  2. 2. A shifting regulatory1. environment2. Risk governance3. Risk convergence?4. Risk priorities
  3. 3. 1. A shifting regulatory environment
  4. 4. Major external factors triggering Risk Management Legal, regulatory or 61% compliance requirementsAs in the 2010 and 2008 study (see next page), compliance 33% Clear requirements from shareholdersand legal requirements remain the main external factorstriggering Risk Management within companies. 31% Corporate social responsibilityCorporate social responsibility is still a key concernespecially for listed companies while catastrophic eventsare less considered as a main trigger compared to 2010. 26% Catastrophic event 19% Major insurance issue 17 Pressure from market % 14 %nalysts / rating agencies pressure A * Multiple choice question
  5. 5. Major external factors triggering Risk Management* Multiple choice question
  6. 6. A brief reminder on the 8th EU Directive Boards are to… “monitor the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control systems”* Multiple choice question
  7. 7. Impact of the regulatory environment: 8th EU Directive Overview of impacts Most impacted Least impacted The impacts of the EU 8th Directive are still poorly assessed and understood by a large number of Risk and Insurance Managers.* Multiple choice question
  8. 8. Impact of the regulatory environment: 8th EU Directive Impacts on Executive CommitteesSufficient time available on the Executive Executive Committee informed of major risksCommittee agenda to present the results of of the company or group at each level?Risk Management reviews? 62% 63% Most informed Definition of the risk appetite by the Executive Committee? Approval of risk appetite by the Board? 53% 100% Most positive Executives Committees still slow to take effects of EU 8th Directive on board
  9. 9. Impact of the regulatory environment: 8th EU Directive Impacts on Executive CommitteesManagers formally made responsible for each Risk Management function incorporated into arisk? "corporate governance division" with internal control, internal audit, ethics/compliance? Least incorporated 80% 9% More than two thirds of respondents indicate that identified risks are attributed to managers who are responsible for their management
  10. 10. Impact of the regulatory environment: 8th EU Directive Country focus% of answers
  11. 11. 2. Risk Governance
  12. 12. Mandate of the Board, Audit and/or Risk Committee A limited scope and a mandate to be clarified% of answers CAPTION Most advanced Mandate of the Board, Audit and/or Risk Committee: Least advanced 1) Monitor the effectiveness of the Risk Management system 2) Monitor and ensure the compliance of Risk Management framework with respect to standards / local regulations 3) Challenge the company’s risk appetite 4) Challenge the company’s Risk Management strategy 5) Challenge residual risk exposure and relevance of existing mitigation actions Emerging: no criteria included Maturity Moderate: 1 or 2 criteria included Mature: 3 or 4 criteria included Advanced: all criteria included The mandate assigned to the Board, Audit and/or Risk Committee remains limited to specific areas (55%) or unclear (10%).
  13. 13. Board oversight A close and regular relationship% of answers CAPTION Most advanced Least advanced Emerging Moderate Mature Advanced No Interaction Topic of Risk Risk mechanism with these Management Management in place to Committees dealt with at completely ensure Risk on an as least on an embedded in Management annual basis reporting to needed basis interaction the Board with the Board of Directors / Maturity Supervisory board / Audit Committee Risk Management activity is globally correctly embedded in reporting to “the board”(79%) and Risk Management topic is generally formally addressed by the board at least on an annual basis.
  14. 14. Risk management - Reporting line Increasing reporting at Top level CAPTION% of answers Most advanced Least advanced Emerging Moderate Mature/Advanced Reports to Reports to Reports to Audit (and/or risk) other function CFO, General Committee, Board or department counsel/Head of Directors/Supervisory Board, of Legal CEO/Managing Director or Department, General/Company secretary Head of Internal Audit MaturityRisk Management function globally reports at Top Management level (93%), but reportingat CFO level (36%) still remains widespread among certain countries such as Italy (59%), Germany (55%) and UK (41%).
  15. 15. Independent assessment of risk management framework Towards a growing involvement of Internal Audit% of answers CAPTION Most advanced Least advanced Emerging Moderate / Mature Advanced No Partially independent assurance Complete independent provided independent assurance in collaboration with others parties assurance provided by provided by the Internal Internal Audit Audit Maturity Globally, Internal Audit is increasingly involved in the process of providing anindependent assurance on the quality/efficiency of the Risk Management system but its role could be strengthened.
  16. 16. Risk governance Country focus (advanced practices)% of answers
  17. 17. 3. Risk Convergence?
  18. 18. Alignment of Risk management functions Foundations in place for further coordination% of answers CAPTION Most advanced Least advanced Emerging Moderate/Mature Advanced Risk functions Some coordination exists Full risk (risk mgt, between the different risk functions internal audit, functions coordination internal in place control, EHS, quality, compliance) are working Maturity independently The different risk functions are no longer working “in silos”, however their level of coordination remains limited.
  19. 19. Alignment of Risk management functions Coordination but no integration CAPTION % of answers % of answers Mature and Advanced Integration Most advanced Least advanced Emerging/ Mature Advanced Moderate No or limited Risk Very integration of Manage close Risk ment is integrati Management closely on of with other cooperati Risk functions ng with Manage other ment functions with other Maturity functionsRisk Management works closely with other departments but integration is not systematic
  20. 20. Risk management organisationRelationships between Insurance Management, Internal Control and Internal Audit Risk and Insurance Management: The most common partnership
  21. 21. Alignment of Risk management functions Coordination but no Sustainability / Sustainable integration DevelopmentMergers andAcquisitions Insurance Management Legal RM Internal Control/ Business Internal Audit Continuity Risk Management first-rank partners Close (3) or very close (4) relationship > 60% Risk Management second-rank partners Emerging (2) relationship >30% Investor Risk Management third-rank partners Relations No relationship (1) > 20%
  22. 22. Risk management and Internal Audit A growing relationship but still too limited synergies% of answers CAPTION Most advanced Least advanced Emerging Moderate Mature Advanced No particular Mutual Coordination Very close relationship reporting – and relationship between Risk coordination/ cooperation between the Management cooperation on the audit two functions on a limited plan and Internal basis Audit functions Maturity and/or separate reporting lines A minimum level of coordination between the two functions is now in place for most European companies.
  23. 23. Alignment of Risk management functions Country focus (advanced practices)% of answers
  24. 24. 4. 2012 Risk Priorities
  25. 25. Risk management remit
  26. 26. 2012 Risk importanceTop 5 Risks
  27. 27. 2012 Risk priorities Risk importance 2012 2010 VariationCompetition, clients, partnerships, market strategy,market 53% 53% 0%Compliance, legislation, policy, regulations (national andinternational) 37% 45% -8%Financial: interest rate & foreign exchange, debt, cashflow, sovereign debt 36% 31% 5%Reputation (social media, communication) 33% New 2012 New 2012Planning and execution 29% 33% -4%Market risks (commodity price shocks, real estate market 29% 14% 15%volatility)Supply chain, business continuity 26% 31% -5%Production, quality, cost cutting 24% 32% -8%Human resources / key people, social security (labour) 21% 15% 6%Political, expansion of governments role 21% New 2012 New 2012IT / IS / data 20% 23% -3%Safety, health and security 19% 22% -3%Corporate governance 17% 20% -3%Assets (buildings, equipment) 17% 24% -7%Ethics, corporate social responsibility, fraud 17% 17% 0%Social, economical issues 16% 30% -13%Environment, sustainable development, climate change 13% 16% -3%Product design, safety and liability 12% 20% -8%Access to credit 11% 17% -6%Treasury 10% 7% 3%Internal control 10% 11% -1%Liability(ies) of the company or corporate directors andofficers 9% 12% -3%Civil, general, professional, criminal or cyber criminality 7% 10% -3%Dynamics, M&A 6% 9% -2%Assets (cash, intellectual property) 5% 9% -4%
  28. 28. Risk Appetite by risk categoryCompanies’ risk appetite driven by risk category rather than risk significance 60% Risk taker zone No tolerance zone High impact risks High impact risks Competition & market Strategic&Corporate Governance Financial 50% External Operational Compliance& Ethics 40% Compliance e Financial c n a Planning and (interest rate & foreign exchange, debt, cah flow…) Reputation t r 30% execution o Supply chain, p Market risks m i business continuity Production, quality k s i HR & social R 20% security Safety, health & security Political, expansion of IT / IS / data Social, economical Corporate governments role issues governance Environment, Assets (buildings, Ethics, Fraud, CSR sustainable Product design equipment) development Treasury 10% Access to credit Internal control Liability(ies) Civil, general, Risk taker zone Dynamics, M&A Assets (cash, intellectual professional No tolerance zone Lowimpact risks property) Lowimpact risks 0% Riskaverse Riskappetite

×