Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Qualicum engagement.novpptx



Engaging All Learners - Nov. 2010 - a 3 hour session by Faye Brownlie and Leyton Schnellert for teachers in grades K-12. First of a series of 2.

Engaging All Learners - Nov. 2010 - a 3 hour session by Faye Brownlie and Leyton Schnellert for teachers in grades K-12. First of a series of 2.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Qualicum   engagement.novpptx Qualicum engagement.novpptx Presentation Transcript

  • Engaging All Learners Qualicum/Parksville  Faye  Brownlie  and  Leyton  Schnellert   November  16th,  2011  
  • Engagement•  Schlechty:    high  aDenEon  and  commitment  –   task  or  acEvity  has  inherent  meaning  or  value   to  the  student  •  Stuart  Shanker  –  self-­‐regulaEon;  calmly   focused  and  alert  •  Brownlie  and  Schnellert  –  voice  and  choice  
  • Highly EngagedSource:  Schlechty  Center  for  Leadership  in  School  Reform.  (2006).  Accessed  online  at  h"p://www.stlucie.k12.fl.us/includes/PDWeb/Files/Engagement.ppt  Accessed  December  2,  2007.  
  • Design  of  Engaging  Work   Clear  Goals          Product     No  Fault   &  Criteria                Focus   Prac3ce   Clear  Goals          Product     No  Fault   &  Criteria                Focus   Prac3ce   Relevant   Organiza3on  of   Relevant    Content   Authen3city   Organiza3on  of   Knowledge    Content   Authen3city   Knowledge   Novelty  &  Variety   Choice   Affilia3on/Affirma3on  Novelty  &  Variety   Choice   Affilia3on/Affirma3on  
  • Stuart Shanker: stages of arousalInhibiEon    asleep    drowsy    hypoalert    calmly  focused  and  alert  ***    hyperalert    flooded  AcEvaEon  
  • FrameworksIt’s All About Thinking – Brownlie & Schnellert, 2009
  • Universal Design for LearningMulEple  means:  -­‐to  tap  into  background  knowledge,  to  acEvate   prior  knowledge,  to  increase  engagement  and   moEvaEon  -­‐to  acquire  the  informaEon  and  knowledge  to   process  new  ideas  and  informaEon  -­‐to  express  what  they  know.                        Rose  &  Meyer,  2002  
  •  Open-ended Multiple teaching intelligences Inquiry learning Workshop Differentiation Literature and information circles
  • Backwards Design•  What  important  ideas  and  enduring   understandings  do  you  want  the  students  to   know?  •  What  thinking  strategies  will  students  need  to   demonstrate  these  understandings?                      McTighe  &  Wiggins,  2001  
  • Teach Content to All    Learning in Safe Schools - Brownlie, King"
  • Model Guided practice Independent practice Independent application  Pearson  &  Gallagher  (1983)  
  • Essential Lesson Components•  EssenEal  quesEon/learning  intenEon/a  big  idea  •  Open-­‐ended  strategies:    connect-­‐process-­‐transform  •  DifferenEaEon  –  choice,  choice,  choice  •  Assessment  for  learning  •  Gradual  release  of  responsibility  
  • Open-Ended Learning Strategies•  Connect/acEvate  •  Process/acquire  •  Transform  and  personalize/apply  
  • Assessment for LearningPurpose   Guide  learning,  inform  instrucEon  Audience     Teachers  and  students  Timing     On-­‐going,  minute  by  minute,  day  by  day  Form     DescripEve  Feedback   ¶what’s  working?   •what’s  not?   •what’s  next?  Black  &  Wiliam,  1998   Hahe  &  Timperley,  2007  
  • Assessment for Learning•  Learning  intenEons  •  Criteria  •  DescripEve  feedback  •  QuesEoning  •  Peer  and  self  assessment  •  Ownership  
  • Examples
  • How  does  sehng  impact  what  happens?  
  • As  I  traveled  from  the  city  toward  the  country  old  age  fell  off  my  shoulders.  
  • As  I  traveled  from  the  city  toward  the  country  old  age  fell  off  my  shoulders.        Salah  Fa’iq  translated  by  Byrne  &  Jayyusi  the  flag  of  childhood    poems  from  the  middle  east  
  • Poetry  Circles  •  Choose  an  essenEal  quesEon  to  guide  your  poetry   readings.  •  Model  a  strategy  for  reading  a  poem  with  a  shared   text.    3  reads:    1  to  ques3on,  1  to  sketch,  1  how  does   seKng  impact  what  happens.  •  Ask  for  student  and/or  adult  volunteers  to  read  and   discuss  a  poem  in  a  fishbowl.  •  Observers  noEce  ‘what  makes  this  discussion  work’.  •  Create  criteria  for  an  effecEve  poetry  circle  discussion  •  Distribute  copies  of  various  poems  for  students  to   read.  
  • •  Using  a  similar  strategy  (read  and  quesEon,  read   and  sketch,  read  and  highlight  powerful   language),  students  independently  read  their   chosen  poem.  •  Form  poetry  circles  of  students  reading  the  same   poem.  •  Students  discuss  their  poems,  keeping  the  criteria   for  an  effecEve  poetry  circle  discussion  in  mind.  •  Students  self-­‐assess  with  the  criteria.  •  Students  write  in  response  to  their  poem  and  the   essenEal  quesEon.   Sample  poems  from  Nancie  Atwell’s  Naming  the  World  
  • •  ConnecEons                 •  RelaEng  self  to  poem   •  Showing  how  the  poem  changes  your  thinking  •  EmoEons   •  Explaining  why  you  feel  the  way  you  do  about  the         poem  and  how  you  think  the  author  feels  about   his/her  subject  •  image   •  CommenEng  on  the  image  formed  in                    your  mind  upon  reading  the  poem  •  Opinions   •  Expressing  likes  and  dislikes  about  poem,  with   evidence   •  Asking  quesEons  of  the  poem  or  the  poet  •  Response  style   •  Using  descripEve  words   •  Using  quotes  from  the  poem   •  SuggesEng  improvements  to  the  poem,  if  needed  
  • Personal  inquiry  within  an  inquiry  unit  •  Provide  students  with  mini  booklets  to  use  to   record  any  quesEons  that  they  have  during  a  unit.    •  This  helps  to  build  students’  own  inquiry   quesEons  and  sets  the  stage  for  more  generaEng   their  own  thinking  later  in  the  unit.    •   Once  a  week  or  so  the  class  engages  in  a   discussion  about  what  they  were  wondering,   what  they  have  learned  so  far  about  these   quesEons  and  what  new  quesEons  are  emerging.     See  Student  Diversity  (2006);  It’s  All  About  Thinking  in  Science  and  Math  (2010)  
  • Figure  10.4.    Diversity  of  Life  Unit  Overview     Science  6/7  Unit  Overview   Diversity  of  Life   1. Living  things  have  similariEes  and   differences;     Big  Ideas     2. Classifying  things  helps  us   understand  the  diversity  of  life;     3. We  are  part  of  ecosystems   Main  Ideas  &  Details  ,  Accessing  Prior   Thinking   Knowledge,  Synthesizing,  Persuading,   Strategies   QuesEoning    
  • Figure  10.8.  Wonderbook  Format     What I’ve Learned Where I Can Find the What I Wonder and/or New Questions Information that I Have
  • Figure  10.10.  Class  example:    Student-­‐Generated  Criteria   Not Quite Yet (2) Good Start (3) You did it! (4) Wow! (5) - Rarely uses - Sometimes - Uses - Uses- Information microscopes uses microscope and microscopes *relevant and equipment microscopes equipment with and equipment *accurate Accurately and equipment accuracy with precision accurately *key/important - Shares very - Makes - Makes few and/or - Notices descriptive and descriptive and inaccurate observations accurate insightful observations but may be observations observations and/or vague or lack (spoken/and (i.e.. notes questions in key details; written) and relationships) discussions or asks yes/no asks relevant and asks writing questions questions relevant questions that - Data is - Records data show an - Records some generally accurately; understanding data; may accurate; diagrams of key ideas be inaccurate diagrams include or missing key include labels relevant labels - Records data information and some and details accurately; details diagrams include relevant labels and key details Thinking Process - Does not - Proposes a - Formulates a - Formulates a *logical inferences attempt to “law” that is “law” that is “law” that is *explanation formulate a not yet fully clear and clear and *understands concept “law” developed logical logical; uses evidence to *clear justify it
  • Figure  10.11.    Student  mindmap  of  the  ways  things  can  be  organized  in  the  world.    
  • Figure  10.15.    Class  opionions   Opinion  Line   Governments  should  pass  laws  protec3ng  living  things.   What  they  said:   Rebecca:    (SA)  “Living  things  have  a  right  to  be  free.”   Caterina:    (SA)  “We  shouldn’t  kill  animals  which  might  kill  a  species.”   Angela:  (UD)  “If  you  don’t  cut  down  trees  we  won’t  have  furnitures.”   Tony:    (UD)    ESL  2  “Some  countries,  they  kill  a  lot  but  sEll  have  a  lot  and  sEll                            have  to  protect.”   Karina:  (SA)  “If  we  chop  down  trees  to  make  houses  and  furniture  it  is  affecEng                              us  because  trees  produce  oxygen  and  we  can’t  live  without  oxygen.   Alan:    (SA)  “We  need  to  protect  all  animals,  it’s  like  killing  all  of  us.”   Betsy:    (SA)  “We  shouldn’t  have  zoos  because  animals  need  freedom  too.”   Brian:    (SA)  “Gov’t.  should  protect  living  things  because  living  things  are  already                            decreasing  &  if  they  keep  decreasing  there  won’t  be  anymore.”   Angelica:    (A)  “If  we  lose  part  of  living  things,  you  lose  food,  so  laws  should  be                                      limited.”   Arian:    (SWA/UD)    “.  .  .  we  cut  down  so  many  trees  we  should  only  cut  50%  of  what  we  usually                                                            do.”   Kushan:    (SA)  “If  we  kill  trees  then  animals  don’t  have  a  habitat  &  they  will  be                                  homeless.”   Tiffany:    (SA)  “.  .  .  because  animals  are  gehng  lesser  and  lesser.”   Joshua:    (SWA/UD)  “Like  the  bald  eagles  are  almost  exEnct  &  the  more  the                                      trees  get  cut  down  our  community  won’t  be  the  same.”   Wednesday,  March  12,  2008  
  • Figure  10.16.  QualiEes  of  Persuasive  WriEng     What  Does  a  Good  Piece  of  Wri3ng  Look  Like?   Look  like?   Feel  like?   Sound  like?   • Text  features   • Convincing   • WriDen  in  3rd  person   • Visuals  (photos,  graphics…)   • Honest   • Uses  specific  words   • An  opening  statement  to  capture   • Personal  thoughts/  experiences   • Stays  on  topic   the  reader’s  aDenEon   • ExciEng  wriEng   • Convincing   • A  hook  to  keep  the  reader’s   • QuesEons  that  make  you  think   • Research  has  been  done   aDenEon   • Entertaining  but  stays  on  topic   • WriDen  in  own  words   • An  opening  quote   • Team  work   • True  facts   • Asks  quesEons  and  they  are   • Catchy  words   answered   • Accurate  informaEon   • Research  has  been  done   • Persuasive   • Facts/data   • SophisEcated  and  detailed   • Previous  knowledge   • Honest   • WriDen  in  own  words   • QuesEons  were  answered   • Incorporated  text  features   • Peoples’  opinions  based  on   • Ending  statement/  concluding  the   research/  facts   topic   • ConnecEng  words  (for  example,   • Gives  examples   addiEonally,  as  you  can  see,   • Sentence  variety   however…)  Student  Generated  Responses  2008  
  • Figure  10.24.  Student  Piece  Published  in  Local  Newspaper  
  • Next Steps Goals: What will we develop/ Goals explore/change/ refine to better engage our learners?   Rationale: Why are weRationale choosing this focus?   Plan: How will we do this?   Plan
  • Bennett, B. & Rolheiser, C. (2001). Beyond Monet: The artful science of instructional integration. Bookation.Brown, A., Cocking, R., & Bransford, J., Eds. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, & school. National Academy Press.Brownlie, F. Feniak, C. & Schnellert, L. (2006). Student Diversity, 2nd ed., Pembroke Publishers.Brownlie, F. & Schnellert, L. (2009). It’s all about thinking: Collaborating to support all learners in Humanities, Social Studies and English., Pembroke Publishers.Brownlie, F. (2005) Grand Conversations, Portage & Main Press.Brownlie, F. & King, J. (2000). Learning in Safe Schools. Pembroke Publishers..Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning, IRA.Daniels, H. & Bizar, M. (2005).Teaching the best practice way: Methods that matter, K-12 Pembroke Publishers.Gregory, K., Cameron, C. & and Davies, A. (2000). Setting and using criteria: For use in middle and secondary classrooms, Connections Publishing, BC, Canada.Lenz, B.K., Deschler, D.D. & Kissam, B.R. (2004). Teaching content to all: Evidence-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollack, J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement ASCD.Schnellert, L., Datoo, M. Ediger, K. & Panas, J. (2009). Pulling together: Integrating inquiry, assessment and instruction in today’s English classroom, Pembroke Publishers.Tomlinson, C. & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design. ASCD.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Wilhelm, J. (2007). Engaging readers and writers with inquiry. New York: Scholastic.