Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Measuring e-Governance as an Innovation in the Public Sector
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Measuring e-Governance as an Innovation in the Public Sector


Published on

Measuring e-Governance as an Innovation in the Public Sector

Measuring e-Governance as an Innovation in the Public Sector

Published in: Business

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Measuring e-Governance as an Innovation in the Public Sector Fatih ÖZLÜ Innovation Management (IS531)
  • 2. OUTLINE Introduction  e-Government  Evaluating e-Governance The Innovation Management Measurement Framework(IMMF)  IMMF Constructs Methodology for Measurement e-Governance Innovation  Conceptual Content Analysis on Surveys  Percentage Normalizated Scores Results of Measurement Recommendations Conclusion 2 11/10/2012
  • 3. e-Government e-Government: “utilizing the internet and the World Wide Web for delivering government information and services to citizens” (United Nations, 2001, p.1). Key stakeholders: various units of government, private-public sector, nongovernment organizations, and citizens. Until the end of the 20th century, offering government services to citizens through electronic media was essentially a very new idea. e-Government was a new trend, but today? 3 11/10/2012
  • 4. Evaluating e-Governance e-Governance can be referred to as an innovation management process in the public sector (United Nations) to evaluate e-Governance, Indices:  e-Government Readiness Index (e-GRI)  e-Participation Index (e-PI) Indices:  composite measurement of capacity and willingness of Member States of the UN for e-Governance  ranking countries according to their e-government efforts like web portals, mobile technologies, other e-services 4 11/10/2012
  • 5. Surveys The UN has used the Indices as metrics for evaluating  more than 50,000 online features and government services  more than 178 Member States across economic and social sectors The surveys measure how willing and ready the governments The surveys applied by  United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAN)  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA)  United Nations Division for Public Economics (UNDPE) It covers all member states of the UN 5 11/10/2012
  • 6. IMMF (Innovation ManagementMeasurement Framework) a innovation measurement methodology many organizations have difficulties in  define the scope of innovations, quantify the measures of innovations,  create benchmarks for the innovation management processes,  evaluate innovation management processes. to evaluate innovative activities in organizations against proposed framework of innovation management measurements. 6 11/10/2012
  • 7. IMMF ConstructsThe IMMF measures innovation management using by seven inductivelyderived constructs:7 11/10/2012
  • 8. IMMF Constructs Inputs  resources ranging from human and physical resources to financial resources  process of generating innovative Ideas  SubConstructs:  People  Physical and financial resources  Tools Knowledge Management  idea generation  tacit and explicit types of information in organizations  SubConstructs:  Idea generation  Knowledge repository  Information Flow 8 11/10/2012
  • 9. IMMF Constructs Innovation Strategy  organizations new products  resource allocations for innovation  business-related processes in competitive environment  SubConstructs  Strategic orientation  Strategic leadership Organization and Culture  cultural and structural elements  interaction frequency of various units in the organization  nature and features of organizational work culture  SubConstructs  Culture  Structure 9 11/10/2012
  • 10. IMMF Constructs Portfolio Management  scoring and optimization models  return on investment  balance sheets between high-gain vs low-gain projects  SubConstructs  Risk/return balance  Optimization tool use Project Management  the process of converting inputs into a marketable innovation  information and communication technologies  SubConstructs  Project efficiency  Tools  Communications  Collaboration 10 11/10/2012
  • 11. IMMF Constructs Commercialization  taking innovation to markets  marketing, sales and distribution  SubConstructs  Market research  Market testing  Marketing and sales 11 11/10/2012
  • 12. Methodology of Measurement IMMF is applied with selected surveys namely:  Benchmarking e-Government: A Global Perspective (United Nations, 2001);  The UN Global e-Government Survey 2003 (United Nations, 2003);  Global e-Government Readiness Report 2004: Towards Access for Opportunity (United Nations, 2004);  Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005: From e- Government to e-Inclusion (United Nations, 2005); and  The UN e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance (United Nations, 2008). Conceptual content analysis is used for analyzing surveys By conceptual content analysis, the IMMF measures the degree of which the existing Surveys assess innovation 12 e-Government initiatives in 11/10/2012
  • 13. Conceptual Content Analysis A dictionary of items is defined to measure the occurrence of constructs. Various words and combinations relevant to all IMMF’s seven constructs/subconstructs are defined as concepts. Outcomes of content analysis are typically summarized and compared to better describe communication data 13 11/10/2012
  • 14. Concepts in Surveys As a part of this research method, conceptual content analysis was carried out, by using a software named Concordance 2.0. key words are selected pick lists are formed frequency count for all of the concepts in all of the Surveys. “innovat*”=innovate, innovat ion, innovated and innovative 14 11/10/2012
  • 15. Frequency Count Project Management  digitatization of goverments through ICTs with web sites Organization&Culture  governments pay attention towards organizational environment Portfolio Management  complexity in measuring return on investments 15 11/10/2012
  • 16. PNS(Percentage Normalized Scores) large variation in terms of the content size of all five Surveys. the one published in 2003, is the shortest in size with just 81 pages, whereas the largest in size was published in 2004 with 270 pages. direct comparison of frequency count would introduce error, and could challenge the internal validity of this research. Hence PNS were calculated. For example, in the 2008 Survey, frequency count of Inputs summed up to 482. The total frequency count for all seven constructs from the IMMF equaled to 10,738. The percentage normalized score for Inputs in the 2008 Survey: =(Frequency Count of Inputs/Total Frequency Count)*100 =(482 /10.738)*100 =4:4887 = Approximated to 4:489 16 11/10/2012
  • 17. Research Design after PNS, graphical figure of the results17 11/10/2012
  • 18. Results High correlation in Knowledge Management and Innovation strategy  natural interdependence of innovation and knowledge management 18 11/10/2012
  • 19. Results High drop in the Project Management construct  not remain heavily emphasized criteria, any more  UN has shifted its focus from investments in ICT to building human skills and human capital. 19 11/10/2012
  • 20. Recommendations for more powerful Indices R1: there is need to balance criteria between hard (ICTs) and soft components (people, information and processes) of e-Governance  high gap between Project Management(average of 29.546%)-Knowledge Management(average of 10.993%)  narrowing gap between Project Management and Knowledge Management  instead of heavily paying attention to ICTs, focus on relations between people, process and information. 20 11/10/2012
  • 21. Recommendations for more powerful Indices R2: better equip the UN for assessing capabilities of Member States for empowering their citizens with knowledge and information pay attention:  types of software and hardware used to develop web portals and e-Government interfaces,  level of expertise, skills, and education levels of employees  the degree of outsourced e-Government projects,  the features associated with public-private partnerships 21 11/10/2012
  • 22. Recommendations for more powerful Indices R3: bringing greater equity to e-Readiness rankings assigned to Member States of the UN  The existing e-Government assessments take into account only the end products, for example: websites represent just one type of e-Government initiatives  but UN assessments do not attempt to quantify unique dynamics among social, economic and cultural contexts  For the equal amount of investment made by the U.S. and Africa, there is a very high likelihood that the African governments willingness and capacity for e-Government is higher than U.S 22 11/10/2012
  • 23. Recommendations for more powerful Indices R4: efficiency of an e-Government initiative could be achieved by paying more attention to the Portfolio Management construct, which has a PNS of 0.34% on average.  Portfolio Management as a combination of risk-to- return ratio and optimization tools  return on investment (ROI), breakeven values (BEV) for investments in e-Government efforts would give information about increasing value of an e- Government initiative 23 11/10/2012
  • 24. Conclusion e-Governance can be referred as an innovation management process. with the help of IMMF, conceptual content analysis run on the existing surveys this study demonstrates new way of analyzing existing practices of the UN. proposes a set of recommendations. 24 11/10/2012
  • 25. End… Any Questions? 25 11/10/2012