make it participatory moving away from passive respondents to active participation
less about answering questions, more about responding to and initiating debate and discussion
more about open source activity, allowing them to bring their world to us rather than taking our world to them
putting them in charge and letting them lead rather than follow
make it creative
making it natural reading natural voice of youth un mediated & unedited let them talk to each other & listen in
making it something they enjoy fit around their worlds rather than fit around yours time of day, creative, giving them a feeling of control
giving it time let go, work over time, don’t put them on the spot build a partnership with the members of the community take time to understand their language and what it all means
don’t exploit up front about what happens to their ideas
the opportunity
how we made it work
the solution
what we learned
observations on-line & face to face co-creation to provide complementary learnings big difference between tribes on the community
listening 2 hour immersion vs 15minute skim read everything twice depth, texture and tone very important
the do’s reading in depth & discuss don’t wait for debrief take time to digest - don’t rush ensure stakeholder engagement
the don’ts don’t over promise internally don’t allow brand teams to take it too literally don’t abandon traditional methods completely
Last week we were presenting at the MRS Youth confe more
Last week we were presenting at the MRS Youth conference in Sadlers Wells London talking about online communities; how to get the best out of them and why they delivered better results than traditional research, particularly in a youth context. We expressed a lot of passion in terms of why we did what we did. I particularly placed a lot of store in the point that true success in this kind of community comes from really encouraging participants to talk to one another in a natural, informal way and not just responding to the 'moderator' in a formal, mannered way.
This reminded me of days when we used to do lots of lots of focus groups and we would always try and have a chat with respondents 'after' the group was formally finished. It was amazing how quickly peoples voice, vocabulary and responses changed - i.e became more natural - once the group was officially over. This just shows how setting up formal environments can create formal responses and this is something we have tried to work against in the communities we run.
However, as a good challenge to that we were approached at the end by a couple of people from the BBC who had their own experiences of running a community online - designed to generate and create feedback on and ideas for BBC3 programs I believe.
They came up and said that their principle in the past had been to keep people separate in order to avoid group effects and people just agreeing with one another and coalescing around one point of view. Well, we chewed the fat a bit about different ways of doing things, and it reminded us that one of the great things about the way we approach communities is that it does allow you to almost simultaneously do a lot of individual and communal work - a great benefit that should not be overlooked.
At least the exchange proved that someone in the audience was listening which was great! less
0 comments
Post a comment