• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Incentives: SR&ED & other government programs - Ken Bell
 

Incentives: SR&ED & other government programs - Ken Bell

on

  • 793 views

Ken Bell presents to Fraser Valley Chartered Accountant Association on Oct 3rd, 2012

Ken Bell presents to Fraser Valley Chartered Accountant Association on Oct 3rd, 2012

Statistics

Views

Total Views
793
Views on SlideShare
762
Embed Views
31

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

2 Embeds 31

http://www.fvcaa.ca 30
http://www.slashdocs.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Incentives: SR&ED & other government programs - Ken Bell Incentives: SR&ED & other government programs - Ken Bell Presentation Transcript

    • INCENTIVES:SR&ED AND OTHERGOVERNMENT PROGRAMS Ken Bell PEng, PE (Wash), FEC Incentive Access Group Corp.
    • Outline• Funding For Innovation• Direct v. Indirect Support• Canadian R&D Landscape (Jenkins Report)• Rebuttal (MacIntosh)• Budget 2012• Ken’s Top Five Picks
    • Direct Support• Defined Program Objectives• Unique Application Form• ‘Peer’ Review – meet objectives?• Fixed Budget each FY• Inherent Regional or Sector Bias• Start-Up Advice: Don’t Bend Your Business Plan Just To Get Funding
    • Dubious claims diminish R&D tax creditBARRIE McKENNA, OTTAWA - Sunday, Feb. 06 2011It’s Canada’s marquee innovation program. And it’s broken.
    • Business Spending on R&D• One-third Canadian R&D $$ - 25 firms• One-half - 75 firms• Most small businesses – no R&D• Small R&D performers – 40% of revenue• Large R&D performers – 1-2% of revenue
    • Government Spending on R&D
    • Support Dimensions 2010-2011 1.3 (2007) $2B large(2007) 1,100 4,000 claims 0.98IRAP grants 3.53 $1.3B small 20,000 claims 0.63
    • Program Costs 2010-2011 1.3 $60M$140M 0.98 3.53 0.63
    • “A Bewildering Array”
    • Jenkins Findings• Many tiny direct programs• Unknown to business• No way to measure effect – direct/indirect• Lots of startups, few big winners (2%)• Foreigners buy those few winners• Lack of venture capital?
    • Jenkins Recommendations• Nation: Make little guys bigger• Create National Innovation Ministry• Cut everything but labor from SR&ED• Divert savings to ‘direct’ programs• Government procurement from SMEs• More risk capital• Re-focus NRC’s mission
    • MacIntosh on Jenkins• Salaries-only benefits talent firms (software)• 2% Success Rate is GOOD Silicon Valley 4% - much greater funding Firms may license tech Firms may plan sell to exit• DIRECT: bureaucracy, bias, incompetence• INDIRECT: market discipline, way out of VOD• Sponsored Venture Funds a Boondoggle
    • Economic Action Plan 2012• $400M large-scale venture capital funds• $100M to BDC venture capital• $110M to NRC to double IRAP• $95M Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program• $14M high-quality researchers to industry (MITACS)• Western Innovation Program• $500M to CFI• Streamline SR&ED program
    • Big Changes? 2010-2011 2012-2013 1.3 1.43 3.10.98 3.53 1.07 0.63 0.69
    • SR&ED Changes• Lower ITC rate (20%  15%)• Still 35% for small CCPCs• Decrease in overhead proxy (65%  60%  55%)• Equipment excluded c. 2014• 80% of contract payments• $6M (CRA) to ‘enhance’ delivery• Review of provider fees
    • Typical Impacts• Small Software CCPC (salaries) ↓6.1%• Small Software CCPC (contracts) ↓20%• Large Software CCPC (salaries) ↓21%• Large Software CCPC (contracts) ↓32.8%* includes provincial top-ups
    • Program Costs$140M $66M 1.43 3.1 1.07 0.69
    • Ken’s Top Five Innovation Programs• SR&ED• CICP• NRC-IRAP• MITACS• NSERC
    • Scientific Research &Experimental Development Tax Credit• Still the biggest game in town• Company directs research as needed• No delay for approvals• Plan and document• Reasonably fast processing• Use qualified third-party advisor• No regional or sector bias
    • Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program• NEW: $95M• Public Works now test-bed for pre-commercial innovations• Supplement to MERX• Register firm, register new product• Evaluation criteria• www.buyandsell.gc.ca
    • Industrial Research Assistance Plan• Additional $110M to double NRC support• Identify R&D project• Portion of salary and contractor costs• Vetted by NRC• Funds allotted per FY, apply early• Track record $10K, $50K, $150K, $500K• SR&ED remaining portion to 75%
    • MITACS• $14M over 2 years to double the program• Grad students and post-docs to industry• All industry sectors and disciplines• Apply any time, vetted within 4-6 weeks• $15,000 for each 4 months, $7,500 from industry gets matching contribution• Your time eligible for SR&ED
    • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)• Various funds• Hire a professor, specific R&D problem• Three forms, at any time• Vetted, decisions 4-6 weeks• $25K grant for $50K project• Company must match in-kind• SR&ED for related expenses
    • Ken’s Top Five Innovation Programs• SR&ED• CICP• NRC-IRAP• MITACS• NSERC
    • QUESTIONS kbell@incentiveaccess.com 604 572 9548 x 320 Ken Bell PEng, PE (Wash), FEC Incentive Access Group Corp.