Canada--2013 FDA Global Electoral Fairness Audit Report
- 3,283 views
On May 30, 2013, the FDA will host a webinar on the 2013 Canada Electoral Fairness Report. To register for the webinar, go to this url: ...
On May 30, 2013, the FDA will host a webinar on the 2013 Canada Electoral Fairness Report. To register for the webinar, go to this url:
Executive Summary of the 2013 Canada Electoral Report
The Foundation for Democratic Advancement (FDA) concludes that the Canadian federal electoral system is mediocre as determined by the overall unsatisfactory passing audit score of 64.49 percent (out of 100 percent). FDA auditors measured
1) Failing score for legislation pertaining to media election coverage (47.35 percent).
2) Unsatisfactory score for legislation pertaining to candidates and parties
3) Satisfactory score for legislation pertaining to voters (73.52 percent).
4) Very satisfactory score for legislation pertaining to electoral finance
In its analysis, the FDA factored in 32 independent variables, matrix examination, and financial analysis to inform calculations and conclusions. Based on its measurements, the FDA believes that Canadian federal election outcomes are not truly reflective of the voice of Canadians from electoral constituencies. Although there is sound legislation relating to voters and electoral finance, various provisions concerning candidates, parties, and media function to favour certain large and established parties over new and small parties and even other large and established parties. The FDA identified several elements in the Canadian electoral system that, when combined, undermine significantly electoral competition and thereby election outcomes. The FDA believes that the degree of electoral competition is an indication of the health of a democracy, and competition whether in the marketplace or elections produces the better societal outcome. Therefore, the FDA recommends a number of reforms to the Canadian electoral system that would eliminate biased electoral legislation and uncompetitive electoral processes.
“If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.”
About the Foundation for Democratic Advancement
The Foundation for Democratic Advancement (FDA) is an international independent, non-partisan democracy organization. The FDA’s mission is
to measure, study, and communicate the impact of government processes on a free and democratic society.
Overall, the FDA works
1. to ensure that people become more knowledgeable about the outcomes of government processes and can then make decisions that are more informed;
2. to get people involved in monitoring government processes at all levels of government and in providing sound, practical, and effective suggestions. (For more information on the FDA visit: www.democracychange.org)
- Total Views
- Views on SlideShare
- Embed Views