Innovations in targeting African farming
systems for improved productivity and
investment impact
FARA AASW Sub-theme 2
Acc...
Contents
Challenges for ARD
Approaches to targeting
Farming systems
Conclusion
Challenge 1: food requirements in 2050
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1970 1990 2010 2030 2050
GlobalFoodDemand(Petacal/day)
...
Century trends: population, agric prices
Source: Fuglie & Wang 2012
Regional trends:
African extensification cf Asian intensification
 Source:
World Bank, 2008
In some African
countries, ar...
Challenge 2: current hunger & poverty
Goal: “eliminate poverty
for 1 billion poor”
Pathways out of smallholder poverty
Intensification
20%
Diversification
30%
Exit
10%
Off-Farm
Income
20%
Farm Size
20%
Exa...
Some of the constraints …
Low productivity
Scarce biomass
Land degradation
Poor marketsClimate variability
Limited resouces
A response:
Sustainable Intensification Systems
Increased productivity and resilience without loss of resource
quality, th...
Where and how to target sustainable
intensification and agric R&D
 Current targeting is often organized by
administrative...
African farming systems framework
NOTES
Too much
diversity for
research & policy
decisions
Differentiate broad
farming sys...
Contrasting sub-systems: Highland
Perennial farming system Central Highlands Western Highlands
Population density +++ ++++...
Drivers of farming system change
• Population, hunger and poverty
• Natural resources and climate
• Energy
• Human capital...
Productivity and risk
e.g., possibilities to 2030 in Australia
Carberry et al. 2011
Applying farming systems targeting
Value add at regional scale
 Differentiating regional strategic priorities
 Framing t...
Some implications in Africa
• Foresight needed to specify plausible future scenarios
• Increased productivity of existing ...
Conclusion
 Twin challenges (of feeding 9 billion in 2050
and addressing current poverty of 1 billion)
can be met through...
ACIAR
Thank you for your
attention
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Key recommnadation from AASW6: Innovations in targeting African farming systems

311

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
311
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Key recommnadation from AASW6: Innovations in targeting African farming systems

  1. 1. Innovations in targeting African farming systems for improved productivity and investment impact FARA AASW Sub-theme 2 Accra, 19 July 2013 John Dixon Principal Regional Coordinator South Asia & Africa, ACIAR
  2. 2. Contents Challenges for ARD Approaches to targeting Farming systems Conclusion
  3. 3. Challenge 1: food requirements in 2050 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 GlobalFoodDemand(Petacal/day) Year 71% increase 2010 to 2050 129% increase 1970 to 2010 Source: Keating et al 2012 Goal: “feeding 9 billion”
  4. 4. Century trends: population, agric prices Source: Fuglie & Wang 2012
  5. 5. Regional trends: African extensification cf Asian intensification  Source: World Bank, 2008 In some African countries, areas of under utilized agricultural land
  6. 6. Challenge 2: current hunger & poverty Goal: “eliminate poverty for 1 billion poor”
  7. 7. Pathways out of smallholder poverty Intensification 20% Diversification 30% Exit 10% Off-Farm Income 20% Farm Size 20% Example: maize mixed farming system in east and southern Africa
  8. 8. Some of the constraints … Low productivity Scarce biomass Land degradation Poor marketsClimate variability Limited resouces
  9. 9. A response: Sustainable Intensification Systems Increased productivity and resilience without loss of resource quality, through: • Commodity or NRM programs • Augmented by “systems” components Four pillars require investment: • Systems and farming systems • Innovation systems and information sharing • Policies, institutions and markets • Metrics and monitoring
  10. 10. Where and how to target sustainable intensification and agric R&D  Current targeting is often organized by administrative or agro-ecological zones  Potential for improved targeting to .. • Improve efficiency and impact, e.g., research productivity • Align better with other programs and partners  Targeting by farming systems is generally more efficient than by administrative divisions or agro-ecological zones
  11. 11. African farming systems framework NOTES Too much diversity for research & policy decisions Differentiate broad farming systems, each with a “core concept” and specific R4D priorities NB. A similar classification exists for North Africa
  12. 12. Contrasting sub-systems: Highland Perennial farming system Central Highlands Western Highlands Population density +++ ++++ Farm size +++ ++ Market infrastructure ++ + Poverty 30% poor >60% poor Crop area 35% maize 17% tea 17% coffee More high value crops 42% maize 8% tea 10% coffee % of improved cattle 95% 22% of crop area in fodder Zero-grazing increasing 67% 11% in fodder Value of production 102K KSh/household 44K KSh/household Use of fertilizers 122 kg/ha 74 manure bags 51 kg/ha 26 manure bags SYSTEM LEVEL High population density High agricultural potential Permanently cultivated systems Market-orientation as a way to intensify systems SUBSYSTEM LEVEL Differentiate
  13. 13. Drivers of farming system change • Population, hunger and poverty • Natural resources and climate • Energy • Human capital and information (gender) • Technology and science • Markets and trade • Institutions and policies
  14. 14. Productivity and risk e.g., possibilities to 2030 in Australia Carberry et al. 2011
  15. 15. Applying farming systems targeting Value add at regional scale  Differentiating regional strategic priorities  Framing technology spillovers across countries  Potential framework for monitoring progress (CAADP .. Value add at national scale  Enrich existing planning frameworks  Support CAADP investment plans
  16. 16. Some implications in Africa • Foresight needed to specify plausible future scenarios • Increased productivity of existing food production without diversification risks poverty traps • Small holders have comparative advantage in integrated management-intensive production • Research on institutional innovations for gender sensitive access to services (beyond markets), access to resources (land, water, .) and options for risk management
  17. 17. Conclusion  Twin challenges (of feeding 9 billion in 2050 and addressing current poverty of 1 billion) can be met through targeted research and scaling out (supported by other programs)  Farming systems offers an efficient targeting framework to support CAADP Investment Plans • Within countries, to enrich existing approaches • Within sub-regions, for strategic priorities and spillovers
  18. 18. ACIAR Thank you for your attention
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×