• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue
 

Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue

on

  • 482 views

Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue ...

Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue

Austin Tibu, Land Resources Conservation Officer, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Malawi

© FAO: http://www.fao.org

Statistics

Views

Total Views
482
Views on SlideShare
465
Embed Views
17

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 17

https://twitter.com 17

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue Synergies between adaptation and mitigation at country level: panel discussion + dialogue Presentation Transcript

    • Bonn, Germany4th June, 2013Options for Adaptation and Mitigationin Malawi: Some EvidenceAustin TibuMoAFS-Malawi
    • Malawi and Agriculture• Agriculture sector contributes 40% of the national GDP;• employs 90 % of the 13 milMalawi population;• The sector is transforming inorder to achieve food securitywhile responding to the effectsof climate change;• The agriculture sector remainsrain-fed; vulnerable to dryspells, changes in the onset ofrains, uneven rainfall distribution
    • Synergistic Adaptation and Mitigation FocusAreas
    • Adaptation Strategies and Food Security:FAO/EC CSA Preliminary Findings• Favorable rainfall outcomes affect positively thedecision to adopt short-term practices, e.g. use ofinorganic fertilizers;• Unfavorable rainfall outcome encourages farmers toadopt maize-legume intercropping, CA, SWC andorganic manures;• Land tenure security increases the likelihood forfarmers to adopt long-term strategies;• Access to extension services, social capital andcollective action also affect positively the adoptiondecision.
    • Emerging Evidence: Mitigation-300-250-200-150-100-500501001500 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000$/tCO2et CO2e abated/year1.agronomy_dry2.Integrated nutrientmanagement _dry3.Tillage/residuemgmt_dry4.Integrated nutrientmanagement_moist5.Tillage/residuemgmt_moist6.agronomy_moist7.agroforestry_dry8.agroforestry_moist9.water mgmt_dry10.water mgmt_moistSource: FAO, 2013
    • Lessons Learned So FarThe need for adaptation and potential for mitigation in agriculturaldevelopment have implications for successful planning to supportfood security and poverty reduction;Barriers to adoption of promising agricultural practices requiresbetter understanding of farmer decision-making, risk managementand smart incentives;Uptake/up-scaling of practices also requires enabling action-supportive policies, institutions and investment - for whichgreater integration and coordination will be essential;Extended transition time to realize some productivity andadaptation benefits of CSA. Means low/negative returns duringtransitionNeed for financing during early phase of transition necessary
    • Thank you!