Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Ecloud copenhagen-130625074823-phpapp01
1. Europeana Cloud: The Project and the
Challenges of Assessing Researchers'
Needs in the Cloud and Ensuring
Community Engagement
Alastair Dunning (The European Library) & Agiatis Benardou (Digital Curation Unit,
ATHENA R.C.)
http://pro.europeana.eu/web/europeana-cloud
#cloud_EU / @europeana_cloud
2. Project Details
Start Date – February 2013
End Date – January 2016
Total Project Cost – 4.75m Euros
EU Funding Contributing 3.8m Euros (80%)
Matched Funding 950k (20k)
co-funded by the
CIP-ICT Policy Support Programme
http://ec.europa.eu/ict_psp
CIP-ICT-PSP-2012-6 - Project number 325091
the author is solely responsible for it and that it does not represent the opinion of the Community and that the Community is not responsible for any use
that might be made of information contained therein
3. 7 Work Packages
WP1 - Assessing Researcher Needs in the Cloud and Ensuring Community Engagement,
Agiatis Benardou (Digital Curation Unit, Athens)
WP2 - Developing the Infrastructure for Europeana Cloud, Pavel Kats
(Europeana Foundation, The Hague)
WP3 - Exploiting Europeana Cloud with services and tools for researchers, Erik Duval
(University of Leuven, Belgium)
WP4 - Ingestion of Content and Metadata Development, Marian Lefferts
(Consortium for European Research Libraries, The Hague)
WP5 - Sustaining the Europeana Cloud: Legal, Strategic and Economic Issues Julia Fallon
(Europeana Foundation, The Hague)
WP6 - Dissemination and Networking, Martin Moyle (University College London)
WP7 - Project Management, Mary Rowlatt (MDR Partners, UK)
Project Coordination, Alastair Dunning (The European Library, The Hague)
4. 35 Partners
1 Stitching Foundation (Europeana Foundation), Netherlands
2 Ariadne Foundation, Belgium
3 Athena Research and Innovation Centre, Greece
4 Bayerische Staatsbibliothek (Bavarian State Library), Germany
5 Central and East European Online Library (CEOOL), Germany
6 Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL), United Kingdom
7 Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (National Research Council), Italy
8 Debreceni Egyetem (University of Debrecen), Hungary
9 Fundación Dialnet (Dialnet Foundation), Spain
10 Hrvatska Akademija Znanosti I Umjetnosti (Croatian Academy for
Science and Arts), Croatia
5. 35 Partners
11 Det Kongelige Bibliotek, Nationalbibliotek Og Kobenhavns
Universitetsbibliotek, (Royal Library and National Library of Copenhagen
University), Denmark
12 Stichting Nederland Kennisland (Kennisland), Netherlands
13 Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen, KNAW (Royal Dutch
Academy for Science), Netherlands
14 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), Belgium
15 Stichting LIBER (LIBER Foundation), Netherlands
16 Cinecitta' Luce Spa , Italy
17 MDR Partners, United Kingdom
18 Kansallisarkisto (Finnish National Archives), Finland
19 Llyfrgellgenedlaethol Cymru (National Library of Wales), United Kingdom
20 Narodni Technicka Knihovna (National Technical Library), Czech Republic
6. 35 Partners
21 Stichting OAPEN (OAPEN Foundation), Netherlands
22 Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland (OKF-DE), Germany
23 The Open University, United Kingdom
24 Instytut Chemii Bioorganicznej Pan (Institute of Bioorganic
Chemistry), Poland
25 Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
26 Stichting Katholieke Universiteit Brabant Universiteit Van Tilburg
(Tilburg University), Netherlands
27 University College London United Kingdom
28 The University Of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
29 Goeteborgs Universitet (Gothenburg University), Sweden
30 Universite Libre De Bruxelles (Free University of Brussels), Belgium
7. 35 Partners
31 Universitaet Bielefeld (University of Bielefeld), Germany
32 University Of Patras, Greece
33 Stichting Vu-Vumc (Free University of Amsterdam), Netherlands
Unfunded Partners:
34 University of Sibiu, Romania
35 DARIAH (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities)
11. Europeana
The European Library
Polish Digital Libraries
Federation
Cost reduction?
Sub-aggregations
for members ?
Ease of sharing?
Shared storage?
Enriched data
potential?
12. Who are the partners?
Europeana
The
European
Library
20 contentproviders
3 aggregators
12 strategic /
technical partners
Polish Digital Libraries
Federation
13. What will they be doing?
Define the principles
of engagement
Ingest metadata (2.4 M
items) and content (5 M
items)
Build a technical
infrastructure
Investigating possible efficiencies
Establishing Long
term consensus
Design a legal
framework
Europeana
The
European
Library
Polish Digital Libraries
Federation
15. We will also investigate how we can build end-user services on
top of this infrastructure
Researchers
In particular for researchers in
humanities and social sciences
Content & Data
16. In scope for the project (Europeana Research):
Europeana Research
Platform
Content & Data
Tools “Portal”
“Annotation”
“API”
“SPARQL”
Services
17. To allow others to build apps and
services on
GLAM
Creative industries
18. Imagined Case Studies – what could a cloud
infrastructure do
Storage and Back-up:
Different nodes
within the cloud
would act as back up
for each member. If
your node was
unavailable there
would always be
another copy
available else where
19. Imagined Case Studies – what could a cloud
infrastructure do
Format Shifting:
All (or some) content
in the cloud in a
particular format
could be migrated to
a new standard
20. Imagined Case Studies – what could a cloud
infrastructure do
Access Interfaces (I):
Developers or
publishers could
work with specific
themes of content
(e.g. WW2, history of
science, fashion)
related to all
members’ content in
the cloud
21. Imagined Case Studies – what could a cloud
infrastructure do
Access Interfaces (II)
Content not yet in
public domain could
be made available to
restricted
communities –
depends on
authentication
system adopted.
22. Imagined Case Studies – what could a cloud
infrastructure do
Tools and Services:
Related content from
different members
could be made
available for
transcription,
annotation,
visualisation
23. WP 1 Objectives
To identify and define the Humanities and Social Sciences research communities that will be
supported via the Europeana Cloud
To identify and define the Humanities and Social Sciences research communities that will be
supported via the Europeana Cloud
To develop an effective research content strategy for Europeana, based on an evidence-
based account of usefulness of Europeana and The European Library resources for research
in the Humanities and Social Sciences
To develop an effective research content strategy for Europeana, based on an evidence-
based account of usefulness of Europeana and The European Library resources for research
in the Humanities and Social Sciences
To improve the understanding of digital tools, research processes and content used in the
Humanities and Social Sciences, thus informing the development of tools and aggregation of
content in the Europeana Cloud
To improve the understanding of digital tools, research processes and content used in the
Humanities and Social Sciences, thus informing the development of tools and aggregation of
content in the Europeana Cloud
To actively engage the Humanities and Social Sciences research communities in
establishing user requirements for the development of Europeana Cloud
To actively engage the Humanities and Social Sciences research communities in
establishing user requirements for the development of Europeana Cloud
25. Task Objective
1.1 Humanities and Social Sciences Research Communities
Advisory Board
1.2 Developing a Content Strategy for Europeana Research
1.3 Research user requirements for Europeana: digital research
practices, tools and content
1.4 Research Community Engagement: Expert Forums
1.5 Research Community User Evaluation
26. The Research Communities Advisory Board
(RCAB)
Prof. Rob Kitchin [Director, National Institute of
Regional and Spatial Analysis]
Prof Karina Van Dalen-Oskam [The Huygens
Institute for the History of the Netherlands]
Dr. Leif Isaksen [Lecturer in Digital Humanities,
University of Southampton]
27. Developing a Content Strategy for
Europeana Research - Aims
1. Matching of the existing content in Europeana and
The European Library to the Humanities and Social
Sciences research communities
2. Informing the ingestion of content from
existing providers into Europeana during the course of
the project
3. Development of a content strategy
28. Research user requirements for Europeana:
digital research practices, tools and content
Desk research: digital research practices and
digital tools state of the art
Research Communities web survey
Identification and creation of Humanities and
Social Sciences case studies
User requirements analysis
29. Research Communities web survey
[June – September 2013]
http://surveys.dcu.gr/index.php
/survey/index/sid/423471/newte
st/Y/lang/en
Ask which partners currently provides metadata aggregation ?
Current europeana ecosystem Many different systems being run by each different aggregator – there are technical costs and staff costs in running independent systems But there are transactional costs – costs of tranferring data, checking data. And what happens if an aggregator wants to take enriched data, or even data from a different source. The end point is always Europeana
Different type of system – where aggregators share a technical framework with
What advantages might the aggregation of digitised content from Europeana cultural heritage institutions bring for researchers? What benefits might different levels of authentication over such an aggregation of content permit? What kind of tools could be built on top of that infrastructure and which of them are the most appropriate to support this kind of communities (ie tools for transcription, tools for data analysis, tools for visualising or enriching metadata, tools for sharing)? And, importantly, how might these findings and information relate to other infrastructures, both existing and future ones?
