Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT

26,352

Published on

2 Comments
16 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Congress shall have the power to define, prescribe, and apportion the jurisdiction of the various courts but may not deprive the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases enumerated in Section 5 here-of. No laws shall be passed reorganizing the Judiciary when it undermine the security of tenure of its Members
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • judicial broach ____ ?
    p.s
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
26,352
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1,023
Comments
2
Likes
16
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Article VIIIJUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
  • 2. SECTION 1
    SECTION 1:
    The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts
    as may be establish by Law.
    Judicial power include the duty of the courts of justice to settle
    actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable,
    and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion
    amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or
    instrumentality of the Government.
  • 3. SECTION 1
    JUDICIAL POWER
    the State and private persons, or between individual litigants in cases properly brought before the judicial tribunals.
    SCOPE OF JUDICIAL POWER
    Adjudicatory power- duty of courts of justice.
    To settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable
    To be determine whether there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of excess of
    jurisdiction(infra) on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the government.(Sec.1, par.2.)
    Power of judicial review -power
    To pass upon validity or constitutionality of the laws of the State and the acts of the other
    departments of the government.
    b. To interpret them To render binding judgements
    Incidental powers
  • 4. SECTION 1
    Judicial power vested in one supreme Court and in Lower Courts
    • Judicial power, under the Constitution, is “vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law”. (Sec.1.). The judiciary composed of the courts is one of the three main divisions of power in our government.
    • 5. Only the Supreme Court is a constitutional court in the sense of being a creation of the Constitution in the sense of being a
    • 6. creation of the Constitution. All other courts, including Sandiganbayan are Stationary Courts in the sense they are creation of law.
    Organization of courts
    Regular Courts -the Philippine judicial system consists of a hierarchy of courts resembling a pyramid with the Supreme Court
    at the apex. Under the Judiciary Act of 1980, the other courts are:
    A Court of Appeals
    A Regional Trial Court presided
    A Metropolitan Trial Court
    Special Courts
    The Court of Tax Appeals
    The Sandiganbayan
    Quasi-judicial Agencies
  • 7. SECTION 1
    Importance of the judiciary
    In the language of Lord Bryce:
    “ The more clearly touches the welfare and security of the average citizen than his sense that he can rely on
    the certain and prompt administration of justice. Law is respected and supported when it is trusted as the shield of
    innocence and the impartial guardian of every private civil right. But if the law be dishonestly administered, the salt
    has lost its savour; if it be weakly or unfaithfully enforced, the guarantees of order fail, for it is more by the certainty
    than by the severity of punishment that offenses are repressed. If the lamp of justice goes out in the darkness, how
    great is that darkness.”
    According to Chancellor James Kent:
    “ Where there is no judicial department to interpret and execute the law, to decide controversies, and to
    enforce rights, the government must either perish by its own imbecility or the other departments of government must
    usurp powers for the purpose of commanding obedience, to the destruction of liberty”
    In the words of Mr. Justice Arthur Vanderbilt:
    “ It is the courts and no in the legislature that our citizens primarily feel the keen cutting edge of the law.
    If they have respect for the work of the courts, their respect for law will survive the shortcomings of any other
    branch of the government; but if they lose their respect for the work of the courts, their respect for law and order will
    banish with it to the great detriment of society.”
  • 8. SECTION 1
    Independence of the Judiciary:
    Congress may not deprive the Supreme Court of the constitutional powers granted to it(Secs.2,5.)
    Congress cannot prescribe the manner in which the Supreme Court should sit, and determine the number of Justices composing the court.(Sec.4[1])
    The Supreme Court is given the authority to appoint all officials and employees of the judiciary.(Sec. 5[6])
    The member of the Supreme Court and judges of the lower courts enjoy security of tenure.(Sec.11.)
    Their salaries cannot be decreased during their continuance in office.(Sec.10)
    The members of the Supreme Court can only be removed through the difficult process of impeachment.(Art.XI, Sec.2)
    The judiciary enjoys fiscal autonomy.(Sec.3)
  • 9. Section 2
    SECTION 2:
    The Congress shall have the power to define, prescribe, and apportion the jurisdiction of the various courts but may not deprive
    the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases enumerated in Section 5 here-of.
    No laws shall be passed reorganizing the Judiciary when it undermine the security of tenure of its Members.
    Power Vested to Apportion Jurisdiction of Various Courts Vested in Congress.
    3 Limitations:
    The Congress cannot adminish or otherwise impair the original and appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
    over cases.
    No law shall be passed reorganizing the judiciary when it undermines security of tenure guaranteed in Sec 11.
    No law shall be passed increasing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court without its advice and concurrence.
  • 10. Section 2
    Jurisdiction of Courts
    Jurisdiction- is the power and authority of a court to hear, try and decide a case.
    It may be:
    General – when it is empowered to decide all disputes which may come before it except those assigned to other courts(e.g. Jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Courts)
    Limited – when it has authority to hear and determine only a few specified cases(e.g. jurisdiction of special courts, supra)
    Original – when it can try and decide a case presented for the first time
    Appellate – when it can take a case already heard and decided by a lower court to removed from the latter by appeal
    Exclusive – when it can try and decide a case which cannot be presented before any other court.
    Concurrent – when any one of two or more courts may take cognizance of a case.
    Criminal – that which exists for the punishment of crime.
    Civil – that which exists when the subject matter is not of a criminal nature
    (e.g. collection of debts)
  • 11. Section 3
    The Judiciary shall enjoy fiscal autonomy. Appropriations for the Judiciary may not be reduced by the legislature below the amount appropriated for the previous year and after approval, shall be automatically and regularly released.
    Fiscal Autonomy
    Section 3 seeks to insure the independence the judiciary. The appropriations for the judiciary may not be reduced as provided above but they may be increased. The constitution takes into account the fact that the administration f justice, in the past, has always been at the bottom list of priorities in government budgetary appropriations. The prohibitation against reduction by Congress of the appropriation for the judiciary below the amounts appropriated for the previous year assures, at least, that the minimal finding requirements of the judiciary will be met.
  • 12. Section 4
    SECTION 4:
    1. The Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associates Justices. It may sit en banc or in its discretion, in division of three, five, or seven members. Any vacancy shall be filled with ninety days from the occurrence thereof.
    2. All cases involving the constitutionally of a treaty, international or executive agreement, or law, which shall be heard by the Supreme Court en banc, including those involving the constitutionality, application, or operation of presidential decrees, proclamations, orders, instructions, ordinances, and other regulations, shall be decided with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon.
    3. Cases or matters heard by a division shall be decided or resolved with the concurrence of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon. And in no case, without the concurrence of at least three of such Members.
  • 13. Section 4
    Composition of the Supreme Court:
    The new constitution retained the membership of the supreme court of 15 members including the Chief Justice under the 1973 Charter to cope with continuing increase in the number of cases brought about by a growing population.
    Sitting Procedure:
    The Supreme Court may sit en banc or in division of three(3), five(5), or seven(7) members. It is now the Supreme Court that decides whether or no it will sit in divisions. On the basis of fifteen(15) members, the number of division swill be five(5), three(3), or two(2), meeting separately. In case of two(2) divisions, there will be eight(8) members including the Chief Justice in one division, and seven(7) in other division.
    Cases to be Heard or Decided En Banc and Vote Acquired:
    All classes involving the constitutionality of a treaty, international or executive agreement, or law shall always be heard and decided by the Supreme Court en banc.
    All other cases including those involving the constitutionality, application or operation of presidential decrees, proclamations, orders, instructions, ordinances and other regulation which under the rules of courts are required to be heard en banc shall be decided with the concurrence also of the number provided above(Ibid).
    In administrative cases where the decision is for the dismissal of a judge of a lower court, the same majority vote is necessary to order such dismissal.
  • 14. Section 4
    Cases heard by a division shall be decided or resolved with the concurrence likewise of the same majority of the members who are at least three(3) in number but if such required number is not obtained, the cases shall be decided en banc
    Cases modifying a doctrine or principle of law laid down by the Court in a decision rendered en banc or in division shall be decided by the Court sitting en banc.
    Executive Agreement – is an agreement entered by the President on behalf of the Philippines with the government of another country and is effective and binding upon the Philippines even without the concurrence of Congress.
    Classes of Executive Agreements
    Those who made purely as executive acts
    Those entered into the pursuance of acts of Congress
    Power of the Judicial Review- is the power of the courts, ultimately of the Supreme Court, to interpret the Constitution and to declare any legislative or executive act invalid because it is in conflict with the fundamental law.
  • 15. SECTION 4
    Imitation on Exercise of Power of Judicial Review
    There must be concurrence of at least a majority of the members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon(Sec.4[2,3])
    A law must be sustained unless clearly repugnant to the Constitution in view of the presumption of validity.
    The question of wisdom, propriety, or necessity of a law, etc., is no open to determination by the court.
    Political question are generally addressed o the political branches of the government and are, therefore, not justifiable.
  • 16. Section 5
    SECTION 5:
    Judiciable Question Distinguish from Political Question :
    Judicial Question – is one which affects personal or property rights accorded to every member of the community in cases properly brought before the judicial tribunals.
    Political Question – is one which under the Constitution.
    SECTION 5: The Supreme Court shall have the following powers:
    Exercise original jurisdiction over cases affecting ambassadors, other public minister and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibitation, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus.
    Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on appeal or certiorari as the law or the Rules of Court may provide, final judgment and orders of lower courts in:
    All cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question.
    All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto.
    All cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower court is in issue.
    All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetuaor higher.
    All cases in which only an error or question of law is involved.
  • 17. Section 5
    Assign temporarily judges of lower courts to other stations as public interest may require. Such temporary assignment shall not exceed six months without the consent of the judge concerned.
    Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
    Promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the Integrated Bar, and legal assistance to the underprivileged.
    Appoints all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with the Civil Service Law.
    Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Over Petition for Certiorari
    Certiorari
    Prohibitation
    Mandamus
    Quo Warranto
    Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
    by Appeal
    by Certiorari
    A Question of Law
  • 18. Section 5
    Rule-Making Power of the Supreme Court
    Protection and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights
    Pleading
    Practice of Law
    Procedure
    Admission to the Practice of Law or to the Bar
    Integrated Bar
    General purpose of Integrated Bar
    a. To elevate the standards of the legal profession
    b. To improve the administration of justice
    c. To enable the bar too discharge its public responsibility more effective.
    Legal Assistance to the Underprivileged
    Limitation on the Rule-Making Power of the Supreme Court
    Rule shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases.
    They shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade
    They shall no diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights.
  • 19. Section 6
    Substantive and Procedural Law/Rights Distinguished
    Substantive Law – part of the law creates, defines and regulates rights concerning life, liberty, or property, or the powers of agencies or instrumentalities for the administration of public affairs.
    Substantive Rights – rights which substantive law declares or rights concerning life, liberty or property.
    SECTION 6: The Supreme Court shall have administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof.
    Administrative Supervision over Lower Court
    The Supreme Court exercises administrative supervision over all courts from the Courts of Appeals down to the lowest Courts and the personnel thereof. This is one fundamental changes introduced in respect of the judicial system by the 1973 constitution
  • 20. Section 7
    SECTION 7:
    No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have for fifteen years or more a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines.
    The Congress shall prescribe the qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judges of thereof unless he is a citizen of the Philippine Bar.
    A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence.
    Qualification for Member of the Supreme Court and any lower Collegiate Court:
    He must be a natural-born citizen of the Philippines
    He must be at least forty years of age
    He must have for fifteen years or more been a judge of a lower house or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines
    He must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence.
  • 21. SECTION 7
    Qualification of Judges of Lower House
    Constitutional
    He must be a citizen
    He must be a member of the Philippine Bar
    He must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence
    Statutory – congress is given the authority to prescribe additional qualification for judges of lower courts.
    Administration of Justice
    Nature – “compared to other public functions and duties, the dispensing of justice, being extremely important, is both delicate and singular.
    Character and Fitness of judges – the possession f the legal qualifications prescribed for appointment to the judiciary and the existence of constitutional safeguards to protect judicial independence are no assurance that the appointee will discharge the duties of his office impartially, free from all outside pressure and influence.
    Judicial standards more exacting – there is no place in the judiciary for those who cannot meet the exacting standards of judicial competence and integrity.
  • 22. Section 8
    SECTION 8:
    A judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice, and a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative of the private sector.
    The regular members of the council shall be appointed by the President for a term of four years with the consent of the Commission of Appointments.
    The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall be the Secretary ex officio of the Council and shall keep record of its proceedings.
    The singular Members of the Council shall receive such emoluments as may be determined by the Supreme Court
    The council shall have the principal function of recommending appointees to the Judiciary. It may exercise such other functions and duties as the Supreme Court may assign to it.
  • 23. Section 9
    SECTION 9:
    The Member of the Supreme Court and judges of lower courts shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least three nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy, Such appointments need no confirmation.
    Appointment of Members of the Supreme Court and Judges of Lower Court
    Non-political process of selection appointment – the appointing power is vested alone in the President.
    List of at least three years nominees- the President shall appoint from a list of at least 3 nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy.
    Judicial and Bar Council – instead of leaving its creation to legislation, the Constitution itself creates the council providing at the same time its composition, appointment of the members, their term of office, their emoluments, and their functions.
  • 24. SECTION 10
    SECTION 10:
    The salary of the Chief Justice and of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, and of judges of lower courts shall be fixed by law. During their continuance in office, their salary shall not be decreased.
    Compensation of Members of the Judiciary
    The salary of the members of the Supreme Court and of judges of lower courts shall be fixed by law. Until Congress shall provide otherwise, the initial annual salary of the Chief Justice is P240,000 and each Associates Justice, P204,000. after Congress has fixed the compensation f any of them, it may not reduce the same during his incumbency.
  • 25. Section 11
    SECTION 11:
    The Member of the Supreme Court and judges of lower courts shall hold office during good behaviour until they reach the age of seventy years or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of their office. The Supreme Court en banc shall have the power to discipline judges of lower courts, or order their dismissal by a vote of a majority of the Members who actually took part in the deliberations on the issues in the case and voted thereon.
    Tenure of Office of Members of the Judiciary
    Importance of security of tenure – section 11 insures the security of tenure of the members of the Supreme Court and the judges of lower courts.
    Retirement age – the retirement age in 1973 Constitution was reduced from the original seventy(70) to sixty-five(65) years which is the retirement age of other non-elective government officials and employees and restored again to seventy(70)
    Termination of rights to hold office – the constitution provides for the impeachment of the members of the Supreme Court
    Abolition of office – well-known rule that valid abolition of offices is neither removal nor separation of incumbents.
  • 26. Section 12
    SECTION 12:
    The Member of the Supreme Court and of other courts established by law shall not be designated to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administration.
    The following reason may be given for the prohibitation:
    Such designated violates the doctrine of separation of powers between the judicial and executive branches of the government.
    It may compromise the independence of the members in the performance of their judicial functions
    With so many cases pending in courts, the practice will result in further delay in their disposition.
  • 27. Section 13-14
    SECTION 13:
    The conclusion of the Supreme Court in any case submitted to it for decision en banc or in division shall be reached in consultation before the case is assigned to a Member for the writing of the opinion of the Court. A certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice shall be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case and served upon the parties. Any Member who took no part, or dissented, or abstained from a decision or resolution must state the reason therefore. The same requirements shall be observed by all lower collegiate courts.
    SECTION 14:
    No decision shall be rendered by any court without expressing therein clearly and distinctly the facts and the law on which it is based.
    No petition for review or motion for reconsideration of a decision of court shall be refused due course or denied without stating the legal basis there for.
    Decision – is the judgement rendered by court of justice other competent tribunal after the presentation of the respective positions of the parties in an ordinary or criminal case or upon a stipulation of facts upon which the disposition of the case is based.
  • 28. Section 15
    SECTION 15:
    All cases or matters filed after the affectivity of this constitution must be decided or resolved within twenty-four months from date of submission for the Supreme Court, and unless reduced by the Supreme Court, twelve months for all lower collegiate courts, and three months for all other lower courts
    A case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon filing of the last pleading, brief, or memorandum required by the Rules of Courts or by the court itself.
    Upon expiration of the corresponding period, a certification to this effect signed by the Chief Justice or the presiding shall forthwith be issued and a copy thereof attached to the record of the case or matter, and served upon the parties, the certification shall state why a decision or resolution has no been rendered or issued within said period.
    Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the court, without prejudice to such responsibility as may have been incurred in consequence thereof, shall decide or resolve the case or matter submitted thereto for determination, without further delay.
  • 29. Section 15
    Maximum Periods for Rendition of Decision
    Supreme Court – within twenty-four(24) months
    The Court of Appeals and other collegiate appellate courts- within 12 months unless reduced by the Supreme Court
    Lower Court- within 3 months unless reduced by the Supreme Court
    Time Limitation Mandatory
    The time limitation established above are mandatory. They are intended to ease up the clogging of court dockets or matter, and served upon implement the right of party litigants to speedy justice under the familiar aphorism that ‘justice delayed is justice denied”. Under Section 5(5), the rules promulgated by the Supreme Court shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases.
  • 30. Section 16
    SECTION 16:
    The Supreme Court shall, within thirty days from the opening of each regular session of the Congress, submit to the President and the Congress an annual report on the operation and activities of the Judiciary.
    The above provision requires the Supreme Court to submit to the President and Congress an annual report on the operations and activities of the Judiciary.
  • 31. THANK YOU!!!!
  • 32. GROUP II
    Submitted by:Eunice Macapia
    ReymarkAggabao
    CristineZipagan
    John Christopher Alluigan
    Ryan Fugaban
    EdmerTaguinod
    Marlon Tagapan
    Romeo Abarabar
    Submitted to: Christopher Vea

×