• Like
Leadership for Justice Peace Safety and Security
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Leadership for Justice Peace Safety and Security

  • 212 views
Published

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
212
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Effective and Ethical Leadership for Global andLocal Justice, Peace, Safety and Security: Building Canals rather than Dikes Erwin Schwella
  • 2. Introduction• Erwin Schwella• Interests and Institutional Affiliations – SPL Stellenbosch • SIGLA • ACCERUS • IFR • PLF – Leiden University • LLC – NIPAM, Namibia
  • 3. Reflections on War and Peace : Initial and Provisional Common Sense Perspectives from a Mere Concerned CitizenDestructive War Constructive Peace
  • 4. Orientation• Goal: Explore, discuss and learn from leadership thinking and action applied to global and local needs related to justice, peace, safety and security• Objectives:• Explore relevant: • Contextual dimensions • Base dynamics of current reality • Challenges
  • 5. Orientation• Leadership Responses – Concepts – Competencies – Conclusions
  • 6. Orientation• Relate these dimensions to: Effective and ethical leadership; Towards global and local peace, justice, security and safety; Building canals and bridges rather than dykes and walls
  • 7. Setting the Scene: Justice, Peace, Safety, SecuritySi vis pacem, para bellum: "If you wish for peace, prepare for war"• Does this mean that preparing for war will result in peace?• Do you get what you prepare for or what you wish for?
  • 8. Setting the Scene: Justice, Peace, Safety, Security• Is there a logic and/or preferred sequence in the phrase chain: Justice, peace, safety and security?• Should there be a logic and/or preferred sequence?• If there is a logic: – Should/is this logic based on morality and/or causality
  • 9. Justice, Peace, Safety, Security• Are their possible/inferred causal relationships?• Are there and/or should there be moral relationships?• How does this relate to effective and ethical leadership?• A personal considered opinion:• Justice results in peace and justice and peace are conditio sine qua non for sustainable safety and security• From an African perspective: “Development can only be advanced in a safe and peaceful environment” President Joaquim Chissano @ SIGLA@SPL@Stellenbosch
  • 10. The Quest for Justice, Peace and Resulting Safety and Security• Justice is more than a mere absence of injustice• Peace is more than a mere absence of war and conflict• People and their leaders are significant actors in the process of creating the conditions for and the condition of justice and peace and therefore safety and security• Peace, justice, safety and security are linked to effective and ethical leadership• Leadership and leaders matter.
  • 11. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Inequality• Differential Access• Rising Expectations – Global visibility – Impact of mass media• Sustainability• Poverty• Diversity• Mobility• Real, perceived and created scarcity• All of the above?
  • 12. Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Global and local inequality – Inequality realities and trends • Global Gini Coefficient 68-70 • Higher than the world’s most unequal countries: South Africa and Brazil • Top 5 per cent of individuals in the world receive about 1/3 of total world income, and top 10 per cent receive one-half
  • 13. Base Dynamics of the Current Reality • Ratio between the average income received by the richest 5 per cent and the poorest 5 per cent in the world is 165 to 1 • Richest earn in about 48 hours as much as the poorest in a year Milanovic (2005 and 2008) • 2000,the top 10% of adults in the world owned 85% of global wealth, while the bottom half owned barely 1% (ASPA, 2008) – Inequality within countries? What are the trends?
  • 14. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Differential access – Real, created and perceived inequality and scarcity linked to the challenge of sustainability – Basic human needs: • Clean water and sanitation – 37% per cent of the developing world’s population – 2.5 billion people – lack improved sanitation facilities
  • 15. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality – Over 780 million people still use unsafe drinking water sources. – Inadequate access to safe water and sanitation services, kills and sickens thousands of children – Leads to impoverishment and diminished opportunities for thousands more (UNICEF JMP) • Education: – 67 million children were out of school globally during the school year ending in 2009 (Unesco Institute of Statistics
  • 16. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Sustainability “If all of humanity lived like an average resident of Indonesia, only two-thirds of the planet’s biocapacity would be used; if everyone lived like an average Argentinean, humanity would demand more than half an additional planet; and if everyone lived like an average resident of the USA, a total of four Earths would be required to regenerate humanity’s annual demand on nature.” http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2012_sum mary_booklet_final.pdf accessed 13 August 2012.
  • 17. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Poverty – The richest 20 % have 83% of global income – The bottom 20 % have 1% of global income (Cummins and Ortiz, 2011) – Last thirty years have seen the gap between rich and poor continually increase, making a reversal of the trend more and more difficult despite recent progress
  • 18. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality – UNICEF estimate: more than 800 years for the bottom billion to achieve ten per cent of global income at current rate of change – 2015 Projections UN MDG – At the current rate of progress by 2015 about 1 billion people will still be living on less than $1.25 a day – Global extreme poverty rate of just below 16 per cent – Four out of every five people living in extreme poverty will live in sub Saharan Africa and Southern Asia (UN MDG Report 2012)
  • 19. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality – Globalised liberal market economy may have delivered economic growth – ‘Singularly and consistently failed to deliver economic justice’ (Rogers, 2009: 10)
  • 20. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Oxford Research Group (2011): – Perhaps the four most important underlying drivers of insecurity are: • Climate change, • Increasing competition over resources, • Global militarisation, and • Marginalisation across much of the ‘majority world
  • 21. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality “Changes in our environment and the resulting upheavals - from droughts to inundated coastal areas to loss of arable lands - are likely to become a major driver of war and conflict” UN S-G Ban Ki-moon, (2007)
  • 22. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality – Consequences: • Too little to go around?! • Mechanisms to control access • Mix of political and economic measures to control access to public and private goods and services – “Markets and/or military might” • Billions excluded from basic services due to base dynamics of current reality • Through mass media and globalisation increasingly aware of it • Impact/Injustice?
  • 23. Context: Base Dynamics of the Current Reality• Base Dynamics creates global and local public leadership challenges in respect of justice, peace, safety and security
  • 24. Leading into Leadership Challenges• The societal context, within which effective and ethical public leadership has to be practiced now, is best described by the famous Charles Dickens quote: – “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times; – it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness; – it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity; – it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness; – it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair; – we had everything before us, we had nothing before us; – we were all going directly to Heaven, we were all going the other way."
  • 25. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Challenges• Deal with the Price of Inequality and the other Aspects of the Base Dynamic• Global, National and Local Transformation – Constitutional – Institutional• Prepare for Justice and Peace and Wish for Safety and Security• Adaptive Challenges and Wicked Problems – Heifetz – Grint
  • 26. Challenges as Dilemmas• Global governance deficit• Global, national, local conflicts of interest• Institutional deficit• Institutional fatigue• Scaling challenges• Individual / collective leadership capture• Leadership disempowerment and incapacity
  • 27. Dealing with Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Challenges• Angry and alienated demands to deal with the big issues related to inequality, access, expectations and sustainability• Public leadership is being determined by the challenges rather than determining what is to be done about the challenges• Three possible insufficient meta outcomes: – Malthusian collapse / MIT “Limits to Growth”
  • 28. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Challenges – Schumpeterian innovation / Joel Barker: Always Another Door Opening – Applying less than adequate mere muddling through methods• Rather than these inadequate, naïve or neglecting options there is a need to find ways to deal with wicked/adaptive problems
  • 29. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Concepts• Conceptual and strategic options in the approaches linked to dealing with adaptive or “wicked” problems• Leadership as facilitating learning (Heifetz)• Leadership as adaptation and learning in complex adaptive systems (Gunderson, Hartzog)• Leadership in complex adaptive systems (Hartley & Bennington and perhaps Schwella?)
  • 30. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Competencies• Facilitate learning and dialogue before dictating action and “final solutions”• Frame and share questions to enhance analysis rather than answers to enhance quality decisions• Create awareness, analysis, experimentation to inform decisions and action• Manage stress and conflict within tolerable ranges for innovative and creative learning
  • 31. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Competencies• Include and involve all stakeholders in the “problem” in a consciously and properly managed and controlled process• Facilitate: – participative professional evidence and ideas based professional approaches, rather thanIt is about facilitating a learning dialogue rather than forcing a lamentable dictatorship.
  • 32. Justice, Peace, Safety and Security Leadership Competencies – power determined political emotion and ideology based approaches to problem solving• Create knowledge and learning based networks which is strong on a participative vision and weak on boundaries
  • 33. Challenging Conclusions• Scalability of the approach?• Enquiry requires facilitation (leadership without authority), thinking and intellect• Implementation requires force (authority), thrust and impact• Concluding Questions: Is this/Are you for Real?