GHG Impact of Organic Waste

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    GHG Impact of Organic Waste - Presentation Transcript

    1. And Greenhouse Gases CO 2 CH 4 N 2 O Organic Waste Management
    2.  
    3. Compost Pile 1 ton Carbon => 3.6 Tons CO 2 Carbon-rich organics Soil-enriching compost
    4. Incineration CO 2 H 2 O CO C N 2 O
    5. Anaerobic Decomposition Carbon/Water to CO 2 Carbon/Water to CH 4 Sequestered Carbon
    6. Palo Alto Composting & CO 2
      • 21,000 tons/yr (60% water)
      • 8,400 tons dry, 50% Carbon
      • Methane production is negligible
      • 15,120 tons of CO 2
      • Biogenic CO 2 , not counted in “footprint”
      • Transportation Concerns:
        • 1,100 tons additional if trucked to Sunnyvale then Gilroy
        • Anthropogenic, counted in “footprint”
        • Traffic impact; Roadway maintenance
      • Carbon Credit prices vary, but center around $20 / metric ton
      • Added to costs of trucks, fuel, drivers, & acceptance fees.
      What’s 1,100 Tons Worth? $22,000 / year
    7. 1,100 tons = + 0.15%
    8. Landfilled Compostables tons tons tons Compostables are 29% of Palo Alto’s “black bin” waste. 22,737 Tons of
    9. Modern Landfill Design
    10. Palo Alto Food and Green Waste in Landfill
        • 15,934 tons wet (60% water)
        • 2,692 tons of Carbon (40% of dry is carbon)
        • 1,346 tons Carbon released in 1st year
          • 50% into CO 2 : 2,424 tons CO 2
          • 50% into CH 4 : 50,880 tons CO 2 Equivalent
        • 1,346 tons Carbon remaining
    11. Palo Alto Landfilled Compostables, after Cap
      • 1,346 tons Carbon from food/green waste carryforward
      • 2,457 tons Carbon from other compostables (based on 45% carbon in dry weight)
      • Total: 3,803 tons carbon
      • 70% decomposes (2662 tons carbon)
        • 85% captured and combusted to CO 2
          • 8,146 tons of CO 2
        • 15% escapes capture
          • 719 tons CO 2
          • 15,099 tons CO 2 Equivalent (methane)
    12. Total GHG Emissions from Landfilled Compostables
      • For one year’s waste:
        • 79,262 tons CO 2 Equivalent !
      • If diverted and composted:
        • 18,534 tons CO 2
      • Full diversion would reduce PA Carbon Footprint by 60,728 tons of CO 2 e!
        • 2.7 tons CO 2 e per ton food/yard waste
          • (carbon credit value $54)
    13. Single Family vs MF/C
      • Greenwaste Palo Alto Target:
        • 9000 tons
        • (comm/mf)
        • $70/ton +/-
      • 13,700 tons still going to landfill
        • 37,000 tons CO 2 e
    14. Organics GHG Reduction
      • Part of the Zero Waste Plan
      • Execution of plan is what matters
      • What we do matters more than where
      • Attention, Measurement, Reporting, Evaluation, & Improvement
    15. Organics GHG Reduction
      • #1
      • Move Aggressively on MF/Commercial Food Waste Collection!
      • (& 3500 tons of leaves & grass)
      • (‘000s tons CO 2 e reduction)
    16. Organics GHG Reduction
      • #2
      • Implement Residential Food Waste Collection!
      • (‘000s tons CO 2 e reduction)
    17. Organics GHG Reduction
      • #3
      • Transform to BioChar/Bioenergy!
        • All green bin contents = minus 7,000 tons CO 2 e
        • 50% blackbin compostables = - 4500 tons CO 2 e
        • Wastewater sludge = - 6,000 tons CO 2 e
      C CO 2 CO 2
    18. Organics Management
      • Passive
      • Criteria:
      • lowest cost disposal
      • diversion mandates
      • Active
      • Criteria:
      • Resource recovery
      • GHG minimization
      • Long-term cost
      ?
    19. Organics Management Passive Active Palo Alto Operation Multi-city Partnership Contracted Location & Technology
    20. Organics Management Control Economies of Scale City-Owned Multi-City Contracted
    21. Multi-tech Organics Approach Composting Digestion Soils Restoration Sequestration Green Energy Green Bins Wastewater Black Bins Pyrolysis
    22. Location Possibilities
      • Expansion of WWTF
      • Industrial sites in Palo Alto
      • Industrial sites elsewhere
      • Energy/GHG Efficiency tradeoff:
        • Large scale operations vs
        • Local operations
    23. GHGs in Perspective
      • Compost just a small piece of the opportunity
      • What more important than where .
      • Audit, execute, and improve.
      • Regional partnership (we are not alone)
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Bryan LongBryan Long Nominate

    custom

    692 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Palo Alto generates yard waste, food and compostabl more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 692
      • 692 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 27
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories