Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Genre theory
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Genre theory

1,310
views

Published on

Published in: Entertainment & Humor

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,310
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. GENRE THEORY
  • 2. DANIEL CHANDLER  Conventional definitions of genres tend to be based on the notion that they constitute particular conventions of content, e.g. themes and settings, which are shared by the texts which are regarded as belonging to them.  Every genre positions those who participate in a text of that kind: as interviewer or interviewee, as listener or story teller, as a reader or a writer, as a person interested in political matters, as someone to be instructed or as someone who instructs. Each of these positioning implies different possibilities for response and for action.  Each written text provides a ‘reading position’ for readers, a position constructed by the writer for the ‘ideal reader’ of the text.  Other pleasures can be derived from sharing our experience of a genre with others within an 'interpretive community' which can be characterized by its familiarity with certain genres.
  • 3. STEVE NEALE (1980)  It is easy to underplay the differences within genre.  Steve Neale declares “Genre are instances or repetition and difference.” He adds that “Difference is absolutely essential to the economy of genre.”: mere repetition would not attract an audience.  Steve Neale argues that Hollywood’s generic regime performs two inter-related functions: i) to guarantee meanings and pleasures for audiences ii) to offset the considerable economic risks of industrial film production by providing cognitive collateral against innovation and difference.  Genre is constituted by “specific systems of expectations and hypothesis which spectators bring with them to the cinema and which interact with the films themselves during the course of the viewing process.”
  • 4. JOHN HARTLEY (1994)  Texts often exhibit the conventions of more than one genre.  John Hartley notes that “The same text can belong to different genres in different countries or times.”  Traditionally genres were regarded as fixed forms, but contemporary theory emphasises that both their forms and functions are dynamic.
  • 5. DAVID BUCKINGHAM (1993)  David Buckingham argues that “Genre is not… simply ‘given’ by the culture: rather, it is in a constant process of negotiation and change.
  • 6. KRESS (1988)  Embedded within texts are assumptions about the ‘ideal reader’, including their attitudes towards the subject matter and often their class, age, gender and ethnicity.
  • 7. GENRE AND AUDIENCES
  • 8. USES AND GRATIFICATION  Pleasure due to the recognition of the features of a particular genre, recognition of what is likely to be important because of our knowledge of the genre, is necessary in order to follow a plot.  Genres may offer various emotional pleasures such as empathy and escapism- a feature in which some theoretical commentaries seem to lose sight of.
  • 9.  Aristotle acknowledged the special emotional responses which were linked to different genres.  Deborah Knights (1994) notes that “Satisfaction is guaranteed with genre; the deferral of the inevitable provides the additional pleasure of the prolonged anticipation.  Steve Neale (1980) argues that pleasure is derived from “Repetition and difference”; there would be no pleasure without difference. We may derive pleasure from observing how the conventions of the genre are manipulated (Abercrombie (1996) we may also enjoy the stretching of a genre in new directions and the consequent shifting of our expectations.
  • 10. TOM RYALL (1978) AND JOHN FISKE  Genre provides a framework of structuring rules, in the shape of patterns, forms, styles, structures, which act as a form of ‘supervision’ over the work of production of filmmakers and the work of reading by the audience.  John Fiske defines genres as ‘attempts to structure some order into the wide range of texts and meanings that circulate in our culture for the convenience of both producers and audiences.’  Ryall sees this framework provided by the generic system; therefore, genre becomes a cognitive repository of images, sounds, stories, characters, and expectations.  1. To the producers of films, genre is a template for what they make. 2. To the distributor/promoter, genre provides assumptions about who the audience is and how to market the films for that specific audience. 3. To the audience, it is a label that identifies a liked or disliked formula and provides certain rules of engagement for the spectator in terms of anticipation of pleasure e.g. the anticipation of what will happen in the attic scene of The Exorcist.  4. When genres become classic, they can exert tremendous influence: production can be come quicker and more confident because film-makers are following tested formulae and have a ready shorthand to work with, and actors can be filtered into genres and can be seen to have assumed ‘star quality’ when their mannerisms, physical attributes, way of speaking and acting fit a certain style of genre.
  • 11. RICK ALTMAN  Rick Altman argues that genres are usually defined in terms of media language (SEMANTIC elements) and codes (in the Western, for example: guns, horses, landscape, characters or even stars, like John Wayne or Clint Eastwood) or certain ideologies and narratives (SYNTACTIC elements).
  • 12. JOHNATON CULLER (1978(  Generic conventions exist to establish a contract between creator and reader so as to make certain expectations operative, allowing compliance and deviation from the accepted modes of intelligibility. Acts of communication are rendered intelligible only within the context of a shared conventional framework of expression.
  • 13.  5. In turn, viewers become ‘generic spectators’ and can be said to develop generic memory which helps the in the anticipation of events, even though the films themselves might play on certain styles rather than follow closely a clichéd formula. E.g. the attic scene from The Exorcist – we expect something to jump out on the woman because all the generic conventions are in place, but in the end, the director deflates the tension. We do not consume films as individual entities, but in an intertextual way. Film is a post-modern medium in this way, because movies make sense in relation to other films, not todeviate from the clichéd formulae that leads to a 6. It is the way genre films reality. more interesting experience for the viewer, but fore this to work properly, the audience must be familiar with generic conventions and style.
  • 14. Problems with genre classification  Theorist and Critic Rick Altman (1999) came up with a list of points he found problematic with genre classicfication . a) Genre is a useful category, because it bridges multiple concerns. b) Genres are defined by the film industry and recognised by the mass audience. c) Genres have clear, stable identities and borders. d) Individual films belong wholly and permanently to a single genre. e) Genres are transhistorical. f) Genres undergo predictable development. g) Genres are located in particular topic, structure and corpus. h) Genre films share certain fundamental characteristic. i) Genres have either a ritual or ideological function. j) Genre critics are distanced from the practice of genre.

×