• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Reboot11 Elvira Berlingieri
 

Reboot11 Elvira Berlingieri

on

  • 745 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
745
Views on SlideShare
745
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Reboot11 Elvira Berlingieri Reboot11 Elvira Berlingieri Presentation Transcript

    • [email_address] Reboot11 – 25-26 june 2009 Copenhagen
    • Me and IT
      • before
      • Italian
      • Left handed
      • Libra
      • Devil is in the details (paranoid)
      • Curious
      • Enthusiast
      • after
      • Global
      • Left handed AND right handed
      • Libra
      • God is in the details (paranoia is a virtue)
      • Frustrated
      • Enthusiast and law professional
    • Overview
      • How do laws regarding IT are created? A quick case study
      • Do people have a role in the law making regarding IT?
      • A quick overview about something that is happening right now
    • Case study: how a technology-related law is born
      • Software protection: zeitgeist
      • 1964: first time ever copyright protection granted for software (US Copyright office)
      • 1968: first time ever hardware and software had to be sold separately (USA Anti Trust lawsuit against IBM)
      • 1969: fist law ever to mention software: France, denies patent protection applies but does not say what protection
      • 1980: personal computers, end users licenses: Copyright protection for software becomes law in USA
      • 1994: TRIPS Agreements: copyright protection has to apply to software
    • A simple way to put it
    • Crucial factor: what people in the business do and how they react sometimes matters
    • Law and technology: watchdog
      • Child pornography
      • Copyright
      • Freedom of expression
      • Privacy
      • Computer crimes/ computer related crimes
      • Consumer’s rights
      • Net neutrality/ right to access
    • Three points
      • Crime repression: need to increase international cooperation to catch criminals -> governments have self evident problems to put a law in force
      • Filtering content is not effective: the only way is to put down the Internet for a whole Nation
      • Right to expression and Internet: a new human right?
    • Freedom to expression
      • Freedom of opinion
      • Freedom of media
      • Freedom to be informed
      • (European Convention Human Rights, at. 10, Carter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, art. 11)
      • Fight and prevention of crime
    • The Iran effect:history in the making?
      • 12 june: elections. Population angst spreads against the results of elections deemed to be fake.
      • 13 june: content in Iran becomes more filtered than before (notably video and emails and most form of interactive communication)
      • 16 june: The US government asked Twitter to delay maintenance plans in order to allow Iranians to communicate while their government banned other media following elections
      • Now: people setting proxies to allow Iranian people to go on using Internet. Foreign governments and UN are officially staying out of the situation.
    • Proxies Source: www.renesys.com
    • Proxies Source: www.renesys.com
    • Much to do about noting!
      • Software and tools are used to communicate in Iran and from Iran to the rest of the world -> more effective than traditional media
      • Many governments use filters for political purposeas: Guatemala, Moldavia, Burma, Saudi Arabia, China etc.
      • Note that filtering sysyems are common in western countries too (libraries in USA, child pornography in northern europe and Italy, policies on the workplace etc)
      • Governments are for the moment avoiding a role in Iran situation but a private company has been asked to delay maintenance: crucial role. Is this influence over a state sovereignty?
      • Google and Youtube: public advocacy
      • Users: public advocacy
      • Tools are from USA, the company is private and subject to US law BUT anyone can change API and use technology as od their needs: code is the law .
    • Open questions towards a worldwide free web
      • Peace keeping – peace building: freedom to access to the web and right to information has been deemed in principle as one of the main elements of an established democracy.
      • Giving access to filtered/censored states: three critical points. 1. State sovereignity 2. the chilling effect 3. crime repression and filtering
      • Something new may come: people are acknowledging the right to self determination to other people
    • future
      • Protect free access at least as free press, promote an international agreement that will deem filters and censorship as a violation of human rights
    • Thanks
      • [email_address]
      • http://www.linkedin.com/in/berlingieri
      • http://elvlog.wordpress.com/