Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- financial analysis by Ganesh Uppin 355 views
- Financial Statement Analysis (Power... by Issa Go 15805 views
- Chap001 by Hang Dang 1131 views
- Chapter 3: Interpreting Financial S... by Ellena98 819 views
- © Copyrright Doug Hillman 2000 Anal... by Ellena98 1255 views
- Interpreting Financial Statements by canouar 4781 views

1,070 views

1,017 views

1,017 views

Published on

No Downloads

Total views

1,070

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

2

Shares

0

Downloads

78

Comments

0

Likes

1

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Chapter 23 Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements
- 2. The Need for Financial Statement Analysis <ul><li>Owners, managers, and others use the information on a firm’s financial statements to make judgments and decisions. </li></ul><ul><li>However, the raw figures on the financial statements do not provide a complete picture. </li></ul><ul><li>To gain a good understanding of the information on the financial statements, it is necessary to make certain comparisons and analyses. </li></ul>
- 3. Liquidity and Profitability <ul><li>For the users of financial statements, two major areas of interest are: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Liquidity of a business </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Profitability of a business </li></ul></ul>
- 4. Liquidity <ul><li>Definition: Ability of a business to pay its debts when they become due. </li></ul>
- 5. Profitability <ul><li>Definition: Ability of a business to earn a reasonable return on the investment of the owners. </li></ul>
- 6. Comparative Financial Statements <ul><li>Present a side-by-side comparison of a firm’s statements for two or more accounting periods. </li></ul><ul><li>Used to observe trends. </li></ul><ul><li>Help to answer the following types of questions: Is net income increasing or decreasing? Is the firm’s cash position improving or getting worse? </li></ul>
- 7. Approaches to Comparing Financial Statements <ul><li>Two basic approaches are used to compare financial statements. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Horizontal Analysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vertical Analysis </li></ul></ul>
- 8. Horizontal Analysis <ul><li>Definition: The comparison of each item in a company’s financial statements in the current period with the same item from a previous accounting period or periods. </li></ul><ul><li>The changes found in horizontal analysis can be expressed as dollar changes or percent changes. </li></ul>
- 9. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Income Statement <ul><li>In 20X2, the Clay Corporation had sales of $345,000. In 20X1, the amount of sales was $300,000. </li></ul><ul><li>Thus, sales increased by $45,000 from 20X1 to 20X2. This is the dollar change. </li></ul>
- 10. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Income Statement <ul><li>To find the percent change, it is necessary to divide the dollar change by the dollar amount for the earlier year. </li></ul><ul><li>$45,000 $300,000 = 15.0% increase </li></ul>
- 11. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Income Statement <ul><li>In 20X2, the Clay Corporation had interest expense of $3,500. In 20X1, the amount of interest expense was $4,100. </li></ul><ul><li>Thus, interest expense decreased by $600. This is the dollar change. </li></ul>
- 12. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Income Statement <ul><li>To find the percent change, it is necessary to divide the dollar change by the dollar amount for the earlier year. </li></ul><ul><li>$600 $4,100 = 14.6% decrease </li></ul>
- 13. Interpreting Horizontal Analysis <ul><li>The horizontal income statement makes it possible to spot strengths and weaknesses in a firm’s operating results. </li></ul>
- 14. Interpreting Horizontal Analysis <ul><li>Example: </li></ul><ul><li>If sales increase by 15% but total selling expenses increase by 28%, management should be concerned. </li></ul><ul><li>The rate of increase for total selling expenses is almost twice the rate of increase for sales. </li></ul>
- 15. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Balance Sheet <ul><li>In 20X2, the Clay Corporation had cash totaling $34,000. In 20X1, the amount of cash was $25,000. </li></ul><ul><li>Thus, cash increased by $9,000 from 20X1 to 20X2. This is the dollar change. </li></ul>
- 16. Horizontal Analysis Comparative Balance Sheet <ul><li>To find the percent change, it is necessary to divide the dollar change by the dollar amount for the earlier year. </li></ul><ul><li>$9,000 $25,000 = 36.0% </li></ul>
- 17. Vertical Analysis <ul><li>Definition: The expression of each item on a financial statement as a percent of a base figure in order to see the relative importance of each item. </li></ul>
- 18. Vertical Analysis <ul><li>In 20X2, the income statement of the Clay Corporation shows net sales of $332,000. </li></ul><ul><li>The base figure for the income statement is net sales (sales minus sales returns and allowances and sales discounts). </li></ul>
- 19. Vertical Analysis Income Statement <ul><li>The income statement of the Clay Corporation for 20X2 shows a gross profit of $150,000. </li></ul><ul><li>The dollar amount of each item on the income statement is divided by the dollar amount of net sales (the base figure). </li></ul><ul><li>$150,000 $332,000 = 45.2% </li></ul>
- 20. Interpreting Vertical Analysis <ul><li>The vertical income statement makes it possible to compare items from year to year in terms of the base figure. </li></ul><ul><li>Example: </li></ul><ul><li>In 20X2, the gross profit of the Clay Corporation was 45.2% of net sales. In 20X1, it was 46.1%. </li></ul>
- 21. Interpreting Vertical Analysis <ul><li>Gross profit has decreased slightly. </li></ul><ul><li>Management should look at the gross profit percent for prior years to see whether a negative trend is developing. </li></ul>
- 22. Vertical Analysis Balance Sheet <ul><li>The base figure for vertical analysis of the balance sheet is total assets. </li></ul><ul><li>In 20X2, the Clay Corporation had total assets of $270,000. The amount of cash was $34,000. </li></ul>
- 23. Vertical Analysis Balance Sheet <ul><li>The dollar amount of each item on the balance sheet is divided by the dollar amount of total assets (the base figure). </li></ul><ul><li>$34,000 $270,000 = 12.6% </li></ul>
- 24. Trend Percentages <ul><li>Used to compare financial data for a period of several years. </li></ul><ul><li>The base year is usually the earliest year. </li></ul><ul><li>Each item in the base year is assigned a value of 100%. </li></ul><ul><li>The dollar amount of an item for any year is expressed as a percent of the same item for the base year. </li></ul>
- 25. Trend Percentages <ul><li>The Cox Corporation had the following net sales from 20X1 to 20X5. </li></ul><ul><li>20X1 $350,000 20X3 $330,000 20X5 $410,000 </li></ul><ul><li>20X2 $360,000 20X4 $380,000 </li></ul>
- 26. Trend Percentages <ul><li>Using 20X1 as the base year, we calculate the percentages for 20X2 and 20X3 as shown below. </li></ul><ul><li>$360,000 $350,000 = 103% for 20X2 </li></ul><ul><li>$330,000 $350,000 = 94% for 20X3 </li></ul>
- 27. Trend Percentages Example <ul><li>At the Cox Corporation, the trend percentages for net sales from 20X1 to 20X5 are as follows. </li></ul><ul><li>20X1 20X2 20X3 20X4 20X5 </li></ul><ul><li>100% 103% 94% 109% 117% </li></ul>
- 28. Trend Percentages Example <ul><li>The figures show a positive trend except for 20X3. </li></ul><ul><li>However, the gain between 20X1 and 20X5 has been very small —only 17%. </li></ul>
- 29. Short-term Liquidity Measures <ul><li>There are certain measures used to evaluate short-term liquidity —the ability to pay debts that will mature within one year. </li></ul><ul><li>These measures are often used by creditors and potential creditors such as banks and suppliers of goods. </li></ul>
- 30. Working Capital <ul><li>Definition: The difference between current assets and current liabilities. </li></ul><ul><li>Working capital provides the funds needed for the day-to-day operations of a business. </li></ul>
- 31. Working Capital <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had current assets of $135,000 and current liabilities of $40,000. Its working capital was $95,000. </li></ul><ul><li>$135,000 $40,000 = $95,000 </li></ul>
- 32. Current Ratio <ul><li>A ratio is a fractional relationship of one number to another. </li></ul><ul><li>The current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. </li></ul>
- 33. Current Ratio <ul><li>At the end of 20X1, the Drake Corporation had a current ratio of 3.4 to 1. A current ratio of 2 to 1 is usually considered safe. </li></ul><ul><li>Current Assets Current Liabilities = Current Ratio </li></ul><ul><li>$135,000 $40,000 = 3.4 to 1 </li></ul>
- 34. Acid-test Ratio <ul><li>Certain current assets can be converted to cash more quickly than others. </li></ul><ul><li>Cash, accounts receivable, short-term notes receivable, and marketable securities are called quick assets. </li></ul><ul><li>They provide cash more quickly than merchandise inventory and supplies. </li></ul>
- 35. Acid-test Ratio <ul><li>The acid-test or quick ratio is the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities. </li></ul><ul><li>At the end of 20X1, the Drake Corporation had quick assets of $84,000 (cash of $21,000 and net receivables of $63,000). </li></ul>
- 36. Acid-test Ratio <ul><li>Drake’s acid-test ratio is 2.1 to 1. An acid-test ratio of 1 to 1 is usually considered safe. </li></ul><ul><li>Quick Assets Current Liabilities = Acid-test Ratio </li></ul><ul><li>$84,000 $40,000 = 2.1 to 1 </li></ul>
- 37. Accounts Receivable Turnover <ul><li>Shows how quickly a firm is collecting its accounts receivable. </li></ul><ul><li>Specifically, this measure indicates how many times per year the average amount of accounts receivable is collected. </li></ul><ul><li>Found by dividing the net credit sales by the average net accounts receivable. </li></ul>
- 38. Accounts Receivable Turnover <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had net credit sales of $250,000 (credit sales minus sales returns and allowances and sales discounts). </li></ul><ul><li>The average of the net accounts receivable for 20X1 is calculated as follows. (Net accounts receivable is accounts receivable minus estimated uncollectible accounts.) </li></ul>
- 39. Accounts Receivable Turnover <ul><li>Net accounts receivable at beginning of year $35,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Net accounts receivable at end of year 63,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Total $98,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Average of net accounts receivable: $98,000 2 = $49,000 </li></ul>
- 40. Accounts Receivable Turnover <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had an accounts receivable turnover of 5.1 times. </li></ul><ul><li>Net Credit Sales Average Net Accts. Rec. = Accts. Rec. Turnover </li></ul><ul><li>$250,000 $49,000 = 5.1 times </li></ul><ul><li>Drake converted its accounts receivable to cash 5.1 times during 20X1. </li></ul>
- 41. Average Collection Period for Accounts Receivable <ul><li>Definition: A rough measure of the length of time it takes the firm to collect its outstanding accounts receivable. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by dividing 365 days by the accounts receivable turnover. </li></ul>
- 42. Average Collection Period for Accounts Receivable <ul><li>At the Drake Corporation, the average collection period for 20X1 was 71.6 days. </li></ul><ul><li>365 days Accts. Rec. Turnover = Average Collection Period </li></ul><ul><li>365 days 5.1 times = 71.6 days </li></ul>
- 43. Average Collection Period for Accounts Receivable <ul><li>If Drake provides credit terms of n/30 to its customers, an average collection period of 71.6 days is very poor. </li></ul>
- 44. Merchandise Inventory Turnover <ul><li>Definition: A measure of how many times a firm sells its average inventory during a year. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold by the average inventory. </li></ul>
- 45. Merchandise Inventory Turnover <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had cost of goods sold of $168,000. </li></ul><ul><li>The average inventory is calculated as follows. </li></ul><ul><li>Merchandise inventory at beginning of year $40,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Merchandise inventory at end of year 44,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Total $84,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Average inventory: $84,000 2 = $42,000 </li></ul>
- 46. Merchandise Inventory Turnover <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation turned over (sold and replaced) its merchandise inventory 4.0 times. </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of Goods Sold Average Inventory = Inventory </li></ul><ul><li> Turnover </li></ul><ul><li>$168,000 $42,000 = 4.0 times </li></ul>
- 47. Merchandise Inventory Turnover <ul><li>To judge the meaning of this figure, it is necessary to know the firm’s inventory turnover in previous years and the inventory turnover of similar types of businesses. </li></ul>
- 48. Number of Days in Merchandise Inventory <ul><li>This measure indicates the number of days it takes a firm to sell its merchandise inventory. </li></ul><ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had 91.3 days in merchandise inventory. </li></ul><ul><li>365 days Inventory Turnover = Number of Days in Inventory </li></ul><ul><li>365 days 4.0 times = 91.3 days </li></ul>
- 49. Long-term Liquidity Measures <ul><li>There are certain measures used to evaluate a firm’s ability to pay its long-term liabilities. </li></ul><ul><li>Long-term liquidity measures are of particular interest to holders of mortgages and bonds. </li></ul>
- 50. Ratio of Plant Assets to Long-term Liabilities <ul><li>Plant assets are sometimes pledged as security for long-term notes payable. </li></ul><ul><li>The ratio of plant assets to long-term liabilities indicates the margin of safety for the holders of notes backed by plant assets. </li></ul><ul><li>This ratio is calculated by dividing a firm’s plant assets by its long-term liabilities. </li></ul>
- 51. Ratio of Plant Assets to Long-term Liabilities <ul><li>At the end of 20X1, the Drake Corporation had plant assets of $110,000 and long-term liabilities of $30,000. </li></ul><ul><li>Pl. Assets Long-term Liab. = Ratio of Pl. Assets to Long-term Liab. </li></ul><ul><li>$110,000 $30,000 = 3.7 to 1 </li></ul>
- 52. Ratio of Plant Assets to Long-term Liabilities <ul><li>A ratio of 2 to 1 for this measure is considered safe. Thus, Drake’s ratio of 3.7 to 1 is good. </li></ul>
- 53. Ratio of Owner’s Equity to Total Liabilities <ul><li>Creditors and potential creditors will want to know how a firm’s liabilities and owner’s equity relate to each other. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is known as the ratio of owner’s equity to total liabilities or the debt-equity ratio. </li></ul><ul><li>It is found by dividing owner’s equity by total liabilities. </li></ul>
- 54. Ratio of Owner’s Equity to Total Liabilities <ul><li>At the end of 20X1, the Drake Corporation had owner’s equity of $175,000 and total liabilities of $70,000. </li></ul><ul><li>Owner’s Equity Total Liab. = Ratio of OE to Total Liab. </li></ul><ul><li>$175,000 $70,000 = 2.5 to 1 </li></ul>
- 55. Ratio of Owner’s Equity to Total Liabilities <ul><li>Drake has $2.50 of owner’s equity for each $1 of debt. </li></ul><ul><li>The higher this ratio is, the better the firm’s credit position will be. </li></ul>
- 56. Times Interest Earned <ul><li>To evaluate a firm’s ability to meet its interest payments, analysts use a ratio called times interest earned. </li></ul><ul><li>This ratio shows the number of times a firm has earned its interest expense. </li></ul><ul><li>This ratio is calculated by adding net income, interest expense, and income taxes and dividing the result by interest expense. </li></ul>
- 57. Times Interest Earned <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had net income of $56,000, interest expense of $11,000, and income taxes of $9,000. The total is $76,000. </li></ul><ul><li>To find the times interest earned ratio, it is necessary to divide the total of the net income, interest expense, and income taxes by the interest expense. </li></ul><ul><li>$76,000 $11,000 = 6.91 to 1 </li></ul>
- 58. Times Interest Earned <ul><li>Most U.S. firms are in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 for this ratio. Thus, Drake has good coverage of its interest. </li></ul>
- 59. Profitability Analysis <ul><li>Profitability measures are mostly of interest to owners, managers, potential investors, and financial analysts. </li></ul>
- 60. Return on Assets <ul><li>Indicates the profitability of a firm’s assets. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by adding net income and interest expense and dividing the result by the average of the total assets for the year. </li></ul><ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had a net income of $56,000 and interest expense of $11,000. The total is $67,000. </li></ul>
- 61. Return on Assets <ul><li>The next step in finding the return on assets is to calculate the average total assets for the year. </li></ul><ul><li>Beginning total assets for year $213,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Ending total assets for year 245,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Total $458,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Average total assets: $458,000 2 = $229,000 </li></ul>
- 62. Return on Assets <ul><li>The final step in finding the return on assets is to divide the sum of the net income and the interest expense by the average total assets. </li></ul><ul><li>$67,000 $229,000 = 29.3% </li></ul>
- 63. Asset Turnover <ul><li>Definition: A measure of how effectively the assets of a firm are being used to produce sales. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by dividing the net sales for the year by the total assets (excluding investments) at the end of the year. </li></ul>
- 64. Asset Turnover <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had net sales of $370,000. At the end of the year, its assets totaled $245,000. (There are no investments.) </li></ul><ul><li>Net Sales Total Assets = Asset Turnover </li></ul><ul><li>$370,000 $245,000 = 1.5 times </li></ul>
- 65. Asset Turnover <ul><li>Usually, the higher the asset turnover rate, the better the firm is using its assets to produce sales. </li></ul>
- 66. Return on Stockholders’ Equity <ul><li>Stockholders and potential stockholders want to know what return a business is earning on its stockholders’ equity. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by dividing the net income for a year by the average stockholders’ equity. </li></ul>
- 67. Return on Stockholders’ Equity <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had net income of $56,000. </li></ul><ul><li>The average stockholders’ equity is found as follows. </li></ul>
- 68. Return on Stockholders’ Equity <ul><li>Stockholders’ equity at beginning of year $143,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Stockholders’ equity at end of year 175,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Total $318,000 </li></ul><ul><li>Average stockholders’ equity: </li></ul><ul><li>$318,000 2 = $159,000 </li></ul>
- 69. Return on Stockholders’ Equity <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had a return of 35.2% on stockholders’ equity. </li></ul><ul><li>Net income Average Stockholders’ Equity = Return on S.E. </li></ul><ul><li>$56,000 $159,000 = 35.2% </li></ul><ul><li>Investors are attracted to a firm that has a high rate of return on stockholders’ equity. </li></ul>
- 70. Earnings Per Share of Common Stock <ul><li>Definition: Amount of a corporation’s net income available for each share of common stock. </li></ul><ul><li>To calculate this amount: </li></ul><ul><li>Step 1. Subtract the dividends owed on the preferred stock from the net income. </li></ul><ul><li>Step 2. Divide the remaining net income by the average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. </li></ul>
- 71. Earnings Per Share of Common Stock <ul><li>In 20X1, the Drake Corporation had net income of $56,000. There is no preferred stock. </li></ul><ul><li>The firm had 12,500 shares of common stock outstanding throughout the year. The common stock is not actively traded. </li></ul>
- 72. Earnings Per Share of Common Stock <ul><li>The amount of earnings per share of common stock at Drake in 20X1 is $4.48. </li></ul><ul><li>Net Income Shares Outstanding = Earnings per Share </li></ul><ul><li>$56,000 12,500 shares = $4.48 </li></ul>
- 73. Price/earnings Ratio <ul><li>Definition: A measure of the relationship between the market price of common stock and the earnings per share. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>This measure is widely used by financial analysts as an indication of the future earnings prospects of a corporation. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The P/E ratio is calculated by dividing the market price of each share of common stock by the earnings per share. </li></ul></ul>
- 74. Price/earnings Ratio <ul><li>Assume the common stock of the Drake Corporation has a market price of $32 on December 31, 20X1. </li></ul><ul><li>The amount of earnings per share of common stock for 20X1 is $4.48. </li></ul>
- 75. Price/earnings Ratio <ul><li>The price/earnings ratio is 7.1. This means the common stock is selling for 7.1 times the amount of earnings per share. </li></ul><ul><li>Price per Share Earnings per Share = P/E Ratio </li></ul><ul><li>$32.00 $4.48 = 7.1 </li></ul>
- 76. Dividend Yield <ul><li>Shows the rate an investor has earned on the stock. </li></ul><ul><li>This measure is calculated by dividing the dividend per share by the market price per share. </li></ul>
- 77. Dividend Yield <ul><li>During 20X1, the Drake Corporation paid a dividend of $1.50 per share of common stock. </li></ul><ul><li>The market price of each share of common stock is $32 on December 31, 20X1. </li></ul><ul><li>The dividend yield is 4.7%. </li></ul><ul><li>Dividend per Share Price per Share = Dividend Yield </li></ul><ul><li>$1.50 $32.00 = 4.7% </li></ul>

No public clipboards found for this slide

×
### Save the most important slides with Clipping

Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.

Be the first to comment