Ossiannilsson130315 sverd

507 views
477 views

Published on

Keynote på SVERDs årsmöte den 15 mars 2013

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
507
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • §
  • The fourth theme is on innovationSo I will start to talk about internationa, level, then Nordic and than localPOERUPShift from development to OER practicesBroader notion of open practices. Open learning, teaching and researcUse of social and participatory media to foster OER Communitieshttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/-D9TnhC0z3Vc/TmoWirCz6aI/AAAAAAAAAaU/cu9LmTRiZLI/s1600/practice.gif
  • The thirdtheme is aboutqualityA move from the paradigm my students, my course, my content..towardshttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-rcFBgUNtQ0/SFO-eE5igTI/AAAAAAAAEIk/4cyVccxKt_U/s400/GMU+service-learning+orientation+037.jpghttp://umami.typepad.com/umami/images/2007/07/18/p7050954.jpghttp://s3.frank.itlab.us/photo-essays/small/aug_05_4646_teacher.jpg
  • Quality can enhance when use the very best of what is out there and available and often for free and peer reviewedIn research we are used to talk about peer review, but not that often in educationTowards any university, any content, any studentProbably the role of the University will shift to an assessing and credentialling institution or just for elite students and for researchhttp://img.scoop.it/_kg6c2d18VvkH-C1_rudTzl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVaiQDB_Rd1H6kmuBWtceBJ
  • Ossiannilsson130315 sverd

    1. 1. Benchmarking e-learning och OERSverige.seEBBA OSSIANNILSSONSVERDS ÅRSMÖTE 15 MARS 2013
    2. 2. Ebba Ossiannilsson, PhD Lund Universitet, Sverige
    3. 3. Ossiannilsson (2012) Benchmarking (e)-learning inhigher education, Doctoral dissertation, OuluUniversity, Finland
    4. 4. BakgrundCurrent known bm/quality methodsThe Swedish National Agency of Higher Education,ELQEADTU, E-xcellence+ESMU, Benchmarking eLearning exercise 2009The First dual-mode distance learningbenchmarking club
    5. 5. Benchmarking…the ´locus´ ofbenchmarking lies betweenthe current and desirablestates of affairs andcontributes to the benchmark-careers.comtransformation processesthat realise theseimprovements. (Moriarty andSmallman, 2009, p. 484)
    6. 6. The benchmarking process The locus of What to benchmark benchmarking lies between the current Take action Benchmarking and desirable states team of affairs and contributes to the transformation process that Analyse benchmarking information Benchmarking partners realizes these improvements.Ossiannilsson 2011. Reprinted with permission from SCIRP
    7. 7. Benchmarking benefits and values• Self assess institutions • Targets for• Better understand the improvements process • Strengthen identity,• Measure and compare strategy, implementation• Discover new ideas • Enhance reputation• Obtain data to support • Respond to international decision making and national indicators • New standard for the sector Van Vught, F. (2008) A practical guide. Benchmarking in European Higher Education
    8. 8. Multimedia resources 80s 93 The Internet and the Webonline.html Learning objects 94 Learning Management Systems 95 Mobile devices 98 Learning Design 99 E-Learning timeline Gaming technologies 00 Open Educational Resources 01 Social and participatory media 04 Virtual worlds 05 07 E-books and smart devices 08 Massive Open Online Courseshttp://scienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/a-ramble-through-history-of-
    9. 9. Personalization……take the individualsperspective on learningincome, course design,learning mode
    10. 10. Ossiannilsson E & Landgren L (2011). Essential areas thatbenchmarking e-learning ought to cover. Reprinted with permissionfrom Wiley-Blackwell.
    11. 11. Quality dimensions… Transperens Examination Delaktighet Lärande design Självbestäm- Kreativitit mande Närvaro Flexibilitet, Innovation tid/rum/plats/fart Ägandeskap cc by stijnbernOssiannilsson 2012
    12. 12. Rhizome and Serendipity perspectives Illustration ©Sonesson2012. In © Ossiannilsson 2012
    13. 13. Retrospective or prospektive? Certification Accreditation Quality assurance From control to quality enhancement Self-evaluation Peer review Some rights reserved by dieselbug2007 Benchmarking Why, what, when, how , where ?Ossiannilsson 2012
    14. 14. Quality culture – dialectic approach Quality control Processmodels Guidelines Rules Communication Standards Trust Co-operation Competences Inclusivness Innovation/CreativityCC BY Some rights reserved by Gerd Altmann Attitudes Values Self -evaluation CC BY Some rights reserved by SeattleClouds.com
    15. 15. Om att byta kvalitetsperspektivHållbarhet GlobaliseringBoundless education DemografiLivslångt lärande Teknisk och digitalHolistiskt, konceptuellt utvecklingEmbedded and beyond Involvement ReferensramA move from mystudents, my course, (Ossiannilsson 2012)my resorurse… towardsour´s…
    16. 16. RQ 3 on Quality- context and stakeholders? Cc by joguldi
    17. 17. AccreditationPeer to Peer University OER University www.p2pu.org/en/ wikieducator.org/OER_univers
    18. 18. 21Conclusions RQ1: Entire benchmarking process Emerging digitalisation and openess Critical success factors RQ2: Quality culture with self-evaluation RQ3: Methodoligical changes External and internal driven processes Retroperspective/Prospective Frame of reference
    19. 19. OER Öppna Lärresurser
    20. 20. Öppna digitala lärresurser kallas på engelskaOpen Educational Resources (OER). Det ärlärresurser som är tillgängliga på internet ochfritt kan användas, kopieras och spridas och imånga fall även bearbetas.En öppen digital lärresurs har en angivelse,eller upphovsrättslicens, som visar under vilkavillkor den får användas, kopieras, spridasoch bearbetas. Creative Commons är denvanligaste licenstypen.
    21. 21. Open Educational Resources are teaching, learning, orresearch materials that are in the public domain or releasedwith an intellectual property license that allows for free use,adaptation, and distribution (Plotkin 2010, UNESCO 2011a).UNESCO defined OER as material used to support educationthat may be freely accessed, reused, modified and shared byanyone (2011/07/14).COL-UNESCO defines OER as: The phenomenon of OER is anempowerment process, facilitated by technology in whichvarious types of stakeholders are able to interact, collaborate,create, and use materials and pedagogic practices, that arefreely available, for enhancing access, reducing costs, andimproving the quality of education and learning at all levels(Kanwar, Balasubramanian & Umar 2010).
    22. 22. Commissionaire Vassilio presented her view fortoday and for tomorrow at the EADTU conference inCyprus 2012" We must engage in a fundamental transformationof our education and training systemsAnd we need to fully exploit the potentioal that openand flexible education offers" (EADTU 120929)
    23. 23. Metaforer om perspektiv
    24. 24. Attitudes Open Educational Resoources Open Educational Practice Open Educational Culture Peer review From content to context
    25. 25. OER Paris Deklarationen (1) awareness and use enabling environments strategies and policies open licensing frameworks sustainable development of quality
    26. 26. OER Paris Deklarationen (2) strategic alliances variety of languages and cultural contexts research finding, retrieving and sharing open licensing, public funds
    27. 27. Emergent themesShift from development to OERpracticesBroader notion of open practices –open learning, teaching and researchUse of social and participatory mediato foster OER communities
    28. 28. Our StudentsOur Education OurSupport Content Friesen & Murray, 2011
    29. 29. Det digitala samhället …men varför inte inom utbildning…http://www.flickr.com/photos/mediaquell/4329902002/
    30. 30. Tsunamin…disruptive innovations
    31. 31. Nordic Open EducationalResource(OER) Alliance Paris OER Declaration 2012 EC Opening up education EUA How to make it work? How to create Policy long-term, Institutions trusted, mutual Individuals partnerships? http://www.tinyurl.com/nordic-position
    32. 32. The main objectivesAdult educationDemocracyICT and the digital agendaEducation for freeHealth careSustainability
    33. 33. OERSverige.seLUNDS UNIVERSITETBLEKINGE TEKNISKAHÖGSKOLAKTHKARLSTAD UNIVERSITETUMEÅ UNIVERSITETHÖGSKOLAN I JÖNKÖPINGMITTUNIVERSITETETHÖGSKOLAN I GÄVLEFRISTÅENDE KONSULT ALMATAAWO
    34. 34. Sammanfattningsvis…om kvalitet ochöppen utbildning What´s in it for me..individualisering!? • Kvalitet • Tid • Reputation • Kritiskt tänkande • Flexibilitet • Anställningsbarhet • Internationalisering
    35. 35. Caring is sharing, sharing is caring Footprints W:www.oulu.fi; www.lu.se/ced E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@oulu.fi E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@ced.lu.se FB:Ebba Ossiannilsson T:@EbbaOssian Phone: +4670995448 S:http://www.slideshare.net/Ebba OssiannOssiannilsson 2013

    ×