0
Findings from European benchmarkingexercices on e-learning: value andimpact                     Footprints                ...
http://www.eadtu.nl/e-xcellencelabelTIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29             June 2011
Benchmarking elearning in European universities…exercise on e-learning launched in the spring of 2009…initiated by the Uni...
Self evaluationTIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29             June 2011
Self evaluation for quality enhancement          TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29                       June 2011
Benchmarking is an exemplar-driven teleological process operating within an organization [sic] with the objective of inten...
What can be achieved/how to improve        ….high performance          hi h    f                  High                  pe...
The Benhmarking process                                Determine                                 what to                  ...
Why?•Why did your university joined thebenchmarking project?•What was your opinion of the processafter it completion? ft i...
Research approach:Exploratory multiple case study strategy,   p      y      p            y       gy,Yin, 2003, 2009Cross c...
Respondents                            E excellence+ e learning                            E-excellence+ e-learning benchm...
cc. Findings from European benchmarking exercises on e-learning: value                and impact. CreativeEducation. Manus...
Benefits                self-assess institution                respond to national performance indicators                 ...
Added valuesCultural issues.C lt l i                                                                                      ...
Quality                                                                          improvement and                          ...
Limitations Time?     Committment?Benchmarks?     Interpretations?Language?     Who is involved?                        TI...
The door is                                                                                open …                         ...
TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29             June 2011                 Ossiannilsson & Landgren, 2011
Opening Pandora’s box                                           TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29Some rights reserved b...
Thank you!                                                TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29                            ...
Findings from European benchmarkingexercices one-learning: value and impact                     Footprints                ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Ossiannilsson tiim2011

481

Published on

Presentation at TIIM2011, Oulu, FI

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
481
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Ossiannilsson tiim2011"

  1. 1. Findings from European benchmarkingexercices on e-learning: value andimpact Footprints W:www.oulu.fi; www.lu.se/ced E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@oulu.fi E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@ced.lu.se FB:Ebba Ossiannilsson T:@EbbaOssian Phone: +4670995448 S:http://www.slideshare.net/EbbaOs siann
  2. 2. http://www.eadtu.nl/e-xcellencelabelTIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  3. 3. Benchmarking elearning in European universities…exercise on e-learning launched in the spring of 2009…initiated by the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) and gathering agroup of nine European universities. April 2009 - December 2009.…co-organised b ESMU and E i d by d European AAssociation of Di i i f Distance T hi TeachingUniversities (EADTU; www.eadtu.nl), combined ESMU’s collaborativebenchmarking approach (benchmarking through a comparative exercise ofggood practices between universities) and EADTU’s more individually-oriented p ) yapproach. EADTU’s E-xcellence online tool, consisting of a set of 33 e-learningbenchmarks, is used as a starting point to the benchmarking exercise http://www.esmu.be/projects/94-benchmarking- http://www esmu be/projects/94 benchmarking elearning.html TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  4. 4. Self evaluationTIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  5. 5. Self evaluation for quality enhancement TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  6. 6. Benchmarking is an exemplar-driven teleological process operating within an organization [sic] with the objective of intentionally changing an existing state of affairs into a superior state of affairs (Moriarty, 2008, p. 30). Benchmarking is an exemplar driven teleological process exemplar-driven operating within an organization [sic] with the objective of intentionally changing an existing state of affairs into a superior state of affairs. (Moriarty, 2008, p. 30). …the ´locus´ of benchmarking lies between the current and desirable states of affairs and contributes to the transformation p f processes that realise these improvements. (Moriarty and Smallman, 2009, p. 484)...is a technique, method, process, activity, incentive, or q , ,p , y, ,reward which conventional wisdom regards as more effectiveat delivering a particular outcome than any other technique,method, process, etc. when applied to a particular conditionor circumstance TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  7. 7. What can be achieved/how to improve ….high performance hi h f High perfomance TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  8. 8. The Benhmarking process Determine what to benchmark Form a Take action benchmarking team Collect and Identify analyse benchmarkong benchmarking partners informationOssiannilsson, E. (2011). Findings fromEuropean benchmarking exercises on e-learning: value and impact CreativeEducation impact. CreativeEducation.Manuscript in press. TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  9. 9. Why?•Why did your university joined thebenchmarking project?•What was your opinion of the processafter it completion? ft its l ti ?•In your opinion, where there anydrawbacks within the project process?•Do you have any additional thoughtsregarding the involvement in thebenchmarking? TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 Photo: CC AT NC SA Some rights reserved by Leo June 2011 Reynolds
  10. 10. Research approach:Exploratory multiple case study strategy, p y p y gy,Yin, 2003, 2009Cross case anayses, with embedded andmultiple unites of analyses TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  11. 11. Respondents E excellence+ e learning E-excellence+ e-learning benchmarking exerciseΑ Alpha xΒ Beta xΓ Gamma xΔ Delta xΕ Epsilon xΖ Zeta x xRespondents involved in the benchmarking projects, EADTU E-xcellence+ and the ESMU e-learning benchmarking exercise. Ossiannilsson, E. (2011). Findings from Europeanbenchmarking exercises on e-learning: value and impact. CreativeEducation. Manuscript inpress. TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  12. 12. cc. Findings from European benchmarking exercises on e-learning: value and impact. CreativeEducation. Manuscript in press.TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  13. 13. Benefits self-assess institution respond to national performance indicators and benchmarks db h k strengthen institutional identitybetter understand the process enhance reputation measure and compare set new standards for the sector fdiscover new ideas, set targets for improvementobtain data to support decision-making van Vught et al., (2008). A practical guide. g ,( ) p g Benchmarking in European HE. ESMU TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  14. 14. Added valuesCultural issues.C lt l i Commitment Attitudes PassionInternal processes and involvement Quality enhancementManagement and commitment. Dedication Collaboration and networking Courage Reflection The concept of rhizome The Th concept of b t f becoming i TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  15. 15. Quality improvement and Policy statement quality assurance Transparency Dialogue TeambuildingSome key findings on the use of EADTU benchmarking QuickScan tool.Ossiannilsson (2011). TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  16. 16. Limitations Time? Committment?Benchmarks? Interpretations?Language? Who is involved? TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011
  17. 17. The door is open … What next? TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011Bild: Wikimedia Commons, Push the button, CC BY SA
  18. 18. TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011 Ossiannilsson & Landgren, 2011
  19. 19. Opening Pandora’s box TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29Some rights reserved by Christiaan Botha June 2011
  20. 20. Thank you! TIIM2011_ Oulu_Ebba Ossiannilsson 29 June 2011Photo: CC AT NC SA Some rights reserved by Travelin Librarian
  21. 21. Findings from European benchmarkingexercices one-learning: value and impact Footprints W:www.oulu.fi; www.lu.se/ced E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@oulu.fi E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@ced.lu.se FB:Ebba Ossiannilsson T:@EbbaOssian Phone: +4670995448 S:http://www.slideshare.net/EbbaOs siann
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×