Novel Techniques & Connections Between High-Pressure Mineral Physics, Microtomography, & Cyberinfrastructure by Mark Rivers, University of Chicago
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Novel Techniques & Connections Between High-Pressure Mineral Physics, Microtomography, & Cyberinfrastructure by Mark Rivers, University of Chicago

  • 244 views
Uploaded on

Talk at the EarthCube End-User Domain Workshop for Rock Deformation and Mineral Physics Research. ...

Talk at the EarthCube End-User Domain Workshop for Rock Deformation and Mineral Physics Research.

By Mark Rivers, University of Chicago

More in: Technology , Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
244
On Slideshare
242
From Embeds
2
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 2

https://twitter.com 2

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Future Opportunities and Challenges for Synchrotron X-ray Sources in the Earth Sciences Mark Rivers University of Chicago
  • 2. GSECARS Overview • GSECARS is a national user facility for synchrotron radiation research in geochemistry, mineral physics, and environmental science. – Funding: NSF-EAR Instrumentation and Facilities Division and DOE Geosciences. – Techniques: high-pressure diffraction (diamond anvil cell and multi-anvil press), XRF microprobe, microtomography, surface scattering, x-ray spectroscopy, powder diffraction – 3 undulator stations, 2 bending magnet stations; 4 stations operate simultaneously – Statistics for last 12 months: 466 unique users, 540 user visits, 283 experiments, 355 beam time requests, 110 publications
  • 3. Personal History of Computed Microtomography • 1987 at NSLS – 1 hour to collect a single slice using first-generation CT – 1 hour to reconstruct single slice • 2013 at APS (routine) – 10 minutes to collect 1040 slices – 1 minute to reconstruct 1040 slices • 104-106 improvements – Brighter x-ray sources – Detectors: 2-D with high sensitivity and rapid readout – Computers for fast reconstruction
  • 4. Complete Reconstruction Fly through in Z direction Soil aggregate 6.5 um/pixel 28 keV Sasha Kravchenko Michigan State Studying decay of organic material with time
  • 5. Tomography and Computing Infrastructure • Where we do NOT need major CI improvements – – – – Collection Reconstruction Local storage All of these are “domain independent” • Extracting scientifically useful information from images has NOT kept up, we do need help • Why? – The information to be extracted is highly specific to the problem (domain). – Cottage industry that does not scale to today’s problems
  • 6. Brighter X-ray Beams • Figure of merit of a storage ring like the APS, NSLS-II, or ALS is the emittance: • σxσ’x (horizontal) • σyσ’y (vertical) • APS emittance today has 3 nm-rad emittance • Brightness of the x-ray beams is directly proportional to the emittance APS electron beam profile today
  • 7. The Future The “New” APS Upgrade • BESAC recommended in July 2013 that the US agressively pursue MBA lattice • APS has made this new plan for the already approved upgrade • Reduce emittance to 60 pm-rad, 50X reduction • Reduce energy from 7 to 6 GeV • All new undulators • 2019 time frame • ~1 year shutdown APS electron beam profile after MBA upgrade
  • 8. 100X Higher Brightness • 100X more photons in the same focal spot size we use today – 100X higher time resolution for kinetic studies, deformation, etc. • 100X smaller spot with the same flux we have today – Reduce focal spot size in diamond anvil cell from 3 µm to 30 nm with no loss in intensity • Source is nearly diffraction limited • 100X higher coherent flux – Coherent x-ray diffraction, photon correlation spectroscopy (speckle) experiments have huge gains XPCS study of deformation
  • 9. Faster Detectors Microtomography • • • • PCO DIMAX HS 2277 frames/sec @ 2000x2000 pixels 5469 frames/sec @1440x1050 pixels Complete microtomography dataset in 0.1 second • 18GB/s peak, 600 MB/sec sustained • Time-resolved tomography: melting, deformation
  • 10. Faster Detectors Diffraction • • • • • • • • Dectris Eiger 75 x 75 micron pixels Single photon counting Up to 1 MHz/pixel 1030 x 1065 pixels 3,000 frames/sec 3.3 GB/sec Will stream lossless compressed images at full frame rate, ~600 MB/sec. • Time-resolved diffraction for fast reactions • Collect a full crystallography data set in 1 second
  • 11. X-ray diffraction in the diamond anvil cell Smaller beams, faster detectors 5 micron beam today 50 nm beam (ultra-high pressure, much more complex)
  • 12. Faster Detectors X-ray fluorescence mapping • Hitachi Quad Vortex silicon drift diode detector • XIA xMAP Digital Signal Processing electronics • 4 elements * 1000 pixels/sec = 4000 spectra/sec • 16 MB/sec sustained • 1 Mega pixel map in 20 minutes • Next generation detector and electronics reduces this to 5 minutes
  • 13. GSECARS 13-ID-E X-ray Microprobe XRF Imaging: high spatial resolution (500 nm) with high flux (>10 11 ph/s) Fe (~70 ppm) Mn (~70 ppm) Zn (~100 ppm) Arabidopsis seed Columbia-0 see Kim et al., Science, 2009 for background 7 µm 200 msec X26A NSLS 0.7 µm 13 msec 13-ID-E APS T. Punshon and A. Sivitz, Dartmouth
  • 14. XRF mapping challenges • • • • Map on previous slide has 1 million spectra like this Currently just map the total counts in each peak (region of interest) Really need to fit background, deconvolve overlapping peaks Not practical today
  • 15. Conclusions • Improvements in x-ray sources and detectors have the potential for transformative improvements in our science in 5-10 years – Improved spatial and temporal resolution – New science by exploiting the coherence of the x-rays • The problems that Martin Kunz presented yesterday will grow by several orders of magnitude • Clear need for major computing infrastructure improvements – If not there will be mountains of unprocessed data • These problems go beyond NSF-EAR. – DOE has major responsibility as operator of the facilities • However, in many cases we need “domain-specific” solutions because our problems and our data are often unique