0
Hybrid Approaches to  Taxonomy & Folksonomy   Semantic Technology 2009 San Jose, CA June 17, 2009  Richard Beatch Paul Wlo...
Agenda <ul><li>The taxonomy/folksonomy debate </li></ul><ul><li>Tagging pitfalls </li></ul><ul><li>Social tagging & the en...
About Earley & Associates <ul><li>Founded in 1994, Earley & Associates is an information management (IM) consulting compan...
About us <ul><li>Richard Beatch </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Senior Consultant at Earley & Associates, Inc. </li></ul></ul><ul><u...
About us <ul><li>Paul Wlodarczyk </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Director, Solutions Consulting at Earley & Associates, Inc. </li></...
The tired debate Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved Taxonomy Folksonomy Control Democracy Top-d...
The relevance problem <ul><li>Search results should be relevant to what a searcher wants, but technology can only determin...
Taxonomy <ul><li>Added by a small number of individuals: author/originators or “authorized” persons (e.g.librarian) </li><...
Tags <ul><li>Added by authors and consumers (individual motivation) </li></ul><ul><li>Can connote any type of meaning or p...
Why tagging is so interesting… <ul><li>Adding individual value to the act of classification – user control over findabilit...
The downside… <ul><li>Neither tags nor taggers are perfect … </li></ul><ul><li>No language control </li></ul><ul><ul><li>G...
The downside… <ul><li>Varying levels of granularity </li></ul><ul><li>Same tag, different meanings </li></ul><ul><li>Lack ...
The downside… <ul><li>Most tag search does not account for stemming, plurals, etc. </li></ul>E.g. Search on Delicious: Fol...
The tagging hype cycle http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/05/tag-history-and-gartners-hype-cycles.html Copyright © 2009...
The web vs. the enterprise <ul><li>Shirky: “there is no shelf” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Traditional organization schemes are ...
R o le of folksonomy in the enterprise? <ul><li>Tagging external links </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Seeing what colleagues are in...
Role of folksonomy in the enterprise? <ul><li>Social aspects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Identifying subject matter experts </li...
The downside… <ul><li>Potential issues of security, inappropriateness </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Can implement some level of ve...
Message text External News Reports Discussion postings Links Engineering document repositories Success Stories Policies Ap...
What if we blended the two? <ul><li>Folksonomy / Taxonomy </li></ul>Low cost Findability Flexible Structured relationships...
Hybrid approaches Co-existence Tag-influenced taxonomy Taxonomy-influenced tagging Tag hierarchies/ontologies Copyright © ...
Co-existence <ul><li>Taxonomy and folksonomy are used side by side </li></ul><ul><li>Strengths of each approach preserved,...
Co-existence –  Ann Arbor District Library Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
Raytheon – corporate example <ul><li>Used in Raytheon employee portal - website lists (“Suggested sites” feature box) </li...
Variation: Tag mediation <ul><li>Vetting & editing tags </li></ul><ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Weeds out potentiall...
Tag-influenced taxonomy <ul><li>Taxonomy & tagging co-exist, tags serve as pool of candidate terms to enrich taxonomy, kee...
Tag-influenced taxonomy <ul><li>Requires formal vetting process </li></ul><ul><li>Can be supported by automation (e.g. can...
Taxonomy-influenced tagging <ul><li>Presenting choices/suggestions to user from controlled set of  terms/tags </li></ul><u...
WWW example: ZigTag Defined Tagging Definitions from Wikipedia & Wordnet Tagging with type-ahead against database of 3M un...
Zigtag <ul><li>Type ahead & synonyms encourage consistency </li></ul><ul><li>Users can enter new tags </li></ul><ul><li>Sy...
Zigtag search Still get problems with uncontrolled tags & recall Interesting relationships from Wikipedia Browse-able tag ...
Example: myedna (Education.au) http://www.educationau.edu.au/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/papers/tagging_hayman.pp...
TextWise Semantic Cloud <ul><li>Document (URL or text) is submitted to web service for semantic analysis </li></ul><ul><li...
Buzzillions.com <ul><li>Review site: tags are “controlled” not against a taxonomy, but against other tags – reduces redund...
SharePoint? <ul><li>Plug-ins make taxonomy easy </li></ul><ul><li>Present the taxonomy like tags </li></ul><ul><li>E.g. KW...
Taxonomy-influenced tagging <ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More consistency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Better support...
Tag hierarchies <ul><li>Tag hierarchies come in two flavors:  </li></ul><ul><li>User-powered </li></ul><ul><li>Automatic d...
User-powered tag hierarchies <ul><li>User-powered </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social approach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Bogus h...
User-powered  tag hierarchies <ul><li>E.g. LibraryThing  </li></ul>LibraryThing allows any use to combine (or uncombine) 2...
User-powered  tag hierarchies: Intelligent tags <ul><li>Move toward more semantic tagging with machine-readable tags, e.g....
User-powered  tag hierarchies: Intelligent tags <ul><li>MOAT: Meaning of a tag – part of linked data movement, mapping tag...
Automatically derived tag hierarchies <ul><li>Tag hierarchies, facets, ontologies, or “folksontology” </li></ul><ul><li>Do...
Delicious & citeulike hiearchy http://heymann.stanford.edu/taghierarchy.html Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All...
Clustering at flickr Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
Auto clustering/facets <ul><li>Still not very mature </li></ul><ul><li>Time-sensitive </li></ul><ul><li>Community- sensiti...
Tag hierarchy pros and cons <ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Relationships, definitions  leveraged  –  adding meaning t...
Conclusion <ul><li>Not all content is created equal – tags and taxonomies have their sweet spots </li></ul><ul><li>Hybrid ...
Questions? Richard Beatch  [email_address] Paul Wlodarczyk [email_address]   Web :  www.earley.com Blog : sethearley.wordp...
Appendix: Corporate social tagging tools
Corporate social tagging software http://www.connectbeam.com/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
Corporate social tagging software http://www.cogenz.com/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
Corporate social tagging software http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/connections/dogear.html Copyright © 2009 ...
Corporate social tagging software <ul><li>BEA AquaLogic Pathways </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.bea.com/framework.js...
Corporate social tagging software <ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.newsgator.com/business/socialsites/default.aspx </li></ul></u...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Semantic Technology 2009: Hybrid Approaches to Taxonomy and Folksonomy

6,216

Published on

Tagging isn’t new - it’s been around for a dog’s age in internet years. But in the past few years some fresh ideas and tools have reinvigorated the social tagging world. These new approaches include an attempt to improve findability through a bit of structure and control. While the idea of adding control to folksonomy seems like going against the whole selling point of social tagging (flexibility, openness), it is bringing the tagging to a new level, making it more viable for practical use in enterprises. This session will present hybrid approaches to formal taxonomies and social tagging. How can they be used in the corporate environment? What type of content is appropriate for social tagging? What kind of software is available for the enterprise? Learn how social tagging is not necessarily anathema to corporate taxonomy programs and how this hybrid approach can bring the best of both worlds: a fresh, up to date taxonomy with the structure needed to improve information findability.
Key Takeaways:

Folksonomy and taxonomy defined
Drawbacks of pure social tagging
Social tagging in the enterprise
Hybrid taxonomy & folksonomy approaches: Four models

Published in: Technology, Business
1 Comment
19 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Interesting slideshow thanks for sharing. Fyi you might want to put Knowledge Plaza (http://www.knowledgeplaza.be) on your radar as it has been providing a mixed taxonomy/folksonomy approach to their information/knowledge management environment for a couple of years now.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
6,216
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
328
Comments
1
Likes
19
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Transcript of "Semantic Technology 2009: Hybrid Approaches to Taxonomy and Folksonomy"

    1. 1. Hybrid Approaches to Taxonomy & Folksonomy Semantic Technology 2009 San Jose, CA June 17, 2009 Richard Beatch Paul Wlodarczyk Earley & Associates www.earley.com
    2. 2. Agenda <ul><li>The taxonomy/folksonomy debate </li></ul><ul><li>Tagging pitfalls </li></ul><ul><li>Social tagging & the enterprise </li></ul><ul><li>Hybrid approaches to taxonomy/folksonomy </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Co-existence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tag-influenced taxonomy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Taxonomy-influenced tags </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tag hierarchies/ontologies </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    3. 3. About Earley & Associates <ul><li>Founded in 1994, Earley & Associates is an information management (IM) consulting company specializing in </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Taxonomy development and management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Content management strategy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Search integration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Usability & Information Architecture </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Some of our recent clients include: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>American Greetings, Hasbro, Ford Foundation, Astra Zeneca, Motorola, The Hartford Insurance Group, Urban Land Institute </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Give us your business card </li></ul><ul><ul><li>For a free pass to one of our Community of Practice conference calls </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    4. 4. About us <ul><li>Richard Beatch </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Senior Consultant at Earley & Associates, Inc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ph.D. in Ontology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Specialized in Taxonomy, Search, Metadata, and content architecture. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Extensive industry experience leading the implementation and design of taxonomies and search solutions for a range of companies including Apple, McAfee, Allstate, Dell, and AT&T. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blog: http://sethearley.wordpress.com/ </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    5. 5. About us <ul><li>Paul Wlodarczyk </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Director, Solutions Consulting at Earley & Associates, Inc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>MBA with BA in Psychology / Cognitive Science </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Specialized in unstructured content technologies with over 20 years experience in XML / structured authoring, content reuse, ECM, KM, localization, semantic analysis and content enrichment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogs at http://sethearley.wordpress.com/ and http://thecontentguy.net </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    6. 6. The tired debate Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved Taxonomy Folksonomy Control Democracy Top-down Bottom-up Arduous process Just do it Accurate Good enough Restrictive Flexible Static Evolving Expensive to maintain Low cost – “crowdsourced”
    7. 7. The relevance problem <ul><li>Search results should be relevant to what a searcher wants, but technology can only determine if it is relevant to a search term* </li></ul><ul><li>Taxonomies and folksonomies = 2 approaches to the problem of relevance with common goal of describing content, each with particular gaps </li></ul>*Billy Cripe: Folksonomy, Keywords & Tags: Social & Democratic User Interaction in Enterprise Content Management http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/content-management/pdf/OracleSocialTaggingWhitePaper.pdf Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    8. 8. Taxonomy <ul><li>Added by a small number of individuals: author/originators or “authorized” persons (e.g.librarian) </li></ul><ul><li>Describes meaning or purpose of content based on a set view point for a specific audience using a controlled vocabulary </li></ul><ul><li>Relationships between terms defined </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Hierarchical (e.g. Computer hardware > Keyboard) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Associative (e.g. Computer hardware – Software) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Equivalent (e.g. Laptop = Notebook Computer) </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    9. 9. Tags <ul><li>Added by authors and consumers (individual motivation) </li></ul><ul><li>Can connote any type of meaning or purpose </li></ul><ul><li>No compression around a single viewpoint, no control of vocabulary </li></ul><ul><li>Self-correcting through volume </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    10. 10. Why tagging is so interesting… <ul><li>Adding individual value to the act of classification – user control over findability </li></ul><ul><li>Reducing the cognitive burden (i.e. it’s easy) </li></ul><ul><li>Reduced technological investment (i.e. it’s cheap) </li></ul><ul><li>Can leverage emergent structure (folksonomy) </li></ul>Reno| Tags Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    11. 11. The downside… <ul><li>Neither tags nor taggers are perfect … </li></ul><ul><li>No language control </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Guy & Tonkin, 2006. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html </li></ul></ul>Study: 40% of flickr tags and 28% of del.icio.us tags were flawed in these ways Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved Misspellings Library vs. libary Plam pilot Compound words TimBernersLee Case & number Folksonomy, Folksonomies Personal tags To read My dog @work Single-use tags Billybobsdog
    12. 12. The downside… <ul><li>Varying levels of granularity </li></ul><ul><li>Same tag, different meanings </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of relationships between tags – which is broader? Narrower? </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of consistency/approach to change – even single user can change language and hamper own personal retrieval </li></ul>Robin Bird Turdus migratorinus … Known as “tag noise” Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    13. 13. The downside… <ul><li>Most tag search does not account for stemming, plurals, etc. </li></ul>E.g. Search on Delicious: Folksonomy: 16049 Folksonomies: 4404 Both: 2642 Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    14. 14. The tagging hype cycle http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/05/tag-history-and-gartners-hype-cycles.html Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    15. 15. The web vs. the enterprise <ul><li>Shirky: “there is no shelf” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Traditional organization schemes are built to deal with physical collections and constraints. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They don’t work well on the web </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>large corpus </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>no clear edges </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>no formal categories </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>no authority </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>The enterprise is much more defined </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>smaller corpuses </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>formal entities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>coordinated users, clear tasks </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>need for reliable retrieval </li></ul></ul></ul>E.g. Flickr Delicious Social tagging works well in this context Social tagging is more of a challenge, needs clear arena Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    16. 16. R o le of folksonomy in the enterprise? <ul><li>Tagging external links </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Seeing what colleagues are interested in </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sharing links with a specific team </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Subscribing to link feeds </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Monitoring news/blog coverage of the company </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consumer/competitor research </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tracking industry trends </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Tagging internal links </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Finding/facilitating access to most popular pages on the intranet </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Seeing what intranet pages mean to staff </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    17. 17. Role of folksonomy in the enterprise? <ul><li>Social aspects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Identifying subject matter experts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Connecting people who share interests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Encouraging collaboration & resource sharing </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Improve your taxonomy, information retrieval </li></ul><ul><ul><li>User tagging to refine the corporate taxonomy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>New concepts </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>New terminology </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Seeing what employees find interesting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Distributing tagging tasks </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    18. 18. The downside… <ul><li>Potential issues of security, inappropriateness </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Can implement some level of vetting </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Privacy concerns </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Can be anonymous tagging, although this removes some social value </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Can create role or team-based collections </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Need higher ratio of active participants due to population size </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    19. 19. Message text External News Reports Discussion postings Links Engineering document repositories Success Stories Policies Approved Methods Best Practices Key concept: Not all content is created equally The content continuum Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved Lower Cost Higher Cost Tagging/Organizing Processes Unfiltered Reviewed/Vetted/Approved Lower Value Higher Value
    20. 20. What if we blended the two? <ul><li>Folksonomy / Taxonomy </li></ul>Low cost Findability Flexible Structured relationships User terminology Oversight Social sharing Consistency Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    21. 21. Hybrid approaches Co-existence Tag-influenced taxonomy Taxonomy-influenced tagging Tag hierarchies/ontologies Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    22. 22. Co-existence <ul><li>Taxonomy and folksonomy are used side by side </li></ul><ul><li>Strengths of each approach preserved, philosophy of each kept “pure” </li></ul>Web example: Flickr & Library of Congress: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    23. 23. Co-existence – Ann Arbor District Library Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    24. 24. Raytheon – corporate example <ul><li>Used in Raytheon employee portal - website lists (“Suggested sites” feature box) </li></ul><ul><li>How does it work: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>inserted “Suggested Sites” in a &quot;feature&quot; box to the right of the regularly ranked results </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>website suggestions (URLs) submitted along with recommended tags/keywords which are subsequently verified and approved by librarians </li></ul></ul>http://www.slideshare.net/CJMConnors/i-kms-singapore-presentation Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    25. 25. Variation: Tag mediation <ul><li>Vetting & editing tags </li></ul><ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Weeds out potentially inappropriate tags </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Eliminates misspellings, plural issues, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Some can be done automatically (spell-checker, e.g.) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enhances findability </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cons: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Higher effort/cost </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Perceived lack of trust </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Who knows better? </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    26. 26. Tag-influenced taxonomy <ul><li>Taxonomy & tagging co-exist, tags serve as pool of candidate terms to enrich taxonomy, keep it current </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Find new terminology (synonyms, popular language) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Find new concepts </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Performed as separate processes (taxonomy tagging=formal, tagging=informal) or combined in single interface </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    27. 27. Tag-influenced taxonomy <ul><li>Requires formal vetting process </li></ul><ul><li>Can be supported by automation (e.g. candidate tags pulled & filtered with script to remove taxonomy terms, stop words) </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluate candidates based on </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Frequency (“literary warrant”) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Salience within context </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Look at tags used in conjunction with taxonomy </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    28. 28. Taxonomy-influenced tagging <ul><li>Presenting choices/suggestions to user from controlled set of terms/tags </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sometimes users prefer easy choice </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Drop-down menus </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Check boxes </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Type ahead </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Tree view </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ influenced” – option to enter own tag? Good source of new terms </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enforces consistency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Offers structure </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    29. 29. WWW example: ZigTag Defined Tagging Definitions from Wikipedia & Wordnet Tagging with type-ahead against database of 3M unique concepts & 8M synonyms Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    30. 30. Zigtag <ul><li>Type ahead & synonyms encourage consistency </li></ul><ul><li>Users can enter new tags </li></ul><ul><li>Synonyms based on Wikipedia, so can be “dirty data” </li></ul><ul><li>No hierarchy, only equivalent relationships so far </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    31. 31. Zigtag search Still get problems with uncontrolled tags & recall Interesting relationships from Wikipedia Browse-able tag cloud Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    32. 32. Example: myedna (Education.au) http://www.educationau.edu.au/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/papers/tagging_hayman.ppt Fully taxonomy-directed tagging Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    33. 33. TextWise Semantic Cloud <ul><li>Document (URL or text) is submitted to web service for semantic analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Category tags from subset of the ODP taxonomy </li></ul><ul><li>Concept tags are derived from document, persisted, related to ODP categories </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved 1 3 2
    34. 34. Buzzillions.com <ul><li>Review site: tags are “controlled” not against a taxonomy, but against other tags – reduces redundancy </li></ul><ul><li>Only popular tags exposed as faceted navigation </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    35. 35. SharePoint? <ul><li>Plug-ins make taxonomy easy </li></ul><ul><li>Present the taxonomy like tags </li></ul><ul><li>E.g. KWizCom: plug-in manages taxonomy and tags in easy interface… can opt-out of letting users create own tags </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    36. 36. Taxonomy-influenced tagging <ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More consistency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Better support for findability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Relationships, definitions leveraged – adding meaning to the tags </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Realistic for the enterprise </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cons: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Not really folksonomy anymore.. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Can be forcing terminology on user </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to develop reference list of concepts – manually through taxonomy or need large corpus to derive automatically </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    37. 37. Tag hierarchies <ul><li>Tag hierarchies come in two flavors: </li></ul><ul><li>User-powered </li></ul><ul><li>Automatic derivation </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    38. 38. User-powered tag hierarchies <ul><li>User-powered </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social approach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Bogus hierarchies possible </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Small population will contribute </li></ul></ul><ul><li>RawSugar tried it </li></ul><ul><ul><li>(no longer around) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Taggers could specify hierarchy in own account, tags clustered based on common groups </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    39. 39. User-powered tag hierarchies <ul><li>E.g. LibraryThing </li></ul>LibraryThing allows any use to combine (or uncombine) 2 tags that are semantically equivalent. www.librarything.com Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    40. 40. User-powered tag hierarchies: Intelligent tags <ul><li>Move toward more semantic tagging with machine-readable tags, e.g. Flickr machine tags in “triple” format: [namespace]:[key]=[value] </li></ul><ul><ul><li>geo:neighborhood=SoHo, geo:lat=58.41618, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>flickr:user=mortimer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>taxonomy:common=grevyszebra   </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>lastfm:event=34640 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>makes your photo appear on a lastfm event page </li></ul></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    41. 41. User-powered tag hierarchies: Intelligent tags <ul><li>MOAT: Meaning of a tag – part of linked data movement, mapping tags to semantic web </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://moat-project.org/ </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Adding to the triplet </li></ul><ul><ul><li>User – resource – tag – meaning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Meaning = URI to a resource containing meaning (e.g. DBPedia) </li></ul></ul><tag:RestrictedTagging> <tag:taggedResource rdf:resource=&quot;http://example.org/post/1&quot;/> <foaf:maker rdf:resource=&quot;http://apassant.net/alex&quot;/> <tag:associatedTag rdf:resource=&quot;http://tags.moat-project.org/tag/ apple &quot;/> <moat:tagMeaning rdf:resource=&quot;http://dbpedia.org/resource/Apple_Records&quot;/> </tag:RestrictedTagging> Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    42. 42. Automatically derived tag hierarchies <ul><li>Tag hierarchies, facets, ontologies, or “folksontology” </li></ul><ul><li>Done through statistical/clustering algorithms </li></ul>http://www.pui.ch/phred/automated_tag_clustering/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    43. 43. Delicious & citeulike hiearchy http://heymann.stanford.edu/taghierarchy.html Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    44. 44. Clustering at flickr Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    45. 45. Auto clustering/facets <ul><li>Still not very mature </li></ul><ul><li>Time-sensitive </li></ul><ul><li>Community- sensitive </li></ul><ul><li>Ambiguous tags </li></ul><ul><li>Improve with volume (self-correcting) </li></ul>http://www.pui.ch/phred/automated_tag_clustering/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    46. 46. Tag hierarchy pros and cons <ul><li>Pros: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Relationships, definitions leveraged – adding meaning to the tags </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provides a basis for application behavior in the absence of taxonomy (e.g. Flickr maps, clusters) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Self-correcting with volume </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cons: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Automatically derived relationships (clusters) can be bogus or time-sensitive </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Folksonomic relationships can be esoteric (just like tags) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Small population of contributors </li></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    47. 47. Conclusion <ul><li>Not all content is created equal – tags and taxonomies have their sweet spots </li></ul><ul><li>Hybrid approaches are emerging </li></ul><ul><ul><li>taxonomy-influenced tagging leading the pack in popularity on the web </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>co-existence in the enterprise </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Look for more developments on the semantic web/linked data front for making tags more intelligent </li></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    48. 48. Questions? Richard Beatch [email_address] Paul Wlodarczyk [email_address] Web : www.earley.com Blog : sethearley.wordpress.com Twitter : earleytaxonomy Give us your business card for a free pass to one of our Community of Practice conference calls (a $50 value).
    49. 49. Appendix: Corporate social tagging tools
    50. 50. Corporate social tagging software http://www.connectbeam.com/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    51. 51. Corporate social tagging software http://www.cogenz.com/ Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    52. 52. Corporate social tagging software http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/connections/dogear.html Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    53. 53. Corporate social tagging software <ul><li>BEA AquaLogic Pathways </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.jsp&FP=/content/products/aqualogic/pathways/ </li></ul></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    54. 54. Corporate social tagging software <ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.newsgator.com/business/socialsites/default.aspx </li></ul></ul></ul>Copyright © 2009 Earley & Associates Inc. All Rights Reserved
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×