ESS-Bilbao Initiative Workshop. R&D Towards mitigation of cavitation damage in the SNS mercury target vessel

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    ESS-Bilbao Initiative Workshop. R&D Towards mitigation of cavitation damage in the SNS mercury target vessel - Presentation Transcript

    1. ESS Bilbao Initiative Workshop Multi-MW Spallation Neutron Sources: Current Challenges and Future Prospects March 16-18, 2009 Bilbao, Spain
    2. • ! \"# • $% !& •' # \" – ( # •) # * ! 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    3. Target-to-core vessel inflatable seal Mercury vessel Target-to-Hg piping seal Water shroud 3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    4. !\"µ # 200 WNR pulses on test target • * –+ ! !! # , -$ # –) # ! –) # . /0 ) 0 4 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    5. $%& µ ' •/ ( 3 & ! 1 .2 –/ ( %4 5 2 7 - 45 ! 6# ! 8 9 # # :: ; ! - %µ <2 = / 8 =% ! 79 * SNS @ 2 MW 5 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    6. $ • # ## > # # 6 6 2 –? ! ! @ %@A B @ %% µ 8( – ## ! 9 •/ ! !! ! # ## ! # # ! ! 6 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    7. ( ) $ ) *+ •) \" # ! # ', C 8 6 DDA9 • 85 6 DD=9 –E ! !! !; –F ! E @ ! • ' $%%%6 . 0 C ' 8. 0 C '9 # ! ! #> ! * 2. • ' \"# * !!\" ! $%% $%%$ – – 7 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    8. , •, # @ 4%% ( G A 6 ∝ /H I –& # • @ ! ! # J 6 6# !6 ! 6 # • ! # ! ( •G # @H G 8 ( /H # 9 ! 8 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    9. •' \" \"# • , !!\" ! •K \" ! •) # .0 C 0 2. 9 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    10. -. . / *0 1 * 0 # • # ( DD4 8& * 9 –' # –' !!# # ! ! # ( •C $%% 10 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    11. -. / *0 1., • ! . $%% • # ! $%% . ! $%%$ # ( J 6 6! 6# • $%%A ! 6# ## > • $%% 0 )C J < # ## ! & • $%%= G # ! ! ! L 11 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    12. , & 2 •) # *. • # ! •/ # , / M GN @H @% 2 / C MK ? N %@= %H / @A =@ % $@= % / !; M& < N % $A * <M N C 6 - $%% 4% @6 - 4% = % ) 6O - % C M( . N $ A $@ @ M .2 N D @$ 4 D /( M /N $A HH A% P %= P %= : 1 %%% WNR: Weapons Neutron Research facility at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center 12 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    13. , Mercury filled test target being Simulation of test target response to prepared for in-beam test beam show mercury pressure evolution [Pa] Mercury in state of cavitation What is the tensile strength of mercury? 1.5 bar 13 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    14. 3 4 •K ! –0# ! # # –0 ! – ! # ## # • ! # ## # 6# # ## !! – ( !* •' \" \"# ! $%%$ ! \" $# # # # J #H • ' \"# $%%A > # ## J #H • . /0 ) ' 8 !!\" 9J # A 14 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    15. 5 5# • + !\" • ! –, * ; 6! )+ # ( 6 6 @ • # ! # # ! 6 @ @6 # ## • ! 28 J $H 2 9 15 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    16. 5 ABS: 3 pairs of acoustic transducers • ! 6' Q 0 ## 80 9 # + • E Q ! •E ! 8E 5 9 ! + 8> ! # +) 2 0 9 •. # ## # ! L ! .0 C 0 # ## SNS Target Test Facility 16 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    17. 6 *0 1 •0 < # ## •) # J Damage Test – Specimens (DTS) ( # – , !! Bubbler #2 # ## @ 50.8 mm 25.4 mm Bubbler #1 Storage Tank Mercury Pump 1.5 mm 17 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    18. 1/ 7 88 %& 9 : A B C Bubbler #1 Bubbler #2 Bubbler #2 Helium Argon Helium Series average Series average Series average VF = 3.56E-04 VF = 1.34E-03 VF = 1.37E-03 18 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    19. 4 ; < ( 7 %& *: 99 = 2.0E-03 1.8E-03 B1 01D-S01_04D-S02S07S08 140 sccm, Total VF = 1.29E-03 B2 140 sccm, Total VF = 4.74E-03 04D-S09S11 1.6E-03 B1 04Dec06State03 300 sccm, Total VF = 2.61E-03 B2 Number density [n/mm ] 300 sccm, Total VF = 3.46E-03 04Dec06State10 3 1.4E-03 1.2E-03 Smallest bubble: 0.12 mm equivalent radius. 1.0E-03 8.0E-04 Corresponds to 2005 damage test condition. 6.0E-04 4.0E-04 2.0E-04 0.0E+00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 Radius [mm] 19 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    20. > . 5& •, 1 %@$ L ' 1 %@ L ! #, 1 %@A • ! % 2 • ! •K ! %@ A %% *From JAEA collaborators For coaxial flow For cross flow 20 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    21. 6.0 A Edge Bubble Diameter [mm] Transmission 5.0 Acoustic 4.0 UL = 0 3.0 2.0 1.0 UL = 0 ; QHe = 10 sccm 0.0 4.5 B 4.0 Bubble Diameter [mm] UL = 0.63 m/s 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 UL = 0.63 m/s; QHe = 10 sccm 0.0 3.0 C Bubble Diameter [mm] 2.5 UL = 0.96 m/s 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 UL = 0.63 m/s; QHe = 100 sccm 0.0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Gas flow rate [SCCM] • # ## !! # !# ! 21 Managed by UT-Battelle # ## 6# < for the U.S. Department of Energy
    22. 6 •K # )+ # ! 2 ! ! –0 # # ## •) •C # * !# ! – ) +R 6+ 6 )) S6 6, + • ! ; ## ( – # ## 8 9 –K –K + 22 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    23. ( # bubble coalescence Db =1.196 mm Db =1.049 mm Fluent CFX Db =1.064 mm (measured) 23 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    24. ) SNS Target configuration TTF Target only has main flow 24 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    25. ? * •+ K T > ! 8 9 • ! \" ! T ! ! ! 6 6 \" •/ G K T ! # # # 25 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    26. 4 * • ! $%%$ \" \"# • ! • B !# %B 26 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    27. 5 27 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    28. 5 = & Replaceable insert Ri = 41 mm Outer acrylic window 28 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    29. 1 / $ = 5 # •K > %@A ' • - 2$ ! • A %% & ! ! @ Mercury flow quasi- stagnation point. Viewport 29 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    30. . (. . • ! !! ! θ8 9 T D %U P φ 8 !\" 9 •+ # < 6 6 6 # 30 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    31. $ Nominal Hg Flow, Gas Flow = 1000 sccm 7A31903 Gas injection 31 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    32. / • ( ! \" ! • !! @! # .0 C 0 Q ' Mercury flow left to right Gas Injected at this Nozzle Vertical grooves (0.5 mm pitch, V 30 deg) 32 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    33. 2010 - . 33 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    34. 6 2010 $ 1/ Flow guides increase flow Hg Flow velocity to more prototypic SNS conditions Test surface with 33 mm surface texturing 34 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    35. -. , •C # # ! H –!% & ' 3 test surfaces per target 35 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    36. )*0 1 ; 8' ): # HIGH intensity 1 σ_X = 13.5 mm 1 σ_Y = 4.5 mm 2σ Rectangular target interior 4.8 MW SNS eq, 1.625 x 5.625” MEDIUM intensity 1 σ_X = 21 mm 1 σ_Y = 7 mm 2σ 2.0 MW SNS eq. LOW intensity 1 σ_X = 30 mm 1 σ_Y = 10 mm 2σ 1.0 MW SNS eq. Total energy deposited in targets is maintained between conditions. 36 Managed by UT-Battelle Intensity varied by changing beam spot size. for the U.S. Department of Energy
    37. 1 protons / Maximum σ_X σ _Y Target – Test No. of Pulses pulse length Comment pulse Intensity µ x 1012 [µs] [mm] [mm] [p/mm2 x 1010] (approx.) (half width) (half height) LDV & PCD testing. Varied RECT – LDV 95 0.1 – 27 0.3 14.8 – 33.6 4.6 – 10.4 5.6 intensities by changing profile and various beam protons RECT – High Request smallest possible beam 100 26.5 0.3 15.4 5.2 5.25 Intensity spot with 3:1 aspect ratio RECT – Medium This condition roughly splits low 100 26.6 0.3 20.2 6.1 3.43 Intensity and high RECT – Low This is about the largest beam that 100 26.3 0.3 32.5 9.5 1.36 fits inside target at 2 σ Intensity RECT – textured Cone type textured test surface; 100 26.5 0.3 21.2 6.7 2.95 surface Gas puffing suspected not correct RECT – Long Long pulse beam conditions still 100 45 ? 833 20.4 6.1 6.0 ? pulse under study Primary damage dependence on intensity scope 37 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    38. 0 • ?# – !# ! – ; # .0 C 0 # ! L ! !!\" \"# •C ! 8A T A ( & < 9 – C) * G +? –() !* •/ 8 $@$A & <9 –, C) – ,# ! ? 38 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    39. 1/ , 5@ * 2 1 Velocity (m/s) -1 -2 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Time (ms) 39 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    40. 1. Band pass velocity data (15 – 300 kHz) Omit 10 µs after pulse 2. 0.1 High CPD = V 2 dt intensity CDP (mm2/s) Medium intensity 0.05 Low intensity Interesting artifact is consistent 2 ms after incidence 0 2 3 4 Time (ms) 40 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    41. ) 6 / # $2 ) /8 9 ! ! 8%@% – H 9 80 20 %9 %@ %@%D & @H=        %@%= %@% $ @%%        %@% $ %@% %@= H        , K /E C - %@%%% : %@% • )/ V ! – L !L • +, – V • 0 0FE ! !! # 41 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    42. • ( ; ! – C !! < # ## –/ ! ! ! # • - 4%% ( G L $S G –) J •E ! # # 6 @ •G ! 89 # ! 42 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    43. 2010 :2 • T. # # • ! 8! 9C T. TE 0 C # • ! # ! •C ! ! ! •& !! ! •) ! # ; ( 43 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + ESS BILBAOESS BILBAO Nominate

    custom

    310 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    R&D Towards mitigation of cavitation damage in the more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 310
      • 310 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories