2010 oct amm_scheps_pres
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
173
On Slideshare
173
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Steel vs. Aluminum Panel Randall Scheps, ChairmanAluminum Transportation Group
  • 2. Down Weighting Cars is a Must• Practical considerations: – How best to cut the weight? • Aluminum can safely take out more weight more than steel • No compromise to function – customers won’t accept it • Lightweighting with aluminum is cost competitive – How much weight to cut? • As much as possible – half measures won’t get the job done • 200 lbs saved = 1 MPG – How fast can we get there? • Aluminum uses many existing production processes 2
  • 3. Body Holds the Largest Weight Reduction Opportunity 12,000• Aluminum penetration Currently Aluminum 10,000 continues to grow in many Aluminum Opportunity established areas KMT Aluminum 8,000• Steel has historically dominated 6,000 the auto body but…• Potential future weight savings 4,000 with steel are diminishing 2,000• Aluminum is the next logical step 0
  • 4. Aluminum Saves More Weight than High Strength Steel• 3rd party research study completed at University of Aachen (2010)• Car body analyzed in detail to select optimum material for each part• Analysis of strength vs. stiffness requirements• “Best” aluminum structure saved 40% body weight (525 lbs)• “Best” steel structure could only save 11% - even with advanced steels Steel alone is not the answer 4
  • 5. Aluminum’s Lightweighting Advantages Are ClearTotal maximum weight reduction compared to reference car: Steel (with YS up to 1,200 MPa): 11% Aluminum (with YS up to 400 MPa): 40% Steel Steel Aluminium Aluminum
  • 6. Aluminum’s Weight Advantage Translates into Fuel Economy Advantage Mass of Body-in-White Fuel Economy Improvement 400 3 350 2.7 MPG Improvement 2.5 300 Miles per GallonKilograms 250 2 200 1.5 150 1 100 0.5 50 0 0 Steel (baseline) High Strength Aluminum Steel (baseline- High Strength Aluminum Steel Intensive Intensive 30 mpg) Steel Intensive Intensive Source: ika - University of Aachen and the European Aluminium Source: Aluminum Association calculated based on ika mass Association (EAA) reduction data; assumes 23% secondary weight savings 6
  • 7. Cost-Effective Overall MID-SIZE CAR EXAMPLE Al Weight Wt. Reduction Cost Impact Multi material body: AL Sheet 330 Lbs BIW 320 Lbs 280 Lbs $ 455 Al Extrusion 60 Closures 115 Lbs 70 Lbs $ 150 Al Castings 30 Steel Sheet 50 Structures 45 Lbs 50 Lbs $ 160 HSLA Sheet 10 Total 480 Lbs 380 Lbs $ 765 (Direct) Optimization (50 Lbs) 170 Lbs ($ 665) (In-direct) $ 0.18 Per Lb Net 430 Lbs 550 Lbs $ 100 Weight Reduction 15% Weight Reduction
  • 8. A Real-World Example Large Car with the Weight of a Mid-Size•Roominess of a large car EPA Size Category Large Mid•No compromise to safety•Better mileage Curb Weight Today 3199 2723•Same acceleration Weight Reduction with (345)•More agile handling & braking Aluminum body•Existing stamping assets•Lower powertrain cost New Curb Weight 2698