Hello James, the short introduction is in Part 4. My main idea is, that organisation need to have 2 Basic Managements (like 2 Commandments) which are the same for the whole organization. First 1 we knew from LEAN and TOC ( JIT or Roadranner law), but this measurement measure only Physical part of job. (or material part of world) and allowing us to start to build Self - organizing system. But the Universe is dual. And we need to have second measurement, who is measuring the Mental part of job, because we want to create Self - improving organization. Self - organizing and Self - improving organizations can create never ending Innovations. Without innovations in one day organization will die. Today in TOC, LEAN, 6 Sigma we have all tools how to manage operational flow, but now clue what to change in organizational structure and basic measurements. Or in other words, what Archetypes are blocking from seeing new Vision? James, I for TOC conference, if You still have a place, I can propose to make one or another presentation: 1. God, Quantum physics .... 2. To share our success how to stop to consult, but to start Service in Supply Chain (when we are making all needed technical job for client, and he is paying for 'real' job, but not consultancy) 3.Our analysis what blocks Retailers to 'open' their sales and stock data to their suppliers 4. Planograma - new possibility for DBM improvement. With best regards Darius
Darius, You form lead our minds to ponder the fundamentals. You open our minds to new ideas which challenge the fundamental structure of organizations. It will be interesting to see what model you propose to be the new fundamental. Dr Holt
God,Physics,Management Part I - Presentation Transcript
Part I 1
The Question: why it’s so hard
to implement logical changes in
to organisation?
• Guru’s answer - because you do not have
a Vision.
• My hypothesis - because you have an
Archetype!
2
Few scenarios, which one is
more realistic?
1.Vision, then
2.Mental model, then
3.Organisational structure model, then
4.Behavioural model
Or
1.Archetype, then
2.Mental model, then
3.Organisational structure model, then
4.Behavioural model and Negative result.
3
My hypothesis:
An Archetype is not allowing Top
Management to create the Right Vision!
4
If my hypothesis is right, then
an Archetypes will be in
opposite with Laws of Nature.
Can it be possible that the Universe and
Business, the World created by a wise God
and the Organisation created by an
initiative Human, the Laws of Physics and
traits of organisational management . . .
have so many similarities?
5
Physics dictates the
beginning: the number of the
forms of matter is limited.
Additionally matter is the same
everywhere, and its laws are
universal. Lets prove!
6
The Universe and Business have many
similarities in structure and laws. The stars
in the sky and the companies on earth are
scattered very widely and unevenly.
The New York Times > Business > Image > Masters of the New ... http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/04/03/business/20070...
7
Global companies are very similar to galaxies.
Global company - Galaxy is a huge system
huge systems of
companies and of stars and matter amid
partners which are the stars, its members
interconnected or
have a gravitational
connected by a
centre which is the gravitational interaction.
business-in-common.
8
A galaxy whirls
around its own
centre, and what
connects it – an
invisible wheel of On the other hand, it is
always interesting to mull
spheres consisting over, around what global
of dark matter. companies circulates and
what is the “green” glue
Scientists says it is a holding it together?
peculiar sort of
cosmic glue
interconnecting
everything. 9
The solar system and a company, large for the scope of its
country, are also similar not only because both revolve around
their own galactic centre but because they attract the smaller
celestial bodies – the planets, asteroids, comets and so forth.
Looking from such an angle, we will be able to see the entire,
acting Solar system as a large regional company which has larger
or smaller galactic bodies of business revolving around it.
• Omnitel
10
Certain planets,
just like companies,
have conditions
that are more or
less applicable to
the development of
life.
11
Moon. Might be akin to a distant
branch of a company that has no
independence but is constantly
bombarded by competing firms and
sporadic radio signals from main
office. 12
Meteorite. A fast, hot and
constantly burning meteorite is
similar to a Consultant leaving a
greater or lesser crater in the
company, which he consulted.
13
Comet. A bright,
distant and
shining comet is
similar to a
Lecturer flying
across the sky,
lighting up the
surface of the
planet with the
light of wisdom
but, unfortunately,
only for a short
time.
14
When galaxies merge, it feels the same as
if two global companies had merged.
15
When galaxies merge, it feels the same
as if two global companies had merged.
• When two or more galaxies collide, their merger can occur.
The friction between the gasses and dust cause an upheaval of
unimaginable cataclysms while discharging gigantic vibrations
of energy and numerous stars and planets outwardly. The
result of a merger depends on many parameters.
• As large companies merge, entire businesses are discharged
into the market, cumbersome structures are reorganised and
thousands of workers are redundant. Negative emotions
predominate, because only a small part of mergers occur
successfully. Numerous regulations limit global mergers, and
they happen especially rarely. It is probably unnecessary even
to explain why at this point.
16
Is an
organisation
spherical or
pyramidical?
That’s where the
essence of the
question lies!
17
Can you smell the first Archetype?
18
You can order a book,
or consultancy, or
lecture, or just a
dream at:
+370 698 41 027
Darius Radkevi!ius
darius@stockm.eu
www.stockm.eu
www.versloknyguklubas.lt
Part I.Today a lot of thinkers are talking, that Or more
Part I.Today a lot of thinkers are talking, that Organizational structure is not flexible,he is more oriented to Boss, then to Client. The Guru\'s are saying, that most important is to build Vision, from vision you will get Mental model, from mental model - Organisational structure and, finally, Behavioural model.
To create Vision is not for everyone, BUT EACH MANAGER CAN OPEN EYES;. Let's look which Archetype in Western management culture is creating main Mental model, which allow to build only one type of Organisational structure and from here Employees Behaviour? The part 1 is asking question is an organisation is spherical or pyramidical? less
2 comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2 previous next Post a comment