Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Evaluation framework linkedup_amsterdam

1,676

Published on

Published in: Business
1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,676
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.    Mo#va#on  Data  on  the  Web  Some  eyecatching  opener  illustra#ng  growth  and  or  diversity  of  web  data       Design  of  an  Evalua#on  Framework    for  Open  Web  Data  Applica#ons   Hendrik  Drachsler,  Slavi  Stoyanov     (The  Open  University  of  the  Netherlands,  NL):  WP2  Lead   Stefan Dietze 25/05/12 1 25 February 2013
  • 2.  LinkedUp  Vision     Adopting open Web data, educational and cross-domain resources to provide educational services up to university degree-level in open and distance education. 1) A domain-specific 2) A generic set of criteria (educational) set of for the evaluation of open criteria Web data applications. “There is a substantial risk that the evaluation criteria are not adequately specified." At what point are the criteria adequately specified? When the stakeholders agree with the criteria. Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 2
  • 3.   Development  of  the  Evalua#on  Framework     P1: Initialisation P2: Establishment P3: Exit and and Evaluation Sustainability M0-M6: Preparation M7-M18: Competition cycle M18-M24: Finalising Comp etition Revie Final Expert 3x Draft w of EF proposal EF release validation of EF New Refin versio ement n of EFLiterature review Group Concept DocumentationCognitive Mapping Mapping Dissemination Practical experiences and refinement Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 3
  • 4.  Development  of  the  Evalua#on  Framework     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 4
  • 5.  LinkedUp     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 5
  • 6.  Group  Concept  Mapping    •  Group Concept Mapping resembles the Post-it notes problem solving technique and Delphi method•  GCM involves participants in a few simple activities (generating, sorting and rating of ideas) that most people are used to.GCM is different in two substantial ways:1. Robust analysis (MDS and HCA)GCM takes up the original participants contribution and then quantitativelyaggregate it to show their collective view (as thematic clusters)2. VisualisationGCM presents the results from the analysis as conceptual maps and other graphicalrepresentations (pattern matching and go-zones). Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 6
  • 7.  Group  Concept  Mapping     brainstorm •  innovations in way network is delivered •  (investigate) corporate/structural alignment •  assist in the development of non-traditional partnerships (Rehab with the Medicine Community) sort •  expand investigation and knowledge of PSNS/PSOs •  continue STHCS sponsored forums on public health issues (medicine managed care forum) •  inventory assets of all participating agencies (providers, Venn Diagrams) •  access additional funds for telemedicine expansion •  better utilization of current technological bridge •  continued support by STHCS to member facilities •  expand and encourage utilization of interface programs to strengthen the viability and to improve the health care delivery system (ie teleconference) •  discussion with CCHN Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4 Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49 Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39 e t ive ly ly. he eff e ct tive gS ime eff ec tin g et rc es Ra a ou ic. an n s. M res atio a sk ecif 1 na ge rm t. info tan le t t sp Ma no of por ultip ...organize the 5 e a re 4 2 ud is im age m ns ultit hat an ctio 3 5 am ew om ire an id wt nd 2 4 Sc dec ho he 1 d e r kw 3 5 3 an cid wo nd De he ely na 2 4 et 1 4 niz ctiv atio 3 ga ffe orm issues... 5 Or 2 ee inf nt. 4 5 tim of ta 1 ge de r 3 5 na itu impo 2 4 Ma ult 1 1 a m at is 3 5 an e wh 2 Sc cid 4 de 1 3 3 5 2 4 1 3 2 1 rate Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 7
  • 8.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 8
  • 9.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 9
  • 10.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 10
  • 11.  Group  Concept  Mapping     •  innovations in way network is delivered •  (investigate) corporate/structural alignment •  assist in the development of non-traditional partnerships (Rehab with the Medicine Community) •  expand investigation and knowledge of PSNS/PSOs •  continue STHCS sponsored forums on public health issues (medicine managed care forum) •  inventory assets of all participating agencies (providers, Venn Diagrams) •  access additional funds for telemedicine expansion •  better utilization of current technological bridge •  continued support by STHCS to member facilities •  expand and encourage utilization of interface programs to strengthen the …”map” the issues... viability and to improve the health care delivery system (ie teleconference) •  discussion with CCHN organize sort Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4 Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49 Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39 et he effectiv effectively ely . g S time tin Manage resource s d an Ra ation . ks. ecific Technology 1 na ge inform le tas t sp 5 Ma e of rtant. ltip no 4 2 ltitudimpo ge mu ns are 3 a muat is na ectio 5 an ma dir 2 Sc e wh w to en 4 cid wh 1 3 de e ho rk 3 5 cid wo De d Information Services 2 4 e the ely n an 4 1 3 5 ga niz ectiv ma tio Or e eff or 2 4 5 tim inf 1 3 5 na ge e of rtant. 2 Ma ltitudimpo 4 1 1 a muat is 3 5 an wh 2 Sc cide 4 3 de 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 2 1 rate Community & Consumer Views Regionalization Management STHCS as model Financing Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 11
  • 12.  Group  Concept  Mapping     •  innovations in way network is delivered •  (investigate) corporate/structural alignment •  assist in the development of non-traditional partnerships (Rehab with the Medicine Community) •  expand investigation and knowledge of PSNS/PSOs •  continue STHCS sponsored forums on public health issues (medicine managed care forum) •  inventory assets of all participating agencies (providers, Venn Diagrams) •  access additional funds for telemedicine expansion •  better utilization of current technological bridge •  continued support by STHCS to member facilities •  expand and encourage utilization of interface programs to strengthen the viability and to improve the health care delivery system (ie teleconference) •  discussion with CCHN Information Services Technology organize sort Community & Consumer Views Decide how to manage multiple tasks. 20 Manage resources effectively. 4 Work quickly and effectively under pressure 49 Organize the work when directions are not specific. 39 et he effectiv effectively ely . g S time tin Manage resource s d an Ra ation . ks. ecific 1 na ge inform le tas t sp 5 Ma e of rtant. ltip no 4 2 ltitudimpo ge mu ns are 3 a muat is na ectio 5 an ma dir 2 Sc e wh w to en 4 cid wh 1 3 de e ho rk 3 5 cid wo De d 2 4 e the ely n an 4 1 3 5 ga niz ectiv ma tio Or e eff or 2 4 5 tim inf 1 3 5 na ge e of rtant. 2 Ma ltitudimpo 4 1 1 a muat is 3 5 an wh 2 Sc cide 4 3 de 1 3 5 2 4 1 3 2 Regionalization 1 rate map Information Services Technology Community & Consumer Views Regionalization Financing Management Mission & Ideology Management STHCS as model Financing ...prioritize the issues... Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 12
  • 13.  Group  Concept  Mapping    WP2 Progress•  Invited 122 external experts•  56 experts contributed 212 indicators for the evaluation framework•  After cleaning -> 108 indicators remained•  26 experts sorted on similarity in meaning•  26 experts rated on priority and applicability Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 13
  • 14.  Group  Concept  Mapping     A point map Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 14
  • 15.  Group  Concept  Mapping     A cluster map 15 Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 15
  • 16.  Group  Concept  Mapping     A cluster map 6 Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 16
  • 17.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Clusters’ labels Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 17
  • 18.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Rating Map Priority Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 18
  • 19.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Rating Map Applicability Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 19
  • 20.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 20
  • 21.  Group  Concept  Mapping     Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 21
  • 22.  Many thanks for your attention!This silde is available at:http://www.slideshare.com/DrachslerEmail: hendrik.drachsler@ou.nlSkype: celstec-hendrik.drachslerBlogging at: http://www.drachsler.deTwittering at: http://twitter.com/HDrachsler Hendrik Drachsler 25 February 2013 22

×