• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery;
 

Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery;

on

  • 1,809 views

Presentaion; Selection of the "Best" Bariatric Surgical Procedure; Discussion of the risk of "Marginal Ulcer" in MGB and in RNY gastric bypass

Presentaion; Selection of the "Best" Bariatric Surgical Procedure; Discussion of the risk of "Marginal Ulcer" in MGB and in RNY gastric bypass

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,809
Views on SlideShare
1,781
Embed Views
28

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
43
Comments
0

2 Embeds 28

http://minibypass.wordpress.com 25
http://minibypass.us 3

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery; Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery; Presentation Transcript

    • Selection of the “Best” Bariatric surgery Procedure
      The Mini-Gastric Bypass
    • Dr Rutledge: Training & Background
      • Undergrad/Medical School; Teacher Dr. Lester Dragstedt Pioneer / Inventor of the Highly Controversial Vagotomy and Pyloroplasty
      • 2 Years Cardiac Surgery National Institutes of Health National Heart Lung Blood Institute
      • 20 years University of NC; Professor of Surgery, Associate Chief of Staff, Director of Section Medical Informatics, Director North Carolina Trauma Registry
      • Author of 93 papers and articles
    • Dr Rutledge: Training & Background
      • Specialty: Trauma, Critical Care, Medical Informatics and Bariatric Surgery (1978-1998 20 years University NC)
      • Experience: Trauma Surgery, Director NC Trauma Registry
      • Peptic Ulcer Surgery; Vagotomy & Pyloroplasty; Antrectomy & Billroth II
      • Bariatric Surgery 33 years: Open RNY & Vertical Banded Gastroplasty
      • 1997 one first surgeons laparoscopic RNY
      • Mini-Gastric Bypass; 14 years, over 6,000 cases
    • CONSIDERING THE MGB?MGB IS A SUPERB SURGERY BUT…WARNING: “THERE ARE “TRICKS AND TRAPS”
      Dr. Rutledge
      USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net
    • OFFER A SAFE & SUCCESSFUL MGB PROGRAM
      • Call / Email: Anytime question or advice on any clinical, technical or patient MGB question
      • USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net
      • Personal Visit: Dr. Rutledge Visiting Professor: France, Turkey, Austria & India, Upcoming visits Greece, Istanbul, United KingdomCzech Republic, Italy, Germany, UAE, Pakistan,
      • Please Use the Knowledge of Others Before You Start;Experience; over 14 years, over 6,000 patients
      • USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net
    • UPCOMING “HANDS ON” MGB IN INDIA“TRICKS AND TRAPS” TRAINING PROGRAM
      • Didactic Sessions Talk with the Leading World Experts
      • Hands On Surgery (with approval) Scrub in on cases Assist and Participate in MGB Surgery
      • This Fall and Next Year
      • Bija India, Dr Rutledge & Dr Kular
      • USA 001-702-714-0011 DrR@clos.net
    • SURGERYHISTORY OF POOR DECISIONSJOSEPH LISTER: AMERICAN SURGEONS DELAYED ADOPTION OF ANTISEPSIS 10 YEARS
    • REPTILIAN BRAINPOOR DECISION MAKING
      • Lister published antisepsis paper:
      • 1867
      Dr. Gross; Gross Clinic 1875
    • Definition of the Problem
      • Obesity Epidemic
      • History of Failure of Bariatric Surgical Procedures
      • Selecting the “Ideal / BEST” Bariatric Surgical Procedure
    • Problem Definition:Bariatric Surgery: A HISTORY OF FAILURE
    • The Gastric Sleeve:Not as Bad as the BandNot as Dangerous as the RNY
    • SUCCESS CRITERIA"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
      1.  Low Risk
      2. Major Weight Loss
      3. Easily performed
      4. Short operative times
      5. Outpatient or short hospital stay
      6. Minimal Blood Loss
      7. No Need for ICU Stay
      8. Minimal Pain
      9. Very High Patient Satisfaction
      10. A Good "Exit Strategy"
    • SUCCESS CRITERIA"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
      11. Change Behavior & Preferences; Marked Decrease in Hunger and Increased Satiety
      12. Minimal Retching and Vomiting
      13. Few adhesions or hernias
      14. Minimal impact on Heart and Lung Function
      15. Low Failure Rate
      16. Low Cost
      17. Short Recovery Time
      18. Rapid Return to Work
      19. Low Risk of Pulmonary Embolus
      20. Durable weight loss
    • SUCCESS CRITERIA"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
      21. Low Risk of Ulcer
      22. Fat Malabsorption; low cholesterol & CV risk
      23. No Plastic Foreign Body
      24. Easily Verifiable Results; > 10 years of Results
      25. Low Risk of Bowel Obstruction
      26. Based upon sound surgical principles
      27. Independent confirmation of results
      28. Healthy life after surgery
      29. Supported by LEVEL I Evidence; RCT (Controlled Prospective Randomized Trial)
      30. Block “Sweet Eater” Failures
    • Selected Bariatric Procedures
      • RNY
      • Band
      • Sleeve
      • MGB
    • MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS
      • The Mini-Gastric Bypass1997 – 2011 ; >6,000 pts,10 yr Data; Multiple Centers,R.C.Trials
      • Vertical Gastric Tube(Collis Gastroplasty)
      • Gastric Bypass(Billroth II Gastro-jejunostomy)
    • MINI-GASTRIC BYPASSBASED SOUND SURGICAL PRACTICE
      • Billroth II Performed over 100 years
      • 16,000 Billroth II’sUSA in 2007
      • Operation of choice: Trauma, Ulcers, Cancer Stomach etc.
    • Criteria for Success; Ideal Weight Loss Surgery
    • Criteria for Success; Ideal Weight Loss Surgery
    • Criteria for Success
    • Marginal Ulcer after Gastric Bypass; RNY & MGB
      Marginal Ulcers after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Pain for the Patient…Pain for the Surgeon
      January 2010
      by Camellia Racu,
      Bariatric Times.
      2010;7(1):23–25
    • Marginal Ulcer after Gastric Bypass; RNY & MGB
    • Marginal Ulcer after Gastric Bypass; RNY & MGB
      Marginal ulcers RNYranging from 0.6 to 16%
      True incidence is very likely much higher
      Csendesprospective study routine postoperative endoscopic evaluation
      28% of marginal ulcers were asymptomatic
      Gastric Bypass (RNY & MGB)HIGH incidence of Marginal Ulcer
      BILE MAKES NO DIFFERENCE!!!
    • Incidence of perforated gastrojejunal anastomotic ulcers after RNY
      April 2002 to April 2010, 1213 patients underwent laparoscopic RYGB
      Operative mortality was .15%
      10 perforated GJA ulcers (.82%) at a mean of 13.5 (6-19) months
      Morbidity and mortality rate was 30% and 10%
      Perforated GJA ulcers can develop in 1 of 120 Roux en Y Gastric Bypasses & DEADLY
    • Marginal Ulcers: Achilles Heel of Gastric Bypass
      Management
      1. Warn Patients & Surgeon “Be Vigilant”
      2. Aggressive anti-H. Pylori Rx
      3. Aggressive use of Antacids
      4. Strict Avoidance of Ulcerogenic Agents(NSAIDS, Etoh, Smoking, Coffee, Soda, Nitrates)
      5. Encourage: Probiotics, Yogurt, Fruits Vegetables
      BILE MAKES NO DIFFERENCE!!!
    • CONCLUSIONS: Best Choice: Mini-Gastric Bypass
      • Choice of Obesity Surgery
      • Objectives “Ideal” Weight Loss Surgery
      • RNY, Band, Sleeve, MGB
      • MGB Best meets all objectives/success criteria
      • Beware of Marginal Ulcer
      • Rational Decision Making: Best Choice; Mini-Gastric Bypass
    • WHY CRITICS ONLY CARE FOR MGB?
      • Why do Critics only care about the Mini-Gastric Bypass?
      • 100,000’s of people already have and are living with and are getting the Billroth II every day
      • Why haven’t concerned bariatric surgeons stepped forward to stop all general, trauma and oncologic surgeons from performing this Billroth II surgery?
    • WHY CRITICS ONLY CARE FOR MGB?
      • Why do Critics only care about the Mini-Gastric Bypass?
      • Why haven’t concerned bariatric surgeons stepped forward to start a fund to help suffering Billroth II patients get needed conversions of their surgery to Roux-en-Y?
      • Why don’t they write letters to the editor calling for the Billroth II to be declared a operation non-grata?
    • WHY CRITICS ONLY CARE FOR MGB?
      • Why do Critics only care about the Mini-Gastric Bypass?
      • Why haven’t concerned bariatric surgeons stepped forward to national funding for lifetime endoscopic screening of Billroth II patients to find dreaded gastric cancers?
      • It seems odd doesn’t it?
      • There is a simple reason
    • WHY CRITICS ONLY CARE FOR MGB?
      • There is a simple reason
      • The critics of the MGB do not do those things because they are ridiculous
      • Such actions are Not supported by the data
      • The Billroth II and the MGB are both good operations
      • Published data Does Not support the critics misreading of the medical literature
    • CRITICS OF THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASSSHOULD BE EMBARRASSED
    • Rational Data Analysis vs.Irrational FEAR Gastric Cancer
      • 1. Gastric Cancer Declining Rapidly
      • 2. GC Environmental Causes; Easily Prevented
      • 3. Some studies show Small Increased RiskProbably from Ulcers / H. Pylori
      • 4. Many large studies: NO increased risk
      • 5. Endoscopic Screening: Not Recommended
      • 6. General, Trauma & Oncologic Surgeons Use Billroth II