Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Failure of Sleeve & Band.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Failure of Sleeve & Band.

409

Published on

Failure of Sleeve & Band. Power of Mini-Gastric Bypass. & Successful Treatment of Obesity & Diabetes!

Failure of Sleeve & Band. Power of Mini-Gastric Bypass. & Successful Treatment of Obesity & Diabetes!

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
409
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. First International ConsensusConference on the Mini-Bypass / One Anastomosis Bypass Paris 2012 October 18-19 Email DrR@CLOS.Net
  • 2. Failure. Power. &Success!
  • 3. Failure of Sleeve & Band.Power of Mini-Gastric Bypass. & Successful Treatment of Obesity & Diabetes!
  • 4. Expert Judgment ofWeight Loss Surgery Procedures
  • 5. The Need for a Multidisciplinary Team• Psychiatrist and Psychologist• Nutritionist and Dietitian• Physical therapist and Physical Trainer• Support Group• Support Group Leader• Anesthesiologist• Generalist and Endocrinologist and Gastroenterologist• And More?
  • 6. Multidisciplinary Team• For Cholecystectomy?• Why no Multidisciplinary Team for Gallbladder Surgery?• Support Group?• Pre Op Liquid Diet• Psychiatric counseling?• Dietician?• No.• Why?
  • 7. No Multidisciplinary Team for Cholecystectomy Because Cholecystectomy Cures the Disease of Cholelithiasis
  • 8. Multidisciplinary Team• A poor form of weight loss surgery• Will require a really good Multidisciplinary Team• A poor operation that fails to successfully treat obesity and diabetes• Patient will NEED a support group• And a Psychologist and a Grief councilor and more…
  • 9. Multidisciplinary Team’s Abuse of the Failed Patient• A further comment:• What will the Multidisciplinary Team say and feel about their patient failures• The failed patient is a judgment against the Multidisciplinary Team and their program• Often the Team (Surgeon) will Blame the Victim (Failed Patient)
  • 10. What do the Experts Say?
  • 11. Survey Results• As part of a Pre-Conference survey for the• MGB/OAB Consensus Conference• Asked Expert Surgeons to Judge 4 weight loss procedures.• This is a report Expert Judgment of the Band, the Sleeve, RNY and the MGB
  • 12. 12. Your Opinion about the LAP BAND• LAP BAND is good, short simple surgery, maybe the best form of WLS, I use it often 7.1%• LAP BAND is OK it is an acceptable alternative and I use it sometimes 46.4%• LAP BAND is a Bad operation and should not be used 46.4%
  • 13. 13. Your Opinion about the SLEEVE• SLEEVE is Good, short simple surgery, maybe the best form of WLS, I use it often 32.1%• SLEEVE is OK it is an acceptable alternative and I use it sometimes 53.6%• SLEEVE is a Bad operation and should not be used 14.3%
  • 14. 14. Your Opinion about the RNY• RNY is Good, maybe the best form of WLS, I use it often 42.9%• RNY is OK it is an acceptable alternative and I use it sometimes 50.0%• RNY is a Bad operation and should not be used 7.1%
  • 15. 15. Your Opinion about the Mini- Bypass / One Anastomosis Bypass• MGB is good, short simple surgery, maybe the best form of WLS, I use it often 67.9%• MGB is OK it is an acceptable alternative and I use it sometimes 28.6%• MGB is a Bad operation and should not be used 3.6%
  • 16. These results are shown graphically
  • 17. MGB: Fewest Negative Judgments• 46.4% said the Band was a bad operation• 14.3%, 7.1% and 3.6% said the Sleeve, the RNY and the MGB were bad operations and should not be done.• By this measure experts judged the band the least favorable operation and the MGB the best choice.
  • 18. MGB: Most Often Judged Best• These experts judged the MGB most often to be a "good, short simple surgery, maybe the best form of WLS, I use it often" in 67.9% of cases as compared to• 7.1%, 32.1% and 42.9% for the band, the sleeve and the RNY respectively.• In these experts opinion the MGB is by far the best judged form of weight loss surgery.
  • 19. Frequency of Negative Judgment
  • 20. Frequency of Choice as"Best" form of Surgery
  • 21. Judgment of the Band
  • 22. Judgment of the Sleeve
  • 23. Judgment of the RNY
  • 24. Judgment of the MGB/OABHighest Good / Lowest Bad
  • 25. Success: Mini-Gastric Bypass Simplicity, Power & Safety
  • 26. Failed Sleeve to RNY; Sept 2012 Less 24 months!• Failed Sleeve:• Weight loss• Diabetes Rx• SEVERE Reflux symptoms.• Time to Failure less than 24 months.• 30% for "Severe Reflux"!!!!• Indications and Mid-Term Results of Conversion from Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Authors Gautier T, et al. Obes Surg. 2012 Sep 23. Département de Chirurgie Digestive, Caen University Hospital, Caen Cedex, France, gautier.tho@gmail.com.
  • 27. Band, Sleeve vs the Neuro-Humoral Drive to Eat• Restrictive Procedures• MAKE SWEET EATERS:• Mechanical Block of Normal Healthy Foods• Weight Loss: Honeymoon 2 years• Then Failure Weight Regain• GE Reflux (Risk of Esophageal Cancer)
  • 28. Band & Sleeve Block Normal Healthy Foods• Weight Loss =>• Increased Hunger• Decreased Satiety• Healthy Foods Blocked• Drive to Eat UP• What Happens?
  • 29. Band & Sleeve;Block Intake Normal Healthy FoodSleeve Band
  • 30. Restrictive Procedures • Successfully Block Normal Healthy Diet But• They DO NOT BLOCK ...
  • 31. Pathologic Dietary Choices Calories: Ice Cream 200g/540 cal, 2 Milky-way Bars, 1,000 cal 2 L Bottle Coke 830 cal Total: 2,370 cal
  • 32. Diet InducedIncreased Hunger
  • 33. Summary• Most Diets & Restrictive Procedures Will Fail• Attempts to Override Neuro-Humoral Hunger System Routinly Fails• RPs Force Patients into Pathological Dietary Choices• MAKE SWEET EATERS!
  • 34. SOLUTION?
  • 35. Diet InducedIncreased Hunger
  • 36. Mini-Gastric Bypass The Mongoose!
  • 37. Mini-Gastric Bypass• Blocks Neuro-Humoral Hunger System• Short, Simple, Durable, 30 minute Surgery that:• Decreases Hunger & The Mongoose He is a Little Bit Ugly, No? Increases Satiety
  • 38. Mini-Gastric Bypass Decreases Hunger Survey 2,783 Pts
  • 39. What Do the Experts Say? Survey of 102 surgeons answered detailed survey online.Surgeons from 6 Continents and 23 countries. The group reported on apast years experience with over 39,000 cases, Very experienced surgeons.
  • 40. IFSO Varianational Committee Survey Over 100 Surgeons from Around the World:
  • 41. MGB Best Rx Diabetes
  • 42. Both Kular and Rutledge, Op Time < 40 min
  • 43. Risk ofEsophagealCancer?
  • 44. 30% Reflux & Esophageal Cancer?
  • 45. LeaksSurg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Jul-Aug;4(4):528-33. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy:
  • 46. Band/Sleeve Road to Failure Initial Weight Loss Return of HungerEat Normal Foods Eat Liquid Calories Obstruction WeightAcid Reflux/Cancer Regain
  • 47. In Summary• Restrictive Procedures Fail• In as Little as 2 Years• Restrictive Procedures Push Patients towards Liquid Calories• (Can a Sleeve stop Coke!)• Weight Regain is Common• Acid Reflux 30%+• Acid Reflux = Esophageal Cancer
  • 48. The Mini-Gastric Bypass Excellent Operation with Results Reported onThousands of Patients Over the Past 10-15 years • Survey Shows: • Short, Simple, Effective, Durable, • 30 min Operation with 1 day Hospital Stay • Lower Leak rate than Sleeve or RNY • Best Weight Loss • Easily Reversible, Revisable

×