Pol Comm 9 Aesthetics

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Perceptions of personality lead to emotional reactions and/or connections and positive or negative thoughts (responses on seeing the individual). These combine to form an impression of the candidate and so inform the overall voter attitudes. However voter’s attitudes do not simply result from the projection of an image. Voters have an ideal candidate image against which they will judge each candidate and they will judge candidates against their opponents. Hence perceptions and impressions are key to understanding voter behaviour. See blog posts under perception politics.

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Pol Comm 9 Aesthetics - Presentation Transcript

    1. The aestheticisation of politics Lecture 9
    2. Perception Politics
      • “ Princes do not need to possess all qualities necessary for good governance, but they should certainly appear to possess them”
      • Niccolo Machiavelli The Prince c1498
    3. Perception Politics (De Vries) Political Identity Personality Impressions Candidate Image Political Impression Management Perception Emotion Cognition Impression Formation Voter Attitudes
    4. Television/Radio and the pictures in our heads
      • The Magic Mirror (S. Gunness)
        • Television tells us about our society and reflects what we like and don’t like, it informs and beguiles
        • Whether it still solely plays that role depends on the individual, their media use, their level of education and what they want to see reflected at them (is the Internet taking over?)
    5. Observations
      • Research among the young
        • Interested in political issues
        • Not interested in news about politicians
      • Politicians seek to celebritise themselves
        • Offer an alternative perspective of them
        • Try to connect with masses
        • But are we bovvered ?
      • Research among the young
        • Interested in political issues
        • Not interested in news about politicians
      • Politicians seek to celebritise themselves
        • Offer an alternative perspective of them
        • Try to connect with masses
        • But are we bovvered ?
      • Research among the young
        • Interested in political issues
        • Not interested in news about politicians
      • Politicians seek to celebritise themselves
        • Offer an alternative perspective of them
        • Try to connect with masses
        • But are we bovvered ?
    6. Celebrity Politicians
      • Project an aesthetic character
        • Or is that synthetic
      • Allow the appearance of authenticity
        • Humanisation / Symbolic Representation
      • Take politics into other fora / media
        • Dumbing down / Infotainment
        • ‘ infoenterpropagainment ’ Rachel Caulfield
      • Are these appropriate?
    7. The challenge for politicians!
      • Prominence is the oxygen of politics
      • If you are not on Television you don’t exist
      • So...
        • Do you accept any offer of TV coverage?
        • Do you only choose ‘serious’ programmes?
        • What will get you the better image?
        • Do politicians ever look good on TV?
    8. New Media – New Opportunities
    9. Alternative impressions
    10. Jackson & Lilleker, forthcoming (Book to be published 2011)
    11. The Online Environment
      • Cluttered
      • Open Access
      • Mediated and Unmediated
        • Can we distinguish always?
      • A site for numerous battlegrounds
    12. Web 1.0 versus 2.0
      • Web 1.0
        • Information provision
        • Static, one to many communication
        • Non-adaptive/adaptable
      • Web 2.0
        • conversations, interpersonal networking, personalisation and individualism
        • relationships, communities & interaction
        • User led and generated
        • An architecture of participation with a flat hierarchy
    13. Comfort Zones
      • Main
        • Local and national press, television
        • Understand shared needs despite hostility
      • Secondary
        • Preparation of material for Web 1.0
        • Creating websites/e-newsletters
      • Web 2.0?
    14. Web 2.0 for political communication
      • Advantages
        • Interactivity – direct conversation
        • Connectedness - relational
        • Participatory deliberation
      • Disadvantages
        • Losing control
        • Levelling the playing field
        • No hierarchy or guaranteed credibility
    15. The drive for a digital strategy
      • “ The goal of developing a digital strategy is to turn anxiety into advantage, by replacing current planning and strategic activities with new ones better suited to a business environment populated by killer apps” (Downes & Mui, 2000:11)
      • Suggests embracing or rejecting!
      • But that rejection is not really an option
    16. Politics on the Web
      • Majority is PR based
        • Websites promoting constituency service
        • Web 1.0 informational role
        • Email to subscribers
        • E-newsletters among supporters
        • Editing entries on Wikis
    17. Adventures in Web 2.0
      • MySpace, Facebook and the social network
      • Blogging
      • Facebook apps
      • Kerry McCarthy – Twitter Tsar
      • Second Life
    18. The potential for political communication
      • “ A “private-collective” model of innovation where [participants] obtain private rewards from [contributing] for their own [and the community’s gratification], sharing their [ideas], and collectively contributing to the development and improvement of [policy]”
      • Adapted from Krogh, Spaeth & Lakhani 2003
    19. Web 1.5 – impression management You can ‘meet’ the politician, but You do not get the chance to talk
    20. Thoughts
      • To what extent should politicians aestheticise their personality?
      • Can that be done in a mass-mediated environment?
      • Is Web 2.0 the answer and why?
      • Is current adventures in Online Political Communication about interacting or getting media coverage? – what is appropriate?

    + Darren LillekerDarren Lilleker, 2 months ago

    custom

    172 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Aesthetics, interactivity and the 'new' politics of more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 172
      • 172 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 31
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories