Pol Comm 6 Permanent Campaigning - Presentation Transcript
Spin v Branding permanent campaigning and impression management Lecture 6
“ Governing is turning into a perpetual campaign”
(Blumenthal, The permanent campaign, 1980)
“ Everyday is Election day”
(Hugh Heclo, Campaigning and Governing, in Ormstein & Mann, 2000)
Campaigning is… “the political ideology of our age” (Blumenthal, 1980)
After an Election
Once about getting on with government
“ Today is day one of the campaign to win a second term – don’t let one of you forget that”
(Blair, speech to new MPs, May 8 th 1997 Interview with Paul Marsden 2001)
“ telling the truth doesn’t get you elected and we are in politics to get elected not scratch around being nice and hoping everyone will be nice to us”
(Karl Rove, reflecting on Bush and Enron scandal)
1976 + all that
Dealignment
Economic / Rational Choice
Mistrust in the US presidency
Nixon and Ford the ‘bandaid’ president
Need to be permanently vigilant!
Pat Cadell, Carter’s marketing guru
Ron Peters (2002) Why US Senators must campaign constantly www.ou.edu/special/albertctr/extensions/spring2002/Intro.html
Realignment of parties
Voters need to know of and understand shifts
Dealignment of voters
Need to seek voters daily, not every 4 years
Technology
Media demands / Making up news
To gain funding
Sponsors need courting too – PR!!
Ormstein & Mann The permanent campaign & its future (2000)
Rise of interest groups
Sap strength of electoral organisations
Fragility of government
Marginal seats
Dramatic shifts in public opinion
Mid-term reaction can be permanent
How politics has changed
How politics has changed
How politics has changed
This means that…
The leader’s image
The party’s image
The ideas & beliefs
The policies
The communication
Must be positive, consistent and constant
“ every communication does something to the brand image – if you can control it, then it must all be positive” (Barry Goldwater)
A party as brand Ideology (Ethos & Values) Product (People & Policy) Communication (messages, imagery and symbols) Communication covers all aspects and so must be positive, if not it damages the overall perception
The Media and branding
“ if you don’t provide a story, some damn journalist will make one up”
(John Chen, consultant to Clinton, speech 2003)
A party must “coordinate all forms of communication in a seven days a week news cycle”
(Thurber, 2002)
The public demand
The big picture
Easily convinced by media reporting
Hypodermic effect of negative frames
Cynical of political communication
Gap between rhetoric and reality
Greater demand for responsive government
Gauging how to campaign
Research among voters
Focus groups
Measuring perceptions
Assessing how to reinforce/change them
Opinion polls
Gauging the mood
Often related to political salesmanship
Problems with permanent campaigning
Short-termism
Governing is a series of mini campaigns
Adversarial
Parties compete to set agenda
Persuasion
Political communication = propaganda
The UK permanent campaign
Designed to strengthen the party
Claims to legitimise politics
Makes the leader pivotal
Can drive the news agenda
To report campaigning activities - positive
To thwart spin-doctor’s efforts - negative
Has changed how politics is done
(Norris, A Virtuous Circle, 2000)
The nature of permanent campaigning in the UK
Constantly evolving
Seeking the edge
Targeting a range of audiences
Narrowcasting
Daily news management
Negative advertising
On message communication at all levels
A feature of New Labour’s history
Permanent reinvention
Strong defence against anti-Labour media
Commitment to a market-orientation
Fear of losing
Drive to win the 2 nd full term of office
(Philip Gould, ‘What permanent campaign’, BBC News, 21/11/02)
The limits to success
The Media
Cohesiveness of the party
Internal v external campaigning
Efficiency of permanent rapid rebuttal
Public perception
Point scoring = childishness
Blurring of truth/accuracy = cynicism
Does it work?
Wedge issues don’t just separate the parties
Spin confuses voters
Protracted war hinders effective politics
lack of continuity
Policies defined by political purposes
People reject politics
See Mandelson, The Blair revolution Revisited, Politicos, 2002.
Local permanent campaigning
Favours the incumbent
(Steger, In Newman, Handbook of Political Marketing, 1999)
Reliant on the local paper
(Lilleker & Negrine, in Journalism Studies 2002)
Image of effective representation
(Lilleker & Negrine, in Journal of Political Marketing 2003)
Can cause conflict with the centre
(Franklin & Richardson, in Journal of Political Marketing 2002)
Local dimension important
Where permanent campaigning is positive
Effective representation
Must be backed by party image and legislative agenda setting
(Barbara Sinclair, US Senator, Extensions, Spring 2002)
Working for public consumption enhances democracy
But can conflict with role of effective governance
Discussion of permanent campaigning and its impact more
Discussion of permanent campaigning and its impact on public engagement. Sixth lecture for final year students on the Political Communication option in Bournemouth University less
0 comments
Post a comment