Groups vs Networks: The Class Struggle Continues


Published on

Stephen Downes presentation to EFest, Wellington, New Zealand,
September 27, 2006

Published in: Technology, Education
  • The use of imagery in this demonstration is very effective. You've done a fantastic job here friend.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Its a great information from you i had never heard about this information. Please give reply for my comment.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Its excellent Stephen. I had to come back and go through these again after the TALOswapmeet07... I still support your notion here in those group meetings, which is funny, because even though I support and speak for the ideas and principles of network, I find myself behaving in group :(

    A lot of people seem to have turned away from this distinction you make, which is disapointing, because I still find it compelling and a significant challenge to the way I work.

    I keep it right up there with Konrad's Losing the Teacherly Voice.

    The points in both these concepts are principles I aspire to in my everyday actions, checks and counter checks in the steps I take, something to reflect on after a day's work and try and work out how to correct what I'm doing so to get closer to the networked way without teacherly voice...
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Groups vs Networks: The Class Struggle Continues

  1. 1. Groups vs Networks The Class Struggle Continues EFest, Wellington, New Zealand Stephen Downes, September 27, 2006
  2. 2. The Personalized Web <ul><li>2006 has seen the emergence of the personalized web, the interactive web, the web that places a premium on participation and community. Web 2.0 </li></ul><ul><li>How should the learning sector respond? </li></ul>
  3. 3. The Response <ul><li>The initial reaction from educational institutions has been negative, with access to many of the new applications blocked and banned by administrators. </li></ul><ul><li>But in the longer term we will need to meet the students where they live, learning how to participate in their online world. </li></ul>
  4. 4. The Challenge <ul><li>Can we, when we explore their world, resist the urge to make them just like us? </li></ul>
  5. 5. Danah Boyd… <ul><li>“ The dynamics of identity production play out visibly on MySpace. Profiles are digital bodies, public displays of identity where people can explore impression management...” </li></ul><ul><li>Identity Production in a Networked Culture: Why Youth Heart MySpace </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>
  6. 6. Sherry Turkle <ul><li>“We do not feel compelled to rank or judge the elements of our multiplicity. We do not feel compelled to exclude what does not fit.” </li></ul><ul><li>Life on the Screen </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>
  7. 7. Groups and Networks <ul><li>“Groups require unity, networks require diversity. Groups require coherence, networks require autonomy. Groups require privacy or segregation, networks require openness. Groups require focus of voice, networks require interaction. ” </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>
  8. 8. Rethinking Learning
  9. 9. Their Natures <ul><li>A group is a collection of entities or members according to their nature; what defines a group is the quality members possess and number </li></ul><ul><li>A network is an association of entities or members via a set of connections; what defines a network is the extent and nature of this connectivity </li></ul>
  10. 10. Groups, Schools, Classes <ul><li>A group, in other words, is a school (of thought, of fish…) or a class of some sort. </li></ul><ul><li>Or: classes and schools are just groups. They are defined as groups. </li></ul><ul><li>Can we even think of schools – and of learning – without thinking at the same time of the attributes of groups? </li></ul>
  11. 11. Again, The Challenge <ul><li>Stanley Frielick kirjoitti 27.9.2006 kello 12:35: </li></ul><ul><li>“ Education and authentic learning, like freedom, is wrapped up with the notion of responsibility and accountability. We need to learn in groups because that's where we form our identities – not in some vast chaotic network where there is no responsibility, no authenticity.” </li></ul>
  12. 12. Elements and Ecologies <ul><li>A group is elemental , defined by mass and sameness – like an ingot of metal (Aside: democracy is a group phenomenon) </li></ul><ul><li>A network is diverse and changing, defined by interactions – like an ecosystem </li></ul><ul><li>Can we achieve order, responsibility, identity in an ecosystem? Do we need the iron hand? (Aside: Solon, learning, justice) </li></ul>
  13. 13. Group Unity <ul><li>A group must be cohesive , united, “ out of many, one ”… “the people, united, will never be defeated…” The melting pot… the encouragement is to conform, to be like the others </li></ul><ul><li>Group technology appeals to the mass : television, radio, newspapers, books </li></ul><ul><li>Internet technology includes: all-staff email, corporate website, portal </li></ul>
  14. 14. Network Diversity <ul><li>A network, by contrast, thrives on diversity … “to each his own” … the salad bowl… the encouragement is to be distinct, to create </li></ul><ul><li>Network technology includes: talking, telephoning, writing letters, personal email </li></ul><ul><li>Internet technology: personal home pages, blogs </li></ul>
  15. 15. Group Coordination <ul><li>Groups require coordination , a leader, someone who will show the way… and to be managed … a group will often be defined by its values (aka the leader’s values?) and then a way to get members to follow, to share the vision, will define standards - members belong to a group </li></ul><ul><li>Associated technology includes the Learning Management System, Learning Design, LOM, etc </li></ul>
  16. 16. Network Autonomy <ul><li>Networks require autonomy, that is, that each individual operate independently according to his or her own values and interests – cooperation entails mutual exchange of value rather than follower and leader – members interact with a network </li></ul><ul><li>Associated technology: e-portfolios, personal learning environments </li></ul>
  17. 17. Group Borders or Boundaries <ul><li>Groups are closed - they require a boundary that defines members and non-members – walls - membership, logins and passwords, jargon and controlled vocabulary, lock-in (staying on-message, speak as one) </li></ul><ul><li>Technology: enterprise computing, federated search, user IDs and passwords, copyrights, patents, trademarks, assertions of exclusivity </li></ul>
  18. 18. Network Openness <ul><li>Networks require that all entities be able to send and receive messages both (a) in their own way and (b) without being impeded </li></ul><ul><li>In their own way: open source software, platform independence, APIs, RSS, communities of practice </li></ul><ul><li>Without being impeded: Creative Commons and GPL, distributed identity </li></ul>
  19. 19. Group Centralization <ul><li>Groups are distributive – knowledge, information, money, etc., flows from the centre – an ‘authority’ and is distributed through to their members </li></ul>
  20. 20. Why Networks? <ul><li>Nature of the knower: humans are more like networks than </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the knowledge: groups are limited by the capacity of the leader </li></ul><ul><li>Nature of the knowledge: group knowledge is transmitted and simple (cause-effect, yes-no, etc) while network knowledge is emergent and complex </li></ul>
  21. 21. Thank You <ul><li>Stephen Downes </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul>