Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
 
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
SlideShare is now available on LinkedIn. Add it to your LinkedIn profile.

Modification of Visitation Orders

From DonSchweitzer, 5 months ago Add as contact

A review of a recent California case where a registered sex offender moved the court for unmonitored visitation, we learn the appropriate test to be used by the court in granting or denying the modification request

199 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 3 downloads | 0 embeds (Stats)

Categories

Groups/Events

Embed in your blog options close
Embed (wordpress.com) Exclude related slideshows Embed in your blog

More Info

This slideshow is Public
Total Views: 199 on Slideshare: 199 from embeds: 0
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Slideshow Transcript

  1. Slide 1: Changes to Parenting Plan
  2. Slide 2: C h ild C u s to d y Ma rria g e of Luc io
  3. Slide 3: Ma rria g e of Luc io  Disso: 8/23/04  Two children Stipulated Judgment:  Joint legal custody  M granted sole physical custody  F given monitored visits for six hours every Sunday
  4. Slide 4: Ma rria g e of Luc io  “Father shall have monitored visits with the children, with the goal of having unmonitored visits once the father’s probation is terminated.” F’s prior convictions:  2002: F pled guilty to one count of lewd conduct (3 years informal probation)  2003: F pled guilty to indecent exposure (30 days jail and 3 years formal probation)
  5. Slide 5: Ma rria g e of Luc io Probation completion:  March, 2006: F completes three years of therapy and his probation ends.  April 2006: F files OSC for modification of the order F’s request:  Unmonitored visits on alternate weekends  Best interest of the children to have visits
  6. Slide 6: Ma rria g e of Luc io  T/Ct: OSC dismissed, based on F’s failure to show change of circumstances  M awarded $5,000 attorney’s fees  F appeals. Your Ruling?
  7. Slide 7: Ma rria g e of Luc io Court of Appeal: Reversed and remanded.  A showing that there was a change of circumstances was not required  F had not requested a change in custody  F only requested a change in visitation  “Best interest test” should have been applied
  8. Slide 8: Family Code, Section 3011  In making a determination of the best interest of the child in a proceeding . . . , the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant, consider all of the following:  (a) The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
  9. Slide 9: Family Code, Section 3011(continued)  (b) Any history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:  (1) Any child to whom he or she is related . . . , or with whom he or she has had a caretaking relationship . . . .  (2) The other parent.  (3) A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
  10. Slide 10: Family Code, Section 3011(continued)  (c) The nature and amount of contact with both parents . . . .  (d) The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances or habitual or continual abuse of alcohol by either parent.
  11. Slide 11: Ma rria g e of Luc io
  12. Slide 13: (626) 683-8113