Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Waxman emails to judy 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Waxman emails to judy 2011

803

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
803
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. All of Waxman Emails to Judy Potter 2011To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Diane RehmFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:51:26 -0500Judy:Your client called in to the Diane Rehm show today, and launched into a malicious and false tirade aboutthis case. She even mentioned me by name twice and claimed that I was "grooming" her daughter, andenjoying overnight and weekend visits with her at my house. As you should know by now, that iscategorically false. Mila has never spent an overnight at my house, nor am I "grooming" her or abusingher. Here is the web site link: http://lorihandrahan.com/2011/12/14/diane-rehm-show-on-child-sex-abuse-takes-call-from-milas-mama/ And here is the link to the radio show directly: http://thedianerehmshow.org/audio-player?nid=15292 Her call comes at about 39 minutes and 15seconds.Additionally, other people have read the material on her site and concluded that she is making falseclaims and exploiting her child. Her response to one person confronting her? She has gone on the attackand made claims that she is "trafficking" children. I am not kidding. That is her modus operandi. Theweb based group War Against Child Abuse has come out against Handrahan, because it has seenthrough her spin and evaluated the facts.http://www.facebook.com/WarAgainstChildAbuse#!/WarAgainstChildAbuse They realize that what yourclient is engaged in is a horrible exploitation of a little girl, which takes resources and credibility away fromreal victims of child abuse.Judy, I dont really care that your client called in to Diane Rehm and made the false and malicious thingsshe made. It is great evidence of 1) her duplicity and malice 2) her mental instability and 3) her campaignof defamation, and she will end up paying for this economically at some point. Also, unfortunately, she isshooting herself in the foot with a high caliber rifle in terms of getting contact with Mila and enjoyingparental rights. I dont say that last piece to gloat, believe me.As I have said numerous times, the best result her for Mila would be for Handrahan to get some help,become mentally healthy, and then enjoy a co-parenting relationship with Igor. Mila deserves a healthyand loving mommy in her life. Right now, your client is neither healthy nor loving. How sad for Mila.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1890 / Virus Database: 2108/4680 - Release Date: 12/14/11 1
  • 2. To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: Settlement DemandFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:36 -0500Judy:I dont understand this response. The Scheduling Order requires you to "respond in writing by December27, 2011."Are you telling me that you cannot even "accept" this demand from us, meaning that you no longerrepresent Handrahan? Are you still representing Handrahan?I am confused.Michael-----Original Message-----From: Judy Potter <judy356@msn.com>To: michael waxman <mjwaxy@aol.com>Cc: lori handrahan <lorihandrahan5@gmail.com>Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 1:13 pmSubject: RE: Settlement DemandI am not authorized to accept this offer for a number of reasons. Judy PotterTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Settlement DemandFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:08:16 -0500Judy:As you are no doubt aware, in the lawsuit which I have filed against Handrahan in Federal Court on behalfof my client, Igor Malenko, the Scheduling Order in Malenko v. Handrahan, Dkt No. 2:11-cv-250-GZSindicates that "the plaintiff shall make a written settlement demand upon the defendant by December 12,2011."Accordingly, I am authorized to make the following demand: $1,500,000. If your client is willing to pay$1.5M in damages for the harm her defamation and other tortious behavior has caused Igor and Mila, andif she will agree to shut down her web sites and cease defaming Igor, then we are willing to dismiss thiscase. Every day that she continues to post defamatory content on the world wide web, every day that herfalse claims remain on those sites, Igors damages are building.I suspect that the response to this Court-ordered demand will be that your client will post this on herinternet sites as further "evidence" of Igors "abuse" or my "bullying." I do not hold out much hope for thiscase settling. In view of that, perhaps we should discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Rich presidingover the jury trial, so that we can obtain a specially assigned date for trial, allowing our witnesses muchmore flexibility in presenting themselves for the adjudication of this matter. 2
  • 3. Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4675 - Release Date: 12/11/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Settlement DemandFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:08:16 -0500Judy:As you are no doubt aware, in the lawsuit which I have filed against Handrahan in Federal Court on behalfof my client, Igor Malenko, the Scheduling Order in Malenko v. Handrahan, Dkt No. 2:11-cv-250-GZSindicates that "the plaintiff shall make a written settlement demand upon the defendant by December 12,2011."Accordingly, I am authorized to make the following demand: $1,500,000. If your client is willing to pay$1.5M in damages for the harm her defamation and other tortious behavior has caused Igor and Mila, andif she will agree to shut down her web sites and cease defaming Igor, then we are willing to dismiss thiscase. Every day that she continues to post defamatory content on the world wide web, every day that herfalse claims remain on those sites, Igors damages are building.I suspect that the response to this Court-ordered demand will be that your client will post this on herinternet sites as further "evidence" of Igors "abuse" or my "bullying." I do not hold out much hope for thiscase settling. In view of that, perhaps we should discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Rich presidingover the jury trial, so that we can obtain a specially assigned date for trial, allowing our witnesses muchmore flexibility in presenting themselves for the adjudication of this matter.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4674 - Release Date: 12/11/11 3
  • 4. To: judy356@msn.comSubject: No limits to Handrahans crazinessFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:03:28 -0500Judy:Here is the latest defamatory and outrageous internet posting from your client on her Saving MilaFacebook site.Saving Mila Chris & Sue, God bless and thank you so, so much! re: understanding--Mila has beentrafficked. It is clear. Either a Kids for Cash like there was in Penn with judges (see the Saving Mila FBwall or website or just google Kids for Cash) or she has been trafficked into a well protected ring in Maineor Waxman has basically purchased my daughter as he vowed he would....I am asking you to tell your client to stop this nonsense. Accusing me of "purchasing" her child, of"trafficking" her in some pedophile ring? Seriously? Judy, you know that there is not one scintilla ofevidence for these claims. You know this. When we get into court, I shall be cross-examining Dr.Handrahan about such baseless and horrendous claims. Your client is not only destroying any chanceshe has to be a mother to her child but she is going to ruin herself economically, because there will beconsequences for this kind of horrendous defamation per se, I assure you.I have to tell you that at this point, I do not understand why you continue to represent her. She isengaging in systematic defamation and fraud. I certainly hope that you are not supporting her efforts onthese sites, Judy. You cant help her and you cant "win" this case. Your client is absolutely underminingany efforts you are making to get this case on an even keel and rebuild some credibility for Handrahansposition.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4674 - Release Date: 12/11/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: New postingFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:27:52 -0500Judy:I do not know how you can be expected to advocate for Handrahan when she is doing everything in herpower to burn every possible bridge in Maine. Check out the latest: 4
  • 5. http://lorihandrahan.com/2011/12/10/state-of-maine-request-for-a-federal-criminal-investigation-into-michael-waxman-on-milas-case/She is calling for a criminal investigation into Michael Waxman, Judge Moskowitz, Judge Alexander, DeanCrocker, Dan Despard and Janet Mills. She addressed this to Chief Judge LaVerdierre, Governor PaulLePage, Attorney General William Schneider, Maine State Senate President Kevin Raye, Maine StateHouse Leader Robert Nutting and Scott Davis.And she thinks that when she appears before Judge Moskowitz or any other Maine judge (you think theentire community of judges is not discussing this?) she is going to be well received? Sorry, Judy, you areone good lawyer, but you are being asked to scale Mount Everest wearing a one piece bathing suit, flipflops and a back pack with a few granola bars and some Juicy Juice. Her self-declared war reminds meof Major General William Tecumseh Shermans "March to the Sea," except that hers is a virtual marchthrough Maine, burning everything in sight.Have a good weekend.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4674 - Release Date: 12/11/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Leslie DevoeFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:17:43 -0500Judy:As you can see in the attached letter I just received from Leslie Devoe, she makes very clear that shenever authorized Handrahan to use her work-product, that Handrahan refuses her demands to take herwork-product off the internet and that Handrahan is not her friend. She was merely paid by Handrahan toattack first Igor Malenko and then Michael Waxman. This is how Lori Handrahan rolls.I would not be surprised to learn that Handrahan stiffed her just like she stiffed Maureen Flatley either,and just as she will likely stiff you as soon as your $15,000 grant has been spent.I like you Judy. I was hopeful that you might be able to use your reputation and good work to persuadeHandrahan to put down her weapons, end the war, and just learn how to be a co-parenting partner withIgor. But this web site makes it very, very clear that she has taken this way too far to go back. She hasover 30,000 people who have bought into her lies, her carefully constructed illusion that she is some kindof victim and that her child is being horribly abused. Even if she really wanted to be a mommy, she haspainted herself into a corner where she cannot just stop fighting Igor, she cannot recant these horribleaccusations, because if she did so, all these thousands of people would realize that she manipulatedthem. Do you understand what I am saying?Handrahan has made it impossible to build any kind of co-parenting relationship with Igor, she has madeit impossible to stop disparaging Igor in front of Mila. She has essentially, destroyed any chance sheotherwise had to be a parent to this little girl. No court is going to allow a parent who has sworn up and 5
  • 6. down that the other parent is a monster, who has made false accusation after false accusation, includingin court under oath, who has admitted she will take the child to Africa or Iran when she has the chance sothat the child wont have to see the horrible postings she has placed on the internet, who has dragged herpoor little girl in to hospitals repeatedly for pelvic examination after pelvic examination, urine drug testafter urine drug test, who has sacrificed her daughters innocence by teaching her to say horrible, falsethings about her father sexually abusing her, no court will permit that kind of person to have unsupervisedcontact with that child. I dont care how competent her attorney is.You cant "win" this war which Handrahan has chosen to wage. The best you could have done -- for littleMila -- would have been to persuade your client to behave rationally, get some help, and be a mommy.But she wont, she cant, hear you or anyone else deliver that message. Thank you for trying. I honestlybelieve you did.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Clifford documentsFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:00:15 -0500Judy:I just spent some time today reviewing the documents produced by DHHS, pursuant to your CliffordOrder. I dont know why you and Handrahan have been so passionate about getting these documents.They are not helpful to your client at all. Anyone scrutinizing these documents will come away with thatconclusion, I assure you, including any judge in this case.The documents show your client threatening and bullying the DHHS caseworkers, telling them sheintends to sue DHHS and that the FBI will be involved. She challenges Alicia Cummings, the DHHScaseworker looking into Handrahans claims that Igor hit Mila with a frying pan, demanding to know whereshe grew up, what her educational and work background is, insinuating that she is not competent and hassome kind of conflict of interest. She admits that she is engaged in frequent audio taping of her child.Cummings has a very hard time keeping her focused on the issue at hand, since Handrahan continues totry and give her global spin on what a monster Igor is.Although Handrahan claims that on Friday, March 25, 2011 when she picked Mila up from the day care,she had a bruise on her forehead (of course, now the "bruise" has morphed into a "huge contusion"), andalthough she claims that the day care permitted her to sit in a feces-filled diaper all day long, DHHSinterviewed the day care personnel and owner and discovered that there was NO bruise on her forehead,and that Mila was never permitted to sit in a poop-filled diaper. Indeed, the day care owner indicated thatfrom time to time when Mila napped, she had a pull-up for when she had accidents. Oh, you will alsonote that your client told DHHS that she had kept the diaper, and it was in her freezer. Seriously.Apparently, it is in there, alongside the multiple urine samples Handrahan has taken from her daughter all 6
  • 7. by herself (see the Maine Coast Memorial Hospital records, which Ild be happy to provide for you). Theday care people told DHHS that they had NO concerns about Igor, but had serious concerns about yourclient and her bizarre behavior.Also, you will see the interviews of Mila conducted by Alicia Cummings, and then another one by ChrisCall, who permitted Handrahans private investigator, Stephen Pickering, to participate. You will see thatMila was as clear as could be that Igor NEVER hit her with anything, that there were NEVER "bad times"with Igor. She said, over and over, that she knew her mother said that Igor was hurting her, but that itwas not true. It is amazing to read the interview and see how Pickering tries to trip her up, tries to get herto say that Igor did hit her with a frying pan. She stands firm and says that he did not. At this point,Pickering launches into attack mode -- WITH A FOUR YEAR OLD CHILD -- and asks her if she is lying, ifshe knows what a lie is. Pickering has no right to be conducting a forensic interview of a little girl. Milaalso tells the DHHS workers that she wants to see her momma, but only if she promises to stop sayingbad things about poppy. She also says that she does not think momma will promise to stop saying badthings about poppy.Please feel free to check out the veracity of my summary. It wont take you more than 30 minutes toreview these documents.We are prepared to go back to Court whenever you are ready, at which time, we shall be demanding thatIgor have Sole Rights and Responsibilities and that Handrahan have no contact at all with this child untilshe has undergone a comprehensive psychological evaluation by a psychologist and submitted towhatever therapy/treatment is recommended. In addition, we shall be demanding that your client pay forthe appointment of a new guardian ad litem, whose primary job will be to communicate with Handrahansmental health providers and determine when she may have contact with her child again. Your clientsweb sites will be admitted as exhibits in this hearing, as they demonstrate very convincingly what hermental state is right now.This position is not spiteful or vengeful. We would like nothing more than for Mila to have a healthyrelationship with her mother as soon as possible. But it is clear beyond peradventure to us that yourclient suffers from serious mental illness which prevents her from being a healthy and loving mother to herchild. We are very sad for Mila that she does not have her mommy in her life right now.The ball is and has been in your clients court. She can either continue to spend all of her time, energyand money on World War III against Igor, committed to destroying him and me, or she can turn over anew leaf, turn her prodigious energies and intelligence on herself, and get healthy, and be a mommy.Completely up to her. We hope that for Milas sake, she makes the right choice.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1890 / Virus Database: 2108/4680 - Release Date: 12/14/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Fwd: More Saving Mila concerns 7
  • 8. From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:42:06 -0500Oh, and this as well. This site is not helping your client, Judy. But you wont be able to convince her ofthat, I am sure. How very, very, very sad for Mila that her mother is spending every waking hour on thiswar instead of on loving her child.-----Original Message-----From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>To: megc <megc@american.edu>; ckerwin <ckerwin@american.edu>; jhoard <jhoard@american.edu>;taylor <taylor@american.edu>; lwong <lwong@american.edu>Cc: aumedia <aumedia@american.edu>; igormalenko <igormalenko@hotmail.com>; Igor-Malenko <Igor-Malenko@idexx.com>; william.j.schneider <william.j.schneider@maine.gov>; William.Stokes<William.Stokes@maine.gov>; Janice.Stuver <Janice.Stuver@maine.gov>; michael.kearney<michael.kearney@maine.gov>Sent: Sun, Dec 4, 2011 11:43 amSubject: More Saving Mila concernsPeople:Here are more responses from Saving Mila followers, discussing murdering Igor Malenko, kidnapping thechild and fleeing the United States to hide in Iran, of all places, and violently harming Michael Waxman.This site is animating loose cannons to say, and perhaps do, bad things, and AU should distance itselfcompletely from it, in my view. This is not going to end well at all.brandyowen says:December 4, 2011 at 9:58 amI understand what you are saying. This brings me back around to Karen McCall-Haslet.Seriously, if a mother KNEW UNEQUIVOCALLY that her child was being repeatedly raped, what doesshe do when the courts tell her to give her child to the rapist?I am not saying I would kill my child, BECAUSE I would kill my ex-husband and sit in prison, if I hadto. No doubt about it, I am street wise enough to know that courts f__k up. Not all of the time, but they do,it is a game of who’s lawyer golfs with the judge and I ain’t “playin” when it comes to my kids.Corrupt Judges says:December 4, 2011 at 3:47 amWe need to have a conversation like you brought up Brandy about what alternatives women have whenfaced with these situations. It becomes paralyzing because the courts have so much power. I believe alot of mothers consider running away, but realize the US can find them wherever they go – even in anycountry. I know some have thought of political asylum – even in Iran they are seeking it b/c of howabusive it is here. That is actually very unknown and secretive, but is done.Maybe you can start some articles or forum for that kind of discussion. Mothers are desperately seeking away to protect their children from abuse and there’s no where to turn.Corrupt Judges says:December 4, 2011 at 3:49 amWhen I said “even in Iran” I mean that I have heard of western people seeking asylum in Iran. Ofcourse, the news won’t cover that b/c Iran is our national enemy. But it is bad when abusedwomen and children have to seek political asylum with our country’s national enemies in order toescape abuse.And more comments about Michael Waxman on her Facebook site: 8
  • 9. Andrew Unkefer He deserves to be put into slavery in a third world country. Jail isnt justice enough forsomething like that. If I saw him, Id be the one in an orange jump suit behind bars. I cant begin tounderstand what you feel right now. Stay strong!Friday at 6:52pm · LikeUnlike · 1Saving Mila likes this.(emphasis added in bold).Word to the wise, AU, distance yourself from this site immediately. Frankly, if your students have beeninvolved in its creation, you may have to shut the site down in order to avoid any civil, and perhapscriminal, liability for the actions perpetrated by followers of the site.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1890 / Virus Database: 2108/4680 - Release Date: 12/14/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Fwd: [New post] Who is Lesley Devoe?From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:15:49 -0500Judy:I have generally reached the point where I am not responding any longer to any of Dr. Handrahansmalicious, false and misleading posts on her web site. There is no persuading her or her followers. Yourclient has fortuitously found the holy grail for narcissists - she can get all the attention she wants fromhordes of virtual followers on these sites she has created.But the post below, containing a report authored by Leslie Devoe is crossing the line for me. Devoesreport portrays me in such a negative light that I am concerned that someone may decide that he/sheneeds to take action to protect Dr. Handrahan from this sinister attorney. I know that Devoe is merelytaking Dr. Handrahans paranoid directives and running with them, creating a ridiculous picture. But thefollowers of this web site do not understand what has taken place in this case. They may merelyconclude that I am some malicious monster threatening a poor, defenseless woman trying to protect herlittle girl.I am asking you NOT to forward this email to your client, for it will simply end up on her web site andfurther inflame the passions of some of her followers. If I see it on the web site, I shall know that you didindeed forward this. I understand that she is your client and that you have responsibilities to her. Accordingly, you may feel free to tell her my message by phone. But this is becoming a very, verydangerous game, I fear. You and I have gotten along remarkably well, given how horrendous this case is. I am concerned for my well-being and that of my children and loved ones. 9
  • 10. I want this Leslie Devoe report removed, and I want it removed immediately.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Visitation?From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:05:42 -0500Judy:I have received and reviewed your letter dated November 4, 2011 indicating-- for the first time in 6 months-- that Dr. Handrahan would like to see her child. I am elated that she now seems to recognize thatseeing her childs face, holding her, telling her that she loves her is an important thing to do for herdaughter.However, since you wrote this letter, your client has embarked on a remarkable, high-tech attack on Igorand on me, in which she is illustrating that she is no longer capable of exercising good judgment, ofpromoting her own childs best interest. Indeed, she recently posted a statement which indicates thatwhen she gets her hands on this child, she intends to flee with her to Africa: "@JordansConcept No worries!I work in Internation Developement. When I get my daughter back well move to Africa and take care of baby elefantswho have lost their moms. That is Milas dream and I promised to make it real." This comment may be found onher YouTube posting of the Mila video: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=iZI1E0zaz88Accordingly, Igor is not willing to agree that Dr. Handrahan can have any visitation at all at this point. Wetruly do not know what she is capable of. Indeed, in one of the posts, a woman named Jacklyn C. Ashleywrites "[t]hat man needs to die." And following that comment, your client clicked "like." Honestly, Judy, Iam fearful that your client or someone she pulls into her world will indeed attempt to kill Igor and/or me.This is quickly getting out of control. Neither Igor nor I feel safe anywhere near your client and if sheshows up near me or Igor, we shall call the police. I am starting to wonder whether I should carry aconcealed weapon. You should see the hateful comments being made about me.I know Dr. Handrahan believes that this new approach will somehow achieve what her attorneys and hermalicious and false claims to DHHS and the Courts have not, but she is terribly mistaken. All she issucceeding in doing is scaring Igor and me and making us completely and utterly unwilling to have anycontact with her whatsoever. As we indicated on many occasions before, if Dr. Handrahan wishes torestart visitation, especially unsupervised visitation, then the onus is on her to demonstrate that she hasturned over a new leaf and merely wishes to be a loving mother, not a digital warrior.Additionally, we do not know this Joy Silberg. Also, even if this web site had not gone up, we would notbe willing to agree that Dr. Handrahan can enjoy an entire weekend with Mila, when she has not evenspoken to her or seen her in 6 months. Baby steps. Last, you claim that Dr. Handrahan "cannot afford topay anyone to supervise." Yet, this recent incredible wave of Internet activity suggests that she has 10
  • 11. plenty of money . . . but that she would rather use it for war, rather than spend it on her child. How terriblysad.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Handrahans obsessionFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:01:05 -0500Judy:Your client has clearly gone off the deep end and is using this new website as her latest toy. She isposting the emails I send to you, as you can see -- http://www.slideshare.net/MamaOfMila/e-mails-from-michael-waxman-nov-7-2011I am a big boy and I have remedies at hand to deal with your clients shenanigans. But Mila does nothave any defenses. Mila just wants to love her mommy and daddy. Dr. Handrahan has doggedlydemonstrated that she does not care very much for her daughter, that she cares much more deeply aboutwaging World War III in order to destroy Igor. She hates Igor more than she loves her child.As you know, despite Igors repeated invitations, she has chosen NOT to see or speak with her child inalmost 6 months. That is an absolute eternity. If I could not see my children for a long period of time, Iwould absolutely fall apart, and I would walk across broken glass to see them again. Not Dr. Handrahan,however.This new, high-tech approach is not helping Mila. Nor will it help your client. By the way, she owes over$6,000 in child support arrearages, yet she seems much happier spending her money on new weapons inher self-styled war.Ill check the site tomorrow to re-read this same email, I am sure. Have a good night, Judy.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: The websiteFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:33:40 -0500Judy: 11
  • 12. Is your client going to take down the website? And the YouTube postings? And the Facebook postings?And the Tumblr and Twitter postings?None of this is going to help her. It just makes her look even more crazy and desperate, in my view. Andin the meantime, she is posting defamatory material, and medical records for Igor and Mila, which Igor didnot authorize being published. I suspect that True North and DHHS will not be happy about this.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: Defamation on the InternetFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:45:05 -0500Judy:Is this website coming down or not? I need to decide whether to file for a preliminary injunction as part ofthe federal lawsuit. Please advise ASAP.MichaelTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Defamation on the InternetFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:33:49 -0500Judy:It has just come to my attention that your client has foolishly and maliciously decided to create an internetsite in which she defames Igor (and me) and in which she has posted the videos and audio tapes that shehas fraudulently concocted. This will, of course, be very helpful to Igor in his federal lawsuit, and it willhelp us obtain a very large verdict, I believe.But this is terribly harmful, not just to Igor, but also to poor Mila. Mila will now have a disgusting digitallegacy for the rest of her life.A loving mother does not behave this way. A loving mother spends her time, money and energy on lovingand supporting her child. Your client, however, is spending her time, money and energy on trying todestroy Igor and me, and she is using her daughter as a means to that end, even though she is harmingher.The website can be found here: http://lorihandrahan.com/ 12
  • 13. Now that I have printed out the contents of the website, feel free to remove it from the web. Indeed, if youcare at all about Mila Malenko, you will make sure this happens.Also, Igor has only recevied ONE child support check, for the month of September. Has your client quither job so that she can avoid paying child support?And last, DOES DR. HANDRAHAN HAVE ANY INTEREST IN VISITING WITH HER CHILD, OR INHEARING HER VOICE?MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Handrahans incessant attacksFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:37:34 -0400Judy:Attached is your clients latest attempt to harm me. Please convey to her that I have not forgotten abouther and her defamatory attacks against me. I have a list of people I intend to sue for defamation,including Dr. Handrahan, and several of her friends. I shall embark on that crusade in 2012.In the meantime, DOES DR. HANDRAHAN HAVE ANY INTEREREST AT ALL IN SEEING ORSPEAKING WITH HER ALMOST 5 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER, WITH WHOM SHE HAS HAD NOCONTACT SINCE MAY 10, 2011???Your client truly is a remarkable human being. I cannot comprehend how she can get up in the morningand function without having had any contact with her only child in almost 6 months!! She can continue tofile grievances against me, defame me as much as she wants, write as many emails to the Governor asshe desires . . . I am not going anywhere. I am going to represent Igor as long as I draw breath in thisworld. Her malicious efforts to harm have only galvanized my commitment to this case.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Expert DesignationFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:00:04 -0400Judy: 13
  • 14. I meant to send this yesterday, but it got lost in the shuffle. Do you want me to send along paper copiesby snail mail?I shall probably continue to ask this question with every single email I send you because I am mystifiedand disturbed about your clients refusal to see or speak with her child since May 10, 2011 -- does shehave any desire to see Mila on a supervised basis or to have phone contact? If you would like me to stopasking this question, then you could simply tell me that Dr. Handrahan has no interest in seeing her childunless it can be unsupervised, and that she has no interest in phone contact with her child. She isalready telling us that with her choices, but Id like to see that in black and white. Otherwise, Ill keepasking.To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Moving off the dime . . .From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:05:24 -0400Judy:I am following up on our hearing today with Judge Moskowitz, in which he denied your Motion to Recuse.As you know, he made another heartfelt effort to get us to resolve this case in some manner, byagreement. He indicated that since our clients tell diametrically opposed stories, that if we have a hearing"it is going to go very, very badly for one of them." I am very confident that you will be unable to provethat Igor has been abusing Mila at all, or that he has been poisoning her. I am very confident that yourclient will be stripped of rights and responsibilities (except of course, her obligation to pay child support),and relegated to supervised visits.You asked me to tell you what kind of psychotherapeutic treatment, in terms of how many visits, Igorwould require in order to permit unsupervised contact. I tried to explain to you that it is not a matter oflogging a certain number of hours on a therapists couch. Rather, Igor needs to see some evidencewhich makes him feel comfortable/confident that Dr. Handrahan is no longer committed to using Mila as apawn in her campaign against Igor. As the Ombudsman indicated, and as I have been saying for months,she has been bringing Mila in for unnecessary medical examinations, and drug tests, and she has beensaying false, negative things about Igor to Mila and taping and video-taping Mila reciting thesefalsehoods. That is very damaging to this child.Nothing that Dr. Handrahan has done recently has made Igor feel any more comfortable that Dr.Handrahan has abandoned her quest to destroy him and his relationship with his daughter, or that shehas abandoned the notion of using her daughter as a means to that end. Indeed, the fact that she hasabsolutely refused to see or speak with her child in over 5 months only supports Igors concerns/fears thatDr. Handrahan cares a great deal more about her private war with Igor than she does about her child.Seriously, how a parent can go that long without contact with her child is absolutely inconceivable to me.If your client wants Igor to agree that she can have unsupervised contact with Mila, then she needs tocarry the ball forward and produce some evidence that she is able to be a healthy, safe mother to herchild. Hiring child lobbyists, assembling teams of experts, overwhelming the Governors Office, DHHSand the Office of the Ombudsman with information and supporters all claiming that Igor is some kind ofabusive monster is NOT showing Igor that she really wants to be a healthy, safe mom.Presently, Igor is not going to agree to unsupervised visitation. The Ombudsman recommended DHHSopen a full investigation into Dr. Handrahan and the emotional well-being of Mila in her care. As far as Iam concerned, unless you can provide information which convincingly shows that Dr. Handrahan hasturned over a new leaf, Igor should not change his position at all. Your client cannot buy her way out of 14
  • 15. this, or hire another expert to prevail. Instead, she needs to turn her focus inward and try to heal herselfso that she can be a good mom to her child.In the meantime, if your client has any interest in seeing Mila, or in speaking with her, we are happy tomake that happen. Of course, the visitation would have to be supervised. But as between no contact andsome supervised contact, I know which choice 99.999999% of all parents would choose. She is nothelping herself or her child by refusing to have contact with Mila. That choice labels her as an uncaringmother, at least in my view, and that is certainly the argument I shall make to the Court. For Milasbenefit, and because it is in your clients interest not to appear to be an uncaring mother, I suggest yourclient make visitation and contact happen as soon as possible.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>Date: Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:56 PMSubject: Ombudsman ReportTo: micki.mullen@maine.gov, mary.mayhew@maine.gov, kathy.veilleux@maine.gov,paul.lepage@maine.gov, daniel.i.billings@maine.govCc: moflatley@gmail.com, kingeil656@aol.com, roxanna.z.sherwood@abc.com,macrory@appletonluff.com, stephenp2@myfairpoint.net, jmeier@law.gwu.eduGovernor LePage, Ms. Mayhew, Ms. Mullen, Ms. Veiilleux and Mr. Billings:Please review the attached report from the Office of the Ombudsman carefully. I hope that you will ceasereflexively doing Dr. Handrahans bidding whenever she and/or her numerous advisors, attorneys andfriends contact you in the future.I also hope that DHHS will conduct the investigation which the Office of the Ombudsman stronglysuggested ought to be conducted into Dr. Handrahan. Indeed, if DHHS refuses to follow-up on this reportand open such an investigation, I shall be filing my own complaint with the Office of the Ombudsman.Enough is enough. Either this administration is committed to protecting children from abuse -- physical aswell as emotional -- or it is not.And one last word, because I am sure that Dr. Handrahan will react to this with new accusations -- I donot know Mr. Crocker or Ms. Mowatt. I have never met either of them. I have not paid them money ormade threats against them. They have no reason to write this report in any particular way, other than toreflect the conclusions which the facts led them to reach. I wish I were one one hundredth as powerful asDr. Handrahan claims that I am. I cant even get my kids to clean their rooms!!Michael J. Waxman, Esq. 15
  • 16. One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Ombudsman ReportFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:58:06 -0400Judy:I have now read the report a second time, and I must direct your attention to the penultimate page, wherethe report reads as follows: "We suggest that DHHS should further investigate the actions of Dr.Handrahan in relation to the emotional health of her daughter. We suggest that, in addition to acomprehensive Child Protective Services Investigation, DHHS specifically consider the following:" Thereport goes on to list 6 separate concerns regarding Dr. Handrahan.It is my hope and belief that DHHS will soon be investigating Dr. Handrahan. This recommendation is acomplete vindication of Igors position regarding contact since May 10, 2011. Igor will not be changing hismind about this unless and until 1) a DHHS investigation is concluded and/or 2) Dr. Handrahan seeks andreceives help in order to change her attitude and behaviors. Igor merely wants to feel confident that Milais safe in Dr. Handrahans care. He does not feel that she is at this point in time, at least notunsupervised.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Ombudsman ReportFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:41:47 -0400 16
  • 17. Judy:Attached is the Ombudsmans second report. As you might expect, if and when we have any hearing onrights and responsibilities and custody, the material in this report will be centrally discussed. As I view it,this report completely supports the steps Mr. Malenko has taken to protect his child from unnecessarymedical examinations, drug testing, and audio and video recording.I dont say these things to gloat. Mila misses her mommy, I am sure. Igor wants his child to have bothparents in her life. Dr. Handrahan needs to start seeing and speaking with her child again, as soon aspossible. For now, Igor will not permit her to do so unsupervised. But if she takes serious steps toaddress whatever issues are compelling her to use her daughter as a tool to harm Igor, our hope is thatunsupervised visits will follow. But we need to see evidence that Dr. Handrahan is truly making an effortto change her attitude and behavior. Thus far, we have seen no such evidence.Indeed, now that American University is garnering her wages for child support, we are concerned that shewill simply quit her job to avoid this obligation. Obviously, that also would negatively affect Mila and wouldbe sad. I hope this does not occur.Oh, and just to nip your clients paranoia in the bud, I received this report not because I am conspiringwith the Ombudsmans Office, but because since I learned of this investigation, I sent the office asubpoena to produce this report, which you could just as easily have done. I do not possess theremarkable powers which your client seems to believe I wield. I am a small, Jewish lawyer with a bigmouth. Thats all.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Marco PetrovicFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:16:47 -0400Judy:I have now had several phone calls from a gentleman named "Marco Petrovic." This individual is fromSerbia and apparently Dr. Handrahan played some part in assisting him in getting to this country severalyears ago. He works at the Jetport, is married and has a couple of children, I believe. 17
  • 18. The reason he has called me is that he claims he feels harassed by your client and by her privateinvestigator Stephen Pickering. Apparently, Dr. Handrahan sends him numerous emails and texts, andPickering continues to demand that Petrovic make himself available to be interviewed by Pickering.Petrovic told me that he has nothing but good things to say about Igor, and that he has refusedHandrahans demands to say bad things about Igor. Both your client and Pickering haveapparently ignored what he claims are his numerous directives to stop calling and texting him.I am telling you these things because I suspect that Handrahan is trying to conjure some kind of"statement" from Petrovic which makes false claims that 1) Petrovic has personal knowledge of Igor andhis parenting (Igor has not seen him in over a year), and 2) that Igor is doing bad things to Mila. If such a"statement" is presented to you, I implore you as an officer of the Court to do some fact-checking of yourown before filing any such statement or affidavit in Court, because from what I have just explained, itwould clearly be a false statement. It is one thing for Dr. Handrahan to willingly perjure herself, as shehas done on multiple occasions, seemingly without hesitation or contrition. It is entirely somethingdifferent to manipulate a well-respected attorney to be complicit in filing false statements with the Court.Incidentally, I suspect that once your client learns of this email, she will immediately begin efforts to getMr. Petrovic deported because that is precisely how she rolls. Mark my words . . .I had hoped that your client would lay down her arms at some point and just be a mommy to her little girl,instead of continuing to fund and plan World War III. I had hoped that perhaps you and I could help thisfamily divest itself of acrimony and blackness and focus on what matters -- a little girl who deserves tohave both of her parents in her life in a big way. Apparently your client hates Igor far, far, far more thanshe loves her daughter. It is far more important to her to crush Igor and me and anyone else who standsin her way than to find a way to love her daughter. Very, very, very, very sad.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Medical Bills?From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:35:04 -0400Judy:I just received the attached letter and bills from your daughter. I am confused. First, these bills are frommonths ago, and it may well be too late to obtain payment from the insurance company. Second, whereare the medical records which accompany these bills? No insurance company is going to pay bills if itdoes not know what services the bills were provided for. If this treatment was necessitated by an injury 18
  • 19. caused by a third party there may be subrogation rights. Furthermore, the services might not even becovered und the terms of the insurance contract.Accordingly, please provide me with the medical records for the services which resulted in these bills.When I have that information, I shall have Igor address payment with his insurance company, although Isuspect it will be too late at that point.See, this is why Shared Rights and Responsibilities is not working here. If Dr. Handrahan hadcommunicated with Igor before, during or after the treatment, this situation never would have arisen. Butbecause these bills are likely just part of your clients ridiculous and malicious quest to stigmatize Igor asa child abuser, she did not bother to share with him anything about these visits.Remarkable. Maybe you guys could ask the Governor or Maureen Flatley to help with this? Shoot, shemight have to pay Flatley the over $2,000 she owes her, though. :( I know . . . perhaps a letter writingcampaign. Or better yet, why not ask Stephanie Anderson/FBI to prosecute me for more crimes? MaybeNightline or Dateline could help? Most assuredly Stephen Pickering could find a way to dig up some dirton me, Igor, Moskowitz, Dalton, Despard, Mills, Crocker, Rabbi Sky and Obama. Oh, and please DOencourage your client to continue to write to the Governor and his assistants, because it makes forwonderfully entertaining reading.Judy, I like you but I am so sick of your clients shenanigans I could scream. I hope she is paying youwell.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: HandrahanFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:34:16 -0400Judy:1. It has now been 4 months and a week since Dr. Handrahan has seen or spoken with her child. Doesshe have any interest in having contact with her daughter on a supervised basis and/or phone calls withher child?2. Is your client going to pay ANY child support at ANY time? I understand you and she claim she shouldbe paying less, based on her new income figures, but why is she not at least paying the amount the ChildSupport Tables would require based on the new income figures?MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11 19
  • 20. To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Child SupportFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:20:57 -0400Judy:Your client has not paid child support for months and months. I understand that she feels the childsupport order should be amended to reflect her present income, instead of her income in January, 2011.But why is she not at least paying the child support required using the Child Support Tables and herpresent income? Generally, I try very hard to keep child support issues and custody issues separate, andI detest it when parents mingle the two and say things like, "when you pay me the child support you oweme, you can see the kids." We are not making visitation or contact at all dependent on receiving childsupport.However, Igor would like to enroll Mila in a day care school. Your client claims that she cares a great dealabout her daughters education. Lets take her at her word -- please direct your client to make childsupport payments so that Mila can enjoy a school experience this year. Igor does not make enoughmoney to pay for this on his own, especially when he is responsible for 100% of Milas financial needs.In this case, I do intend to explain to the Court that although your client claims to love this child and wantnothing but the best for her, she absolutely refuses to pay ANY child support, which seems inconsistentwith her expressions of love and care. It really would be best for all if your client paid child supportimmediately.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: Settlement discussions?From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:51:31 -0400A solution to your concerns about the confidentiality of your clients medical records struck me just now. Ifwe agreed to the appointment of a GAL, paid for by your client, then the GAL could be in charge ofreviewing those records and making a recommendation to the Court as to whether your client is makingtherapeutic progress such that unsupervised visitation could occur. We would likely agree with whateverrecommendations a good GAL makes. Whaddya think?To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Settlement discussions?From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:54:23 -0400Judy: 20
  • 21. You sent me an email last week about unsupervised visitation and treatment, and I sent you a response.Is your client willing to stop the war and enter treatment?MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: Settlement discussions?From: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:51:23 -0400Judy:The judge tried to focus us on ending this war. You wanted to engage with me about a short cut for yourclient to see Mila unsupervised. Igor has no objection to your client taking a direct and possibly evenshort path to unsupervised visitation. But the condition precedent to that happening is not some finiteperiod of time but rather a clear illustration from Dr. Handrahan that she is committed to ending this warand being a nurturing mother, not a warrior. What can you tell me/show me about that?And . . . Mila has not seen or spoken with her mother since May 10, 2011. Why doesnt your client wishto see her child and talk to her, under ANY circumstances? Seriously. The choice Dr. Handrahan ismaking NOT to see or speak to her daughter, but rather to use her time and resources to fight a war withIgor speaks volumes about her priorities. Please encourage Dr. Handrahan to see her child, as soon aspossible.MichaelTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: ResponseFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comDate: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:35:23 -0400Judy:Thanks for your email. I wish I could just give you a quick answer, but nothing aboutthis case is simple. As I said in Judge Moskowitzs chambers to you on Monday -- if youcan help stop this war, and help little Mila have two parents in her life, Igor and I shall beforever grateful to you.I take from your email that perhaps Dr. Handrahan is willing to enter a treatmentprogram, and I am heartened to hear that, because that might help her sincerelyunderstand that all Igor has done or wanted to do is love this child and ensure that sheis treated with love and care by all those around her. Of course, we need to be 21
  • 22. confident that the treater is qualified and will be given the relevant materials, not simplysome unilaterally chosen tidbits. This war is of Dr. Handrahans making, not Igors. Itarises out of Dr. Handrahans relentless campaign to destroy Igor, and to use an armyof people to secure this result. It is true that we have recently taken the offensive byfiling a federal lawsuit, but as I mentioned to you, we would happily dismiss that if wefelt confident that Dr. Handrahan will stop her remarkable offensive against Igor. Igorslawsuit and my advocacy on his behalf is merely a reaction to Dr. Handrahansextraordinary efforts to brand Igor an abuser, a child molester, a man who poisons hischild with methamphetamines, and her efforts to destroy him and his relationship withMIla.As the natural guardian of this child, Igor has a weighty responsibility to protect her.Your client has been using Mila as a means to destroy Igor by briinging her to hospitalsfor unnecessary examinations and unnecessary drug tests. She has been telling herfalse things about her father abusing her, and video taping and audio taping her childreciting such things. We need to hear that she will stop doing these things. We need tohear that she will stop making these false and malicious claims. We need to hear andbe convinced that she has seen the light about this. Igor is a loving parent. Thats all.He would never harm his child. We need to hear that your client will stop making claimsthat "it is not a matter of IF Igor will kill Mila, but rather WHEN." Perhaps you are notaware that she has done and said these things. If you want, I can easily supply youwith email after email illustrating your client doing all these things.Dr. Handrahan needs to stop directing Stephen Pickering to investigate Igor, contactDHHS, including Commissioner Mayhew, trying to cause trouble for Igor.Dr. Handrahan needs to stop using Maureen Flatley to cause trouble for Igor.Dr. Handrahan needs to stop using Justice for Children, including Joan Meier andEileen King to cause trouble for Igor.Dr. Handrahan needs to stop putting together "panels of experts" to influence DHHS to"substantiate" Igor for abuse.Dr. Handrahan needs to stop making claims to DHHS that Igor is abusing Mila in anyway.Dr. Handrahan needs to pay Igor child support arrearages and enter into an agreedupon amount that can be sent to him by direct deposit. That she has chosen to spendthousands of dollars on mercenaries to destroy Igor, but has not paid child support soher child can attend pre-school is simply unconscionable.If Dr. Handrahan can persuade us that she is taking a new path, that she truly isabandoning this jihad against Igor, then he and his new wife will happily meet Dr.Handrahan in the middle and do what is best for Mila, so that she can have both parentsin her life. The agreement about treatment is only one item that will demonstrate to Igor 22
  • 23. that Dr. Handrahan sincerely is ready to end this war. The burden at this point is on Dr.Handrahan to convince us that she is turning over a new leaf and wants to be a mommore than she wants to be involved in a war to destroy Igor. The burden is on Dr.Handrahan to show us that she will love Mila and not use her as a means to hurt Igor,harming her daughter in the process. We sincerely hope that this is her intention, butwe have yet to see any evidence supporting this notion.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: MilaFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:37:48 -0400Judy:I understand that your client thinks Igor has no right to insist on supervised visitation and that it isoffensive to her rather well-developed ego to have to endure such an "embarrassing" situation. I get that.Such a restraint would have greatly angered me as well, if that had ever happened.But, the issue of most importance to all of us in this case should be the welfare of a little girl who has notseen or had ANY contact with her mother since May 10, 2011. Mila has called many times, and yourclient has failed to pick the phone up or call back. Mila has sent post-cards and other mailings and yourclient has not even acknowledged receipt of same. Your client claims in emails that she will send Milapackages. She does not. Your client does not send child support, yet does not make any inquiry aboutwhether Mila has what she needs. Clearly, and sadly, she is more concerned with building a case againstIgor and destroying him than she is about spending time with her daughter and making sure that her littlegirl knows her mommy loves her, misses her and thinks about her all the time.When your client filed a false and retaliatory PFA Complaint on May 23, 2008, just after Igor had servedher with a divorce complaint, Igor was required to endure supervised visits for 8 months!! He never, evermissed ONE visit at Connections for Kids, and Mila enjoyed every single visit. Also, when those visits gowell, the supervisors take great notes, and can be called as witnesses to attest to the good parenting 23
  • 24. illustrated. That could help your client convince a court that she is on the right path, that her priorities arealigned appropriately.I suspect that your client will not be able to do what is best for her daughter because the very idea ofsupervised visits offends her. That is truly a shame. I would do ANYTHING to see my kids, under thesame circumstances, and most good parents would as well. Her refusal to communicate with her child isstriking and sad.We remain open to supervised visitation at Connections for Kids. Let me know if we can begin.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: HearingFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:37:46 -04001. Thanks.2. The pros are that everyone is right there in the courtroom and can get on the witness stand fast; also,with someone like Kaplan especially, no sequestration means he could sit and observe (even before hetestifies) and then his testimony can be informed by what he has heard. The cons might be that a witnesswould conform his testimony to be consistent with what someone else said before him/her. I am notworried about that in this case. Each side pretty much knows what the other side is going to say. Notmany surprises in this case, where the email trail is HUGE!3. Word to the wise about what Moskowitz thinks on timing -- he will likely tell us each how much time wehave (and keep in mind the cross you do counts towards your time), and he wont budge much on that, sobe surgeon-like in your choices. Ken whined about not having enough time, and Moskowitz did notlisten. Dont assume hell listen to you, just because you are nicer than Ken! :)4. I shall spend time this week reviewing that large stack and picking a select few of the documents. Illlet you know which ones I anticipate using, by Bates Stamp number as soon as I am able.Oh, I asked Moskowitzs clerk last week which side goes first, and she did not know. I was assuming Iwould, since I filed Motions first (back in April), but I could be mistaken. Im going to try and find that out,as it may affect how each of us decides to try this case.----- Original Message -----From: MjwaxyTo: judy356@msn.com 24
  • 25. Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:45 PMSubject: HearingJudy:As far as I know, we are still on for Monday. Issues to address/agree on:1. I have an executed Summons showing service of your Motion for Contempt was effected today, andwe shall waive any argument or objection based on insufficient or improper service of process. I expectyou will do the same, as we discussed.2. I think we should agree to NO sequestration of the witnesses to speed things along. We did this forthe divorce trial as well and it helped the trial go smoother in my view. Please let me know if you agree.3. As far as anticipated witnesses on my end, I foresee 3 or 4. Igor and his partner, Lily, Kathy Rogersfrom North Atlantic Montessori (I subpoenaed her), and possibly Beth Angle. The first three woulddiscuss what you would expect them to discuss. Beth Angle is a friend of Igors and has spent time withMila on numerous occasions. She will testify about her observations of Mila over time, particularly howshe has been doing the last several months.4. You have most of the exhibits I shall be admitting, including a number of the documents found in theFOAA production from the Governors Office.Can you please address these numbered comments, so that I know your position? Thanks.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: KaplanFrom: mjwaxy@aol.comDate: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:08:13 -0400Judy:Please reconsider my request to have your expert disclose the names of cases in which hehas testified in court and/or depositions as an expert witness. This is required under thefederal rules. See F.R. Civ. P. 26(2)(v) ("a list of all other cases in which, during theprevious 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition"). If I had achance to depose this expert, chosen by you, I certainly would have asked these questions. 25
  • 26. I can only assume, since you directed your client to this particular expert (see report, page1), that you are familiar with his expert witness qualifications. With all due respect, I do notthink it is fair for you to choose this guy, based on what you know of his background, andthen deny me very general and routine information.I would like to call the other attorneys involved in cases he has testified in, get copies of histestimony, and make strategy decisions about whether and/or how to cross examine him. Yes, I can voir dire him at the hearing, but that is a waste of time (we only have a total ofthree hours, I believe), and it does not give me sufficient time to evaluate and makestrategic decisions.Accordingly, please reconsider your position. Thanks.Have a good night.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: KaplanDate: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:44:52 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comHeres why the medical records are relevant -- Igor was completely unaware until about 2 months agothat Handrahan had brought his child to the Maine Coast Memorial Hospital on 15 separate occasions in19 months. Handrahan never informed him. Also, he was unaware that she brought the child in for drugtests on her urine at Maine Coast Memorial Hospital and the Eleanor W. Dixon Clinic on 18 separateoccasions. Handrahan never told him. We did not discover this until I sent a request for medical recordsto the hospital. The decisions any parent makes about medical treatment clearly have a direct impact onthe welfare of the child. That Handrahan did not bother to share any of this with Igor is reprehensible. That she had her examined and evaluated and tested for conditions that did not exist is worse thanreprehensible.To: judy356@msn.comSubject: KaplanDate: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 12:57:42 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comJudy:I may not object to Dr. Kaplan testifying. Have not decided yet. He is clearly qualified, in the Daubertmanner as an expert. And I suppose what he has to say would be "relevant," even if I think his opinionsare easily impeachable. So, I am leaning towards offering no objection.Can we agree that my certified medical records from Maine Coast Memorial Hospital from August 2, 2009to March 27, 2011 come in under the statute? 26
  • 27. And I shall have a set of documents from the FOAA request to the Governor available for you to pick uplater this afternoon. Ill shoot you an email with the cost of the copying. I expect to use some of thedocuments in that stack as well, during the hearing.Last (for now), will your client attend the hearing?Thanks.No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>Date: Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:23 AMSubject: Executive meddling in judicial functions?To: moflatley@gmail.comCc: igormalenko@hotmail.com, Igor-Malenko@idexx.com, daniel.i.billings@maine.gov,governor@maine.gov, mary.mayhew@maine.gov, dick.woodbury@legislature.maine.gov,daniel.r.despard@maine.gov, micki.mullen@maine.gov, gkesich@pressherald.com,tmaxwell@pressherald.com, dhench@pressherald.com, beem@gwi.net, mmoretto@theforecaster.net,bnemitz@pressherald.comDear Ms. Maureen Flatley:I have just obtained a large production of electronic correspondence from the Office of the Governor inMaine, pursuant to a Freedom of Access Act request I made some weeks ago. I learned that you havebeen engaged by Dr. Handrahan, and I have reviewed several emails from and to you concerning yourefforts to pressure the Governor to conduct some kind of "intervention" in the Malenko v. Handrahanmatter. I have noted that Micki Mullen has claimed that the Governor agrees such extraordinary andunconstitutional measures are appropriate -- "The Governor agrees that intervention is necessary, and hewill work with Mary [Mayhew, Commissioner of DHHS] to give her whatever support and backing sheneeds." See email from Micki Mullen to Lori Handrahan dated June 8, 2011, copied to HandrahansPrivate Investigator Stephen Pickering.I cannot tell from your biographical data on the web, but it appears that you are not an attorney.Nonetheless, I would hope that you would understand that our democratic republic is governed by 3separate branches of government, and that the executive branch of government does not have the rightto meddle in and affect the judicial branch, except in rare cases, such as granting reprieves and pardons.See Article II, section 2 of the United States Constitution, and Article V, section 11 of the MaineConstitution. There is a very famous case entitled Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803) in which this "separation of powers" theme was developed and expounded upon. Here is alink to a summary of that case -- http://www.lawnix.com/cases/marbury-madison.htmlI know that you have personally done a great deal of good in your career and developed a reputation forfighting for the rights of children. I am surprised, therefore, that you would lend your voice and yourreputation to Dr. Handrahan in this case. You cannot possibly have informed yourself about this case,otherwise you would realize that Dr. Handrahans war, which you have joined as yet another mercenary,does not have a little girls welfare as its ultimate goal. Igor Malenko is a gentle, kind, nurturing, hard-working father, not some demonic, violent monster as Dr. Handrahan portrays him. Dr. Handrahanshysterical, malicious and paranoid rants have defamed and criticized virtually every single person whohas not agreed to do her bidding. Perhaps you should read some of the court decisions from this terriblecustody battle before you commit to giving Dr. Handrahan any further assistance.In particular, you should read: 27
  • 28. 1. The initial decision by our highest court emanating from the Malenko/Handrahan custody battle: http://www.courts.state.me.us/court_info/opinions/2009%20documents/09me96ma.pdf2. Then, you should probably turn to Judge Alexanders excellent decision in the case brought againstme, based on Handrahans malicious falsehoods, for this summarizes the case quite well: http://www.courts.state.me.us/court_info/opinions/documents/Bar-10-5WaxmanOrder.pdf3. You should also read Handrahans ill-fated appeal of a baseless and malicious PFA she filed againstMr. Malenko: http://www.courts.state.me.us/court_info/opinions/2011%20documents/11me15ha.pdf.4. Next, you really ought to read the decision from Judge Moskowitz on February 1, 2011 taking custodyaway from Handrahan and transferring it to Malenko. See attached "PRDecision."5. I have also attached Judge Jane Bradleys decision dismissing Dr. Handrahans merit-less Protectionfrom Harassment case against me. See waxman.PFHDecision.pdf.I share with you the laudable goal of protecting and helping children, who often have no voice. See page71 of the most recent Maine Bar Journal, http://www.mainebar.org/images/temppdf/MBJspng2011.pdf. Ihave four wonderful children myself, including one daughter. Their mother and I, who have been divorcedfor 11 years, are great friends who coparent about as well as anyone I have ever met. My kids areamazing human beings.Neither Mr. Malenko nor I would ever do anything to harm any child. Mila is well taken care of and wellloved by Igor. Dr. Handrahans claims are false and malicious.No amount of money is worth harming a child, which is precisely what Dr. Handrahan has been doing toher little girl, and what you are helping her to do again. Please accept my invitation to inform yourselfproperly about this case before doing any further work on behalf of Dr. Handrahan. If you like, I can sharewith you the certified medical records from Maine Coast Memorial Hospital in Ellsworth Maine showingthat in about a 19 month period, Dr. Handrahan brought her child to the hospital emergency department15 times including poking, prodding and taking pictures of her vagina, and also dragged her in for 18separate drug tests on this little girls urine. I can show you the DHHS report dated April 29, 2011 whichnot only unsubstantiates the claims by Dr. Handrahan about Igor hitting Mila in the head with a metalfrying pan, but also notes that Mila twice indicated in forensic interviews with properly trained DHHScaseworkers, that she knows her papa did not hit her, she knows her mother claims that he did, and sheknows her mothers claims are false. Indeed, her mother even made her recite these falsehoods into arecording device. This is emotional and physical abuse.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11 28
  • 29. To: judy356@msn.comSubject: StuffDate: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:35:51 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comGood morning Judy:Nice meeting your husband this morning. :)Ok, I plan on placing Bates Stamp numbers on the fairly voluminous documents I received on Friday fromthe Governor and then making a copy for you. It looks like about 1,000 pages to me. And, incidentally, itreflects a REMARKABLE, sustained, well-funded and well-connected effort by your client to destroy Igor.It has convinced me that no matter what you or I may agree on, she is completely incapable of ceasingand desisting from engaging in this war. She has criticized and attacked virtually every single person whohas not done precisely what she wants, including Dan Despard, Brenda Harvey, Karen Simone, MichaelWaxman, Judge Moskowitz, Judge Alexander, Rebecca Austin, etc. etc. She claims that MichaelWaxman actually "ghost wrote" Judge Alexanders decision, as well as some or all of Judge Moskowitzsdecisions. She and her friends claim that I have engaged in insurance fraud and witness tampering. Sheconvened a meeting of 20 people, including her "panel of experts," with DHHS on May 31, 2011, includinga Power Point presentation. She claims to have a connection to Vice President Biden. She hasdemanded that Governor LePage conduct some kind of "intervention," constitutional separation ofpowers be damned.And she did all or much of this while completely ignoring her own child. If she had spent any smallfraction of the time, energy and money that she threw at her "panel of experts" and her privateinvestigator, and her "child lobbyist," Maureen Flatley on enjoying visitation and contact with her child, wewould not be here.This production of documents from the Governor is very, very helpful and instructive about how Dr.Handrahan operates and what her motivations are. She is trying desperately to have Igor deported, aswell, even though she denied this under oath on January 14, 2011. How would having her fatherdeported back to Macedonia be in Milas best interest?Judy, you and I will get along fine, and be respectful of one another. But your client has been driving thisbus to the edge of the cliff and I cannot stop the vehicle from going over the cliff at this point. Neither canyou, I do not believe.MichaelNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation?Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:06:57 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comJudy:Yes, all of the parameters would be mutual except for the last one. 29
  • 30. And yes, I was thinking of unsupervised visits if we could get this Order.___________________________________________________________________________To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation?Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:36:38 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comJudy:I am intrigued by, and interested in, discussing a global end to the war, including dropping all law suits,dismissing all motions, agreeing on an appropriate amount of child support to be paid by direct depositevery single week as well as taking care of arrearages. Such a denouement would absolutely be in Milasbest interest. Indeed, I suspect that if these two could agree to go down this path, Mila could start toenjoy a normal life, being raised and loved by two smart, passionate, loving people.As you and Lori must understand, Michael Waxman is not going anywhere, and I shall continue to take allnecessary legal steps to protect Igor and Mila and their beautiful bond. But I would much rather spendmy time on other cases. :)Let me just lay out some of the basic parameters of any such agreement to get a feel for whether or notIgor and Lori might be able to envision light at the end of the tunnel.1. Lori terminates her engagement/employment of Private Investigator Stephen Pickering and agrees notto engage any other PIs.2. Lori agrees that she will not take Mila in for any more drug tests on her urine, hair, feces or any otherbody part or fluid.3. Lori agrees to drop her claims that Igor is poisoning Mila with methamphetamines or any other drugs.4. Lori agrees that she will not bring Mila in to any hospital Emergency Department for any condition thatis not an emergency.5. Lori agrees to find and use a primary care physician for Mila to see for run-of-the-mill conditions, wellchecks, essentially anything short of emergent care.6. Lori agrees to engage with Igor through email regarding Mila -- including where she intends to travelwith her (including actual addresses and contact numbers), how she is doing generally, and including anyconcerns about her well-being.7. Lori agrees that she will not disparage Igor, nor will she permit others to disparage Igor, in Milaspresence or hearing.8. Lori agrees that she will not file or have others file any further DHHS claims regarding Igor.9. Lori agrees to engage and pay the retainer for a Parenting Coordinator like Tommie Burke to resolveany parenting issues that may arise, so that we do not return to filing motion after motion in the future.In exchange for such written promises, which Id like as part of an Order from the Court, Igor would agreeto dismiss the Motion to Modify seeking Sole Rights and Responsibilities, the Motion for Contempt, andthe Federal lawsuit. Again, as part of this, we would agree to a weekly child support amount, to be doneby direct deposit, as well as an amount to be paid for the arrearages that have accumulated. 30
  • 31. I have not even run this by Igor yet, but I suspect that if I tell him we are trying to craft an agreementwhich offers Mila the chance to have the warfare between her parents end, and offers her the chance toenjoy both parents in her life without all the nastiness of the past several years, he would jump at this.Please consider this, discuss it with your client, and get back to me. This would be the greatest gift Milacould ever receive.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.usTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Fwd: May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation?Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:47:14 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comThis email highlights the issues that MUST be addressed if we are to find a way to make things better forMila. This war needs to stop. Mila keeps getting hit by the cross fire. Can you do anything to help get atruce declared . . . for MIla?Thanks. Michael-----Original Message-----From: igor malenko <igormalenko@hotmail.com>To: lorihandrahan5@gmail.comCc: mjwaxy@aol.comSent: Tue, Jul 26, 2011 8:32 amSubject: RE: May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation?Lori,We need to have a discussion about the elephant in the room -- you disparaging me to Mila, making falseclaims about me, coaching Mila to say false things into a recording device, and you bringing Mila in forunnecessary medical examinations and drug tests. These are the reasons that I have decided to preventyou from having unsupervised contact with Mila. This is physical and emotional abuse.You may feel great about how yesterday went for you, but Judge Moskowitz has not yet seen theevidence of the elephant in the room, which he will see at the next hearing.I dont want Mila separated from her mother. I want Mila and you to have a healthy relationship. But thatcannot happen if everytime you are with her, you and the people around you are saying bad things aboutme, tormenting our lives with false abuse claims and dragging Mila in for unnecessary medicalexaminations and drug tests.You have never once discussed this issue with me. It is not going away just because we no longer havea PFH Order against you. 31
  • 32. If you refuse to have this discussion, then I will continue to offer you only supervised visits with Mila.From: lorihandrahan5@gmail.comTo: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comSubject: May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation?Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:15:00 -0400Igor,May I pick-up Mila on Friday for visitation? If so, what time and where.No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: StuffDate: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:20:17 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comJudy:Good job today. I think your decision to announce to Moskowitz that we were not going to adhere to theletter of the Court Order no matter what was very, very smart. That got him in a pissy mood, I think.In any case, lets get our clients served. In Igors Motions, the Order from Mulhern specifically permits meto serve both Motions on you (with an Acceptance in my view), and then the Court will schedule ahearing. Lemme know when you want to serve Igor and I can have him come by my office or yours toaccept it.Regarding visitation and contact between Mila and Lori, we honestly DO want Mila to have contact. Iwould suggest that Lori and Igor make some kind of arrangement for when Lori can call to speak with Milaor vice versa, several times each week. If Lori wants supervised visitation, we are willing to make thathappen. Igor will not under any circumstances permit Lori to enjoy unsupervised contact. In my mind,supervised contact is better than nothing. Igor has been forced to do this in the past, and he movedheaven and earth to enjoy that visitation several times per week. It may not be what Lori wants, but it iscertainly what Mila needs.Let me know if you need my help in trying to set something up.Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 fax 32
  • 33. www.waxmanlaw.usNo virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: recordings of Mila talking about pan to headDate: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:46:05 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comThis recording really upsets me, Judy. A parent who would coach her 4 year old daughter to say suchthings is truly beyond help, I fear. I know she sees this as some kind of cataclysmic struggle betweengood and evil, which she will do anything to win, but thats not at all what this is.If your client could find a way to become emotionally healthy, to co-parent her little girl with Igor, then Milawould have been given the greatest gift she could ever receive. I truly believe that very shortly JudgeMoskowitz will grant Igor Sole Rights. I dont say this to gloat. I am saying it because what happens toher rights to be with her daughter ARE COMPLETELY WITHIN HER CONTROL. If your client concededthat she had some mental health issues to address, and then if she were committed to addressing them,there could be a happy ending to this debacle.No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11To: judy356@msn.comSubject: Re: (no subject)Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:05:04 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.comCorrect. That requirment was imposed by the custodial father, since it is his obligation to protect his childfrom abuse.I dont understand how anything these individuals may have to say is relevant to whether your clientengaged in Harassment on June 21, 2011. But bring along whomever you want, by all means.MichaelTo: judy356@msn.comSubject: Court letter requesting MoskowitzDate: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:42:14 -0400From: mjwaxy@aol.comCC: igormalenko@hotmail.com; Igor-Malenko@idexx.com 33
  • 34. Judy:This goes out today.MichaelP.S. Is your client planning on attending this hearing?No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4703 - Release Date: 12/25/11-----Original Message-----From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:46:11To: <judy356@msn.com>Cc: <igormalenko@hotmail.com>; <Igor-Malenko@idexx.com>Subject: Outstanding MotionsJudy:I have received your Motion for Contempt (Igor allegly keeping child fromHandrahan) and your Motion to Enforce (visitation). Interestiingly, you indicatethat child support is not an issue, when in fact, your client owes approximately$5,000 in child support, I believe.As you may or may not be aware, Igor filed a Motion to Modify (seeking SoleRights and Responsibilities after he learned of the false allegations Handrahanmade about hitting Mila in the head with a frying pan, the forced statements intoa recording device to that effect, and the disgusting and unnecessary medicalevaluations and examinations, including multiple urine catches and drug tests) onApril 10, 2011, and a Motion for Contempt (seeking child support among otherthings) on April 25, 2011. Your client has successfully and creatively avoidedservice of process on both, so Judge Mulhern issued the attached Order.Accordingly, we need to have a global hearing on all these motions. I shall behappy to accept service of process of your motions as long as you agree to acceptservice of my motions. Deal?Michael J. Waxman, Esq.One Monument Way, 2nd FloorP.O. Box 375Portland, Maine 04112-0375(207) 772-9558 phone(207) 772-9567 faxwww.waxmanlaw.us <http://www.waxmanlaw.us>-----No virus found in this message. 34
  • 35. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4703 - Release Date: 12/25/11-----Original Message-----From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:50:06To: <judy356@msn.com>Subject: Re: Outstanding MotionsJudy:I dont ever take a vacation from this case, nor will I. I am available to myclient and friend 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Unfortunately, that isnecessary given your clients relentless and malicious behaviors and schemes.What you choose to do is up to you. I honestly hope that you obtained a verylarge retainer because this case never ceases to demand prodigious amounts oftime. Although, it would be wonderful if our clients resources could be used tobenefit the child, not the attorneys, private investigators and expert witnessesyour client chooses to pay instead of paying child support.MichaelFrom: MjwaxyTo: judy356@msn.comCc: igormalenko@hotmail.comCc: Igor-Malenko@idexx.comSent: Jul 11, 2011 11:51 AMSubject: Motiion to Modify?Judy:Arent you going to file a Motion to Modify? Your client has claimed that shelost her job paying her $105,000 shortly following the 2/1/11 Order. She hasclaimed that this is the reason she cannot or will not pay child support.Although I have no idea whether this is true, I have been expecting her/you tofile a Motion to Modify, changing the child support obligation to reflect her newfinancial reality. I can only assume from the absense of any such filing, thatDr. Handrahan continues to earn $105,000 per year or more. The weekly obligationof $368 continues, as you know, until Igor has been served with a Motion toModify.Michael 35
  • 36. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry-----No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11 36

×