Mid-Term Presentation on

DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF OSM MAP OF
KATHMANDU
Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering
Ka...
1/9/2014

PRESENTATION OUTLINES
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•

Background
Introduction
Rationale
Study Area
Objectives
Methodol...
1/9/2014

BACKGROUND
•
•
•

•

OSM is open source map can be prepared by anybody
Higher the accuracy of map, higher the us...
1/9/2014

INTRODUCTION
•

•

Data quality assessment means to check the accuracy in various
quality aspects of the map and...
1/9/2014

RATIONALE
•

•

The use of OSM map has been increasing day by day.
But we aren’t aware about the quality of map....
1/9/2014

STUDY AREA

6
1/9/2014

STUDY AREA

7
1/9/2014

STUDY AREA
•

•

•

Kathmandu is the capital and largest metropolitan
city of Nepal
Our project deals within Rin...
1/9/2014

OBJECTIVES
•

To find the accuracy of OSM map of our project site

Sub-Objective
•

Use of map in other projects...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
Data Collection
OSM

Digital Map

Data Preparation
OSM in .shp file

Road Network Analysis
• Positio...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
DATA COLLECTION
•
•

•

Openstreesmap and Survey Department map
Downloaded map from Openstreetmap Bu...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY

Openstreetmap

Survey Department Map
Road Map

12
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY

Openstreetmap

Survey Department Map
Building Map

13
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
Meta Data of Survey Department Map
•
•
•

Topographic map of Nepal
Datum: Everest Bangladesh
project...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
DATA PREPARATION
•
•

Change of projection system of OSM from WGS_84 to MUTM.
Parameters used in tra...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY

OSM
SD

Before Transformation
After Transformation

16
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
DATA ANALYSIS
Positional Accuracy of Road
•
•

Calculate the percentage intersect with the buffer of...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
Positional Accuracy of Building
1.Near Distance Method
•
•

distance between centroid of OSM and SD ...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
2. Area difference
•

•

difference of area of OSM and SD buildings is calculated
classify the data ...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
3. Circulatory Ratio Difference (CRD)
•

•
•
•

CRD=4*pi*Area /Perimeter2
Difference of ratio of OSM...
1/9/2014

METHODOLOGY
•

Attribute Accuracy
-name, one way ,bridge of road map
-verify attributes from field survey

21
1/9/2014

RESOURCES REQUIRED
•
•
•
•

ArcGis Software
OSM map
Survey Department Map
Microsoft Excel 2007

22
WORK SCHEDULE
S.No

Weeks 1

1/9/2014

2

3

4 5

6 7

8

9

10 11 12 13

Works
1

Concept paper

2

Proposal Defense

3

...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES

24
1/9/2014

25
1/9/2014

PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES

26
1/9/2014

27
1/9/2014

PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES

28
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Building Analysis (Ward 12)

Near Distance
QUALITY

Class(m)

Frequency

In %

VERY GOOD

0-6.4

56

82...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES

Ciculatory Ratio Difference
QUALITY

Class

Frequency

In %

VERY GOOD

0-0.06

56

82.35294

GOOD

0....
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
60

50

40

30

Area Difference
QUALITY

8
2

2

2

0
VERY GOOD

GOOD

AVERAGE

BAD

VERY BAD

In %

0-...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES

COMBINED RESULT
QUALITY

Class(Score)

Frequency

in %

VERY GOOD
GOOD
AVERAGE

84-100
68-84
52-68

63...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Building Analysis (Ward 11)
Near Distance Bar Diagram
120

100

Near Distance
Quality

Frequency

80

C...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Circulatory Ratio Bar Diagram
120

100

Circulatory Ratio Difference

Frequency

80

60

Quuality
VERY ...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Area Difference Bar Diagram
140
120

Area Difference

Frequency

100

Quality

Class(m2)

Frequency

in...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Combined Result Bar Diagram
140
120

Combined Result

Frequency

100

QUALITY

80
140

Class(Score) Fre...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Building Analysis (Ward 10)
Near Distance Bar Diagram
400

350
300

Near Distance
QUALITY

Frequency]

...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Circulatory Ratio Difference Bar Diagram
600

500

Circulatory Ratio Difference

400

Frequency

QUALIT...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Area Difference Bar Diagram
700
600

Area Difference

500

Frequency

QUALITY
400

Class(m2)

Frequency...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES
Combined Rseult Bar Diagram
700
600

Frequency

500

QUALITY

400

COMBINED RESULT
Class(Score) Frequen...
1/9/2014

OUTCOMES

41
1/9/2014

WORKS REMAINING
•

Analysis of positional accuracy of building on other wards

42
1/9/2014

LIMITATIONS
•

Accuracy of OSM depends on the map of Survey
Department.

43
1/9/2014

SNAPSHOTS DURING PROJECTS

44
1/9/2014

45
1/9/2014

46
1/9/2014

Building Overlap in Ward 12
47
1/9/2014

District Road Intersection of OSM and SD
48
1/9/2014

12
11
10

Building Map of Kathmandu ward no. 10,11 &12

49
1/9/2014

REFERENCES
•
•
•

•

•
•

•

Koundai, Quorinia.(2009), Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap data, Msc
thesis, ...
1/9/2014

51
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Data quality assessment of OSM datasets of Ringroad, Kathmandu, Nepal

422

Published on

Report based on the project conducted by the students of Kathmandu University on the Open Street Map datasets.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
422
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Data quality assessment of OSM datasets of Ringroad, Kathmandu, Nepal

  1. 1. Mid-Term Presentation on DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF OSM MAP OF KATHMANDU Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering Kathmandu University Dhulikhel, Kavre Members (Group (5)) Shaswat Kafle (11) Maheshwor Karki (14) Suresh Manandhar (17) Dipesh Suwal (29) Project Supervisor Mr. Sashish Maharjan Mr. Nawaraj Shrestha Project In charge Prof. Dr. Ramesh Kumar Maskey
  2. 2. 1/9/2014 PRESENTATION OUTLINES • • • • • • • • • • • • Background Introduction Rationale Study Area Objectives Methodology Resources Required Project Schedule Outcomes Limitations Conclusions References 2
  3. 3. 1/9/2014 BACKGROUND • • • • OSM is open source map can be prepared by anybody Higher the accuracy of map, higher the use of that map On the basis of quality of map they are used in various project In Nepal the accuracy of OSM map has not been mentioned. 3
  4. 4. 1/9/2014 INTRODUCTION • • Data quality assessment means to check the accuracy in various quality aspects of the map and gives the knowledge how much that map can be trusted. Aspects • Positional accuracy • Logical consistency • Temporal accuracy • Thematic accuracy • Purpose • Usage • Lineage(how data was collected and evolved) 4
  5. 5. 1/9/2014 RATIONALE • • The use of OSM map has been increasing day by day. But we aren’t aware about the quality of map. 5
  6. 6. 1/9/2014 STUDY AREA 6
  7. 7. 1/9/2014 STUDY AREA 7
  8. 8. 1/9/2014 STUDY AREA • • • Kathmandu is the capital and largest metropolitan city of Nepal Our project deals within Ringroad of Kathmandu valley. Length of ringroad is approximately 27 km. 8
  9. 9. 1/9/2014 OBJECTIVES • To find the accuracy of OSM map of our project site Sub-Objective • Use of map in other projects such as disaster risk management , planning, tourism, navigation and others. 9
  10. 10. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY Data Collection OSM Digital Map Data Preparation OSM in .shp file Road Network Analysis • Positional Accuracy • Attribute Accuracy Coordinate system Data Analysis Building Analysis • Positional Accuracy • Attribute Accuracy Data Validation 10
  11. 11. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY DATA COLLECTION • • • Openstreesmap and Survey Department map Downloaded map from Openstreetmap Bulidings and Road shape file from http://BBBike.orgosmium2shape on Wed Apr 3 2013 08:19:41 Survey Department map from Survey Department of Nepal 11
  12. 12. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY Openstreetmap Survey Department Map Road Map 12
  13. 13. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY Openstreetmap Survey Department Map Building Map 13
  14. 14. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY Meta Data of Survey Department Map • • • Topographic map of Nepal Datum: Everest Bangladesh projection system :MUTM Meta Data of Openstreetmap • • • Volunteered geographic information Datum:WGS84 projection System: Geographic Coordinate System 14
  15. 15. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY DATA PREPARATION • • Change of projection system of OSM from WGS_84 to MUTM. Parameters used in transformation are ΔX=-293.17m ΔY=-726.18m ΔZ=-245.36m (obtained from Survey department document) 15
  16. 16. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY OSM SD Before Transformation After Transformation 16
  17. 17. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY DATA ANALYSIS Positional Accuracy of Road • • Calculate the percentage intersect with the buffer of SD map. Classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium, Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval. Road in OSM Road Buffer of SD Road Centerline in SD 17
  18. 18. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY Positional Accuracy of Building 1.Near Distance Method • • distance between centroid of OSM and SD buildings is calculated classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium, Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval. Building in OSM Distance Between Centroid of Buildings Building in OSM Fig.: 18
  19. 19. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY 2. Area difference • • difference of area of OSM and SD buildings is calculated classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium, Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval. Building in SD Building in OSM 19
  20. 20. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY 3. Circulatory Ratio Difference (CRD) • • • • CRD=4*pi*Area /Perimeter2 Difference of ratio of OSM and SD buildings is calculated Checks the variation in shape Classify the data into 5 classes (Very Good, Good, Medium, Bad and Very Bad) using equal interval. Building in SD Building in OSM 20
  21. 21. 1/9/2014 METHODOLOGY • Attribute Accuracy -name, one way ,bridge of road map -verify attributes from field survey 21
  22. 22. 1/9/2014 RESOURCES REQUIRED • • • • ArcGis Software OSM map Survey Department Map Microsoft Excel 2007 22
  23. 23. WORK SCHEDULE S.No Weeks 1 1/9/2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Works 1 Concept paper 2 Proposal Defense 3 Data Collection 4 Data Preparation 4 Data Analysis 5 Mid term Presentation 6 Report preparation and Final Presentation Proposed schedule Work Accomplished 23
  24. 24. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES 24
  25. 25. 1/9/2014 25
  26. 26. 1/9/2014 PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES 26
  27. 27. 1/9/2014 27
  28. 28. 1/9/2014 PROVISIONAL OUTCOMES 28
  29. 29. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Building Analysis (Ward 12) Near Distance QUALITY Class(m) Frequency In % VERY GOOD 0-6.4 56 82.35294 GOOD 6.4-12.8 8 11.76471 AVERAGE 12.8-19.2 2 2.941176 BAD 19.2-25.6 0 0 VERY BAD 25.6-32 2 2.941176 Fig: Near Distance Analysis 29
  30. 30. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Ciculatory Ratio Difference QUALITY Class Frequency In % VERY GOOD 0-0.06 56 82.35294 GOOD 0.06-0.12 7 10.29412 AVERAGE 0.12-0.18 3 4.411765 BAD 0.18-0.24 0 0 VERY BAD 0.24-0.31 2 2.941176 Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis 30
  31. 31. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES 60 50 40 30 Area Difference QUALITY 8 2 2 2 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD In % 0-0.06 54 79.41176 0.06-0.12 8 11.76471 AVERAGE 10 Frequency GOOD 20 Class(sq.m.) VERY GOOD 54 0.12-0.18 2 2.941176 BAD 0.18-0.24 2 2.941176 VERY BAD 0.24-0.31 2 2.941176 Fig.: Area Difference Analysis 31
  32. 32. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES COMBINED RESULT QUALITY Class(Score) Frequency in % VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE 84-100 68-84 52-68 63 5 0 92.64706 7.352941 0 BAD VERY BAD 36-52 20-36 0 0 0 0 32
  33. 33. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Building Analysis (Ward 11) Near Distance Bar Diagram 120 100 Near Distance Quality Frequency 80 Class(m) Frequency In % VERY GOOD 20 9 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE 2 BAD 71.34 4.64 - 9.21 34 20.73 9.21 - 13.78 9 5.49 13.78 - 18.35 2 1.22 VERY BAD 34 117 BAD 40 4.64 GOOD 117 - AVERAGE 60 0.06 18.35 - 22.92 2 1.22 2 VERY BAD Quality Fig: Near Distance Analysis 33
  34. 34. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Circulatory Ratio Bar Diagram 120 100 Circulatory Ratio Difference Frequency 80 60 Quuality VERY GOOD 114 Class 0.00 - 0.08 Frequency 114 In % 69.51 GOOD 8 6 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD 34 20.73 0.17 - 0.25 8 4.88 0.25 - 0.33 6 3.66 VERY BAD 34 0.17 BAD 20 - AVERAGE 40 0.08 0.33 - 0.42 2 1.22 2 VERY BAD Quality Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis 34
  35. 35. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Area Difference Bar Diagram 140 120 Area Difference Frequency 100 Quality Class(m2) Frequency in % - 133.88 134 81.71 GOOD 133.88 - 267.57 14 8.54 40 AVERAGE 267.57 - 401.26 9 5.49 20 BAD 401.26 - 534.96 4 2.44 VERY BAD 534.96 - 668.65 3 1.83 80 134 VERY GOOD 60 14 9 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE 4 BAD 3 0.19 VERY BAD Quality Fig.: Area Difference Analysis 35
  36. 36. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Combined Result Bar Diagram 140 120 Combined Result Frequency 100 QUALITY 80 140 Class(Score) Frequency In % VERY GOOD 84-100 140 85.366 GOOD 68-84 15 9.146 40 AVERAGE 52-68 5 3.049 20 BAD 36-52 1 0.610 VERY BAD 20-36 3 1.829 60 15 0 VERY GOOD GOOD 5 AVERAGE 1 BAD 3 VERY BAD Quality 36
  37. 37. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Building Analysis (Ward 10) Near Distance Bar Diagram 400 350 300 Near Distance QUALITY Frequency] 250 Class(m) Frequency In % 100 50 62 5 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD 366 44.80 2.29 - 4.45 383 46.88 4.45 - 6.61 62 7.59 6.61 - 8.77 5 0.61 VERY BAD 150 - 2.29 BAD 383 0.12 GOOD 366 VERY GOOD AVERAGE 200 8.77 - 10.94 1 0.12 1 VERY BAD Quality Fig: Near Distance Analysis 37
  38. 38. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Circulatory Ratio Difference Bar Diagram 600 500 Circulatory Ratio Difference 400 Frequency QUALITY Class Frequency In % VERY GOOD 100 63 35 67.81 0.05 - 0.11 144 17.63 0.11 - 0.16 63 7.71 0.16 - 0.22 35 4.28 VERY BAD 144 554 BAD 200 - 0.05 AVERAGE 554 0.00 GOOD 300 0.22 - 0.27 21 2.57 21 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD Quality Fig.: Circulatory Ratio Difference Analysis 38
  39. 39. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Area Difference Bar Diagram 700 600 Area Difference 500 Frequency QUALITY 400 Class(m2) Frequency In % VERY GOOD 100 24 0 VERY GOOD GOOD Quality AVERAGE 7 BAD 78.21 43.61 - 87.19 145 17.75 87.19 - 130.78 24 2.94 130.78 - 174.36 7 0.86 VERY BAD 145 639 BAD 200 - 43.61 AVERAGE 300 0.02 GOOD 639 174.36 - 217.95 2 0.24 2 VERY BAD Fig.: Area Difference Analysis 39
  40. 40. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES Combined Rseult Bar Diagram 700 600 Frequency 500 QUALITY 400 COMBINED RESULT Class(Score) Frequency In % VERY GOOD 100 14 0 VERY GOOD GOOD AVERAGE 2 BAD 1 79.43696 68-84 151 18.48225 52-68 14 1.713586 BAD 151 649 AVERAGE 200 84-100 GOOD 649 300 36-52 2 0.244798 VERY BAD 20-36 1 0.122399 VERY BAD Quality 40
  41. 41. 1/9/2014 OUTCOMES 41
  42. 42. 1/9/2014 WORKS REMAINING • Analysis of positional accuracy of building on other wards 42
  43. 43. 1/9/2014 LIMITATIONS • Accuracy of OSM depends on the map of Survey Department. 43
  44. 44. 1/9/2014 SNAPSHOTS DURING PROJECTS 44
  45. 45. 1/9/2014 45
  46. 46. 1/9/2014 46
  47. 47. 1/9/2014 Building Overlap in Ward 12 47
  48. 48. 1/9/2014 District Road Intersection of OSM and SD 48
  49. 49. 1/9/2014 12 11 10 Building Map of Kathmandu ward no. 10,11 &12 49
  50. 50. 1/9/2014 REFERENCES • • • • • • • Koundai, Quorinia.(2009), Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap data, Msc thesis, London, University College London. O’Brien.Oliver.(2010).Openstreet map Quality issue (http://www.oliverobrien.co.uk/ ) Helbitch,Marco,Amelunxen,Christof.Neis,Pascal.Zipf.Alexnader(2010), Compa rative Spatial Analysis of Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap and Proprietary Geodata Haklay, M. (2010), datasets.Environment anHow good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey d Planning B, 37, 682-703. OpenStreetMap (2013), The free wiki world map. http://www.openstreetmap.org/ (last date accessed June, 2013). Zielstra, D. & Zipf, A. (2010), A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. 13th AGILE International Conference On Geographic Information Science. Guimaraes, Portugal. Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team (2012), Evaluation of OpenstreetMap Data in Indonesia (A Final Report), Department of Geodetic & Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering UGM 50
  51. 51. 1/9/2014 51
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×