We’re living in a time of tremendous technological change. In the next five years, another billion people will gain access to the internet. By 2020, 80% of the adults on Earth will have a smartphone, double what it is today. We started the Seed Fund to seek out those places where technological change might be leveraged to improve education, and there is much to improve about our current system. One of the most troubling trends of the last decade is the decrease in educational mobility. As a country, we are doing worse than most at educating our neediest kids which now account for just over half of public school children. For our neediest children, the problems are cumulative. A series of school failures and missed opportunities add up to an education of accumulated disadvantage, a reverse Matthew Effect of sorts. Our team is focused on how technology can be used to reduce and even eliminate these obstacles so that our school system is an escalator to opportunity for all. We’ve invested in over 40 teams scaling ideas to improve our education system by empowering students, educators and families with the best tools technology has to offer. Through this lens, we share our second ReImaginED deck. Inspired by KPCB’s Mary Meeker’s widely shared Internet Trends deck, we set out to expose data about our K-12 education system and highlight some of the innovations in education technology. The goal of this deck is to draw out high level trends so it doesn’t include the human stories on the other side of these numbers and charts, see here for some of those. In ReimaginED 2015 (building off the original published over a year ago), we review the latest systemic challenges, landscape shifts, and emerging innovations that are helping to solve these problems. Let us know about other innovation trends you are seeing in the comments below or by sharing this on twitter, #ReimaginED2015. (Cross-post from www.newschools.org/blog/reimagined2015, original post by Jennifer Carolan and David Havens)

1. ReimaginEd 2015
Trends in K12 Education
David Havens
@eduhavens
#ReimaginED2015
Vivek Murali
@vivmurali

2. US students are low income
(eligible for free or reduced lunch)
51%
US districts interested in
implementing 1:1 solution
in next 2 years
teenagers age 13-18
have smart phones
text messages are sent each
day by the average teen
MEANWHILE
60
79
81%
2
Source: Southern Education Foundation, Ambient Insights, Level Playing Field Institute, http://kpk12.com/states/, Benedict Evans “Mobile is eating the world”
US students were
homeless in 2013
states had no black
student take the AP
Computer Science exam
1
30
11
#ReimaginED2015
The following slides analyze how innovations have scaled in education
Systemic inequality rising while mainstream tech catching on

3. Outline
Continued
Challenges:
Diversity,
Equity, and
Education
The Evolving
Landscape
Appendix
New
Technologies
and
Approaches
4627164
3
#ReimaginED2015

4. Continued Challenges:
Diversity, Equity, and Education
“Too often, America’s education system amplifies not opportunity but inequality.”
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
The New York Times
Source: The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/26/opinion/sunday/nicholas-kristof-the-american-dream-is-leaving-america.html
4
#ReimaginED2015

5. Russian Federation*
Korea
Finland
Flanders (Belgium)
France
Ireland
Poland
Netherlands
Canada
Estonia
Sweden
Japan
Australia
Average
Spain
England / N. Ireland (UK)
Danemark
Norway
Italy
Slovak Republic
United States
Austria
Germany
Czech Republic
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Upward mobility
Downward mobility
There is a 5% college completion rate for Americans whose parents didn’t graduate from High School*
Educational mobility in the U.S. is lower than you think
ABSOLUTE EDUCATIONAL
MOBILITY (2012)
Percentage of 25-64 years-old-non-students
whose educational attainment is higher than
(upward mobility), lower than (downward
mobility) or the same as (status quo) that of
their parents.
*compare to 23% for
other wealthy nations
5
Source: Chart A4.3 - OECD Indicators - Education at a Glance 2014
#ReimaginED2015

6. Many factors influence education opportunity, starting in preschool
Over 8,000 toddlers were suspended from preschool in 2011 school year. 70% were minority.
DISPARITY IN DISCIPLINE STARTS IN PRESCHOOL
43%
4%
29%
18%
1%
4%
2%
26%
3%
42%
25%
0.1%
1%
1%
0.1%
1%
1%
26%
4%
20%
48%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Overall
enrollment
Out-of-school
suspension
(single)
Out-of-school
suspension
(multiple)
White
Two or more races
Hispanio/Latino
Black or African-American
Native Hawaiian
or other Pacific Islander
Asian
American Indian
or Alaska Native
6
Source: U.S. Department of education, Office for civil Rights Data Collection, 2011-12, http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/civil-rights-education-race-equity-104879.html
#ReimaginED2015

7. 2006 2010 2013
1/50
1.5M
1/45
1.6M
1/30
2.5M
NUMBEROFCHILDRENHOMELESSANNUALLY
General
(non-HHM or FRL)
National Norm
Reduced Meals
Free Meals
Homeless or
highly mobile
180
200
220
240
3 4 5 6 7 8
GRADE
MATHACHIEVEMENT
Homelessness of youth is up 67% in the last 7 years
Growth in math and literacy is slower among homeless and highly mobile students
7
Source: The National Center on Family Homelessness at American Institutes for Research http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/acad-ach-res-article-oct2012.pdf
RISE IN NUMBER OF HOMELESS CHILDREN
#ReimaginED2015

8. Racial segregation persists 60+ years after Brown v. Board of Education
An increasing number of black and hispanic students go to schools that are over half-minority
8
Source: nea.org/schoolequity
#ReimaginED2015
PERCENTAGE OF LATINO & BLACK STUDENTS ATTENDED
SCHOOLS THAT WERE MORE THAN HALF MINORITY
Hispanic Students
Black Students
55%
77%
80%
74%
1968-69
School Year
2009-2010
School Year
40 years later…

9. Black students are 62% more likely to receive discretionary discipline than white students
The racial disparity in discipline continues in high school
9
Source: https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/infographic-school-prison-pipeline, http://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Breaking_Schools_Rules_Report_Final.pdf
#ReimaginED2015
PERCENT OF STUDENTS COMMITING DISCRETIONARY
AND MANDATORY VIOLATIONS, BY RACE AND ETHNICITY.
Students suspended
or expelled for a
discretionary violation are
nearly 3 times more likely
to be in contact with the
juvenile justice system
the following year
Discretionary Punishment
Mandatory Punishment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
African
American
(n=133.719)
Hispanic
(n=366.900)
White
(n=400.104)
76.7%
7.2%
66.7%
7.9%
47.9%
5.3%

10. The 90/10 percentile income gap compares to the black/white gap in the 1950s
Not just race: achievement gap between rich and poor widening
10
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may13/vol70/num08/The-Widening-Income-Achievement-Gap.aspx
AVERAGE DIFFERENCE IN STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES
(90/10 income gap or black-white gap)
90/10 Income Gap
Black-White Gap
.00
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
.25
.50
.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
COHORT BIRTH YEAR
INSTANDARDDEVIATIONUNITS
#ReimaginED2015

11. of 8th graders
say they are going
to college
95%
graduate
from HS
80%
are prepared
to succeed
in college
37%
of low income
students are
prepared to
succeed in college
17%
of students in
the lowest income
quartile complete
a college degree
within six years
8%
While 95% of 8th graders say they are going to college, schools prepare only 37%
A vast majority of young people are ill-prepared for college
11
Source: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
#ReimaginED2015

12. Educational inequality is manifest in the corporate world
Disparities in STEM Education are mirrored in the STEM Workforce
12
• White and Asian students are more
than 4x as likely to take AP Math
and Science exams and more than
6x as likely to take the AP
Computer Science exam than their
Black and Latino/a peers
• In eleven states, no black students
took the AP Computer Science test
RACIAL AND ETHNIC REPRESENTATION IN THE STEM WORKFORCE
Total workfoce
STEM
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
White alone,
not Hispanic
or Latino
Black or
Africain
American alone
Asian alone American Indian
and Alaska Native
alone
Hispanic
or Latino
(of any race)
66.9
70.8
10.8
6.4 5.5
14.5
0.6 0.4
14.9
6.5
Note: Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander alone was combined with Some Other Race because of a small number of sample observation.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 American Comunity Survey.
Source: http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-24.pdf, Level Playing Field Institute http://lpfi.org/blog/level-playing-field-institute
#ReimaginED2015

13. U.S. tech companies lack diversity
1% of VC-backed internet startups (Series Seed & A) have a black founder. 83% are all white teams.
13
Source: Techcrunch, http://www.lpfi.org/sites/default/files/code2040_lpfi_final.pdf SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics
DIVERSITY IN LEADING U.S. TECH COMPANIES IS LACKING
White
Asian
Hispanic
Black
Two or more race
Other
Facebook Google
Yahoo Lnkedln
Non-Hispanic white
Hispanic
Black
Asian
Did not Identify
racially or ethnically
64%
16%
12%
5%
3%
The labor force by ethnicity
Ethnicity (US only)
34% 57% 30% 61%
38% 55%39% 50%
#ReimaginED2015

14. Fortune
500 CEOs
by Gender
96%
Men
4%
Women
Fortune
500 CEOs
by Race
and Ethnicity
96%
Non-Hispanic
white
1%
Hispanic
1%
African
American
2%
Asian
And the inequality continues up the ladder to leadership
White men make up over 90% of Fortune 500 CEOs but less than 35% of all Americans
14
Source: Diversity Inc.
#ReimaginED2015

15. With equitable access, education can help level the field
Education continues to offer a strong return on investment
RETURNS TO EDUCATION COMPARED TO OTHER INVESTMENTS
15
Source: CPS (2009, 2010-12); Damodaran (2013), Federal Reserve Economic Data (2013); National Center for Education
Statistics: (NCES 2012-13); National Mining Association (2012); Shiller (2013); authors’ calculations.
http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2013/06/13-facts-higher-education
0
5
10
15
20
25
Associate’s
degree
Professional
degree
Bachelor’s
degree
Some
college
Stocks Gold 10-year
Treasury
bonds
T-bills Housing
PERCENTRETURN
#ReimaginED2015

16. The evolving landscape
“School is where childhood happens. Even if civil war dates are forgotten and geometry
becomes a blur, one lesson must stick: the love of learning.”
LILY ESKELSON
NEA President
16
#ReimaginED2015

17. Universal pre-K is gaining traction
A highly researched benefit begins to make its way to practice
0% of 4-year-olds served
1-10% of 4-year-olds served
11-20% of 4-year-olds served
21-30% of 4-year-olds served
31-40% of 4-year-olds served
41-50% of 4-year-olds served
51-60% of 4-year-olds served
61-70% of 4-year-olds served
17
Source: http://preschoolmatters.org/2012/11/01/preschool-for-yall-the-rise-of-early-education-in-the-south/
#ReimaginED2015
PERCENT OF 4-YEAR-OLDS SERVED BY STATE PRE-K

18. Adopted
Not adopted
Common Core continues to roll out around the country
Confronting new challenges and opportunities along the way
COMMON CORE ADOPTION ACROSS THE USA
18
Source: www.corestandards.org
#ReimaginED2015

19. Graduation rates have increased in the past twenty years
81% of high school students are graduates (the equivalent of 7,000 dropouts/day)
AVERAGED FRESHMAN GRADUATION RATE FOR PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS:
SCHOOL YEARS 1990–91 THROUGH 2011–12
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2011-121990-91
74
71 72
73
80 81
1995-96 2000-01 2005-06 2010-11
SCHOOL YEAR
19
Source: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_coi.asp
#ReimaginED2015

20. Teachers have a huge impact on student performance
Student performance varies greatly depending on quality of teacher
20
Source: http://www.cgp.upenn.edu/pdf/Sanders_Rivers-TVASS_teacher%20effects.pdf
THE EFFECT OF TEACHER QUALITY
There is a 53%
difference in student
achievement based
on performance
of the teacher
100th
50th
0th
8 11
Age
STUDENTPERFORMANCE
(INPERCENTILE)
Student with
top-quintile teacher
Student with
bottom-quintile teacher
90th
37th
#ReimaginED2015
"Students of different ethnicities respond equivalently
within the same quintile of teacher effectiveness"

21. 1
2
3
4
5
Other
1
4
32
4
6
4
Years of
experience
required
Number
of states
Two years is too
soon for a teacher
to earn tenure
Public school teachers
should not receive
tenure at all
Two years is
the right amount
of time for tenure
Refuse
Two years is too long
for teachers
to wait for tenure
38%
41%
35%
35%
17%
13%
6%
7%
4%
5%
All voters
Parents
VOTERS DISAGREE WITH CURRENT
TEACHER TENURE REQUIREMENTS
Poll Question: California public school teachers are currently
awarded tenure after 18th months in the classroom. Which of the following
do you agree with most:
Vergara v California put spotlight on teacher tenure laws nationally
States re-examine how easy it should be to get tenure
HOW LONG BEFORE A TEACHER EARNS TENURE?
21
Source: http://studentsmatter.org/event/vergara-trial-day-16/?instance_id=165, http://edsource.org/2014/poll-finds-common-core-opposition-rising-in-state/64917#.VFv2KfTF9ig
#ReimaginED2015

22. Total working hours
Hours spent on teaching
Hours per week
United States
Chile
Alberta (Canada)
Brazil
Mexico
Abu Dhabi (UAE)
Estonia
Portugal
Finland
Slovak Republic
England (United Kingdom)
Croatia
Average
Latvia
Flanders (Belgium)
Iceland
Denmark
Korea
Spain
Poland
France
Australia
Bulgaria
0 10 20 30 40 50
While teachers continue innovating with few resources
The average U.S. teacher spends 1000 hours instructing each year
TEACHERS SALARIES $1000 s (OECD DATA)
These figures show how much teachers get paid on average each
year in dollars, average gathered over 15 years.
AVERAGE HOURS SPENT WORKING AND TEACHING
PER WEEK
68.82
57.87
53.73
51.47
47.34
47.3
45.93
44
42.81
41.71
41.52
41.46
40.90
Switzerland
Netherlands
Germany
Belgium
Korea
Ireland
Japan
Australia
Finland
Danemark
Spain
United States
United Kingdom
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/sep/05/how-the-job-of-a-teacher-compares-around-the-world, http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/TALIS-Teachers-
Guide.pdf
22
#ReimaginED2015
Total working hours
Hours spent on teaching
Hours per week
States
Chile
nada)
Brazil
Mexico
(UAE)
stonia
rtugal
nland
public
gdom)
roatia
erage
Latvia
gium)
eland
nmark
Korea
Spain
oland
rance
stralia
lgaria
Serbia
Israel
public
apan
weden
Italy
apore
0 10 20 30 40 50

23. Venture capital entering edtech at record levels
With investments in K12 education technology up 32% from 2013, to $643 million
ED TECH FINANCING: INVESTMENT DEALS AND DOLLARS Q1’09 – Q2’14
23
Source: https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/ed-tech-investment-report-2014/, NewSchools Venture Fund http://www.newschools.org/blog/a-closer-look-at-k12-edtech-funding-in-2014
12
29
19 22
17
29
25
29
43
57
47 44
51
63 62
72
78
98
85
73
95
81
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Q1'09
Q2'09
Q3'09
Q4'09
Q1'10
Q2'10
Q3'10
Q4'10
Q1'11
Q2'11
Q3'11
Q4'11
Q1'12
Q2'12
Q3'12
Q4'12
Q1'13
Q2'13
Q3'13
Q4'13
Q1'14
Q2'14
DollarsInvested(M)
Amounted Invested (M$)
Number of Deals
#ReimaginED2015

24. Signed a new law
Passed a bill
Introduced a bill
Had no bills
A bill died
Ensuring that companies use learning data to improve learning, not sales
Privacy laws concerning student data continue to evolve
see
appendix
for more
details
24
Source: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/10/08/07privacy.h34.html, http://www.marketplace.org/topics/world/day-life-data-mined-kid
#ReimaginED2015

25. Virtual school students are fastest growing K12 sub-population
While adoption is increasing dramatically, effectiveness is mixed and controversial
VIRTUAL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
NUMBEROFSTUDENTS
YEAR
25
Source: http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/nepc-virtual-2013-section-1-2.pdf
#ReimaginED2015

26. Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May
22, 2011 Teen/Parent Survey. n=799 teens ages 12-17 and a parent or guardian.
Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish, on landlines and cell phones.
Mobile phones offer key access to poor and rural communities
Teens w/ household incomes <$30k per year send significantly more SMS messages than their peers
TEXTS SENT PER DAY FROM TEENS (12-17)
BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME
SMARTPHONE PENTRATION BY AGE DEMOGRAPHIC
% by age group who own a smartphone
26
Source: http://www.edisonresearch.com/2014-smartphone-ownership-demographics/
AGE
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All
61%
74%
80% 79%
69%
57%
45%
25%
12-17 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
NUMBEROFTEXTS
Mean
Median
0
50
100
150
200
250
Less than $30K $30K - $50K $50K - $75k $75K +
#ReimaginED2015

27. New Technologies
and Approaches
“With the energy, creativity and money being invested recently in [education],
I am optimistic that this time will indeed be different”
UMANG GUPTA
Silicon Valley Technology
Entrepreneur, wrote Oracle’s first
business plan
27
#ReimaginED2015

28. Evolution of student and
school data
28
#ReimaginED2015

29. Re-imagination of student data
One-dimensional data systems → holistic and benchmarked data
Incremental and static Holistic and actionable
Source: Schoolzilla
29
#ReimaginED2015

30. Evolution of data analytics tools
New tools provide school leaders with actionable, timely data that make school decisions proactive
Key Questions
Addressed
30
How do we ensure
more equitable
enrollment of students
in AP/IB courses?
How do we make
rigorous AP/IB course
offerings more available
to minority students?
What’s the connection
between technology use
and learning outcomes
in my school?
What residual problems
may arise from technology
adoption?
Do I provide my students
with effective feedback
to improve?
Am I conveying class
material effectively?
How does school
spending impact
student outcomes?
How does school
spending compare to
other districts with
similar demographics?
#ReimaginED2015

31. Evolution of assessments
31
#ReimaginED2015

32. Re-imagination of assessments
Driven by mobile and CCSS, moving from high-stakes summative testing to digital portfolios of work
Important and longitudinal,
but infrequent and often too late
Valuable diagnostic tools that
identify gaps
Media rich digital portfolios
Long Cycle Time Short Cycle Time
32
#ReimaginED2015

33. Evolution of feedback
Written feedback → dynamic voice enabled feedback
Dynamic, voice enabled
feedback
Prescriptive feedback
that lacks nuance
33
#ReimaginED2015

34. Evolution of school-to-home
communication
34
#ReimaginED2015

35. Re-imagination of school-to-home communication
Robo-calling and infrequent in-person meetings → personalized, real-time communications
Infrequent one-way status updates
Regular communication
that empowers parents to be actors,
not observers
35
#ReimaginED2015

36. Evolution of school-to-home communication
Free & teacher friendly products are pioneering a new model of viral, consumer-like growth
23 million teachers
and parents
$60 million invested
Consumer Mobile
38 million teachers,
parents and students,
$10 million invested
46 million teachers,
students, parents
$88 million invested
400 million active users
$58 million invested, $19
billion acquisition
100 million active users
$648 million invested,
$10 billion valuation
300 million active users
$57 million invested,
$1 billion acquisition
Teacher User
Student Users
Parent Users
Education
With each signup, a teacher offers a built-in
community of potential users
36
Source: Publicly disclosed data, Note: Snapchat figure based on industry estimates that vary between 100M - 200M, http://www.fastcompany.com/3041031/fast-feed/startups-battle-for-
one-of-educations-most-valuable-opportunities-parent-teacher-m
#ReimaginED2015

37. Evolution of teacher
professional development
37
#ReimaginED2015

38. Re-imagination of teacher professional development
One size fits all static content → peer-led, personalized, and simulation-based instruction
Static, undifferentiated Collaborative teacher-driven PD
Source: EdCamp
“The best PD has been when a teacher shows me what
has revolutionized their classroom.” – A US teacher
38
Source: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Teachers Know Best: Teachers’ Views on Professional Development
#ReimaginED2015

39. 29%
51%
Few teachers are highly
satisfied with current
professional development offerings.
51% of educators do not engage
in any formal professional learning
Landscape of teacher professional development
Communities have formed both online and in person to advance teacher development
WHY IT MATTERS
Offline
Communities
Online
Communities
Educator Focused
Content
Opportunities for
Simulation
Unstructured
Educator Forums
39
Source: Brightbytes, NewSchools Venture Fund
#ReimaginED2015

40. Emerging Evolutions
40
#ReimaginED2015

41. Re-imagination of teacher spending
Out-of-pocket expense, slow reimbursement time → Crowdfunded, easy approval and tracking
Paper-based, manual
entry expensing
Streamlined discovery and purchasingOut-of-pocket spending
The average teacher spends $480
out-of-pocket on classroom supplies
Can take 2-3 months
for reimbursement
41
#ReimaginED2015

42. Other re-imaginations that excite us
There has never been a better time in education to be a technology entrepreneur
Project Based Learning Peer to Peer Learning
Data Literacy Kinesthetic Engagement
42
#ReimaginED2015

43. There’s more work to do
ELA, science, and cross-disciplinary education still necessitate better tools
43
TEACHER VOICES: AREAS THAT LACK USABLE DIGITAL TOOLS
• High School Math and
ELA tools
• Grades 3-8 cross-
disciplinary products
• Grade 3-8 science
products
• Project based learning
workflow tools
Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
#ReimaginED2015

44. So, you want to
re-imagine education?
#ReimaginED2015

45. QUESTIONS?
Contact dhavens@newschools.org
JOIN IN
45
#ReimaginED2015
JOIN OUR
COMMUNITY
WORK FOR A
START UP
ATTEND
AN EVENT
START A
COMPANY
newschools.org/
community
edsurge.com/jobs edsurge.com/e newschools.org/
entrepreneurs/submit

46. Appendix
#ReimaginED2015

47. A sampling of student data laws enacted
LIMITING DATA COLLECTION
• Florida prohibits school districts from collecting unique biological data –
called biometrics – including students fingerprints or scans of the vein
patterns in their palms.
• Kansas forbids districts from collecting biometric details on minors, and
from surveying them about religious, moral or sexual beliefs, without
parental consent.
• Louisiana prohibits public school employees from collecting information
about students political or religious beliefs, family income, relationships
with ministers of doctors and gun ownership.
• Louisiana, Rhode Island and Maine protect students or
prospective students from having to give school officials access to their
personal social media accounts or email addresses.
• New Hampshire prohibits students email addresses, Social Security
Numbers, biometric data, criminal records and information about family
members from being stored in a state-run educational database.
• Virginia prohibits ‘public institutions of higher education’ from selling
information about students, including thair named, addresses and email
addresses, to marketers.
INCREASING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
• Laws in Colorado, Idaho and West Virginia require the
publication of lists of data points collected about students, such as race,
ethnicity, disability status, disciplinary record, family financial status and
medical conditions like asthma. Colorado’s list includes a category for
‘dietary supplements for weight control.’
• Colorado must also list the names of third-party data warehouse, cloud
service, learning apps and educational sites under contract with the
education department that hold student data.
REGULATING THE HANDLING OF DATA
• Noth Carolina requires the states board of education to develop a
plan for securing student information. State officials must also develop
rules to comply with a federal student privacy law, called the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or Ferpa.
• Wyoming directs the state’s departments of education and enterprise
technology to create a data security plan for students information. Among
other steps, state officials are required to develop procedures for data
breach prevention and notification.
47
Source: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/10/08/07privacy.h34.html, http://www.marketplace.org/topics/world/day-life-data-mined-kid
#ReimaginED2015

48. Expectations of educational achievement vary with household income
86% of high income parents expect children to go to college vs. 50% of low income parents
PARENTAL EXPECTATIONS FOR ACADEMIC ATTAINMENT FOR CHILDREN IN GRADES 6-12,
PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME LEVEL (2007)
High School or Less
Some Postsecondary Education
Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$25.000 or less
19.3
11.4
28.4
59.8
6.2
23.9
70.7
2.2
11.2
86.5
30.8
49.9
$25.001 - 50.000 $50.001 - $75.000 More than $75.000
48
*Some postsecondary education include attending a vocational or technical school after high school, or attending two or more years of college but finishing with less than a four-or five-
year college degree.
Source: Child Trends’ original analyses of National Household Education Survey data.
#ReimaginED2015

49. National spotlight starts to look at diversity and accessibility in higher ed
New York Times pilots college access index as department of education develops new ranking system
College
Vassar
Grinnell
U.N.C. - Chapel Hill
Smith
Amherst
Harvard
Pomona
St. Mary’s (ind.)
Susquehanna
Columbia
Rice
Kalamazoo
Wesleyan
Denison
Pell
(2012-2014)
23
24
21
23
20
17
18
24
25
16
18
21
18
20
Pell
(2008)
12
14
13
16
16
13
12
14
17
12
15
13
12
11
Net price, low-
to middles-income
$5.600
$10.400
$7.600
$11.600
$8.400
$3.000
$5.200
$15.900
$18.000
$3.500
$8.100
$13.900
$8.700
$11.800
College Access
Index
3.1
2.7
2.3
2.2
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Endowment
per students
$340.000
$880.000
n/a
$440.000
$940.000
$1.520.000
$1.170.000
$80.000
$50.000
$320.000
$810.000
$190.000
$200.000
$330.000
49
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/09/09/upshot/100000003098950.mobile.html?abt=0002&abg=1
#ReimaginED2015

50. In 40 years, spending has doubled while achievement has not
With spending levelling off, schools must be smarter about the resources they do have
200
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
250
300
350
400
450
500
$4.000
$6.000
$8.000
$10.000
$12.000
YEAR
Per-student Expenditures
Mathematics: Age 17
Reading: Age 17
Mathematics: Age 13
Reading: Age 13
Mathematics: Age 9
Reading: Age 9
$11.184
$4.529
AVERAGE US PER-PUPIL
EXPENDITURES AVERAGE SCALE
SCORES ON NATIONAL
ASESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL
PROGRESS (NAEP). SPENDING
DATA IN CONSTANT 2011-12
US DOLLARS.
50
Source: National Center for Education Statistics http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/lttdata
#ReimaginED2015

51. Native American, Black, and Hispanic students overrepresented in dropouts
Minority students make up 59% of 9-12 dropouts but 38% of the population
PUBLIC HIGHT SCHOOL EVENT DROPOUT RATE FOR GRADES 9-12,
BY RACE/ETHNICITY: SCHOOL YEAR 2009-10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
White Black Hispanic Asian /
Pacific
Islander
American
Indian /
Alaska
Native
2.3
5.5 5.0
1.9
6.7
51
Source: U.S. Departement of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), ‘NCES Common Core of Data State Dropout and Completion Data File,’
School Year 2009-10, Version 1a., ed.gov/news/speeches/partnering-education-reform, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013309rev.pdf
#ReimaginED2015