Librarians as Knowledge Managers

Librarians as Knowledge Managers: The View from the Executive Suite Dave Pollard SLA Annual Conference June 6, 2007 [email_address] Meeting of Minds

A Tale of Two Executives D: “We figured that by providing all this Knowledge Management software to our people, we could get rid of the library, and everyone could do their own research online.” R: “Information Professionals are specialists like everyone else today. It’s insane to have our managers and staff trying, badly, to do research, when IPs have spent their careers learning to do it very well.”

Dave’s Cultural Anthropology Story (1) The View from the Executive Suite

“ We don’t know how to use this knowledge stuff. And we don’t need it. We’ve already got what we need.”

“ Here’s what’s keeping us awake at night:

Mitigating risk

Reducing costs

Increasing value/person

Strengthening key customer relationships

Tell us how KM, IPs and librarians can help us with that .”

Dave’s Cultural Anthropology Story (2) The View from the Front Lines “ I can’t find anything on my computer.” “ I can search, but I can’t re search.” “ Why didn’t anyone show me this before ?” “ My task is to assess what all this data means.” “ I don’t need a perfect answer. But I need one right now .” “ Half of my calls are to ask me if I know about X , or, if not, who does.” “ The things we’re worst at are collaboration and innovation. Can you help us with that ?”

Dave’s Cultural Anthropology Story (3) The View from the Customers “ Why isn’t KM enabling our suppliers to reduce the cost of their services?” “ We don’t choose a supplier based on what they know about our business (and we assume they know their business). We choose based on the quality of the relationship we have with our supplier representative.” “ We expect our suppliers to be leveraging best practices and their communities of practice, to improve their services to us and leverage what they all know. Aren’t they?” Different from what the Executives view. Different from the Front Line’s view. Which group do you want to please?

The View from the Executive Suite: Panel Results Part 1 Who Owns KM? What’s the IP’s Role?

No agreement on what it is or if it’s needed

No agreement on who owns it or what it should do

Not sure whether to centralize, decentralize or outsource ICM

Type D view: It’s everyone’s job. If people can’t do it themselves, get rid of them

Type R view: The BUs own the content

If librarians are focused on content, they probably belong in BUs too. Or maybe in R&D? Or marketing?

If KM is about infrastructure (technology), then IT owns it (they have the budgets)

If KM is about learning, HR owns it

Librarians are becoming IPs and they have two roles: research and cataloguing/metadata

Librarians have to specialize or they’ll be outsourced; if they specialize they could become SMEs

IPs are increasingly overskilled and underemployed

The View from the Executive Suite: Panel Results Part 2 Where Does KM Fit? What’s its Mission?

Still don’t see the benefits: Few senior champions, and disconnect with perceptions of the front lines

Obsession with risk & cost: Is knowledge-sharing risky? Can KM increase value-based billings? Reduce headcount?

Don’t care about customers’ unmet needs or innovation or collaboration

Customers want knowledge delivered on their site, their way, not on Extranet/Internet

Information we buy is too raw

Information on Intranet is not very useful

Execs still trying to ‘change the culture’ and processes and expect KM to help

Intrigued by new tech (Facebook, UTube, blogs, wikis) but don’t get them

Decentralizing (Type R) organizations see the value in KM that the front lines see, but they are outnumbered by centralizing (Type D) organizations

Diagnosing Your Organization’s Knowledge Culture Stories, ideas, advice ‘ Best practices’ What knowledge is most valued In networks In hierarchies Where power resides What management wants from workers What motivates people How knowledge flows What drives decision-making Effectiveness Efficiency Personal satisfaction Promotion, raise P2P through collaboration Top-down from ‘leadership’ Long-term agility, opportunity Short-term profits, risk Type R Organizations Type D Organizations

How Executives See the Role of Information and Information Professionals Type D Organizations Type R Organizations (These charts to be re-done to improve legibility)

acquire store disseminate add value synthesize connect canvass apply Know-what Collection Content Just in case Know-who Connection Context Just in time Librarians are good at this But can they do this ? Type R Organizations: The Challenge

Type D Organizations: The Waiting Game

A KM Framework & Why It’s Important

To guide KM activities and provide context for KM projects

To explain the ‘what’ and ‘why’ of KM (over & over, consistently)

To frame elevator pitches

Value Propositions:

Why are we doing this?

What is expected?

KM Services & Products:

Content acquisition & provision

Research, knowledge transfer

Architecture, tools, spaces

Support & Training

etc.

Design & Development

Principles

What guides what we do

and how we do it?

Outcomes:

How do we measure

success?

Customers:

Who are we doing

this for?

Six KM “Quick Win” Ideas

Introduce IM

Introduce Google Desktop and other PCM tools

Introduce Desktop Videoconferencing

Create a JIT Canvassing system

Improve “Know-Who” Directories

Introduce RSS Aggregator Pages

What You Can Do Now: Type R Organizations

Quick Wins

Cultural Anthropology (study all 3 groups):

current state use of information & technology

needs

‘ time & motion’ data (see Davenport’s study)

information behaviours (incl. dysfunctional ones)

Experiments: e.g.

personal productivity improvement

proactive research & adding meaning

collaboration

harvesting

stories

mindmaps

social networking tools

‘ wisdom of crowds’ canvassing

thinking customers ahead

Davenport’s Study of Knowledge Worker Activity Volumes

Workers spend an average every day of:

3 ¼ hours processing work-related information

Half of that is e-mail (processing and sending 17 e-mails, receiving and processing 44 e-mails, participating in 16 IMs)

A quarter of that is phone (making 15 calls, receiving 18 calls and 8 voice messages and participating in 1 teleconference)

Much of the remainder is looking for information

Multiple, un-integrated tools, not effectively used, not well supported

Most have poor search, poorer research skills

Work effectiveness tends to be proportional to time invested in and size of networks

Pilot experiments lack rigour

No ‘end of process’ – yet!

Dysfunctional Information Behaviours

(list of 4 categories, 25 total types of dysfunctional information behaviour e.g. bad news never travels up) – this list explains why it’s so difficult to change ‘culture’ in organizations

What You Can Do Now: Type D Organizations

Quick Wins

Assess the Cost of Not Knowing (Christensen, risk assessment)

Competitive Intelligence pilot: environmental scanning, strategy canvasses etc.

Then: skunkworks, vision, learn more about the business, and/or wait

Now Let’s Brainstorm

What’s your biggest KM challenge:

Knowing what’s needed?

Finding good models & success stories?

‘ Selling’ investment in KM to management?

How have you solved these challenges?

Is your organization ready for the Connect, Canvass, Synthesize, Apply model of KM? Are you?

What do you need, to be able to persuade your organization to let you add more value to information? To let you become a personal productivity enabler? Do you even want to do this?